Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Sports Medicine 5/2020

Open Access 01-05-2020 | Correction

Correction to: The Effectiveness of Two Methods of Prescribing Load on Maximal Strength Development: A Systematic Review

Authors: Steve W. Thompson, David Rogerson, Alan Ruddock, Andrew Barnes

Published in: Sports Medicine | Issue 5/2020

Login to get access

Excerpt

While typesetting the entries of the Table 1 were incorrectly aligned. The correct Table 1 has been copied below.
Table 1
Study characteristics
Study
Participants (n)
Groups (+ participant numbers (n))
Sex (n)
Age (years ± SD)
Body mass (kg ± SD)
Stature (cm ± SD)
Resistance training experience
Participant characterisation
Weiss et al. (1988) [33]
56
RT (28)
M (28)
20.8 ± 1.8
NR
NR
NRT < 3 months
Healthy
C (28)
F (28)
Braith et al. (1993) [34]
58
RT (47)
M (33)
24.0 ± 4.0
70.1 ± 9.0
174.0 ± 6.3
NRT < 1 year
Untrained
C (11)
F (25)
25.0 ± 5.0
74.3 ± 14.5
172.6 ± 6.6
Moss et al. (1997) [35]
31
RT—G90 (9)
M
22.7 ± 3.4
75.8 ± 5.6
179.0 ± 6.8
Well-trained
University students (non-dominant arm = control group)
RT—G35 (11)
24.0 ± 3.4
83.2 ± 8.8
185.7 ± 8.5
RT—G15 (10)
22.9 ± 2.8
78.1 ± 10.4
182.6 ± 6.7
Bell et al. (2000) [36]
21
RT (11)
M (12)
22.3 ± 3.3
73.4 ± 11.6
176.0 ± 9.3
NRT
University students
C (10)
F (9)
Campos et al. (2002) [37]
31
RT—LR (9)
M
21.1 ± 1.5
80.1 ± 8.4
179.8 ± 6.5
NRT < 6 months
Healthy
RT—IR (7)
20.7 ± 2.9
79.5 ± 7.8
179.6 ± 7.4
RT—HR (7)
20.4 ± 3.5
70.2 ± 9.5
174.3 ± 8.6
C (5)
31.6 ± 9.8
80.8 ± 23.3
178.1 ± 5.5
McBride et al. (2003) [38]
28
RT—S1 (9)
F (13)
M (15)
22.1 ± 3.4
83.7 ± 29.4
172.8 ± 10.5
NRT (< 6 months)
Untrained
RT—M6 (9)
20.0 ± 1.22
70.7 ± 23.0
169.4 ± 11.8
C (10)
22.4 ± 1.89
70.6 ± 7.8
171.3 ± 7.2
Willoughby (2004) [39]
22
RT (12)
M
20.9 ± 2.76
78.7 ± 6.2
176.5 ± 7.1
NRT < 6 months
Untrained
C (10)
Tricoli et al. (2005) [40]
14
RT (7)
M
22.0 ± 1.5
73.4 ± 10.4
179.4 ± 8.8
NRT < 3 months (trained prior)
College students
C (7)
Rana et al. (2008) [41]
16
RT (9)
F
20.6 ± 1.9
64.1 ± 7.9
165.6 ± 4.9
NRT
Untrained
C (7)
22.9 ± 2.4
72.5 ± 15.0
163.6 ± 4.5
Tanimoto et al. (2008) [42]
24
RT (12)
M
19.5 ± 0.5
63.8 ± 4.0
174.8 ± 4.3
NRT
Healthy
C (12)
19.8 ± 0.7
64.2 ± 4.0
174.3 ± 7.2
Terzis et al. (2008) [43]
17
RT (11)
M
22.0 ± 1.0
85.0 ± 4.0
184.0 ± 3.0
NRT < 1 year
P.E students
C (6)
Hartmann et al. (2009) [44]
40
RT—SPP (13)
M
24.31 ± 3.2
84.7 ± 11.2
183.9 ± 7.2
RT in BP (minimum 1RM of 100 kg)
Sport science students
RT—UP (14)
25.14 ± 4.0
79.4 ± 10.4
177.6 ± 7.5
C (13)
24.77 ± 3.1
74.4 ± 12.1
180.5 ± 8.1
Cormie et al. (2010) [45]
16
RT (8)
M
23.9 ± 4.8
79.8 ± 12.0
180.0 ± 6.4
NRT (Technically proficient in BS)
Healthy
C (8)
Chtourou et al. (2012) [46]
30
RT—MTG (10)
M
22.9 ± 1.3
72.0 ± 8.8
180.0 ± 5.0
NRT < 6 months
P.E students
RT—ETG (10)
C (10)
Weier et al. (2012) [47]
12
RT (6)
M (6)
F (6)
20 ± 0.8
NR
NR
NR
University students
C (6)
22 ± 0.6
   
Naclerio et al. (2013) [48]
32
RT—LV (6)
M (20)
F (12)
23.3 ± 1.2
66.4 ± 11.0
169.9 ± 8.4
NRT < 5 years
Team sports athletes
Soccer (20) (M)
Volleyball (12) (F)
RT—MV (6)
23.3 ± 1.4
71.4 ± 8.5
173.3 ± 7.6
RT—HV (8)
23.9 ± 2.0
69.4 ± 12.5
173.0 ± 9.8
C (7)
22.1 ± 1.1
71.1 ± 14.2
169.7 ± 6.9
Aguiar et al. (2015) [49]
18
RT (9)
M
20.9 ± 2.0
73.7 ± 9.4
173.8 ± 6.9
NRT < 6 months
Healthy
C (9)
20.0 ± 1.8
75.0 ± 8.8
176.4 ± 8.1
Akagi et al. (2016) [50]
23
RT (13)
C (10)
M
22.1 ± 1.1
61.4 ± 5.8
170.6 ± 5.8
NRT upper body (< 6 months)
Healthy
Botton et al. (2016) [51]
43
RT—UG (14)
F
24.8 ± 1.4
60.8 ± 6.4
163.0 ± 6.5
NRT < 3 months
Healthy
RT—BG (15)
24.3 ± 3.7
57.0 ± 4.8
160.2 ± 5.8
C (14)
22.7 ± 2.8
58.0 ± 5.7
163.6 ± 6.2
Wirth et al. (2016) [52]
120
RT—SQ (43)
M
23.7 ± 2.7
81.6 ± 9.8
181.7 ± 7.5
NR
Students
RT—LP (40)
23.8 ± 2.3
80.5 ± 8.1
180.1 ± 7.0
C (37)
25.1 ± 2.1
78.2 ± 8.5
181.0 ± 5.7
Jarvis et al. (2017) [53]
21
RT (11)
C (10)
M (15)
F (6)
27.5 ± 3.2
72.7 ± 18.0
169.6 ± 10.3
RT > 1 year
Collegiate athletes
27.2 ± 3.4
76.4 ± 11.5
176.2 ± 7.9
Souza et al. (2018) [54]
33
RT—NP (8)
M
25.6 ± 6.3
79.5 ± 13.0
172.8 ± 6.1
NRT (< 6 months)
College students
RT—TP (9)
25.0 ± 7.0
76.0 ± 9.9
175.3 ± 5.7
RT—UP (8)
24.4 ± 5.2
74.9 ± 4.2
176.8 ± 5.3
C (8)
25.1 ± 3.3
76.8 ± 11.7
173.6 ± 6.8
Mean ± SD standard deviation
1RM 1 repetition maximum, BG bilateral training group, C control, cm centimetres, BP bench press, BS back squat, ETG evening training group, F female, G15 15% load group, G35 35% load group, G90 90% load group, HR high-repetition group, HV high volume, IR intermediate-repetition group, kg kilograms, LP leg press group, LR low-repetition group, LV low volume, M male, M6 six set training group, MTG morning training group, MV moderate volume, n number, NP non-periodised group, NRT no resistance training, NR not reported, P.E Physical Education, RT resistance training, S1 1 set training group, SPP strength-power periodisation, SQ squat group, TP traditional periodisation group, UG unilateral training group, UP daily undulating periodised group
Metadata
Title
Correction to: The Effectiveness of Two Methods of Prescribing Load on Maximal Strength Development: A Systematic Review
Authors
Steve W. Thompson
David Rogerson
Alan Ruddock
Andrew Barnes
Publication date
01-05-2020
Publisher
Springer International Publishing
Published in
Sports Medicine / Issue 5/2020
Print ISSN: 0112-1642
Electronic ISSN: 1179-2035
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s40279-019-01253-z

Other articles of this Issue 5/2020

Sports Medicine 5/2020 Go to the issue