Skip to main content
Top
Published in: BMC Health Services Research 1/2019

Open Access 01-12-2019 | Research article

Could shared decision making affect staying in hospital? A cross-sectional pilot study

Authors: M. R. Gualano, F. Bert, S. Passi, M. Stillo, V. Brescia, G. Scaioli, R. Thomas, G. Voglino, D. Minniti, F. Boraso, R. Siliquini

Published in: BMC Health Services Research | Issue 1/2019

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Shared Decision Making (SDM) is an approach where clinicians and patients share the best available evidence to make decision and where patients opinions are considered. This approach provides benefits for patients, clinicians and health care system. The aim of the present study is to investigate the patients’ perception of their participation in treatment choices and to identify the possible influences of variables in decision aids and therapeutic choices. Furthermore the present study evaluates the impact of SDM on the length of hospital stay and the health expenditure in Piemonte, an Italian region.

Methods

A cross-sectional study was performed in 2016. The patients were selected after hospitalization to clinical and surgical units at the Rivoli and Susa Hospital. Data were collected through the questionnaire and the Hospital Discharge Registers. STROBE guidelines for observational studies were used. A descriptive analysis was conducted. Frequencies and percentages of the categorical variables were reported. Statistical analyses were performed using t-test, chi-square test and Mann-Whitney test.

Results

The final sample was made of 174 subjects. More than half of the sample reported a SDM approach. Female gender (p = 0.027) and lower age (p = 0.047) are associated with an increased possibility to report SDM. Receiving “good” or “excellent” information, having their own request fulfilled and their opinions took into account by healthcare professionals, were all found to be predictors for an approach recognized as SDM (p ≤ 0.05). The perception that healthcare professionals spent a proper amount of time with the patients and used an understendable language are factors increase the chance of a “shared” decision process (p ≤ 0.05). The patients trust in the information given by the healthcare professional is not affecting their perception about the decision making process (P = 0.195). No significant difference where recorded in length of stay and hospital expenditure.

Conclusions

The data show the role played by different dimension of the patients-clinician relationship and that the strongest determinant of a perceived shared decision making approach are healthcare professional-depending.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Elwin G, Laitner S, Coulter A, Walker E, Watson P, Thomson R. Implementing shared decision making in the NHS. BMJ. 2010;341:c5146.CrossRef Elwin G, Laitner S, Coulter A, Walker E, Watson P, Thomson R. Implementing shared decision making in the NHS. BMJ. 2010;341:c5146.CrossRef
2.
go back to reference Charles C, Whelan T, Gafni A. What do we mean by partnership in making decisions about treatment? BMJ. 1999;319:780–2.CrossRef Charles C, Whelan T, Gafni A. What do we mean by partnership in making decisions about treatment? BMJ. 1999;319:780–2.CrossRef
3.
go back to reference Emanuel EJ, Emanuel LL. Four models of the physician-patient relationship. JAMA. 1992;267(16):2221–6.CrossRef Emanuel EJ, Emanuel LL. Four models of the physician-patient relationship. JAMA. 1992;267(16):2221–6.CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Elwyn G, Frosch D, Thomson R, Joseph-Williams N, Lloyd A, Kinnersley P, et al. Share decision making: a model for clinical practice. J Gen Intern Med. 2012;27(10):1361–7.CrossRef Elwyn G, Frosch D, Thomson R, Joseph-Williams N, Lloyd A, Kinnersley P, et al. Share decision making: a model for clinical practice. J Gen Intern Med. 2012;27(10):1361–7.CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Renzi C, Goss C, Mosconi P. L’importanza della partecipazione dei pazienti e delle famiglie per ottimizzare l’adesione alla terapia e gli esiti di salute. In: Rivista di Immunologia e allergologia pediatrica; 2009. p. 3–7. Renzi C, Goss C, Mosconi P. L’importanza della partecipazione dei pazienti e delle famiglie per ottimizzare l’adesione alla terapia e gli esiti di salute. In: Rivista di Immunologia e allergologia pediatrica; 2009. p. 3–7.
6.
go back to reference Levenstein J. The patient-centred general practice consultation. S Afr Fam Pract. 1984;5:276–82. Levenstein J. The patient-centred general practice consultation. S Afr Fam Pract. 1984;5:276–82.
7.
go back to reference Barry MJ, Edgman-Levitan S. Shared decision making--pinnacle of patient-centered care. New Engl J Med. 2012;366(9):780–1.CrossRef Barry MJ, Edgman-Levitan S. Shared decision making--pinnacle of patient-centered care. New Engl J Med. 2012;366(9):780–1.CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Elwyn G, Frosch D, Thomson R, Joseph-Williams N, Lloyd A, Kinnersley P, et al. Shared decision making: a model for clinical practice. J Gen Intern Med. 2012;27(10):1361–7.CrossRef Elwyn G, Frosch D, Thomson R, Joseph-Williams N, Lloyd A, Kinnersley P, et al. Shared decision making: a model for clinical practice. J Gen Intern Med. 2012;27(10):1361–7.CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Oshima Lee E, Emanuel EJ. Shared decision making to improve care and reduce costs. N Engl J Med. 2013;368:6–8.CrossRef Oshima Lee E, Emanuel EJ. Shared decision making to improve care and reduce costs. N Engl J Med. 2013;368:6–8.CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Fowler FJ, Levin CA, Sepucha KR. Informing and involving patients to improve the quality of medical decision. Health Aff (Millwood). 2011;30(4):699–706.CrossRef Fowler FJ, Levin CA, Sepucha KR. Informing and involving patients to improve the quality of medical decision. Health Aff (Millwood). 2011;30(4):699–706.CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Deber RB, Kraetschmer N, Irvine J. What role do patients whish to play in treatment decision making? Arch Intern Med. 1996;156:1414–20.CrossRef Deber RB, Kraetschmer N, Irvine J. What role do patients whish to play in treatment decision making? Arch Intern Med. 1996;156:1414–20.CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Guadagnoli E, Ward P. Patient participation in decision-making. Soc Sci Med. 1998;47(3):329–39.CrossRef Guadagnoli E, Ward P. Patient participation in decision-making. Soc Sci Med. 1998;47(3):329–39.CrossRef
14.
go back to reference Coulter A. Do patients want a choice and does it work? BMJ. 2010;341:c4989.CrossRef Coulter A. Do patients want a choice and does it work? BMJ. 2010;341:c4989.CrossRef
15.
go back to reference Levinson W, Kao L, Kuby A, Thisted RA. Not all patients want to participate in decision making. J Gen Intern Med. 2005;20(6):531–5.CrossRef Levinson W, Kao L, Kuby A, Thisted RA. Not all patients want to participate in decision making. J Gen Intern Med. 2005;20(6):531–5.CrossRef
16.
go back to reference Pieterse AH, Baas-Thijssen MCM, Marijnen CAM, Stiggelbout AM. Clinician and cancer patient views on patient participation in treatment decision-making: a quantitative and qualitative exploration. Br J Cancer. 2008;99(6):875–82.CrossRef Pieterse AH, Baas-Thijssen MCM, Marijnen CAM, Stiggelbout AM. Clinician and cancer patient views on patient participation in treatment decision-making: a quantitative and qualitative exploration. Br J Cancer. 2008;99(6):875–82.CrossRef
17.
go back to reference Gattellari M, Butow PN, Tattersall MHN. Sharing decisions in cancer care. Soc Sci Med. 2001;52(12):1865–78.CrossRef Gattellari M, Butow PN, Tattersall MHN. Sharing decisions in cancer care. Soc Sci Med. 2001;52(12):1865–78.CrossRef
19.
go back to reference Rood JAJ, Nauta IH, Witte BI, Stam F, van Zuuren FJ, Manenschijn A, et al. Shared decision-making and providing information among newly diagnosed patients with hematological malignancies and their informal caregivers: not “one-size-fits-all”. Psychooncology. 2017;26(12):2040–7. https://doi.org/10.1002/pon.4414.CrossRefPubMed Rood JAJ, Nauta IH, Witte BI, Stam F, van Zuuren FJ, Manenschijn A, et al. Shared decision-making and providing information among newly diagnosed patients with hematological malignancies and their informal caregivers: not “one-size-fits-all”. Psychooncology. 2017;26(12):2040–7. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1002/​pon.​4414.CrossRefPubMed
21.
go back to reference Walsh T, Barr PJ, Thompson R, Ozanne E, O'Neill C, Elwyn G. Undetermined impact of patient decision support interventions on healthcare costs and savings: systematic review. BMJ. 2014;348:g188.CrossRef Walsh T, Barr PJ, Thompson R, Ozanne E, O'Neill C, Elwyn G. Undetermined impact of patient decision support interventions on healthcare costs and savings: systematic review. BMJ. 2014;348:g188.CrossRef
23.
go back to reference Charles C, Gafni A, Whelan T. Shared decision making in the medical encounter: what does it mean? (or it takes at least two to tango). Soc Sci Med. 1997;44(5):681–92.CrossRef Charles C, Gafni A, Whelan T. Shared decision making in the medical encounter: what does it mean? (or it takes at least two to tango). Soc Sci Med. 1997;44(5):681–92.CrossRef
24.
go back to reference Frosch DL, Kaplan RM. Shared decision making in clinical medicine: past research and future directions. Am J Prev Med. 1999;17(4):285–94.CrossRef Frosch DL, Kaplan RM. Shared decision making in clinical medicine: past research and future directions. Am J Prev Med. 1999;17(4):285–94.CrossRef
27.
go back to reference Vuorma S, Teperi J, Aalto AM, Hurskainen R, Kujansuu E, Rissanen P. A randomized trial among women with heavy menstruation - impact of a decision aid on treatment outcomes and costs. Health Expect. 2004;7(4):327–37.CrossRef Vuorma S, Teperi J, Aalto AM, Hurskainen R, Kujansuu E, Rissanen P. A randomized trial among women with heavy menstruation - impact of a decision aid on treatment outcomes and costs. Health Expect. 2004;7(4):327–37.CrossRef
28.
go back to reference Kennedy AD, Sculpher MJ, Coulter A, Dwyer N, Rees M, Abrams KR, et al. Effects of decision aids for menorrhagia on treatment choices, health outcomes, and costs: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA. 2002;288(21):2701–8.CrossRef Kennedy AD, Sculpher MJ, Coulter A, Dwyer N, Rees M, Abrams KR, et al. Effects of decision aids for menorrhagia on treatment choices, health outcomes, and costs: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA. 2002;288(21):2701–8.CrossRef
29.
go back to reference von Elm, E., Altman D.G., Egger M., Pocock S.J., Gotzsche P.C. & Vandenbroucke J.P. Strengthening the reporting of observational studies in epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies. BMJ. 2007;335(7624):806–808. von Elm, E., Altman D.G., Egger M., Pocock S.J., Gotzsche P.C. & Vandenbroucke J.P. Strengthening the reporting of observational studies in epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies. BMJ. 2007;335(7624):806–808.
Metadata
Title
Could shared decision making affect staying in hospital? A cross-sectional pilot study
Authors
M. R. Gualano
F. Bert
S. Passi
M. Stillo
V. Brescia
G. Scaioli
R. Thomas
G. Voglino
D. Minniti
F. Boraso
R. Siliquini
Publication date
01-12-2019
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
BMC Health Services Research / Issue 1/2019
Electronic ISSN: 1472-6963
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-019-4002-8

Other articles of this Issue 1/2019

BMC Health Services Research 1/2019 Go to the issue