Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics 5/2018

01-05-2018 | Gynecologic Endocrinology and Reproductive Medicine

Conventional in vitro fertilization (IVF) or intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI): which is preferred for advanced age patients with five or fewer oocytes retrieved?

Authors: Hui Liu, Haibin Zhao, Guanling Yu, Mei Li, Shuiying Ma, Haozhen Zhang, Keliang Wu

Published in: Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics | Issue 5/2018

Login to get access

Abstract

Purpose

To investigate the clinical outcomes of conventional IVF and ICSI in female patients aged 40 years and over with no more than five oocytes retrieved and non-male factor infertility.

Methods

A retrospective study of a cohort of 644 patients undergoing IVF/ICSI treatment. The 534 female patients aged ≧ 40 years with no more than five oocytes retrieved and non-male factor infertility undergoing their first conventional IVF cycles were assigned in IVF group. The rest of 110 patients aged 40 years and over with no more than five oocytes retrieved and non-male factor infertility undergoing first ICSI cycles were recruited in ICSI group.

Results

Our results showed the clinical pregnancy, live birth and miscarriage rates were similar between the IVF and ICSI groups (21.59% vs. 13.25%, P > 0.05; 12.16% vs. 6.02%, P > 0.05; 43.68% vs. 54.55%, P > 0.05; respectively), however, the implantation and cumulative live-birth rates were significantly higher in the IVF compared to the ICSI group (15.11% vs. 7.75%, 14.59% vs. 5.56%, P < 0.05), though the IVF group had a lower normal fertilization rate (61.56% vs. 76.00%, P < 0.001).

Conclusions

Our study provides strong evidences that the conventional IVF exhibits advantages over the ICSI method in non-male factor infertility for advanced age patients with five or fewer oocytes retrieved.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
2.
go back to reference Ron-El R, Raziel A, Strassburger D, Schachter M, Kasterstein E, Friedler S (2000) Out-come of assisted reproductive technology in women over the age of 41. Fertil Steril 74:471–475CrossRefPubMed Ron-El R, Raziel A, Strassburger D, Schachter M, Kasterstein E, Friedler S (2000) Out-come of assisted reproductive technology in women over the age of 41. Fertil Steril 74:471–475CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Ciray HN, Ulug U, Tosun S, Erden HF, Bahceci M (2006) Outcome of 1114 ICSI andembryo transfer cycles of women 40 years of age and over. Reprod Biomed Online 13:516–522CrossRefPubMed Ciray HN, Ulug U, Tosun S, Erden HF, Bahceci M (2006) Outcome of 1114 ICSI andembryo transfer cycles of women 40 years of age and over. Reprod Biomed Online 13:516–522CrossRefPubMed
4.
5.
go back to reference Terriou P, Giorgetti C, Auquier P et al (1996) Value of an embryo score to predictimplantation. Contracept Fertil Sex 24:657–660PubMed Terriou P, Giorgetti C, Auquier P et al (1996) Value of an embryo score to predictimplantation. Contracept Fertil Sex 24:657–660PubMed
6.
go back to reference Samuel FM, Peter RB (1996) In-vitro fertilization and embryo transfer in women aged 40 years and over. Hum Reprod Update 2(6):459–468CrossRef Samuel FM, Peter RB (1996) In-vitro fertilization and embryo transfer in women aged 40 years and over. Hum Reprod Update 2(6):459–468CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Gilbert WM, Nesbitt TS, Danielsen B (1999) Childbearing beyond age 40: pregnancy outcome in 24,032 cases. Obstet Gynecol 93(1):9–14PubMed Gilbert WM, Nesbitt TS, Danielsen B (1999) Childbearing beyond age 40: pregnancy outcome in 24,032 cases. Obstet Gynecol 93(1):9–14PubMed
10.
go back to reference Jacobsson B, Ladfors L, Milsom I (2004) Advanced maternal age and adverse perinatal outcome. Obstet Gynecol 104:727–733CrossRefPubMed Jacobsson B, Ladfors L, Milsom I (2004) Advanced maternal age and adverse perinatal outcome. Obstet Gynecol 104:727–733CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Dyer S, Chambers GM, de Mouzon J, Nygren KG, Zegers-Hochschild F, Mansour R, Ishihara O, Banker M, Adamson GD (2016) International Committee for Monitoring Assisted Reproductive Technologies world report: Assisted reproductive technology 2008, 2009 and 2010. Hum Reprod 31:1588–1609. https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/dew082 CrossRefPubMed Dyer S, Chambers GM, de Mouzon J, Nygren KG, Zegers-Hochschild F, Mansour R, Ishihara O, Banker M, Adamson GD (2016) International Committee for Monitoring Assisted Reproductive Technologies world report: Assisted reproductive technology 2008, 2009 and 2010. Hum Reprod 31:1588–1609. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1093/​humrep/​dew082 CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference Puissant F, Van RM, Barlow P (1987) Embryo scoring as a prognostic tool in IVF treatment. Hum Reprod 2:705–708CrossRefPubMed Puissant F, Van RM, Barlow P (1987) Embryo scoring as a prognostic tool in IVF treatment. Hum Reprod 2:705–708CrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference Gardner DK, Lane M (1997) Culture and selection of viable blastocysts: a feasible proposition for human IVF? Hum Reprod Update 3:367–382CrossRefPubMed Gardner DK, Lane M (1997) Culture and selection of viable blastocysts: a feasible proposition for human IVF? Hum Reprod Update 3:367–382CrossRefPubMed
21.
go back to reference Dumoulin JM, Coonen E, Bras M, Bergers-Janssen JM, Ignoul-Vanvuchelen RC, Van Wissen LC, Geraedts JP, Evers JL (2001) Embryo development and chromosomal anomalies after ICSI: effect of the injection procedure. Hum Reprod 16:306–312CrossRefPubMed Dumoulin JM, Coonen E, Bras M, Bergers-Janssen JM, Ignoul-Vanvuchelen RC, Van Wissen LC, Geraedts JP, Evers JL (2001) Embryo development and chromosomal anomalies after ICSI: effect of the injection procedure. Hum Reprod 16:306–312CrossRefPubMed
23.
go back to reference Moreno C, Ruiz A, Simen C, Pellicer A, Remohi J (1998) Intracytoplasmic sperm injection as a routine indication in low responder patients. Hum Reprod 13:2126–2129CrossRefPubMed Moreno C, Ruiz A, Simen C, Pellicer A, Remohi J (1998) Intracytoplasmic sperm injection as a routine indication in low responder patients. Hum Reprod 13:2126–2129CrossRefPubMed
24.
go back to reference Miller JE, Smith TT (2001) The effect of intracytoplasmic sperm injection and semen parameters on blastocyst development in vitro. Hum Reprod 16:918–924CrossRefPubMed Miller JE, Smith TT (2001) The effect of intracytoplasmic sperm injection and semen parameters on blastocyst development in vitro. Hum Reprod 16:918–924CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Conventional in vitro fertilization (IVF) or intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI): which is preferred for advanced age patients with five or fewer oocytes retrieved?
Authors
Hui Liu
Haibin Zhao
Guanling Yu
Mei Li
Shuiying Ma
Haozhen Zhang
Keliang Wu
Publication date
01-05-2018
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics / Issue 5/2018
Print ISSN: 0932-0067
Electronic ISSN: 1432-0711
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00404-018-4696-6

Other articles of this Issue 5/2018

Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics 5/2018 Go to the issue