Published in:
01-11-2015 | CORR Insights
CORR Insights®: Kaplan-Meier Survival Analysis Overestimates the Risk of Revision Arthroplasty: A Meta-analysis
Author:
Raphaël Porcher, PhD
Published in:
Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research®
|
Issue 11/2015
Login to get access
Excerpt
It is well known that the Kaplan-Meier estimator overestimates the probability of events of interest in the presence of competing risks [
1,
8]. For example, if a study seeks to examine the durability of a particular arthroplasty implant (so the event of interest is revision), and a substantial proportion of the patients die, the Kaplan-Meier approach will overestimate the frequency of revision, since patients who have died cannot subsequently undergo revision. As such, death is considered a competing event to the event of interest (implant revision). The more frequent the competing events, the more Kaplan-Meier-based estimates will depart from the true probability of occurrence of the event of interest. In light of this, alternative analytic approaches that account for the occurrence of such competing events have been developed to estimate the cumulative incidence [
1,
8]. While these issues are mathematically demonstrated and have been illustrated in various medical domains [
2,
3,
6], they have received less attention in orthopaedic research until recently [
7,
8]. But while some work has been done in individual datasets [
8], to my knowledge, no study has taken a broader look at the influence of the phenomenon of competing risks on Kaplan-Meier survivorship estimates across orthopaedics more generally. …