Skip to main content
Key Specialties
Cardiology Diabetology Endocrinology Gastroenterology Geriatrics and Gerontology Gynecology and Obstetrics Hematology Infectious Disease Internal Medicine Nephrology Neurology Oncology Pediatrics Respiratory Medicine Rheumatology Surgery
Congress Coverage
2024 ACC Congress 2023 ESMO Congress 2023 EASD Congress 2023 ERS Congress 2023 ESC Congress
Clinical Collections
Advances in Alzheimer’s

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on medication adherence

LIVE: Thursday 27th June 2024, 18:00-19:30 (CEST)
Join our expert panel to discover why you need to understand the drivers of non-adherence in your patients, and how you can optimize medication adherence in your clinics to drastically improve patient outcomes.
ADVANCED SEARCH
Log in
Top
Surgical Endoscopy
Published in: Surgical Endoscopy 10/2012

01-10-2012 | Letter to the Editor

Cosmetic outcome is an important parameter when comparing single-incision laparoscopic surgery (SILS) and conventional multiport laparoscopic cholecystectomy (CLC)

Authors: Pankaj Garg, Serena Tharani, Jai Deep Thakur

Published in: Surgical Endoscopy | Issue 10/2012

Login to get access

Excerpt

It was interesting to read the meta-analysis by Markar et al. [1] that compared single-incision laparoscopic surgery (SILS) and conventional multiport laparoscopic cholecystectomy (CLC). They studied postoperative pain during first day after surgery and postoperative complications as the primary parameters and length of hospital stay and operative time as the secondary parameters. …
Literature
1.
Markar SR, Karthikesalingam A, Thrumurthy S, Muirhead L, Kinross J, Paraskeva P (2012) Single-incision laparoscopic surgery (SILS) vs. conventional multiport cholecystectomy: systematic review and meta-analysis. Surg Endosc. doi:10.​1007/​s00464-011-2051-0
2.
3.
Garg P, Thakur JD, Singh I, Nain N, Garima, Gupta V (2012) A prospective controlled trial comparing single incision and conventional laparoscopic cholecystectomy: caution before damage control. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech (accepted)
4.
Asakuma M, Hayashi M, Komeda K, Shimizu T, Hirokawa F, Miyamoto Y, Okuda J, Tanigawa N (2011) Impact of single-port cholecystectomy on postoperative pain. Br J Surg 98:991–995PubMedCrossRef
5.
Lee PC, Lo C, Lai PS, Chang JJ, Huang SJ, Lin MT, Lee PH (2010) Randomized clinical trial of single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy versus minilaparoscopic cholecystectomy. Br J Surg 97:1007–1012PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
Cosmetic outcome is an important parameter when comparing single-incision laparoscopic surgery (SILS) and conventional multiport laparoscopic cholecystectomy (CLC)
Authors
Pankaj Garg
Serena Tharani
Jai Deep Thakur
Publication date
01-10-2012
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
Surgical Endoscopy / Issue 10/2012
Print ISSN: 0930-2794
Electronic ISSN: 1432-2218
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-012-2265-9

Other articles of this Issue 10/2012

Surgical Endoscopy 10/2012 Go to the issue

OriginalPaper

Transvaginal cholecystectomy versus single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy versus four-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a prospective cohort study

OriginalPaper

Marginal ulcer after Roux-en-Y gastric bypass: what have we really learned?

Video

Laparoscopic complete mesocolic excision for right colon cancer

OriginalPaper

Damage control strategy for the management of perforated diverticulitis with generalized peritonitis: laparoscopic lavage and drainage vs. laparoscopic Hartmann’s procedure

OriginalPaper

Drain after elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy. A randomized multicentre controlled trial

OriginalPaper

Surgeons don’t know what they don’t know about the safe use of energy in surgery