Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Current Bladder Dysfunction Reports 3/2018

01-09-2018 | Overactive Bladder and Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms (U Lee and S Adelstein, Section Editors)

Cost-Effectiveness of Third-Line Therapies for Overactive Bladder

Author: Seth A. Cohen

Published in: Current Bladder Dysfunction Reports | Issue 3/2018

Login to get access

Abstract

Purpose of Review

While third-line therapies for overactive bladder and urgency urinary incontinence are well-described in guideline statements, there is little offered in guidance when it comes to selecting a particular intervention amongst these therapies for patients. Data regarding efficacy has a body of literature that takes sides on all fronts, making efficacy of these interventions a topic of continued debate. An ever-present factor for consideration also remains—cost of therapy. This review examines current data available for cost of third-line therapies.

Recent Findings

In this body of literature regarding cost, there too remains ongoing debate, with no definitive answer. Data appears to support bladder Botox treatment being less costly in the short term (under 5 years), while sacral neuromodulation may have increased cost-effectiveness in the long-term (between 5 and 10 years). Percutaneous tibial nerve stimulation may be more cost-effective than sacral neuromodulation in the long-term, but has the associated challenges of patients needing to be present in offices at regular intervals for treatment duration. The generalizability of this data is limited by cost models being conducted in different countries, with varying healthcare systems and intervention techniques.

Summary

Therapies of the future, such as rechargeable technologies for sacral neuromodulation, appear to offer cost-saving opportunities that could impact therapy decision making in years to come. Rechargeable systems could significantly decrease the associated cost of sacral neuromodulation therapies. Ultimately, intangible clinical factors that influence patient care should still drive decision making and not be superseded by perceived treatment costs, especially as a definitive understanding regarding this remains elusive.
Literature
1.
go back to reference •• Gormley EA, Lightner DJ, Faraday M, Vasavada SP. Diagnosis and treatment of overactive bladder (non-neurogenic) in adults: AUA/SUFU guideline amendment. J Urol. 2015;193(5):1572–80. This guideline provides insightful understanding into the pathway for treatment, including description of 3rd line therapies CrossRefPubMed •• Gormley EA, Lightner DJ, Faraday M, Vasavada SP. Diagnosis and treatment of overactive bladder (non-neurogenic) in adults: AUA/SUFU guideline amendment. J Urol. 2015;193(5):1572–80. This guideline provides insightful understanding into the pathway for treatment, including description of 3rd line therapies CrossRefPubMed
2.
go back to reference Amundsen CL, Richter HE, Menefee SA, Komesu YM, Arya LA, Gregory WT, et al. OnabotulinumtoxinA vs sacral neuromodulation on refractory urgency urinary incontinence in women: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA. 2016;316(13):1366–74.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Amundsen CL, Richter HE, Menefee SA, Komesu YM, Arya LA, Gregory WT, et al. OnabotulinumtoxinA vs sacral neuromodulation on refractory urgency urinary incontinence in women: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA. 2016;316(13):1366–74.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
3.
go back to reference Kraus SR. Sacral neuromodulation is preferred over onabotulinumtoxinA injection for overactive bladder in women: pro. J Urol. 2017;198(3):501–2.CrossRefPubMed Kraus SR. Sacral neuromodulation is preferred over onabotulinumtoxinA injection for overactive bladder in women: pro. J Urol. 2017;198(3):501–2.CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Komesu YM, Amundsen CL, Richter HE, Erickson SW, Ackenbom MF, Andy UU, et al. Refractory urgency urinary incontinence treatment in women: impact of age on outcomes and complications. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2018;218(1):111.e1–9.CrossRef Komesu YM, Amundsen CL, Richter HE, Erickson SW, Ackenbom MF, Andy UU, et al. Refractory urgency urinary incontinence treatment in women: impact of age on outcomes and complications. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2018;218(1):111.e1–9.CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Anger JT, Cameron AP, Madison R, Saigal CS, Clemens JQ. The effect of sacral neuromodulation on anticholinergic use and expenditures in a privately insured population. Neuromodulation. 2014;17(1):72–4. discussion 4CrossRefPubMed Anger JT, Cameron AP, Madison R, Saigal CS, Clemens JQ. The effect of sacral neuromodulation on anticholinergic use and expenditures in a privately insured population. Neuromodulation. 2014;17(1):72–4. discussion 4CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Chen HW, Bercik RS, Werner EF, Thung SF. Cost-effectiveness of percutaneous tibial nerve stimulation versus extended release tolterodine for overactive bladder. J Urol. 2012;187(1):178–84.CrossRefPubMed Chen HW, Bercik RS, Werner EF, Thung SF. Cost-effectiveness of percutaneous tibial nerve stimulation versus extended release tolterodine for overactive bladder. J Urol. 2012;187(1):178–84.CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Ng DB, Espinosa R, Johnson SJ, Walker D, Gooch K. The impact of persistence with mirabegron usage vs switching to onabotulinumtoxinA on healthcare costs and resource utilization in patients with overactive bladder in the United States. J Med Econ. 2017;20(12):1272–80.CrossRefPubMed Ng DB, Espinosa R, Johnson SJ, Walker D, Gooch K. The impact of persistence with mirabegron usage vs switching to onabotulinumtoxinA on healthcare costs and resource utilization in patients with overactive bladder in the United States. J Med Econ. 2017;20(12):1272–80.CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference • Martinson M, MacDiarmid S, Black E. Cost of neuromodulation therapies for overactive bladder: percutaneous tibial nerve stimulation versus sacral nerve stimulation. J Urol. 2013;189(1):210–6. The authors provide a non-traditional cost-model evaluating PTNS CrossRefPubMed • Martinson M, MacDiarmid S, Black E. Cost of neuromodulation therapies for overactive bladder: percutaneous tibial nerve stimulation versus sacral nerve stimulation. J Urol. 2013;189(1):210–6. The authors provide a non-traditional cost-model evaluating PTNS CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Barnett G, Ockrim J. Re: cost of neuromodulation therapies for overactive bladder: percutaneous tibial nerve stimulation versus sacral nerve stimulation: M. Martinson, S. MacDiarmid and E. Black J Urol 2013; 189: 210–216. J Urol. 2013;190(4):1444–5. Barnett G, Ockrim J. Re: cost of neuromodulation therapies for overactive bladder: percutaneous tibial nerve stimulation versus sacral nerve stimulation: M. Martinson, S. MacDiarmid and E. Black J Urol 2013; 189: 210–216. J Urol. 2013;190(4):1444–5.
10.
go back to reference • Liberman D, Ehlert MJ, Siegel SW. Sacral neuromodulation in urological practice. Urology. 2017;99:14–22. The authors provide a robust description of SNM’s history and guidance for optimization of this therapy CrossRefPubMed • Liberman D, Ehlert MJ, Siegel SW. Sacral neuromodulation in urological practice. Urology. 2017;99:14–22. The authors provide a robust description of SNM’s history and guidance for optimization of this therapy CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Bertapelle MP, Vottero M, Popolo GD, Mencarini M, Ostardo E, Spinelli M, et al. Sacral neuromodulation and botulinum toxin a for refractory idiopathic overactive bladder: a cost-utility analysis in the perspective of Italian healthcare system. World J Urol. 2015;33(8):1109–17.CrossRefPubMed Bertapelle MP, Vottero M, Popolo GD, Mencarini M, Ostardo E, Spinelli M, et al. Sacral neuromodulation and botulinum toxin a for refractory idiopathic overactive bladder: a cost-utility analysis in the perspective of Italian healthcare system. World J Urol. 2015;33(8):1109–17.CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Leong RK, de Wachter SG, Joore MA, van Kerrebroeck PE. Cost-effectiveness analysis of sacral neuromodulation and botulinum toxin A treatment for patients with idiopathic overactive bladder. BJU Int. 2011;108(4):558–64.CrossRefPubMed Leong RK, de Wachter SG, Joore MA, van Kerrebroeck PE. Cost-effectiveness analysis of sacral neuromodulation and botulinum toxin A treatment for patients with idiopathic overactive bladder. BJU Int. 2011;108(4):558–64.CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference Penson DF. Re: physician use of sacral neuromodulation among Medicare beneficiaries with overactive bladder and urinary retention. J Urol. 2016;195(3):689.CrossRefPubMed Penson DF. Re: physician use of sacral neuromodulation among Medicare beneficiaries with overactive bladder and urinary retention. J Urol. 2016;195(3):689.CrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference Arlandis S, Castro D, Errando C, Fernandez E, Jimenez M, Gonzalez P, et al. Cost-effectiveness of sacral neuromodulation compared to botulinum neurotoxin a or continued medical management in refractory overactive bladder. Value Health. 2011;14(2):219–28.CrossRefPubMed Arlandis S, Castro D, Errando C, Fernandez E, Jimenez M, Gonzalez P, et al. Cost-effectiveness of sacral neuromodulation compared to botulinum neurotoxin a or continued medical management in refractory overactive bladder. Value Health. 2011;14(2):219–28.CrossRefPubMed
15.
go back to reference Freemantle N, Khalaf K, Loveman C, Stanisic S, Gultyaev D, Lister J, et al. OnabotulinumtoxinA in the treatment of overactive bladder: a cost-effectiveness analysis versus best supportive care in England and Wales. Eur J Health Econ. 2016;17(7):911–21.CrossRefPubMed Freemantle N, Khalaf K, Loveman C, Stanisic S, Gultyaev D, Lister J, et al. OnabotulinumtoxinA in the treatment of overactive bladder: a cost-effectiveness analysis versus best supportive care in England and Wales. Eur J Health Econ. 2016;17(7):911–21.CrossRefPubMed
16.
go back to reference Hassouna MM, Sadri H. Economic evaluation of sacral neuromodulation in overactive bladder: a Canadian perspective. Can Urol Assoc J. 2015;9(7–8):242–7.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Hassouna MM, Sadri H. Economic evaluation of sacral neuromodulation in overactive bladder: a Canadian perspective. Can Urol Assoc J. 2015;9(7–8):242–7.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
17.
go back to reference Aboseif SR, Kim DH, Rieder JM, Rhee EY, Menefee SA, Kaswick JR, et al. Sacral neuromodulation: cost considerations and clinical benefits. Urology. 2007;70(6):1069–73. discussion 73-4CrossRefPubMed Aboseif SR, Kim DH, Rieder JM, Rhee EY, Menefee SA, Kaswick JR, et al. Sacral neuromodulation: cost considerations and clinical benefits. Urology. 2007;70(6):1069–73. discussion 73-4CrossRefPubMed
18.
go back to reference Siddiqui NY, Amundsen CL, Visco AG, Myers ER, Wu JM. Cost-effectiveness of sacral neuromodulation versus intravesical botulinum A toxin for treatment of refractory urge incontinence. J Urol. 2009;182(6):2799–804.CrossRefPubMed Siddiqui NY, Amundsen CL, Visco AG, Myers ER, Wu JM. Cost-effectiveness of sacral neuromodulation versus intravesical botulinum A toxin for treatment of refractory urge incontinence. J Urol. 2009;182(6):2799–804.CrossRefPubMed
19.
go back to reference Watanabe JH, Campbell JD, Ravelo A, Chancellor MB, Kowalski J, Sullivan SD. Cost analysis of interventions for antimuscarinic refractory patients with overactive bladder. Urology. 2010;76(4):835–40.CrossRefPubMed Watanabe JH, Campbell JD, Ravelo A, Chancellor MB, Kowalski J, Sullivan SD. Cost analysis of interventions for antimuscarinic refractory patients with overactive bladder. Urology. 2010;76(4):835–40.CrossRefPubMed
20.
go back to reference • Siegel S. OnabotulinumtoxinA is preferred over sacral neuromodulation for refractory overactive bladder: con. J Urol. 2017;197(1):11–3. Insightful commentary into the benefits of SNM CrossRefPubMed • Siegel S. OnabotulinumtoxinA is preferred over sacral neuromodulation for refractory overactive bladder: con. J Urol. 2017;197(1):11–3. Insightful commentary into the benefits of SNM CrossRefPubMed
21.
go back to reference Noblett KL, Dmochowski RR, Vasavada SP, Garner AM, Liu S, Pietzsch JB. Cost profiles and budget impact of rechargeable versus non-rechargeable sacral neuromodulation devices in the treatment of overactive bladder syndrome. Neurourol Urodyn. 2017;36(3):727–33.CrossRefPubMed Noblett KL, Dmochowski RR, Vasavada SP, Garner AM, Liu S, Pietzsch JB. Cost profiles and budget impact of rechargeable versus non-rechargeable sacral neuromodulation devices in the treatment of overactive bladder syndrome. Neurourol Urodyn. 2017;36(3):727–33.CrossRefPubMed
22.
go back to reference • Bales GT. Sacral neuromodulation is preferred over OnabotulinumtoxinA injection for overactive bladder in women: con. J Urol. 2017;198(3):500–1. Insightful commentary into the benefits of BoNT CrossRefPubMed • Bales GT. Sacral neuromodulation is preferred over OnabotulinumtoxinA injection for overactive bladder in women: con. J Urol. 2017;198(3):500–1. Insightful commentary into the benefits of BoNT CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Cost-Effectiveness of Third-Line Therapies for Overactive Bladder
Author
Seth A. Cohen
Publication date
01-09-2018
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Current Bladder Dysfunction Reports / Issue 3/2018
Print ISSN: 1931-7212
Electronic ISSN: 1931-7220
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11884-018-0477-0

Other articles of this Issue 3/2018

Current Bladder Dysfunction Reports 3/2018 Go to the issue

Pediatric Voiding Dysfunction (D Clayton and J Thomas, Section Editors)

Utility of Urodynamics in Children with Dysfunctional Voiding

Stress Incontinence and Prolapse (S Reynolds, Section Editor)

Stress Urinary Incontinence Management in the Patient With Overactive Bladder

Overactive Bladder and Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms (U Lee and S Adelstein, Section Editors)

Ketamine-Associated Bladder Dysfunction—a Review of the Literature

Stress Incontinence and Prolapse (S Reynolds, Section Editor)

Apical Prolapse: Is There a Best Approach?

Overactive Bladder and Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms (U Lee and S Adelstein, Section Editors)

Does Urodynamics Impact the Outcomes of Third-line Therapy of Refractory OAB (or Refractory Urgency Urinary Incontinence)?