Skip to main content
Top
Published in: BMC Public Health 1/2021

01-12-2021 | Coronavirus | Research article

Analyzing disparities in COVID-19 testing trends according to risk for COVID-19 severity across New York City

Authors: Wil Lieberman-Cribbin, Naomi Alpert, Raja Flores, Emanuela Taioli

Published in: BMC Public Health | Issue 1/2021

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Given the interplay between race and comorbidities on COVID-19 morbidity and mortality, it is vital that testing be performed in areas of greatest need, where more severe cases are expected. The goal of this analysis is to evaluate COVID-19 testing data in NYC relative to risk factors for COVID-19 disease severity and demographic characteristics of NYC neighborhoods.

Methods

COVID-19 testing and the racial/ethnic composition of NYC Zip Code Tabulation Areas (ZCTA) were obtained from the NYC Coronavirus data repository and the American Community Survey, respectively. The prevalence of neighborhood-level risk factors for COVID-19 severity according to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention criteria for risk of severe illness and complications from COVID-19 were used to create a ZCTA-level risk index. Poisson regressions were performed to study the ratio of total tests relative to the total ZCTA population and the proportion of positive tests relative to the total tests performed over time.

Results

From March 2nd-April 6th, the total tests/population (%) was positively associated with the proportion of white residents (IRRadj: 1.0003, 95% CI: 1.0003–1.0004) and the COVID risk index (IRRadj: 1.038, 95% CI: 1.029–1.046). The risk index (IRRadj: 1.017, 95% CI: 0.939–1.101) was not associated with total tests performed from April 6th-May 12th, and inversely associated from May 12th-July 6th (IRRadj: 0.862, 95% CI: 0.814–0.913). From March 2nd-April 6th the COVID risk index was not statistically associated (IRRadj: 1.010, 95% CI: 0.987–1.034) with positive tests/total tests. From April 6th-May 12th, the COVID risk index was positively associated (IRRadj: 1.031, 95% CI: 1.002–1.060), while from May 12th-July 6th, the risk index was inversely associated (IRRadj: 1.135, 95% CI: 1.042–1.237) with positivity.

Conclusions

Testing in NYC has suffered from the lack of availability in high-risk populations, and was initially limited as a diagnostic tool for those with severe symptoms, which were mostly concentrated in areas where vulnerable residents live. Subsequent time periods of testing were not targeted in areas according to COVID-19 disease risk, as these areas still experience more positive tests.
Literature
11.
go back to reference Nelson A. Unequal treatment: confronting racial and ethnic disparities in health care. J Natl Med Assoc. 2002;94(8):666–8.PubMedPubMedCentral Nelson A. Unequal treatment: confronting racial and ethnic disparities in health care. J Natl Med Assoc. 2002;94(8):666–8.PubMedPubMedCentral
12.
go back to reference Yancy CW. COVID-19 and African Americans. JAMA. 2020. Yancy CW. COVID-19 and African Americans. JAMA. 2020.
17.
go back to reference Richardson S, Hirsch JS, Narasimhan M, Crawford JM, McGinn T, Davidson KW, et al. Presenting characteristics, comorbidities, and outcomes among 5700 patients hospitalized with COVID-19 in the New York City area. JAMA. 2020. Richardson S, Hirsch JS, Narasimhan M, Crawford JM, McGinn T, Davidson KW, et al. Presenting characteristics, comorbidities, and outcomes among 5700 patients hospitalized with COVID-19 in the New York City area. JAMA. 2020.
20.
go back to reference Razzaghi H, Wang Y, Lu H, Marshall KE, Dowling NF, Paz-Bailey G, et al. Estimated county-level prevalence of selected underlying medical conditions associated with increased risk for severe COVID-19 illness—United States, 2018. Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2020;69(29):945–50. https://doi.org/10.15585/mmwr.mm6929a1.CrossRef Razzaghi H, Wang Y, Lu H, Marshall KE, Dowling NF, Paz-Bailey G, et al. Estimated county-level prevalence of selected underlying medical conditions associated with increased risk for severe COVID-19 illness—United States, 2018. Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2020;69(29):945–50. https://​doi.​org/​10.​15585/​mmwr.​mm6929a1.CrossRef
22.
go back to reference Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, Division of Population Health. 500 Cities Project Data [online]. 2018 [Accessed Oct 23, 2018]. URL: https://www.cdc.gov/500cities. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, Division of Population Health. 500 Cities Project Data [online]. 2018 [Accessed Oct 23, 2018]. URL: https://​www.​cdc.​gov/​500cities.
23.
go back to reference Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System Survey Data. Atlanta, Georgia: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, [2017]. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System Survey Data. Atlanta, Georgia: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, [2017].
27.
go back to reference U.S. Census Bureau; American Community Survey, 2018 American Community Survey 5-Year Estimates, Tables B02001 and B03003. [Accessed 04/28/2020]. U.S. Census Bureau; American Community Survey, 2018 American Community Survey 5-Year Estimates, Tables B02001 and B03003. [Accessed 04/​28/​2020].
34.
Metadata
Title
Analyzing disparities in COVID-19 testing trends according to risk for COVID-19 severity across New York City
Authors
Wil Lieberman-Cribbin
Naomi Alpert
Raja Flores
Emanuela Taioli
Publication date
01-12-2021
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
BMC Public Health / Issue 1/2021
Electronic ISSN: 1471-2458
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-021-11762-0

Other articles of this Issue 1/2021

BMC Public Health 1/2021 Go to the issue