Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Critical Care 1/2011

01-02-2011 | Article selection

Correction: Effect of dexmedetomidine versus lorazepam on outcome in patients with sepsis: an a priori-designed analysis of the MENDS randomized controlled trial

Authors: Pratik P Pandharipande, Robert D Sanders, Timothy D Girard, Stuart McGrane, Jennifer L Thompson, Ayumi K Shintani, Daniel L Herr, Mervyn Maze, E Wesley Ely, the MENDS investigators

Published in: Critical Care | Issue 1/2011

Login to get access

Excerpt

After publication of our article [1], we noted typographical errors in our tables and in the labelling of Figure 3 (Figure 1). There have been no changes to the results or their interpretation.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference Pandharipande PP, Sanders RD, Girard TD, McGrane S, Thompson JL, Shintani AK, Herr DL, Maze M, Ely EW, for the MENDS investigators: Effect of dexmedetomidine versus lorazepam on outcome in patients with sepsis: an a priori-designed analysis of the MENDS randomized controlled trial. Crit Care. 2010, 14: R38-10.1186/cc8916.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Pandharipande PP, Sanders RD, Girard TD, McGrane S, Thompson JL, Shintani AK, Herr DL, Maze M, Ely EW, for the MENDS investigators: Effect of dexmedetomidine versus lorazepam on outcome in patients with sepsis: an a priori-designed analysis of the MENDS randomized controlled trial. Crit Care. 2010, 14: R38-10.1186/cc8916.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
Metadata
Title
Correction: Effect of dexmedetomidine versus lorazepam on outcome in patients with sepsis: an a priori-designed analysis of the MENDS randomized controlled trial
Authors
Pratik P Pandharipande
Robert D Sanders
Timothy D Girard
Stuart McGrane
Jennifer L Thompson
Ayumi K Shintani
Daniel L Herr
Mervyn Maze
E Wesley Ely
the MENDS investigators
Publication date
01-02-2011
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
Critical Care / Issue 1/2011
Electronic ISSN: 1364-8535
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/cc9416

Other articles of this Issue 1/2011

Critical Care 1/2011 Go to the issue