Skip to main content
Key Specialties
Cardiology Diabetology Endocrinology Gastroenterology Geriatrics and Gerontology Gynecology and Obstetrics Hematology Infectious Disease Internal Medicine Nephrology Neurology Oncology Pediatrics Respiratory Medicine Rheumatology Surgery
Congress Coverage
2024 ACC Congress 2023 ESMO Congress 2023 EASD Congress 2023 ERS Congress 2023 ESC Congress
Clinical Collections
Advances in Alzheimer’s

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on medication adherence

LIVE: Thursday 27th June 2024, 18:00-19:30 (CEST)
Join our expert panel to discover why you need to understand the drivers of non-adherence in your patients, and how you can optimize medication adherence in your clinics to drastically improve patient outcomes.
ADVANCED SEARCH
Log in
Top
BMC Public Health
Published in: BMC Public Health 1/2022

Open Access 01-12-2022 | COVID-19 | Research

Consumer-driven strategies towards a resilient and sustainable food system following the COVID-19 pandemic in Australia

Authors: Katherine Kent, Fred Gale, Beth Penrose, Stuart Auckland, Elizabeth Lester, Sandra Murray

Published in: BMC Public Health | Issue 1/2022

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

The COVID-19 pandemic and associated public health restrictions temporarily disrupted food supply chains around the world and changed the way people shopped for food, highlighting issues with food systems resilience and sustainability. The aim of this study was to explore consumer-driven strategies towards a more resilient and sustainable food system in Australia, learning from experiences during the beginning of the COVID-19 pandemic.

Methods

During May–June 2020, a cross-sectional, online survey was conducted in Tasmania, Australia in a non-random sample of adults aged 18 years and over. The survey collected demographic data and posted the open-ended question: “How could Tasmania’s food system be better prepared for a disaster in the future?” Descriptive statistics were used to analyse the demographic data and thematic analysis was employed to analyse the qualitative data.

Results

Survey respondents (n = 698) were predominantly female (79%), over 55 years of age (48%), university educated (70%) and living with dependents (45%). Seven key themes were identified: (i) balance food exports with local needs; (ii) strengthen local food systems; (iii) increase consumer awareness of food supply chains; (iv) build collaboration and connection in the food system; (v) embed clear contingency arrangements; (vi) support community capacity building and individual self-sufficiency; and (vii) the food system coped well.

Conclusions

The consumer-driven strategies identified indicate multiple opportunities to increase resilience and sustainability in the food system to avoid future supply disruptions. Our findings indicate that considerable popular support for more resilient, local and sustainable food systems may be emerging from the COVID-19 pandemic.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
Ericksen PJ. Conceptualizing food systems for global environmental change research. Glob Environ Chang. 2008;18(1):234–45.CrossRef
2.
Heller MC, Keoleian GA. Assessing the sustainability of the US food system: a life cycle perspective. Agric Syst. 2003;76(3):1007–41.CrossRef
3.
4.
Crippa M, Solazzo E, Guizzardi D, et al. Food systems are responsible for a third of global anthropogenic GHG emissions. Nature Food. 2021;2:198–209.CrossRef
5.
Willett W, Rockström J, Loken B, et al. Food in the Anthropocene: the EAT–Lancet Commission on healthy diets from sustainable food systems. The Lancet (British edition). 2019;393:447–92.
6.
Clapp J. Food. 3rd ed. London: Polity Press; 2020.
7.
8.
Singh-Peterson L, Lawrence G. Insights into community vulnerability and resilience following natural disasters: perspectives with food retailers in Northern NSW, Australia. Local Environ. 2015;20:782–95.CrossRef
9.
Béné C. Resilience of local food systems and links to food security – A review of some important concepts in the context of COVID-19 and other shocks. Food Security. 2020;12:805–22.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
10.
Keating A (2013) Food Security in Australia: The Logistics of Vulnerability. In Food Security in Australia: Challenges and Prospects for the Future, pp. 21–34 [Q Farmar-Bowers, V Higgins and J Millar, editors]. Boston, MA: Springer US.
11.
Institute of Medicine and National Research Council. A Framework for Assessing Effects of the Food System. United States: National Academies Press; 2015.
12.
Tendall DM, Joerin J, Kopainsky B, et al. Food system resilience: Defining the concept. Glob Food Sec. 2015;6:17–23.CrossRef
13.
Schipanski ME, MacDonald GK, Rosenzweig S, et al. Realizing Resilient Food Systems. Bioscience. 2016;66:600–10.CrossRef
14.
Berry EM, Dernini S, Burlingame B, et al. Food security and sustainability: can one exist without the other? Public Health Nutr. 2015;18:2293–302.PubMedCrossRef
15.
Bakalis S, Valdramidis VP, Argyropoulos D, et al. Perspectives from CO+RE: How COVID-19 changed our food systems and food security paradigms. Curr Res Food Sci. 2020;3:166–72.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
16.
17.
Marusak A, Sadeghiamirshahidi N, Krejci CC, et al. Resilient regional food supply chains and rethinking the way forward: Key takeaways from the COVID-19 pandemic. Agric Syst. 2021;190:103101.CrossRef
18.
Heck S, Campos H, Barker I, et al. Resilient agri-food systems for nutrition amidst COVID-19: evidence and lessons from food-based approaches to overcome micronutrient deficiency and rebuild livelihoods after crises. Food Security. 2020;12:823–30.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
19.
Boyacι-Gündüz CP, Ibrahim SA, Wei OC, et al. Transformation of the Food Sector: Security and Resilience during the COVID-19 Pandemic. Foods. 2021;10:497.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
20.
Thilmany D, Canales E, Low SA, et al. Local Food Supply Chain Dynamics and Resilience during COVID-19. Appl Econ Perspect Policy. 2021;43:86–104.CrossRef
21.
Kent K, Murray S, Penrose B, et al. Prevalence and Socio-Demographic Predictors of Food Insecurity in Australia during the COVID-19 Pandemic. Nutrients. 2020;12:2682.PubMedCentralCrossRef
22.
Davis KF, Downs S, Gephart JA. Towards food supply chain resilience to environmental shocks. Nature Food. 2021;2:54–65.CrossRef
23.
Boylan S, Sainsbury E, Thow A-M, et al. A healthy, sustainable and safe food system: examining the perceptions and role of the Australian policy actor using a Delphi survey. Public Health Nutr. 2019;22:2921–30.PubMedCrossRef
24.
25.
Annison G. Bushfires to pandemics - How the industry responded. vol. 73: Australian Institute of Food Science and Technology. 2021.
26.
Australian Bureau of Statistics ABS. 3218.0 - Regional Population Growth, Australia, 2014–15. ABS. 2016.
27.
Gale F. Pulp Friction in Tasmania: a Review of the Environmental Assessment of Gunns’ Proposed Pulp Mill. 2011.
28.
Tasmanian Government AgriGrowth Tasmania Department of Primary Industries P, Water and Environment DPIPWE. Tasmania's Sustainable Agrifood Plan. 2019
29.
Flanagan R. Toxic: The Rotting Underbelly of the Tasmanian Salmon Industry: Penguin Random House Australia. 2021.
30.
Tasmanian Government Department of Primary Industries Parks Water and Environment DPIPWE. Tasmania’s Genetically Modified Organisms (GMO) Moratorium. Tasmania: DPIPWE; 2019.
31.
Yanotti MB, Gonzalez LR. Food, community and wellbeing: An exploration of Harvest Launceston farmers’ market. 2020.
32.
33.
34.
35.
36.
Godrich SL, Macau F, Kent K, Lo J, Devine A. Food Supply Impacts and Solutions Associated with the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Regional Australian Case Study. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022;19(7):4116.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
37.
Godrich SL, Lo J, Kent K, Macau F, Devine A. A mixed-methods study to determine the impact of COVID-19 on food security, food access and supply in regional Australia for consumers and food supply stakeholders. Nutr J. 2022;21(1):1.CrossRef
38.
Braun V, Clarke V. Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qual Res Psychol. 2006;3:77–101.CrossRef
39.
Tong A, Sainsbury P, Craig J. Consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative research (COREQ): a 32-item checklist for interviews and focus groups. Int J Qual Health Care. 2007;19(6):349–57.PubMedCrossRef
40.
Henwood KL, Pidgeon NF. Qualitative research and psychological theorizing. Br J Psychol. 1992;83(1):97–111.PubMedCrossRef
41.
Kent K, Murray S, Auckland S, et al. The Tasmania Project: the importance of Tasmanian grown produce during the COVID-19 pandemic: report 18. Institute for Social Change News: University of Tasmania; 2020.
42.
Eat Well Tasmania EWT. Building Resilience Through Local Food Hobart. Tasmania: Eat Well Tasmania; 2020.
43.
Tasmanian Government Department of Primary Industries Parks Water and Environment DPIPWE. Tasmanian Agri-Food SCORECARD 2017–18. Tasmania: DPIPWE; 2017.
44.
45.
46.
47.
48.
Australian Government Productivity Commission. Vulnerable Supply Chains Productivity Commission Interim Report. Canberra: Australian Government Productivity Commission; 2021.
49.
Kerr WA. The COVID-19 pandemic and agriculture: Short- and long-run implications for international trade relations. Canadian Journal of Agricultural Economics/Revue canadienne d’agroeconomie. 2020;68:225–9.PubMedCentralCrossRef
50.
Powell M. Coronavirus Fears Trigger Tasmanian Lobster Lockout. In The Examiner. Tasmania. 2020
51.
Hynninen E. How a Tassie fisherman stays afloat as the price of lobster dives. In ABC. Tasmania. 2020
52.
Berti G, Mulligan C. Competitiveness of Small Farms and Innovative Food Supply Chains: The Role of Food Hubs in Creating Sustainable Regional and Local Food Systems. Sustainability 8. 2016.
53.
Weatherell C, Tregear A, Allinson J. In search of the concerned consumer: UK public perceptions of food, farming and buying local. Journal of rural studies. 2003;19:233–44.CrossRef
54.
Berlin L, Lockeretz W, Bell R. Purchasing foods produced on organic, small and local farms: A mixed method analysis of New England consumers. Renewable Agri Food Syst. 2009;24:267–75.CrossRef
55.
Cho CH, Laine M, Roberts RW, et al. The Frontstage and Backstage of Corporate Sustainability Reporting: Evidence from the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge Bill. J Bus Ethics. 2018;152:865–86.CrossRef
56.
Born B, Purcell M. Avoiding the Local Trap: Scale and Food Systems in Planning Research. J Plan Educ Res. 2006;26:195–207.CrossRef
57.
Wägeli S, Hamm U. Consumers’ perception and expectations of local organic food supply chains. Org Agric. 2016;6:215–24.CrossRef
58.
Marsden T, Smith E. Ecological entrepreneurship: sustainable development in local communities through quality food production and local branding. Geoforum. 2005;36:440–51.CrossRef
59.
Aday S, Aday MS. Impact of COVID-19 on the food supply chain. Food Quality and Safety. 2020;4:167–80.CrossRef
60.
Lal R. Home gardening and urban agriculture for advancing food and nutritional security in response to the COVID-19 pandemic. Food Security. 2020;12:871–6.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
61.
Kent K, Murray S, Auckland S, et al. The Tasmania Project: more Tasmanians started growing their own food during the COVID-19 pandemic: report 20. Institute for Social Change News: University of Tasmania; 2020.
62.
Wilson MA, Howarth RB. Discourse-based valuation of ecosystem services: establishing fair outcomes through group deliberation. Ecol Econ. 2002;41:431–43.CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Consumer-driven strategies towards a resilient and sustainable food system following the COVID-19 pandemic in Australia
Authors
Katherine Kent
Fred Gale
Beth Penrose
Stuart Auckland
Elizabeth Lester
Sandra Murray
Publication date
01-12-2022
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
BMC Public Health / Issue 1/2022
Electronic ISSN: 1471-2458
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-022-13987-z

Other articles of this Issue 1/2022

BMC Public Health 1/2022 Go to the issue

Research

A cross-sectional study on public health nurses' disaster competencies and influencing factors during the COVID-19 pandemic in Korea

Research

Socioeconomic risks of food insecurity during the Covid-19 pandemic in the UK: findings from the Understanding Society Covid Survey

Research

Application of an innovative grid-based surveillance strategy to ensure elimination and prevent reintroduction of malaria in high-risk border communities in China

Research

Co-design of an oral health intervention (HABIT) delivered by health visitors for parents of children aged 9–12 months

Research

Military service experiences and reasons for service separation among lesbian, gay, and bisexual individuals in a large military cohort

Research

Effects of the COVID-19 pandemic on sexual functioning and activity: a systematic review and meta-analysis