Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Pediatric Surgery International 8/2018

01-08-2018 | Original Article

Conversion from laparoscopic to open appendectomy: decreased risk at dedicated children’s hospitals

Authors: Kevin N. Johnson, Maria Linnaus, David M. Notrica

Published in: Pediatric Surgery International | Issue 8/2018

Login to get access

Abstract

Purpose

The advent of laparoscopy has revolutionized surgical practice within the last 30 years. Conversion to open surgery, however, remains necessary at times, even for the most experienced laparoscopic surgeon.

Methods

The kids’ inpatient database was analyzed for 2006, 2009, and 2012 for patients who underwent laparoscopic appendectomy and conversion to open (CPT 470.1 and V64.41, respectively). Variables included in multivariable analysis were determined based on those variables found to have significance on univariate analysis.

Results

A total of 104,865 patients, ages 0–17 years, underwent laparoscopic appendectomy during the three study periods. Of these, 2370 (2.2%) laparoscopic surgeries were converted to open appendectomy. Multivariable logistic regression showed significantly higher rates of conversion amongst patients with peritonitis (OR 6.7, p < 0.001) or abscess (OR 14.3, p < 0.001), obesity (OR 2.02, p < 0.001), age > 13 years (OR 1.53 for ages 13–15, OR 1.77 for ages 16–17, p < 0.001 for both), or cared for at rural hospitals (OR 1.55, p = 0.002). Rates of conversion decreased over time for children at adult hospitals and at urban hospitals, regardless of teaching status (p < 0.001 for both).

Conclusion

Risk factors for conversion from laparoscopic to open appendectomy included abscess, peritonitis, increased age, obesity, male gender, socioeconomic status and treatment at a non-pediatric-specific hospital, and the overall rate is decreasing over time.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Addiss DG et al (1990) The epidemiology of appendicitis and appendectomy in the United States. Am J Epidemiol 132(5):910–925CrossRefPubMed Addiss DG et al (1990) The epidemiology of appendicitis and appendectomy in the United States. Am J Epidemiol 132(5):910–925CrossRefPubMed
2.
go back to reference Gupta N et al (2013) Identification of preoperative risk factors associated with the conversion of laparoscopic to open appendectomies. Int Surg 98(4):334–339CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Gupta N et al (2013) Identification of preoperative risk factors associated with the conversion of laparoscopic to open appendectomies. Int Surg 98(4):334–339CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
4.
5.
go back to reference Liu SI et al (2002) Factors associated with conversion to laparotomy in patients undergoing laparoscopic appendectomy. J Am Coll Surg 194(3):298–305CrossRefPubMed Liu SI et al (2002) Factors associated with conversion to laparotomy in patients undergoing laparoscopic appendectomy. J Am Coll Surg 194(3):298–305CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Papandria D et al (2013) Risk factors for conversion from laparoscopic to open surgery: analysis of 2138 converted operations in the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program. Am Surg 79(9):914–921PubMed Papandria D et al (2013) Risk factors for conversion from laparoscopic to open surgery: analysis of 2138 converted operations in the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program. Am Surg 79(9):914–921PubMed
7.
go back to reference Wu JM et al (2007) Impact of previous abdominal surgery on laparoscopic appendectomy for acute appendicitis. Surg Endosc 21(4):570–573CrossRefPubMed Wu JM et al (2007) Impact of previous abdominal surgery on laparoscopic appendectomy for acute appendicitis. Surg Endosc 21(4):570–573CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Nana AM et al (2007) Laparoscopic appendectomies: results of a monocentric prospective and non-randomized study. Hepatogastroenterology 54(76):1146–1152PubMed Nana AM et al (2007) Laparoscopic appendectomies: results of a monocentric prospective and non-randomized study. Hepatogastroenterology 54(76):1146–1152PubMed
9.
go back to reference Jaschinski T et al (2015) Laparoscopic versus open appendectomy in patients with suspected appendicitis: a systematic review of meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials. BMC Gastroenterol 15:48CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Jaschinski T et al (2015) Laparoscopic versus open appendectomy in patients with suspected appendicitis: a systematic review of meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials. BMC Gastroenterol 15:48CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
10.
go back to reference Hurd WH et al (1991) Abdominal wall characterization with magnetic resonance imaging and computed tomography. The effect of obesity on the laparoscopic approach. J Reprod Med 36(7):473–476PubMed Hurd WH et al (1991) Abdominal wall characterization with magnetic resonance imaging and computed tomography. The effect of obesity on the laparoscopic approach. J Reprod Med 36(7):473–476PubMed
11.
go back to reference Dasari BV et al (2015) Laparoscopic appendicectomy in obese is associated with improvements in clinical outcome: systematic review. Int J Surg 13:250–256CrossRefPubMed Dasari BV et al (2015) Laparoscopic appendicectomy in obese is associated with improvements in clinical outcome: systematic review. Int J Surg 13:250–256CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Duepree HJ et al (2003) Does means of access affect the incidence of small bowel obstruction and ventral hernia after bowel resection? Laparoscopy versus laparotomy. J Am Coll Surg 197(2):177–181CrossRefPubMed Duepree HJ et al (2003) Does means of access affect the incidence of small bowel obstruction and ventral hernia after bowel resection? Laparoscopy versus laparotomy. J Am Coll Surg 197(2):177–181CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Conversion from laparoscopic to open appendectomy: decreased risk at dedicated children’s hospitals
Authors
Kevin N. Johnson
Maria Linnaus
David M. Notrica
Publication date
01-08-2018
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
Pediatric Surgery International / Issue 8/2018
Print ISSN: 0179-0358
Electronic ISSN: 1437-9813
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00383-018-4297-2

Other articles of this Issue 8/2018

Pediatric Surgery International 8/2018 Go to the issue