Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Trials 1/2022

Open Access 01-12-2022 | COVID-19 | Research

A cross-sectional survey on the early impact of COVID-19 on the uptake of decentralised trial methods in the conduct of clinical trials

Authors: Arnela Suman, Jasmijn van Es, Helga Gardarsdottir, Diederick E. Grobbee, Kimberly Hawkins, Megan A. Heath, Isla S. Mackenzie, Ghislaine van Thiel, Mira G. P. Zuidgeest, on behalf of the Trials@Home Consortium

Published in: Trials | Issue 1/2022

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

The COVID-19 pandemic significantly impacted the conduct of clinical trials through delay, interruption or cancellation. Decentralised methods in clinical trials could help to continue trials during a pandemic. This paper presents the results of an exploratory study conducted early in the pandemic to gain insight into and describe the experiences of organisations involved in clinical trials, with regard to the impact of COVID-19 on the conduct of trials, and the adoption of decentralised methods prior to, and as mitigation for the impact, of COVID-19.

Methods

A survey with 11 open-ended and four multiple choice questions was conducted in June 2020 among member organisations of the public-private “Trials@Home” consortium. The survey investigated (1) the impact and challenges of COVID-19 on the continuation of ongoing clinical trials, (2) the adoption of decentralised methods in clinical trials prior to and as a mitigation strategy for COVID-19, (3) the challenges of conducting clinical trials during COVID-19, (4) the expected permanency of COVID-19-driven changes to the adoption of decentralised methods in clinical trials, and (5) lessons learned from conducting clinical trials during the COVID-19 pandemic. A thematic, inductive analysis of open survey questions was performed, complemented with descriptive statistics (frequencies and distributions).

Results

The survey had a response rate of 81%. All organisations included in the analysis (n = 18) implemented (some) decentralised methods in their clinical trials prior to COVID-19, and 15 (83%) implemented decentralised methods as mitigation for COVID-19. Decentralised methods for IMP supply, patient-health care provider interaction and communication, clinic visits and source document verification were used more often as mitigation strategies than they were used prior to COVID-19. Many respondents expect to maintain those decentralised methods they implemented during COVID-19 in ongoing trials, as well as implement them in future trials.

Conclusions

Decentralised methods are a widely implemented mitigation strategy for trial conduct in the face of the COVID-19 pandemic. The results of this survey show that there is an interest to continue the use of decentralised methods in future trials, but important points of attention have been identified that need solutions to help guide the transition from the traditional trial model to a more decentralised trial model.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference World Health Organization. COVID-19 strategy update. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2020. World Health Organization. COVID-19 strategy update. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2020.
4.
go back to reference World Health Organization. The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on noncommunicable disease resources and services: results of a rapid assessment. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2020. World Health Organization. The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on noncommunicable disease resources and services: results of a rapid assessment. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2020.
5.
go back to reference Czeisler MÉ, Marynak K, Clarke KE, et al. Delay or avoidance of medical care because of COVID-19–related concerns—United States, June 2020. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2020;69:1250–7.CrossRef Czeisler MÉ, Marynak K, Clarke KE, et al. Delay or avoidance of medical care because of COVID-19–related concerns—United States, June 2020. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2020;69:1250–7.CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Bagiella E, Bhatt DL, Gaudino M. The consequences of the COVID-19 pandemic on non-COVID-19 clinical trials. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2020;76(3):342–5.CrossRef Bagiella E, Bhatt DL, Gaudino M. The consequences of the COVID-19 pandemic on non-COVID-19 clinical trials. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2020;76(3):342–5.CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Meschia JF, Barrett KM, Brown RD Jr, Turan TN, Howard VJ, Voeks JH, et al. The CREST-2 experience with the evolving challenges of COVID-19. A clinical trial in a pandemic. Neurology. 2020;95(1):29–36.CrossRef Meschia JF, Barrett KM, Brown RD Jr, Turan TN, Howard VJ, Voeks JH, et al. The CREST-2 experience with the evolving challenges of COVID-19. A clinical trial in a pandemic. Neurology. 2020;95(1):29–36.CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Rusen ID. Challenges in tuberculosis clinical trials in the face of the COVID-19 pandemic: a sponsor’s perspective. Trop Med Infect Dis. 2020;5(2):E86.CrossRef Rusen ID. Challenges in tuberculosis clinical trials in the face of the COVID-19 pandemic: a sponsor’s perspective. Trop Med Infect Dis. 2020;5(2):E86.CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Anker SD, Butler J, Khan MS, Abraham WT, Bauersachs J, Bocchi E, et al. Conducting clinical trials in heart failure during (and after) the COVID-19 pandemic: an expert consensus position paper from the Heart Failure Association (HFA) of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC). Eur Heart J. 2020;41(22):2109–17.CrossRef Anker SD, Butler J, Khan MS, Abraham WT, Bauersachs J, Bocchi E, et al. Conducting clinical trials in heart failure during (and after) the COVID-19 pandemic: an expert consensus position paper from the Heart Failure Association (HFA) of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC). Eur Heart J. 2020;41(22):2109–17.CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Ledford H. Coronavirus shuts down trials of drugs for multiple other diseases. Nature. 2020;580(7801):15–6.CrossRef Ledford H. Coronavirus shuts down trials of drugs for multiple other diseases. Nature. 2020;580(7801):15–6.CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Chan A, Song F, Vickers A, Jefferson T, Dickersin K, Gøtzsche PC, et al. Increasing value and reducing waste: addressing inaccessible research. Lancet. 2014;383(9913):257–66.CrossRef Chan A, Song F, Vickers A, Jefferson T, Dickersin K, Gøtzsche PC, et al. Increasing value and reducing waste: addressing inaccessible research. Lancet. 2014;383(9913):257–66.CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Waterhouse DM, Harvey RD, Hurley P, Levit LA, Kim ES, Klepin HD, et al. Early impact of COVID-19 on the conduct of oncology clinical trials and long-term opportunities for transformation: findings from an American Society of Clinical Oncology survey. JCO Oncol Pract. 2020;16(7):417–21.CrossRef Waterhouse DM, Harvey RD, Hurley P, Levit LA, Kim ES, Klepin HD, et al. Early impact of COVID-19 on the conduct of oncology clinical trials and long-term opportunities for transformation: findings from an American Society of Clinical Oncology survey. JCO Oncol Pract. 2020;16(7):417–21.CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Upadhaya S, Yu JX, Oliva C, Hooton M, Hodge J, Hubbard-Lucey VM. Impact of COVID-19 on oncology clinical trials. Nat Rev Drug Discov. 2020;19(6):376–7.CrossRef Upadhaya S, Yu JX, Oliva C, Hooton M, Hodge J, Hubbard-Lucey VM. Impact of COVID-19 on oncology clinical trials. Nat Rev Drug Discov. 2020;19(6):376–7.CrossRef
15.
go back to reference Laggis CW, Williams VL, Yang X, Kovarik CL. Research techniques made simple: teledermatology in clinical trials. J Invest Dermatol. 2019;139(8):1626–33.CrossRef Laggis CW, Williams VL, Yang X, Kovarik CL. Research techniques made simple: teledermatology in clinical trials. J Invest Dermatol. 2019;139(8):1626–33.CrossRef
16.
go back to reference Moseson H, Kumar S, Juusola JL. Comparison of study samples recruited with virtual versus traditional recruitment methods. Contemp Clin Trials Commun. 2020;19:100590.CrossRef Moseson H, Kumar S, Juusola JL. Comparison of study samples recruited with virtual versus traditional recruitment methods. Contemp Clin Trials Commun. 2020;19:100590.CrossRef
17.
go back to reference Ali Z, Zibert JR, Thomsen SF. Virtual clinical trials: perspectives in dermatology. Dermatology. 2020;236(4):375–82.CrossRef Ali Z, Zibert JR, Thomsen SF. Virtual clinical trials: perspectives in dermatology. Dermatology. 2020;236(4):375–82.CrossRef
18.
go back to reference Rosa C, Campbell AN, Miele GM, Brunner M, Winstanley EL. Using e-technologies in clinical trials. Contemp Clin Trials. 2015;45(Pt A):41–54.CrossRef Rosa C, Campbell AN, Miele GM, Brunner M, Winstanley EL. Using e-technologies in clinical trials. Contemp Clin Trials. 2015;45(Pt A):41–54.CrossRef
19.
go back to reference Apostolaros M, Babaian D, Corneli A, Forrest A, Hamre G, Hewett J, et al. Legal, regulatory, and practical issues to consider when adopting decentralized clinical trials: recommendations from the Clinical Trials Transformation Initiative. Ther Innov Regul Sci. 2020;54(4):779–87.CrossRef Apostolaros M, Babaian D, Corneli A, Forrest A, Hamre G, Hewett J, et al. Legal, regulatory, and practical issues to consider when adopting decentralized clinical trials: recommendations from the Clinical Trials Transformation Initiative. Ther Innov Regul Sci. 2020;54(4):779–87.CrossRef
20.
go back to reference Perry B, Geoghegan C, Lin L, McGuire F, Nido V, Grabert BK, et al. Patient preferences for using mobile technologies in clinical trials. Contemp Clin Trials Commun. 2019;15:100399.CrossRef Perry B, Geoghegan C, Lin L, McGuire F, Nido V, Grabert BK, et al. Patient preferences for using mobile technologies in clinical trials. Contemp Clin Trials Commun. 2019;15:100399.CrossRef
21.
go back to reference Coran P, Goldsack JC, Grandinetti CA, Bakker JP, Bolognese M, Dorsey ER, et al. Advancing the use of mobile technologies in clinical trials: recommendations from the Clinical Trials Transformation Initiative. Digit Biomark. 2019;3(3):145–54.CrossRef Coran P, Goldsack JC, Grandinetti CA, Bakker JP, Bolognese M, Dorsey ER, et al. Advancing the use of mobile technologies in clinical trials: recommendations from the Clinical Trials Transformation Initiative. Digit Biomark. 2019;3(3):145–54.CrossRef
22.
go back to reference Bakker JP, Goldsack JC, Clarke M, Coravos A, Geoghegan C, Godfrey A, et al. A systematic review of feasibility studies promoting the use of mobile technologies in clinical research. npj Digit Med. 2019;2:47.CrossRef Bakker JP, Goldsack JC, Clarke M, Coravos A, Geoghegan C, Godfrey A, et al. A systematic review of feasibility studies promoting the use of mobile technologies in clinical research. npj Digit Med. 2019;2:47.CrossRef
23.
go back to reference Kelley K, Clark B, Brown V, Sitzia J. Good practice in the conduct and reporting of survey research. International J Qual Health Care. 2003;15(3):261–6.CrossRef Kelley K, Clark B, Brown V, Sitzia J. Good practice in the conduct and reporting of survey research. International J Qual Health Care. 2003;15(3):261–6.CrossRef
27.
go back to reference Braun V, Clarke V. Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qual Res Psychol. 2006;3(2):77–101.CrossRef Braun V, Clarke V. Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qual Res Psychol. 2006;3(2):77–101.CrossRef
28.
go back to reference Balevic S, Singler L, Randell R, Chung RJ, Lemmon ME, Hornik CP. Bringing research directly to families in the era of COVID-19. Pediatr Res. 2020; [ePub ahead of print]. Balevic S, Singler L, Randell R, Chung RJ, Lemmon ME, Hornik CP. Bringing research directly to families in the era of COVID-19. Pediatr Res. 2020; [ePub ahead of print].
29.
go back to reference Schneider RB, Biglan KM. The promise of telemedicine for chronic neurological disorders: the example of Parkinson’s disease. Lancet. 2017;16(7):541–51.CrossRef Schneider RB, Biglan KM. The promise of telemedicine for chronic neurological disorders: the example of Parkinson’s disease. Lancet. 2017;16(7):541–51.CrossRef
31.
go back to reference Khozin S, Coravos A. Decentralized trials in the age of real-world evidence and inclusivity in clinical investigations. Clin Pharmacol Therapeut. 2019;106(1):25–7.CrossRef Khozin S, Coravos A. Decentralized trials in the age of real-world evidence and inclusivity in clinical investigations. Clin Pharmacol Therapeut. 2019;106(1):25–7.CrossRef
32.
go back to reference Marsch LA, Campbell A, Campbell C, Chen CH, Ertin E, Ghitza U, et al. The application of digital health to the assessment and treatment of substance use disorders: the past, current, and future role of the National Drug Abuse Treatment Clinical Trials Network. J Subst Abuse Treat. 2020;112(s):4–11.CrossRef Marsch LA, Campbell A, Campbell C, Chen CH, Ertin E, Ghitza U, et al. The application of digital health to the assessment and treatment of substance use disorders: the past, current, and future role of the National Drug Abuse Treatment Clinical Trials Network. J Subst Abuse Treat. 2020;112(s):4–11.CrossRef
33.
go back to reference Tan AC, Ashley DM, Khasraw M. Adapting to a pandemic—conducting oncology trials during the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic. Clin Cancer Res. 2020;26(13):3100–3.CrossRef Tan AC, Ashley DM, Khasraw M. Adapting to a pandemic—conducting oncology trials during the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic. Clin Cancer Res. 2020;26(13):3100–3.CrossRef
34.
go back to reference Khozin S, Kim G, Pazdur R. From big data to smart data: FDA’s INFORMED initiative. Nat Rev Drug Discov. 2017;16(306). Khozin S, Kim G, Pazdur R. From big data to smart data: FDA’s INFORMED initiative. Nat Rev Drug Discov. 2017;16(306).
Metadata
Title
A cross-sectional survey on the early impact of COVID-19 on the uptake of decentralised trial methods in the conduct of clinical trials
Authors
Arnela Suman
Jasmijn van Es
Helga Gardarsdottir
Diederick E. Grobbee
Kimberly Hawkins
Megan A. Heath
Isla S. Mackenzie
Ghislaine van Thiel
Mira G. P. Zuidgeest
on behalf of the Trials@Home Consortium
Publication date
01-12-2022
Publisher
BioMed Central
Keyword
COVID-19
Published in
Trials / Issue 1/2022
Electronic ISSN: 1745-6215
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s13063-022-06706-x

Other articles of this Issue 1/2022

Trials 1/2022 Go to the issue