Skip to main content
Top
Published in: European Spine Journal 2/2015

01-02-2015 | Original Article

Correlation between Cobb angle, spinous process angle (SPA) and apical vertebrae rotation (AVR) on posteroanterior radiographs in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS)

Authors: Devlin G. Morrison, Amanda Chan, Doug Hill, Eric C. Parent, Edmond H. M. Lou

Published in: European Spine Journal | Issue 2/2015

Login to get access

Abstract

Purpose

To investigate the accuracy and reliability of the Cobb angle, the spinous process angle (SPA), and apical vertebral rotation (AVR) for measuring adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS), and to evaluate the correlations between these measurements.

Methods

A retrospective study of two sets of standing posteroanterior radiographs of patients with AIS was performed. The first set was 59 consecutive patients with AIS with Cobb angles <45° and the second set was 25 patients with Cobb angles >45°. The Cobb angle, SPA and AVR of each curve was measured twice by three observers with varying measurement experience. The mean absolute difference, standard deviation, and intra- and inter-rater reliability coefficients for each measurement were examined. The Pearson correlation coefficients between any two parameters were reported. The association of the Cobb angle with the SPA and AVR was examined using a multiple regression model.

Results

The average intra- and inter-observer reliabilities (ICC [2, 1]) of the Cobb angle, SPA, and AVR were 0.99, 0.95, 0.92 and 0.98, 0.88, 0.83, respectively. The correlation coefficients (r) between Cobb angle and SPA, Cobb angle and AVR, and SPA and AVR were 0.93, 0.68, and 0.60, respectively. Using multiple regression, the association between the Cobb angle and SPA combined with AVR was R 2 = 0.90. The resulting regression model was: \({\text{Cobb angle}} = 4.1 + 0.88 \times {\text{SPA}} + 0.44 \times {\text{AVR}}\).

Conclusion

The SPA has high correlation with the Cobb angle. Including the AVR as an additional factor in multiple regression improves the prediction of the Cobb angle.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Cobb JR (1948) Outline for the study of scoliosis. Am Acad Othop Surg Inst Course Lect 5:261–275 Cobb JR (1948) Outline for the study of scoliosis. Am Acad Othop Surg Inst Course Lect 5:261–275
2.
go back to reference Herzenberg JE, Waanders NA, Closkey RF et al (1990) Cobb angle versus spinous process angle in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. The relationship of the anterior and posterior deformities. Spine 15(9):874–879PubMedCrossRef Herzenberg JE, Waanders NA, Closkey RF et al (1990) Cobb angle versus spinous process angle in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. The relationship of the anterior and posterior deformities. Spine 15(9):874–879PubMedCrossRef
3.
go back to reference Illes T, Somoskeoy S (2013) Comparison of scoliosis maesurements based on three-dimensional vertebra vectors and conventional two-dimensional measurements: advantages in evaluation of prognosis and surgical results. Eur Spine J 22(6):1255–1263PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef Illes T, Somoskeoy S (2013) Comparison of scoliosis maesurements based on three-dimensional vertebra vectors and conventional two-dimensional measurements: advantages in evaluation of prognosis and surgical results. Eur Spine J 22(6):1255–1263PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef
4.
5.
go back to reference Li M, Cheng J, Ying M et al (2010) Application of 3-D ultrasound in assisting the fitting procedure of spinal orthosis to patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Stud Health Technol Inform 158:34–37PubMed Li M, Cheng J, Ying M et al (2010) Application of 3-D ultrasound in assisting the fitting procedure of spinal orthosis to patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Stud Health Technol Inform 158:34–37PubMed
6.
go back to reference Li M, Cheng J, Ying M et al (2012) Could clinical ultrasound improve the fitting of spinal orthosis for the patients with AIS? Eur Spine J 21(10):1926–1935PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef Li M, Cheng J, Ying M et al (2012) Could clinical ultrasound improve the fitting of spinal orthosis for the patients with AIS? Eur Spine J 21(10):1926–1935PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef
8.
go back to reference Lonstein JE, Carlson JM (1984) The prediction of curve progression in untreated idiopathic scoliosis during growth. J Bone Joint Surg (Am) 66(7):1056–1060 Lonstein JE, Carlson JM (1984) The prediction of curve progression in untreated idiopathic scoliosis during growth. J Bone Joint Surg (Am) 66(7):1056–1060
9.
go back to reference Malfair D, Flemming AK, Cvorak MF et al (2010) Radiographic evaluation of scoliosis: review. Am J Roentgenol 194(3):S8–S22CrossRef Malfair D, Flemming AK, Cvorak MF et al (2010) Radiographic evaluation of scoliosis: review. Am J Roentgenol 194(3):S8–S22CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Morrissy RT, Goldsmith GS, Hall EC et al (1990) Measurement of the Cobb angle on radiographs of patients who have scoliosis. Evaluation of intrinsic error. J Bone Joint Surg (Am) 72(3):320–327 Morrissy RT, Goldsmith GS, Hall EC et al (1990) Measurement of the Cobb angle on radiographs of patients who have scoliosis. Evaluation of intrinsic error. J Bone Joint Surg (Am) 72(3):320–327
11.
go back to reference Pruijs JEH, Hageman MAPE, Keessen W et al (1994) Variation in Cobb angle measurements in scoliosis. Skeletal Radiol 23(7):517–520PubMedCrossRef Pruijs JEH, Hageman MAPE, Keessen W et al (1994) Variation in Cobb angle measurements in scoliosis. Skeletal Radiol 23(7):517–520PubMedCrossRef
12.
go back to reference Stokes IA, Bigalow LC, Moreland MS (1986) Measurement of axial rotation of vertebrae in scoliosis. Spine 11(3):213–218PubMedCrossRef Stokes IA, Bigalow LC, Moreland MS (1986) Measurement of axial rotation of vertebrae in scoliosis. Spine 11(3):213–218PubMedCrossRef
13.
14.
go back to reference Suzuki S, Yamamuro T, Shimizu K et al (1989) Ultrasound measurement of vertebral rotation in idiopathic scoliosis. J Bone Joint Surg (Br) 71(2):252–255 Suzuki S, Yamamuro T, Shimizu K et al (1989) Ultrasound measurement of vertebral rotation in idiopathic scoliosis. J Bone Joint Surg (Br) 71(2):252–255
15.
go back to reference Vieira RR, Arora R, Schweitzer ME (2009) Radiologic imaging of spinal deformities. In: Errico TJ, Lonner BS, Moulton AW (eds) Surgical management of spinal deformities, 1st edn. Elsevier, Philadelphia, pp 45–59CrossRef Vieira RR, Arora R, Schweitzer ME (2009) Radiologic imaging of spinal deformities. In: Errico TJ, Lonner BS, Moulton AW (eds) Surgical management of spinal deformities, 1st edn. Elsevier, Philadelphia, pp 45–59CrossRef
16.
go back to reference Villemure A, Aubin CE, Grimard G et al (2001) Progression of vertebral and spinal three-dimensional deformities adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Spine 26(20):2244–2250PubMedCrossRef Villemure A, Aubin CE, Grimard G et al (2001) Progression of vertebral and spinal three-dimensional deformities adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Spine 26(20):2244–2250PubMedCrossRef
17.
go back to reference Zhang J, Lou E, Hill DL et al (2010) Computer-aided assessment of scoliosis on posteroanterior radiographs. Med Biol Eng Comput 48:185–195PubMedCrossRef Zhang J, Lou E, Hill DL et al (2010) Computer-aided assessment of scoliosis on posteroanterior radiographs. Med Biol Eng Comput 48:185–195PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
Correlation between Cobb angle, spinous process angle (SPA) and apical vertebrae rotation (AVR) on posteroanterior radiographs in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS)
Authors
Devlin G. Morrison
Amanda Chan
Doug Hill
Eric C. Parent
Edmond H. M. Lou
Publication date
01-02-2015
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
European Spine Journal / Issue 2/2015
Print ISSN: 0940-6719
Electronic ISSN: 1432-0932
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-014-3684-1

Other articles of this Issue 2/2015

European Spine Journal 2/2015 Go to the issue