Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research® 1/2017

01-01-2017 | CORR Insights

CORR Insights®: Can Surgeons Adequately Capture Adverse Events Using the Spinal Adverse Events Severity System (SAVES) and OrthoSAVES?

Author: Y. Raja Rampersaud, MD, FRCSC

Published in: Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research® | Issue 1/2017

Login to get access

Excerpt

The Institute of Medicine has recommended systems for reporting medical errors. However, at a basic level, a standard language and consistent definitions for what constitutes an adverse event (AE) have been lacking [11]. Current terminology, such as “complication,” “AE,” “adverse occurrence,” or “near misses,” are often used interchangeably, but have different meanings (between or within institutions depending on case definition) and varying methods for identification and reporting [10]. In addition, concerns regarding malpractice, professional, and financial implications (personal, practice group, or institutional) of AEs can result in variable reporting of AEs [7]. The inconsistency of AE reporting in surgery reflects the complexity and challenges of this important issue, and currently is a focus of many surgical societies and institutions. …
Literature
1.
go back to reference Bohl DD, Russo GS, Basques BA, Golinvaux NS, Fu MC, Long WD 3rd, Grauer JN. Variations in data collection methods between national databases affect study results: a comparison of the nationwide inpatient sample and national surgical quality improvement program databases for lumbar spine fusion procedures. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2014;96:e193.CrossRefPubMed Bohl DD, Russo GS, Basques BA, Golinvaux NS, Fu MC, Long WD 3rd, Grauer JN. Variations in data collection methods between national databases affect study results: a comparison of the nationwide inpatient sample and national surgical quality improvement program databases for lumbar spine fusion procedures. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2014;96:e193.CrossRefPubMed
2.
go back to reference Daniels AH, Kawaguchi S, Contag AG, Rastegar F, Waagmeester G, Anderson PA, Arthur M, Hart RA. Hospital charges associated with “never events”: Comparison of anterior cervical discectomy and fusion, posterior lumbar interbody fusion, and lumbar laminectomy to total joint arthroplasty. J Neurosurg Spine. 2016;25:165–9.CrossRefPubMed Daniels AH, Kawaguchi S, Contag AG, Rastegar F, Waagmeester G, Anderson PA, Arthur M, Hart RA. Hospital charges associated with “never events”: Comparison of anterior cervical discectomy and fusion, posterior lumbar interbody fusion, and lumbar laminectomy to total joint arthroplasty. J Neurosurg Spine. 2016;25:165–9.CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Hellsten EK, Hanbidge MA, Manos AN, Lewis SJ, Massicotte EM, Fehlings MG, Coyte PC, Rampersaud YR. An economic evaluation of perioperative adverse events associated with spinal surgery. Spine J. 2013;13:44–53.CrossRefPubMed Hellsten EK, Hanbidge MA, Manos AN, Lewis SJ, Massicotte EM, Fehlings MG, Coyte PC, Rampersaud YR. An economic evaluation of perioperative adverse events associated with spinal surgery. Spine J. 2013;13:44–53.CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Hemingway MW, O’Malley C, Silvestri S. Safety culture and care: a program to prevent surgical errors. AORN J. 2015;101:404–12; quiz 413–415. Hemingway MW, O’Malley C, Silvestri S. Safety culture and care: a program to prevent surgical errors. AORN J. 2015;101:404–12; quiz 413–415.
5.
go back to reference Howell AM, Panesar SS, Burns EM, Donaldson LJ, Darzi A. Reducing the burden of surgical harm: a systematic review of the interventions used to reduce adverse events in surgery. Ann Surg. 2014;259:630–641.CrossRefPubMed Howell AM, Panesar SS, Burns EM, Donaldson LJ, Darzi A. Reducing the burden of surgical harm: a systematic review of the interventions used to reduce adverse events in surgery. Ann Surg. 2014;259:630–641.CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Karstensen S, Bari T, Gehrchen M, Street J, Dahl B. Morbidity and mortality of complex spine surgery: A prospective cohort study in 679 patients validating the Spine AdVerse Event Severity (SAVES) system in a European population. Spine J. 2016;16:146–153.CrossRefPubMed Karstensen S, Bari T, Gehrchen M, Street J, Dahl B. Morbidity and mortality of complex spine surgery: A prospective cohort study in 679 patients validating the Spine AdVerse Event Severity (SAVES) system in a European population. Spine J. 2016;16:146–153.CrossRefPubMed
7.
8.
go back to reference Lee MJ, Shonnard N, Farrokhi F, Martz D, Chapman J, Baker R, Hsiang J, Lee C, Gholish R, Flum D; Spine SCOAP-CERTAIN Collaborative. The Spine Surgical Care and Outcomes Assessment Program (Spine SCOAP): A surgeon-led approach to quality and safety. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2015;40:332–341. Lee MJ, Shonnard N, Farrokhi F, Martz D, Chapman J, Baker R, Hsiang J, Lee C, Gholish R, Flum D; Spine SCOAP-CERTAIN Collaborative. The Spine Surgical Care and Outcomes Assessment Program (Spine SCOAP): A surgeon-led approach to quality and safety. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2015;40:332–341.
9.
go back to reference Mauskopf JA, Paul JE, Grant DM, Stergachis A. The role of cost-consequence analysis in healthcare decision-making. Pharmacoeconomics. 1998;13:277–288.CrossRefPubMed Mauskopf JA, Paul JE, Grant DM, Stergachis A. The role of cost-consequence analysis in healthcare decision-making. Pharmacoeconomics. 1998;13:277–288.CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Rampersaud YR, Anderson PA, Dimar JR 2nd, Fisher CG; Spine Trauma Study Group and Degenerative Spine Study Group. Spinal Adverse Events Severity System, version 2 (SAVES-V2): Inter- and intraobserver reliability assessment. J Neurosurg Spine. 2016;25:256–263.CrossRefPubMed Rampersaud YR, Anderson PA, Dimar JR 2nd, Fisher CG; Spine Trauma Study Group and Degenerative Spine Study Group. Spinal Adverse Events Severity System, version 2 (SAVES-V2): Inter- and intraobserver reliability assessment. J Neurosurg Spine. 2016;25:256–263.CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Rampersaud YR, Neary MA, White K: Spine adverse events severity system: content validation and interobserver reliability assessment. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2010;35:790–795. Rampersaud YR, Neary MA, White K: Spine adverse events severity system: content validation and interobserver reliability assessment. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2010;35:790–795.
12.
go back to reference Rowin EJ, Lucier D, Pauker SG, Kumar S, Chen J, Salem DN. Does error and adverse event reporting by physicians and nurses differ? Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf. 2008;34:537–545.CrossRefPubMed Rowin EJ, Lucier D, Pauker SG, Kumar S, Chen J, Salem DN. Does error and adverse event reporting by physicians and nurses differ? Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf. 2008;34:537–545.CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference Street JT, Lenehan BJ, DiPaola CP, Boyd MD, Kwon BK, Paquette SJ, Dvorak MF, Rampersaud YR, Fisher CG. Morbidity and mortality of major adult spinal surgery. A prospective cohort analysis of 942 consecutive patients. Spine J. 2012;12:22–34.CrossRefPubMed Street JT, Lenehan BJ, DiPaola CP, Boyd MD, Kwon BK, Paquette SJ, Dvorak MF, Rampersaud YR, Fisher CG. Morbidity and mortality of major adult spinal surgery. A prospective cohort analysis of 942 consecutive patients. Spine J. 2012;12:22–34.CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
CORR Insights®: Can Surgeons Adequately Capture Adverse Events Using the Spinal Adverse Events Severity System (SAVES) and OrthoSAVES?
Author
Y. Raja Rampersaud, MD, FRCSC
Publication date
01-01-2017
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research® / Issue 1/2017
Print ISSN: 0009-921X
Electronic ISSN: 1528-1132
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11999-016-5142-3

Other articles of this Issue 1/2017

Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research® 1/2017 Go to the issue