Skip to main content
Top
Published in: EJNMMI Research 1/2013

Open Access 01-12-2013 | Original research

Contrast-noise-ratio (CNR) analysis and optimisation of breast-specific gamma imaging (BSGI) acquisition protocols

Authors: Dennis Dieckens, Jules Lavalaye, Leo Romijn, Jan Habraken

Published in: EJNMMI Research | Issue 1/2013

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Breast cancer is one of the most prevalent forms of cancer in women. Breast-specific gamma imaging (BSGI) is a diagnostic imaging method that uses sestamibi-labelled 99Tc and a dedicated gamma camera to localize malignant lesions in breast tissue. The aim of this study is to investigate if the current acquisition protocol for BSGI at our hospital is optimized for the detection of lesions in our patients.

Methods

We analyzed patient data and performed a phantom study with a Dilon 6800 gamma camera. The patient data were collected from a group of 13 patients (740 MBq 99mTc-sestamibi, four views per patient were dynamically acquired with a frame duration of 30 s per frame and a total acquisition time of 8 min per view). Reduced-time static images were created, and contrast-to-noise ratios of identified hotspots were determined for different acquisition times. For the phantom study, we used a contrast detail phantom to investigate the contrast and resolution properties, within the range of relevant clinical acquisition parameters. The phantom was filled with a concentration of 80 MBq in 500 ml of water, and we dynamically acquired frames for a total acquisition time of 60 min using a general purpose (GP) collimator. To compare the GP collimator with the high-resolution collimator, a second acquisition was made for both collimators with a total acquisition time of 16 min.

Results

The initial analysis of BSGI scans of the 13 patients showed that a dose reduction by a factor of 3 would not have reduced the number of observable hotspots in each of the acquired views. However, a subsequent systematic analysis of our protocol with a contrast-detail phantom showed that dose reduction results in a lower observability of hotspots, whereas increased doses resulted in a higher observability.

Conclusion

We believe that the results of our phantom study are relevant for clinical practice and that further dose reduction cannot be recommended for the BSGI exams at our hospital and that an increase of the administered activity should be considered.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference Bluemke D, Gatsonis C, Chen M, DeAngelis G, DeBruhl N, Harms S, Heywang-Köbrunner SH, Hylton N, Kuhl CK, Lehman C, Pisano ED, Causer P, Schnitt SJ, Smazal SF, Stelling CB, Weatherall PT, Schnall MD: Magnetic resonance imaging of the breast prior to biopsy.JAMA 2004,292(22):2735–2742. + 10.1001/jama.292.22.2735CrossRefPubMed Bluemke D, Gatsonis C, Chen M, DeAngelis G, DeBruhl N, Harms S, Heywang-Köbrunner SH, Hylton N, Kuhl CK, Lehman C, Pisano ED, Causer P, Schnitt SJ, Smazal SF, Stelling CB, Weatherall PT, Schnall MD: Magnetic resonance imaging of the breast prior to biopsy.JAMA 2004,292(22):2735–2742. + 10.1001/jama.292.22.2735CrossRefPubMed
2.
go back to reference Jones EA, Phan TD, Blanchard DA, Miley A: Breast-specific γ-imaging: molecular imaging of the breast using 99mTc-sestamibi and a small-field-of-view γ-camera.J Nucl Med Technol 2009, 37: 201–205. 10.2967/jnmt.109.063537CrossRefPubMed Jones EA, Phan TD, Blanchard DA, Miley A: Breast-specific γ-imaging: molecular imaging of the breast using 99mTc-sestamibi and a small-field-of-view γ-camera.J Nucl Med Technol 2009, 37: 201–205. 10.2967/jnmt.109.063537CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Brem RF, Rapelyea JA, Zisman G, Montashemi K, Raub J, Teal CB, Majewski S, Welch BL: Occult breast cancer: scintimammography with high-resolution breast-specific gamma camera in women at high risk for breast cancer.Radiology 2005, 237: 274–280. 10.1148/radiol.2371040758CrossRefPubMed Brem RF, Rapelyea JA, Zisman G, Montashemi K, Raub J, Teal CB, Majewski S, Welch BL: Occult breast cancer: scintimammography with high-resolution breast-specific gamma camera in women at high risk for breast cancer.Radiology 2005, 237: 274–280. 10.1148/radiol.2371040758CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Schillaci O, Buscombe JR: Breast scintigraphy today: indications and limitations.Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2004, 31: S35-S45. 10.1007/s00259-004-1525-xCrossRefPubMed Schillaci O, Buscombe JR: Breast scintigraphy today: indications and limitations.Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2004, 31: S35-S45. 10.1007/s00259-004-1525-xCrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Hendrick RE: Radiation doses and cancer risks from breast imaging studies.Radiology 2010, 257: 246–253. 10.1148/radiol.10100570CrossRefPubMed Hendrick RE: Radiation doses and cancer risks from breast imaging studies.Radiology 2010, 257: 246–253. 10.1148/radiol.10100570CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Hruska CB, Weinmann AL, O’Connor MK: Proof of concept for low-dose molecular breast imaging with a dual-head CZT gamma camera. Part I. Evaluation in phantoms.Med Phys 2012, 39: 3466. 10.1118/1.4718665CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Hruska CB, Weinmann AL, O’Connor MK: Proof of concept for low-dose molecular breast imaging with a dual-head CZT gamma camera. Part I. Evaluation in phantoms.Med Phys 2012, 39: 3466. 10.1118/1.4718665CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
7.
go back to reference Hruska CB, Weinmann AL, Skjerseth CMT, Wagenaar EM, Conners AL, Tortorelli CL, Maxwell RW, Rhodes DJ, O’Connor MK: Proof of concept for low-dose molecular breast imaging with a dual-head CZT gamma camera. Part II. Evaluation in patients.Med Phys 2012, 39: 3476. 10.1118/1.4719959CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Hruska CB, Weinmann AL, Skjerseth CMT, Wagenaar EM, Conners AL, Tortorelli CL, Maxwell RW, Rhodes DJ, O’Connor MK: Proof of concept for low-dose molecular breast imaging with a dual-head CZT gamma camera. Part II. Evaluation in patients.Med Phys 2012, 39: 3476. 10.1118/1.4719959CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
8.
go back to reference Goldsmith SJ, Parsons W, Guiberteau MJ, Stern LH, Lanzkowsky L, Weigert J, Heston TF, Jones E, Buscombe J, Stabin MG: SNM practice guideline for breast scintigraphy with breast-specific g-cameras 1.0.J Nucl Med Technol 2010, 38: 219–224. 10.2967/jnmt.110.082271CrossRefPubMed Goldsmith SJ, Parsons W, Guiberteau MJ, Stern LH, Lanzkowsky L, Weigert J, Heston TF, Jones E, Buscombe J, Stabin MG: SNM practice guideline for breast scintigraphy with breast-specific g-cameras 1.0.J Nucl Med Technol 2010, 38: 219–224. 10.2967/jnmt.110.082271CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference EANM: Breast scintigraphy with breast specific gamma cameras 1.0. 2010. EANM: Breast scintigraphy with breast specific gamma cameras 1.0. 2010.
10.
go back to reference Moré MJ, Goodale PJ, Majewski S, Williams MB: Evaluation of gamma cameras for use in dedicated breast imaging.IEEE Trans Nucl Sci 2006, 53: 2675–2679.CrossRef Moré MJ, Goodale PJ, Majewski S, Williams MB: Evaluation of gamma cameras for use in dedicated breast imaging.IEEE Trans Nucl Sci 2006, 53: 2675–2679.CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Cherry SR, Phelps ME, Sorenson JA: Physics in Nuclear Medicine. Philadelphia: Saunders; 2003. Cherry SR, Phelps ME, Sorenson JA: Physics in Nuclear Medicine. Philadelphia: Saunders; 2003.
Metadata
Title
Contrast-noise-ratio (CNR) analysis and optimisation of breast-specific gamma imaging (BSGI) acquisition protocols
Authors
Dennis Dieckens
Jules Lavalaye
Leo Romijn
Jan Habraken
Publication date
01-12-2013
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
EJNMMI Research / Issue 1/2013
Electronic ISSN: 2191-219X
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/2191-219X-3-21

Other articles of this Issue 1/2013

EJNMMI Research 1/2013 Go to the issue