Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Applied Health Economics and Health Policy 3/2016

01-06-2016 | Original Research Article

Cost Implications for Subsequent Perinatal Outcomes After IVF Stratified by Number of Embryos Transferred: A Five Year Analysis of Vermont Data

Authors: Olivia J. Carpinello, Peter R. Casson, Chia-Ling Kuo, Renju S. Raj, E. Scott Sills, Christopher A. Jones

Published in: Applied Health Economics and Health Policy | Issue 3/2016

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

In states in the USA without in vitro fertilzation coverage (IVF) insurance coverage, more embryos are transferred per cycle leading to higher risks of multi-fetal pregnancies and adverse pregnancy outcomes.

Objective

To determine frequency and cost of selected adverse perinatal complications based on number of embryos transferred during IVF, and calculate incremental cost per IVF live birth.

Methods

Medical records of patients who conceived with IVF (n = 116) and delivered at >20 weeks gestational age between 2007 and 2011 were evaluated. Gestational age at delivery, low birth weight (LBW) term births, and delivery mode were tabulated. Healthcare costs per cohort, extrapolated costs assuming 100 patients per cohort, and incremental costs per infant delivered were calculated.

Results

The highest prematurity and cesarean section rates were recorded after double embryo transfers (DET), while the lowest rates were found in single embryo transfers (SET). Premature singleton deliveries increased directly with number of transferred embryos [6.3 % (SET), 9.1 % (DET) and 10.0 % for ≥3 embryos transferred]. This trend was also noted for rate of cesarean delivery [26.7 % (SET), 36.6 % (DET), and 47.1 % for ≥3 embryos transferred]. The proportion of LBW infants among deliveries after DET and for ≥3 embryos transferred was 3.9 and 9.1 %, respectively. Extrapolated costs per cohort were US$718,616, US$1,713,470 and US$1,227,396 for SET, DET, and ≥3 embryos transferred, respectively.

Conclusion

Attempting to improve IVF pregnancy rates by permitting multiple embryo transfers results in sharply increased rates of multiple gestation and preterm delivery. This practice yields a greater frequency of adverse perinatal outcomes and substantially increased healthcare spending. Better efforts to encourage SET are necessary to normalize healthcare expenditures considering the frequency of very high cost sequela associated with IVF where multiple embryo transfers occur.
Literature
2.
go back to reference Martin JR, Bromer JG, Sakkas D, Patrizio P. Insurance coverage and in vitro fertilization outcomes: a U.S. perspective. Fertil Steril. 2011;95:964–9.CrossRefPubMed Martin JR, Bromer JG, Sakkas D, Patrizio P. Insurance coverage and in vitro fertilization outcomes: a U.S. perspective. Fertil Steril. 2011;95:964–9.CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference United States. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention: Division of Reproductive Health. 2013 Assisted Reproductive Technology National Summary Report, 2013. United States. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention: Division of Reproductive Health. 2013 Assisted Reproductive Technology National Summary Report, 2013.
4.
go back to reference Ata B, Seli E. Economics of assisted reproductive technologies. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol. 2010;22:183–8.CrossRefPubMed Ata B, Seli E. Economics of assisted reproductive technologies. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol. 2010;22:183–8.CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Blickstein I, Jones C, Keith LG. Zygotic-splitting rates after single-embryo transfers in in vitro fertilization. N Engl J Med. 2003;348:2366–7.CrossRefPubMed Blickstein I, Jones C, Keith LG. Zygotic-splitting rates after single-embryo transfers in in vitro fertilization. N Engl J Med. 2003;348:2366–7.CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Bromer JG, Ata B, Seli M, Lockwood CJ, Seli E. Preterm deliveries that result from multiple pregnancies associated with assisted reproductive technologies in the USA: a cost analysis. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol. 2011;23:168–73.CrossRefPubMed Bromer JG, Ata B, Seli M, Lockwood CJ, Seli E. Preterm deliveries that result from multiple pregnancies associated with assisted reproductive technologies in the USA: a cost analysis. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol. 2011;23:168–73.CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Chambers GM, Sullivan EA, Ishihara O, Chapman MG, Adamson GD. The economic impact of assisted reproductive technology: a review of selected developed countries. Fertil Steril. 2009;91:2281–94.CrossRefPubMed Chambers GM, Sullivan EA, Ishihara O, Chapman MG, Adamson GD. The economic impact of assisted reproductive technology: a review of selected developed countries. Fertil Steril. 2009;91:2281–94.CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference ESHRE Capri Workshop Group. Multiple gestation pregnancy. Hum Reprod. 2000;15:1856–64.CrossRef ESHRE Capri Workshop Group. Multiple gestation pregnancy. Hum Reprod. 2000;15:1856–64.CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Forte L. Funding of IVF in Quebec: a cost-benefit analysis. Infertility Awareness Association of Canada. March 13, 2009. Forte L. Funding of IVF in Quebec: a cost-benefit analysis. Infertility Awareness Association of Canada. March 13, 2009.
10.
go back to reference Janvier A, Spelke B, Barrington KJ. The epidemic of multiple gestations and neonatal intensive care unit use: the cost of irresponsibility. J Pediatr. 2011;159:409–13.CrossRefPubMed Janvier A, Spelke B, Barrington KJ. The epidemic of multiple gestations and neonatal intensive care unit use: the cost of irresponsibility. J Pediatr. 2011;159:409–13.CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Kowlessar NM, Jiang HJ, Steiner C. Hospital stays for newborns, 2011. Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project (HCUP) Statistical Brief # 163. October 2013. Rockville, MD. Kowlessar NM, Jiang HJ, Steiner C. Hospital stays for newborns, 2011. Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project (HCUP) Statistical Brief # 163. October 2013. Rockville, MD.
13.
go back to reference Gilbert WM, Nesbitt TS, Danielsen B. The cost of prematurity: quantification by gestational age and birth weight. Obstet Gynecol. 2003;102:488–92.PubMed Gilbert WM, Nesbitt TS, Danielsen B. The cost of prematurity: quantification by gestational age and birth weight. Obstet Gynecol. 2003;102:488–92.PubMed
14.
go back to reference Moore JE, Witt WP, Elixhauser A. Complicating conditions associated with childbirth, by delivery method and payer, 2011. Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project (HCUP) Statistical Brief #173. May 2014. Rockville, MD. Moore JE, Witt WP, Elixhauser A. Complicating conditions associated with childbirth, by delivery method and payer, 2011. Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project (HCUP) Statistical Brief #173. May 2014. Rockville, MD.
16.
go back to reference Jones CA. Economic evaluation of alternative embryo transfer policies in in vitro fertilisation (IVF). PhD thesis; 2005, Univ Oxford. British Library EthOS uk.bl.ethos.426399. Jones CA. Economic evaluation of alternative embryo transfer policies in in vitro fertilisation (IVF). PhD thesis; 2005, Univ Oxford. British Library EthOS uk.bl.ethos.426399.
17.
go back to reference Van Hout BA, Al MJ, Gordon GS, Rutten FFH. Costs, effects and C/E ratios alongside a clinical trial. (VAGR curve). Health Econ. 1994;3:309–19.CrossRefPubMed Van Hout BA, Al MJ, Gordon GS, Rutten FFH. Costs, effects and C/E ratios alongside a clinical trial. (VAGR curve). Health Econ. 1994;3:309–19.CrossRefPubMed
20.
go back to reference Ndegwa S, Kelly S. Status of public funding for in vitro fertilization in Canada and internationally [Environmental Scan Issue 14]. Ottawa: Canadian Agency for Drugs and Technologies in Health; 2010. Ndegwa S, Kelly S. Status of public funding for in vitro fertilization in Canada and internationally [Environmental Scan Issue 14]. Ottawa: Canadian Agency for Drugs and Technologies in Health; 2010.
22.
go back to reference Straughen JK, Salihu HM, Keith L, Petrozzino J, Jones C. Obligatory versus elective single embryo transfer in in vitro fertilization: a population-based analysis of data from the U.K. Human Fertilisation and Embryology Authority. J Reprod Med. 2013;58:95–100.PubMed Straughen JK, Salihu HM, Keith L, Petrozzino J, Jones C. Obligatory versus elective single embryo transfer in in vitro fertilization: a population-based analysis of data from the U.K. Human Fertilisation and Embryology Authority. J Reprod Med. 2013;58:95–100.PubMed
23.
go back to reference Lukassen HGM, Braat DD, Wetzels AMM, Zielhuis GA, Adang EMM, Scheenjes E, Kremer JAM. Two cycles with single embryo transfer versus one cycle with double embryo transfer: a randomized controlled trial. Hum Reprod. 2005;20:702–8.CrossRefPubMed Lukassen HGM, Braat DD, Wetzels AMM, Zielhuis GA, Adang EMM, Scheenjes E, Kremer JAM. Two cycles with single embryo transfer versus one cycle with double embryo transfer: a randomized controlled trial. Hum Reprod. 2005;20:702–8.CrossRefPubMed
24.
go back to reference Kjellberg AT, Carlsson P, Bergh C. Randomized single versus double embryos transfer: obstetric and paediatric outcome and a cost-effectiveness analysis. Hum Reprod. 2006;21:210–6.CrossRefPubMed Kjellberg AT, Carlsson P, Bergh C. Randomized single versus double embryos transfer: obstetric and paediatric outcome and a cost-effectiveness analysis. Hum Reprod. 2006;21:210–6.CrossRefPubMed
25.
go back to reference Gerris J, De Sutter P, De Neubourg D, Van Royen E, Vander Elst J, Mangelschots K, et al. A real-life prospective health economic study of elective single embryo transfer versus two-embryo transfer in first IVF/ICSI cycles. Hum Reprod. 2004;19:917–23.CrossRefPubMed Gerris J, De Sutter P, De Neubourg D, Van Royen E, Vander Elst J, Mangelschots K, et al. A real-life prospective health economic study of elective single embryo transfer versus two-embryo transfer in first IVF/ICSI cycles. Hum Reprod. 2004;19:917–23.CrossRefPubMed
26.
go back to reference Fauque P, Jouannet P, Davy C, Guibert J, Viallon V, Epelboin S, et al. Cumulative results including obstetrical and neonatal outcome of fresh and frozen-thawed cycles in elective single versus double fresh embryo transfers. Fertil Steril. 2010;94:927–35.CrossRefPubMed Fauque P, Jouannet P, Davy C, Guibert J, Viallon V, Epelboin S, et al. Cumulative results including obstetrical and neonatal outcome of fresh and frozen-thawed cycles in elective single versus double fresh embryo transfers. Fertil Steril. 2010;94:927–35.CrossRefPubMed
27.
go back to reference Connolly M, Gallo F, Hoorens S, Ledger W. Assessing long-run economic benefits attributed to an IVF-conceived singleton based on projected lifetime net tax contributions in the UK. Hum Reprod. 2009;24(3):626–32. doi:10.1093/humrep/den435.CrossRefPubMed Connolly M, Gallo F, Hoorens S, Ledger W. Assessing long-run economic benefits attributed to an IVF-conceived singleton based on projected lifetime net tax contributions in the UK. Hum Reprod. 2009;24(3):626–32. doi:10.​1093/​humrep/​den435.CrossRefPubMed
28.
go back to reference Gordts S, Campo R, Puttermans P, Brosens I, Valkenburg M, Norre J, et al. Belgian legislation and the effect of elective single embryo transfer on IVF outcome. Reprod Biomed Online. 2005;10(4):436–41.CrossRefPubMed Gordts S, Campo R, Puttermans P, Brosens I, Valkenburg M, Norre J, et al. Belgian legislation and the effect of elective single embryo transfer on IVF outcome. Reprod Biomed Online. 2005;10(4):436–41.CrossRefPubMed
29.
go back to reference Sills ES. An evidence-based policy for the provision of subsidised fertility treatment in California: integration of array comparative genomic hybridisation with IVF and mandatory single embryo transfer to lower multiple gestation and preterm birth rates. PhD thesis (2013), Univ Westminster-London. British Library EthOS uk.bl.ethos.576982. Sills ES. An evidence-based policy for the provision of subsidised fertility treatment in California: integration of array comparative genomic hybridisation with IVF and mandatory single embryo transfer to lower multiple gestation and preterm birth rates. PhD thesis (2013), Univ Westminster-London. British Library EthOS uk.bl.ethos.576982.
30.
go back to reference Cuevas KD, Silver DR, Brooten D, Youngblut JM, Bobo CM. Hospital charges at birth and frequency of rehospitalizations and acute care visits over the first year of life: a comparison by gestational age and birth weight. Am J Nurs. 2005;105(7):56–65.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Cuevas KD, Silver DR, Brooten D, Youngblut JM, Bobo CM. Hospital charges at birth and frequency of rehospitalizations and acute care visits over the first year of life: a comparison by gestational age and birth weight. Am J Nurs. 2005;105(7):56–65.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
Metadata
Title
Cost Implications for Subsequent Perinatal Outcomes After IVF Stratified by Number of Embryos Transferred: A Five Year Analysis of Vermont Data
Authors
Olivia J. Carpinello
Peter R. Casson
Chia-Ling Kuo
Renju S. Raj
E. Scott Sills
Christopher A. Jones
Publication date
01-06-2016
Publisher
Springer International Publishing
Published in
Applied Health Economics and Health Policy / Issue 3/2016
Print ISSN: 1175-5652
Electronic ISSN: 1179-1896
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s40258-016-0237-2

Other articles of this Issue 3/2016

Applied Health Economics and Health Policy 3/2016 Go to the issue