Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Current Urology Reports 5/2010

Open Access 01-09-2010

Contrasting the Percutaneous Nerve Evaluation Versus Staged Implantation in Sacral Neuromodulation

Authors: Chad Baxter, Ja-Hong Kim

Published in: Current Urology Reports | Issue 5/2010

Login to get access

Abstract

Sacral neuromodulation is increasingly used for the treatment of voiding dysfunction, pelvic pain syndromes, and gastrointestinal disorders. While increased use of this technology has led to a greater understanding of its potential as well as its limitations, difficulty persists in identifying the patients that will benefit most. Either of two trial stimulation techniques is performed before placement of a permanent neuromodulator: the monopolar percutaneous nerve evaluation and the tined quadripolar staged trial. The preponderance of recent literature asserts the superior sensitivity of the staged trial over percutaneous nerve evaluation. However, the techniques offer disparate advantages, and other issues, such as cost-effectiveness, remain largely unexplored. The role of sacral neuromodulation will continue to expand as physicians and patients become increasingly aware of its therapeutic potential. Widespread adoption of this clinically superior technique will most rapidly help the greatest number of patients.
Literature
1.
go back to reference van Kerrebroeck PE, van Voskuilen AC, Heesakkers JP, et al.: Results of sacral neuromodulation therapy for urinary voiding dysfunction: outcomes of a prospective, worldwide clinical study. J Urol 2007, 178:2029–2034.CrossRefPubMed van Kerrebroeck PE, van Voskuilen AC, Heesakkers JP, et al.: Results of sacral neuromodulation therapy for urinary voiding dysfunction: outcomes of a prospective, worldwide clinical study. J Urol 2007, 178:2029–2034.CrossRefPubMed
2.
go back to reference Jonas U, Fowler CJ, Chancellor MB, et al.: Efficacy of sacral nerve stimulation for urinary retention: results 18 months after implantation. J Urol 2001, 165:15–19.CrossRefPubMed Jonas U, Fowler CJ, Chancellor MB, et al.: Efficacy of sacral nerve stimulation for urinary retention: results 18 months after implantation. J Urol 2001, 165:15–19.CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Janknegt RA, Weil EH, Eerdmans PH: Improving neuromodulation technique for refractory voiding dysfunctions: two-stage implant. Urology 1997, 49:358–362.CrossRefPubMed Janknegt RA, Weil EH, Eerdmans PH: Improving neuromodulation technique for refractory voiding dysfunctions: two-stage implant. Urology 1997, 49:358–362.CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Spinelli M, Giardiello G, Gerber M, et al.: New sacral neuromodulation lead for percutaneous implantation using local anesthesia: description and first experience. J Urol 2003, 170:1905–1907.CrossRefPubMed Spinelli M, Giardiello G, Gerber M, et al.: New sacral neuromodulation lead for percutaneous implantation using local anesthesia: description and first experience. J Urol 2003, 170:1905–1907.CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference • Kessler TM, Burkhard FC, Madersbacher H, et al.: Safety of prolonged sacral neuromodulation tined lead testing. Curr Med Res Opin 2008, 24:343–347. The authors address feasibility and patient tolerance of the extended trial period.CrossRefPubMed • Kessler TM, Burkhard FC, Madersbacher H, et al.: Safety of prolonged sacral neuromodulation tined lead testing. Curr Med Res Opin 2008, 24:343–347. The authors address feasibility and patient tolerance of the extended trial period.CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Kessler TM, Madersbacher H, Kiss G: Prolonged sacral neuromodulation testing using permanent leads: a more reliable patient selection method? Eur Urol 2005, 47:660–665.CrossRefPubMed Kessler TM, Madersbacher H, Kiss G: Prolonged sacral neuromodulation testing using permanent leads: a more reliable patient selection method? Eur Urol 2005, 47:660–665.CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Kessler TM, Madersbacher H, Kiss G: Bilateral migration of sacral neuromodulation tined leads in a thin patient. J Urol 2005, 173:153–154.PubMed Kessler TM, Madersbacher H, Kiss G: Bilateral migration of sacral neuromodulation tined leads in a thin patient. J Urol 2005, 173:153–154.PubMed
8.
go back to reference • Bannowsky A, Wefer B, Braun P, et al.: Urodynamic changes and response rates in patients treated with permanent electrodes compared to conventional wire electrodes in the peripheral nerve evaluation test. World J Urol 2008, 26:623–626. The authors report objective evidence during testing phase showing more robust urodynamic effect with quadripolar tined leads.CrossRefPubMed • Bannowsky A, Wefer B, Braun P, et al.: Urodynamic changes and response rates in patients treated with permanent electrodes compared to conventional wire electrodes in the peripheral nerve evaluation test. World J Urol 2008, 26:623–626. The authors report objective evidence during testing phase showing more robust urodynamic effect with quadripolar tined leads.CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Hijaz A, Vasavada SP, Daneshgari F, et al.: Complications and troubleshooting of two-stage sacral neuromodulation therapy: a single institution experience. Urology 2006, 68:533–537.CrossRefPubMed Hijaz A, Vasavada SP, Daneshgari F, et al.: Complications and troubleshooting of two-stage sacral neuromodulation therapy: a single institution experience. Urology 2006, 68:533–537.CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Blandon R, Gebhart J, Lightner D, et al.: Re-operation rates after permanent sacral nerve stimulation for refractory voiding dysfunction in women. BJU Int 2008, 101:1119–1123.CrossRefPubMed Blandon R, Gebhart J, Lightner D, et al.: Re-operation rates after permanent sacral nerve stimulation for refractory voiding dysfunction in women. BJU Int 2008, 101:1119–1123.CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference •• Borawski K, Foster R, Webster G, et al.: Predicting implantation with a neuromodulator using two different test stimulation techniques: A prospective randomized study in urge incontinent women. Neurourol Urodyn 2007, 26:14–18. This is a rare prospective randomized trial contrasting the PNE and staged trial techniques.CrossRefPubMed •• Borawski K, Foster R, Webster G, et al.: Predicting implantation with a neuromodulator using two different test stimulation techniques: A prospective randomized study in urge incontinent women. Neurourol Urodyn 2007, 26:14–18. This is a rare prospective randomized trial contrasting the PNE and staged trial techniques.CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference • Sutherland SE, Lavers A, Carlson A, et al.: Sacral nerve stimulation for voiding dysfunction: one institution’s 11-year experience. Neurourol Urodyn 2007, 26:19–28. This article reports a large series of patients from one of the most experienced groups and offers an excellent discussion of neuromodulation.CrossRefPubMed • Sutherland SE, Lavers A, Carlson A, et al.: Sacral nerve stimulation for voiding dysfunction: one institution’s 11-year experience. Neurourol Urodyn 2007, 26:19–28. This article reports a large series of patients from one of the most experienced groups and offers an excellent discussion of neuromodulation.CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference Sievert KD, Nagele U, Pannek J, et al.: Subcutaneous tunneling of the temporary testing electrode significantly improving improves the success rate of subchronic sacral nerve modulation (SNM). World J Urol 2007, 25:607–612.CrossRefPubMed Sievert KD, Nagele U, Pannek J, et al.: Subcutaneous tunneling of the temporary testing electrode significantly improving improves the success rate of subchronic sacral nerve modulation (SNM). World J Urol 2007, 25:607–612.CrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference Scheepens WA, de Bie RA, Weil EH, van Kerrebroeck PE: Unilateral versus bilateral sacral neuromodulation in patients with chronic voiding dysfunction. J Urol 2002, 168:2046–2050.CrossRefPubMed Scheepens WA, de Bie RA, Weil EH, van Kerrebroeck PE: Unilateral versus bilateral sacral neuromodulation in patients with chronic voiding dysfunction. J Urol 2002, 168:2046–2050.CrossRefPubMed
15.
go back to reference Pham K, Guralnick ML, O’Connor RC: Unilateral versus bilateral stage I neuromodulator lead placement for the treatment of refractory voiding dysfunction. Neurourol Urodyn 2008, 27:779–781.CrossRefPubMed Pham K, Guralnick ML, O’Connor RC: Unilateral versus bilateral stage I neuromodulator lead placement for the treatment of refractory voiding dysfunction. Neurourol Urodyn 2008, 27:779–781.CrossRefPubMed
16.
go back to reference • Zabihi N, Mourtzinos A, Maher MG, et al.: Short-term results of bilateral S2–S4 sacral neuromodulation for the treatment of refractory interstitial cystitis, painful bladder syndrome, and chronic pelvic pain. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct 2008, 19:553–557. These very experienced authors provide the initial description of an alternative method for sacral neuromodulation and early results.CrossRefPubMed • Zabihi N, Mourtzinos A, Maher MG, et al.: Short-term results of bilateral S2–S4 sacral neuromodulation for the treatment of refractory interstitial cystitis, painful bladder syndrome, and chronic pelvic pain. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct 2008, 19:553–557. These very experienced authors provide the initial description of an alternative method for sacral neuromodulation and early results.CrossRefPubMed
17.
go back to reference Peters KM, Carey JM, Konstandt DB: Sacral neuromodulation for the treatment of refractory interstitial cystitis: outcomes based on technique. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct 2003, 14:223–228.CrossRefPubMed Peters KM, Carey JM, Konstandt DB: Sacral neuromodulation for the treatment of refractory interstitial cystitis: outcomes based on technique. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct 2003, 14:223–228.CrossRefPubMed
18.
go back to reference •• Powell CR, Kreder KJ: Long-term outcomes of urgency–frequency syndrome due to painful bladder syndrome treated with sacral neuromodulation and analysis of failures. J Urol 2010, 183:173–176. This article reports long-term outcomes with an excellent discussion of relevant contemporary literature.CrossRefPubMed •• Powell CR, Kreder KJ: Long-term outcomes of urgency–frequency syndrome due to painful bladder syndrome treated with sacral neuromodulation and analysis of failures. J Urol 2010, 183:173–176. This article reports long-term outcomes with an excellent discussion of relevant contemporary literature.CrossRefPubMed
19.
go back to reference Everaert K, Kerckhaert W, Caluwaerts H, et al.: A prospective randomized trial comparing the 1-stage with the 2-stage implantation of a pulse generator in patients with pelvic floor dysfunction selected for sacral nerve stimulation. Eur Urol 2004, 45:649–654.CrossRefPubMed Everaert K, Kerckhaert W, Caluwaerts H, et al.: A prospective randomized trial comparing the 1-stage with the 2-stage implantation of a pulse generator in patients with pelvic floor dysfunction selected for sacral nerve stimulation. Eur Urol 2004, 45:649–654.CrossRefPubMed
20.
go back to reference •• Siddiqui N, Amundsen C, Visco A, et al.: Cost-effectiveness of sacral neuromodulation versus intravesical botulinum A toxin for treatment of refractory urge incontinence. J Urol 2009, 182:2799–2804. The authors describe their Markov decision model comparing cost-effectiveness of neuromodulation and intravesical botulinum toxin therapy.CrossRefPubMed •• Siddiqui N, Amundsen C, Visco A, et al.: Cost-effectiveness of sacral neuromodulation versus intravesical botulinum A toxin for treatment of refractory urge incontinence. J Urol 2009, 182:2799–2804. The authors describe their Markov decision model comparing cost-effectiveness of neuromodulation and intravesical botulinum toxin therapy.CrossRefPubMed
21.
go back to reference Aboseif SR, Kim DH, Rieder JM, et al.: Sacral neuromodulation: cost considerations and clinical benefits. Urology 2007, 70:1069–1073.CrossRefPubMed Aboseif SR, Kim DH, Rieder JM, et al.: Sacral neuromodulation: cost considerations and clinical benefits. Urology 2007, 70:1069–1073.CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Contrasting the Percutaneous Nerve Evaluation Versus Staged Implantation in Sacral Neuromodulation
Authors
Chad Baxter
Ja-Hong Kim
Publication date
01-09-2010
Publisher
Current Science Inc.
Published in
Current Urology Reports / Issue 5/2010
Print ISSN: 1527-2737
Electronic ISSN: 1534-6285
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11934-010-0128-2

Other articles of this Issue 5/2010

Current Urology Reports 5/2010 Go to the issue