Skip to main content
Top
Published in: BMC Public Health 1/2019

Open Access 01-12-2019 | Contraception | Research article

Trends in utilisation and inequality in the use of reproductive health services in Sub-Saharan Africa

Author: Gordon Abekah-Nkrumah

Published in: BMC Public Health | Issue 1/2019

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

The paper argues that unlike the income literature, the public health literature has not paid much attention to the distribution of substantial improvements in health outcomes over the last decade or more, especially, in the Sub-Saharan African (SSA) context. Thus, the paper examines current levels of utilisation, changes in utilisation as well as inequality in utilisation of reproductive health services over the last 10 years in SSA.

Methods

The paper uses two rounds of Demographic and Health Survey (DHS) data from 30 SSA countries (latest round) and 21 countries (earlier round) to compute simple frequencies, cross-tabulated frequencies and concentration indices for health facility deliveries, skilled delivery assistance, 4+ antenatal visits and use of modern contraceptives.

Results

The results confirm the fact that utilisation of the selected reproductive health services have improved substantially over the last 10 year in several SSA countries. However, current levels of inequality in the use of reproductive health services are high in many countries. Interestingly, Guinea’s pro-poor inequality in health facility delivery and skilled attendance at birth changed to pro-rich inequality, with the reverse being true in the case of use of modern contraceptives for Ghana, Malawi and Rawanda. The good news however is that in a lot of countries, the use of reproductive health services has increased while inequality has decreased within the period under study.

Conclusion

The paper argue that whiles income levels may play a key role in explaining the differences in utilisation and the levels of inequality, indepth studies may be needed to explain the reason for differential improvements and stagnation or deterioration in different countries. In this way, best practices from better performing countries can be documented and adapted by poor performing countries to improve their situation.
Footnotes
1
The countries and respective years for data collection are Angola- 2016, Benin- 2012, Burkina Faso- 2010, Burundi- 2010, Cameroon- 2011, Chad- 2015, Cote de’ Ivoire- 2012, Comoros- 2012, Congo- 2012, Democratic Republic of Congo- 2014, Ethiopia- 2016, Gabon- 2012, Gambia- 2013, Ghana- 2014, Guinea- 2012, Kenya- 2014, Lesotho- 2014, Liberia- 2013, Malawi- 2016, Mali- 2013, Namibia- 2013, Niger- 2012, Nigeria- 2013, Rwanda- 2015, Senegal- 2016, Sierra Leone- 2013, Tanzania- 2016, Togo- 2014, Zambia- 2014 and Zimbabwe- 2014.
 
2
The following are the 20 countries used for the change estimates Benin (2001–2012), Burkina-Faso (98–2010), Cameroon (1998–2011), Chad (2004–2015), CIV (1998–2012), Ethiopia (2005–2016), Gabon (2000–2012), Ghana (2003–2014), Guinea (1999–2012), Kenya (2003–2014), Lesotho (2004–2014), Malawi (2004–2016), Mali (2001–2013), Namibia (2000–2013), Niger (1998–2012), Nigeria (2003–2013), Rwanda (2005–2015), Senegal (2005–2016), Togo (1998–2014), Zambia (2002–2014), Zimbabwe (1999–2015)
 
3
What is considered as modern contraception as per this paper include: pill, UID, injections, diaphragm, jelly, foam, condoms, female sterilisation and Norplant.
 
Literature
1.
go back to reference Dollar D, Kleineberg T, Kraay A. Growth still is good for the poor. Worldbank Policy Research Working Paper 6568. Development Research Group. 2013 Dollar D, Kleineberg T, Kraay A. Growth still is good for the poor. Worldbank Policy Research Working Paper 6568. Development Research Group. 2013
2.
go back to reference Fosu AK. Growth, inequality, and poverty reduction in developing countries: recent global evidence. Res Econ. 2017;71(2):306-36.CrossRef Fosu AK. Growth, inequality, and poverty reduction in developing countries: recent global evidence. Res Econ. 2017;71(2):306-36.CrossRef
3.
go back to reference Alvaredo F, Chancel L, Piketty T, Saez E, Zucman G, editors. World inequality report 2018. Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, Cambridge Massachusetts; 2018. Alvaredo F, Chancel L, Piketty T, Saez E, Zucman G, editors. World inequality report 2018. Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, Cambridge Massachusetts; 2018.
4.
go back to reference Klugman, J. Human Development Report 2010. The Real Wealth of Nations: Pathways to Human Development. United Nations Development Programme; 2010. Klugman, J. Human Development Report 2010. The Real Wealth of Nations: Pathways to Human Development. United Nations Development Programme; 2010.
5.
go back to reference UNDP. Human Development Report 2011: Sustainability and equity: a better future for Al. Sustain. Equity A better Futur. all. 2011. UNDP. Human Development Report 2011: Sustainability and equity: a better future for Al. Sustain. Equity A better Futur. all. 2011.
6.
go back to reference Sembene D. Poverty, growth, and inequality in sub-Saharan Africa: did the walk match the talk under the PRSP approach? IMF work. Pap. WP/15/122. Washington DC: International Monetary Fund; 2015. Sembene D. Poverty, growth, and inequality in sub-Saharan Africa: did the walk match the talk under the PRSP approach? IMF work. Pap. WP/15/122. Washington DC: International Monetary Fund; 2015.
7.
go back to reference Okojie C, Shimeles A. Inequality in sub-Saharan Africa: a synthesis of recent research on the levels, trends, effects and determinants of inequality in its different dimensions. London: The Inter-Regional Inequality Facility. Overseas Development Institute; 2006. Okojie C, Shimeles A. Inequality in sub-Saharan Africa: a synthesis of recent research on the levels, trends, effects and determinants of inequality in its different dimensions. London: The Inter-Regional Inequality Facility. Overseas Development Institute; 2006.
8.
go back to reference Ferreira FH, Ravallion M. Global poverty and inequality: a review of the evidence. Policy Research Working paper 4623. Development research Group. Washington DC: The World Bank; 2008.CrossRef Ferreira FH, Ravallion M. Global poverty and inequality: a review of the evidence. Policy Research Working paper 4623. Development research Group. Washington DC: The World Bank; 2008.CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Bigsten A, Shimeles A. Prospects for ‘Pro-poor’Growth in Africa. WIDER Conf “Inequality, Poverty Hum Well-Being”, Helsinki, Finl; 2003. p. 30–1. Bigsten A, Shimeles A. Prospects for ‘Pro-poor’Growth in Africa. WIDER Conf “Inequality, Poverty Hum Well-Being”, Helsinki, Finl; 2003. p. 30–1.
10.
go back to reference Bhorat H, Naidoo K, Pillay K. Growth, poverty and inequality interactions in Africa: An overview of key issues. Unpublished mimeograph. University of Cape Town, Development Policy Research Unit Cape Town, South Africa Bhorat H, Naidoo K, Pillay K. Growth, poverty and inequality interactions in Africa: An overview of key issues. Unpublished mimeograph. University of Cape Town, Development Policy Research Unit Cape Town, South Africa
11.
go back to reference Cornia GA, Martorano B. Building the integrated inequality database and the seven sins of inequality measurement in Sub-Saharan Africa. Universita’degli Studi di Firenze, Dipartimento di Scienze per l’Economia e l’Impresa; 2017. Cornia GA, Martorano B. Building the integrated inequality database and the seven sins of inequality measurement in Sub-Saharan Africa. Universita’degli Studi di Firenze, Dipartimento di Scienze per l’Economia e l’Impresa; 2017.
12.
go back to reference ISSC, IDS and UNESCO. World social science report 2016. Challenging inequalities: Pathways to a just world. 2016. Paris: UNESCO Publishing. ISSC, IDS and UNESCO. World social science report 2016. Challenging inequalities: Pathways to a just world. 2016. Paris: UNESCO Publishing.
14.
go back to reference Unicef WHO and World Bank. Levels and trends in child malnutrition: UNICEF, WHO and World Bank Group joint child malnutrition estimates. UNICEF, WHO and World Bank. 2015 Ed. Unicef WHO and World Bank. Levels and trends in child malnutrition: UNICEF, WHO and World Bank Group joint child malnutrition estimates. UNICEF, WHO and World Bank. 2015 Ed.
15.
go back to reference United Nations. Trends in contraceptive use worldwide 2015. Contraception. United Nations, Department of Economic and Social Affairs, Population Divison; 2015. United Nations. Trends in contraceptive use worldwide 2015. Contraception. United Nations, Department of Economic and Social Affairs, Population Divison; 2015.
16.
go back to reference Udo IE, Doctor HV. Trends in health facility births in sub-Saharan Africa: an analysis of lessons learned under the millennium development goal framework. Afr J Reprod Health. 2016;20(3):108–17.PubMedCrossRef Udo IE, Doctor HV. Trends in health facility births in sub-Saharan Africa: an analysis of lessons learned under the millennium development goal framework. Afr J Reprod Health. 2016;20(3):108–17.PubMedCrossRef
18.
go back to reference Uthman OA. Using extended concentration and achievement indices to study socioeconomic inequality in chronic childhood malnutrition: the case of Nigeria. Int J Equity Health. 2009;8:22.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Uthman OA. Using extended concentration and achievement indices to study socioeconomic inequality in chronic childhood malnutrition: the case of Nigeria. Int J Equity Health. 2009;8:22.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
19.
go back to reference Zere E, Oluwole D, Kirigia JM, Mwikisa CN, Mbeeli T. Inequities in skilled attendance at birth in Namibia: a decomposition analysis. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2011;11:34.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Zere E, Oluwole D, Kirigia JM, Mwikisa CN, Mbeeli T. Inequities in skilled attendance at birth in Namibia: a decomposition analysis. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2011;11:34.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
20.
22.
go back to reference Nkonki LL, Chopra M, Doherty TM, Jackson D, Robberstad B. Explaining household socio-economic related child health inequalities using multiple methods in three diverse settings in South Africa. Int J Equity Heal. 2011;10:13.CrossRef Nkonki LL, Chopra M, Doherty TM, Jackson D, Robberstad B. Explaining household socio-economic related child health inequalities using multiple methods in three diverse settings in South Africa. Int J Equity Heal. 2011;10:13.CrossRef
23.
go back to reference Boerma T, Requejo J, Victora CG, Amouzou A, George A, Agyepong I, et al. Countdown to 2030: tracking progress towards universal coverage for reproductive, maternal, newborn, and child health. Lancet Elsevier. 2018;391:1538–48.CrossRef Boerma T, Requejo J, Victora CG, Amouzou A, George A, Agyepong I, et al. Countdown to 2030: tracking progress towards universal coverage for reproductive, maternal, newborn, and child health. Lancet Elsevier. 2018;391:1538–48.CrossRef
24.
go back to reference Hogan DR, Stevens GA, Hosseinpoor AR, Boerma T. Monitoring universal health coverage within the sustainable development goals: development and baseline data for an index of essential health services. Lancet Glob Heal Elsevier. 2018;6:e152–68.CrossRef Hogan DR, Stevens GA, Hosseinpoor AR, Boerma T. Monitoring universal health coverage within the sustainable development goals: development and baseline data for an index of essential health services. Lancet Glob Heal Elsevier. 2018;6:e152–68.CrossRef
25.
go back to reference Hosseinpoor AR, Victora CG, Bergen N, Barros AJD, Boerma T. Towards universal health coverage: the role of within-country wealth-related inequality in 28 countries in sub-Saharan Africa. Bull world health organ. SciELO Public Health. 2011;89:881–9. Hosseinpoor AR, Victora CG, Bergen N, Barros AJD, Boerma T. Towards universal health coverage: the role of within-country wealth-related inequality in 28 countries in sub-Saharan Africa. Bull world health organ. SciELO Public Health. 2011;89:881–9.
26.
go back to reference Hosseinpoor AR, Williams JAS, Itani L, Chatterji S. Socioeconomic inequality in domains of health: results from the World Health Surveys. BMC Public Health BioMed Central. 2012;12:198.CrossRef Hosseinpoor AR, Williams JAS, Itani L, Chatterji S. Socioeconomic inequality in domains of health: results from the World Health Surveys. BMC Public Health BioMed Central. 2012;12:198.CrossRef
27.
go back to reference World Health Organization (WHO). Health inequities in the African Region of the World Health Organization: magnitudes, trends and sources. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2010. World Health Organization (WHO). Health inequities in the African Region of the World Health Organization: magnitudes, trends and sources. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2010.
28.
go back to reference Li Q, Rimon JG. A demographic dividend of the FP2020 Initiative and the SDG reproductive health target: Case studies of India and Nigeria. Gates open Res. 2018;2:11 Gates Foundation-Open Access.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Li Q, Rimon JG. A demographic dividend of the FP2020 Initiative and the SDG reproductive health target: Case studies of India and Nigeria. Gates open Res. 2018;2:11 Gates Foundation-Open Access.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
29.
go back to reference Singh S, Darroch JE, Vlassoff M, Nadeau J. Adding it up. The benefits of investing in sexual and reproductive health care. New York New York Alan Guttmacher Institute [AGI] 2003; 2003. Singh S, Darroch JE, Vlassoff M, Nadeau J. Adding it up. The benefits of investing in sexual and reproductive health care. New York New York Alan Guttmacher Institute [AGI] 2003; 2003.
30.
go back to reference Greene ME, Merrick T. Poverty reduction: does reproductive health matter? Washington: World Bank; 2005. Report No.: 33399 Greene ME, Merrick T. Poverty reduction: does reproductive health matter? Washington: World Bank; 2005. Report No.: 33399
31.
go back to reference Gwatkin DR, Rutstein S, Johnson K, Suliman E, Wagstaff A, Amouzou A. Socio-economic differences in health, nutrition, and population within developing countries, vol. 287. Washington: World Bank; 2007. Gwatkin DR, Rutstein S, Johnson K, Suliman E, Wagstaff A, Amouzou A. Socio-economic differences in health, nutrition, and population within developing countries, vol. 287. Washington: World Bank; 2007.
32.
go back to reference Corsi DJ, Neuman M, Finlay JE, Subramanian SV. Demographic and health surveys: a profile. Int J Epidemiol. 2012;41:1602–13 Oxford University Press.PubMedCrossRef Corsi DJ, Neuman M, Finlay JE, Subramanian SV. Demographic and health surveys: a profile. Int J Epidemiol. 2012;41:1602–13 Oxford University Press.PubMedCrossRef
33.
go back to reference Abekah-Nkrumah G. Spatial variation in the use of reproductive health services over time: a decomposition analysis. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. BioMed Central. 2018;18:63.CrossRef Abekah-Nkrumah G. Spatial variation in the use of reproductive health services over time: a decomposition analysis. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. BioMed Central. 2018;18:63.CrossRef
35.
go back to reference World Health Organization (WHO). Antenatal Care: Report of a Technical Working Group. 31 October-4 November. Geneva: Swithzerland World Health Organisation; 1994. World Health Organization (WHO). Antenatal Care: Report of a Technical Working Group. 31 October-4 November. Geneva: Swithzerland World Health Organisation; 1994.
36.
go back to reference World Health Organization (WHO). Mother-baby package: implementing safe motherhood in countries: practical guide. Geneva: Maternal Health and Safe Motherhood Programme Division of Family, Health World Health OrganisationWorld Health Organization; 1996. World Health Organization (WHO). Mother-baby package: implementing safe motherhood in countries: practical guide. Geneva: Maternal Health and Safe Motherhood Programme Division of Family, Health World Health OrganisationWorld Health Organization; 1996.
37.
go back to reference World Health Organization (WHO). WHO recommendations on antenatal care for a positive pregnancy experience. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2016. World Health Organization (WHO). WHO recommendations on antenatal care for a positive pregnancy experience. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2016.
38.
go back to reference Wagstaff A, Van Doorslaer E, Watanabe N. On decomposing the causes of health sector inequalities with an application to malnutrition inequalities in Vietnam. J Econom. 2003;112:207–23.CrossRef Wagstaff A, Van Doorslaer E, Watanabe N. On decomposing the causes of health sector inequalities with an application to malnutrition inequalities in Vietnam. J Econom. 2003;112:207–23.CrossRef
39.
go back to reference Wagstaff A, Watanabe N. Socioeconomic inequalities in Child Malnutrition in the Developing World. Washington: World Bank; 2000. World Bank Policy Res. Work. Pap. 2434 Wagstaff A, Watanabe N. Socioeconomic inequalities in Child Malnutrition in the Developing World. Washington: World Bank; 2000. World Bank Policy Res. Work. Pap. 2434
40.
go back to reference Lindelow M. Sometimes more equal than others: how health inequalities depend on the choice of welfare indicators. Health Econ. 2006;15(3):263–79.PubMedCrossRef Lindelow M. Sometimes more equal than others: how health inequalities depend on the choice of welfare indicators. Health Econ. 2006;15(3):263–79.PubMedCrossRef
41.
go back to reference Barros AJD, Victora CG. Measuring coverage in MNCH: determining and interpreting inequalities in coverage of maternal, newborn, and child health interventions. PLoS Med. 2013;10:e1001390 Public Library of Science.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Barros AJD, Victora CG. Measuring coverage in MNCH: determining and interpreting inequalities in coverage of maternal, newborn, and child health interventions. PLoS Med. 2013;10:e1001390 Public Library of Science.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
42.
go back to reference Wagstaff A. The bounds of the concentration index when the variable of interest is binary, with an application to immunization inequality. Health Econ Wiley Online Library. 2005;14:429–32. Wagstaff A. The bounds of the concentration index when the variable of interest is binary, with an application to immunization inequality. Health Econ Wiley Online Library. 2005;14:429–32.
43.
go back to reference Erreygers G. Correcting the concentration index. J Health Econ Elsevier. 2009;28:504–15.CrossRef Erreygers G. Correcting the concentration index. J Health Econ Elsevier. 2009;28:504–15.CrossRef
44.
go back to reference Mekonnen Y, Mekonnen A. Factors influencing the use of maternal healthcare services in Ethiopia. J Health Popul Nutr. 2003;21(4):374–82.PubMed Mekonnen Y, Mekonnen A. Factors influencing the use of maternal healthcare services in Ethiopia. J Health Popul Nutr. 2003;21(4):374–82.PubMed
45.
go back to reference Overbosch GB, Nsowah-Nuamah NNN, van den Boom GJM, Damnyag L. Determinants of antenatal care use in Ghana. J Afr Econ. 2004;13:277–301.CrossRef Overbosch GB, Nsowah-Nuamah NNN, van den Boom GJM, Damnyag L. Determinants of antenatal care use in Ghana. J Afr Econ. 2004;13:277–301.CrossRef
46.
go back to reference Medina L, Jonelis MAW, Cangul M. The informal economy in sub-Saharan Africa: size and determinants. International Monetary Fund: Washinton DC; 2017. Medina L, Jonelis MAW, Cangul M. The informal economy in sub-Saharan Africa: size and determinants. International Monetary Fund: Washinton DC; 2017.
47.
go back to reference Heintz J. Informality, inclusiveness, and economic growth: an overview of key issues. Amherst: Univ Massachusetts; 2012. Heintz J. Informality, inclusiveness, and economic growth: an overview of key issues. Amherst: Univ Massachusetts; 2012.
48.
go back to reference Zere E, Tumusiime P, Walker O, Kirigia J, Mwikisa C, Mbeeli T. Inequities in utilization of maternal health interventions in Namibia: implications for progress towards MDG 5 targets. Int J Equity Health. 2010;9:16.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Zere E, Tumusiime P, Walker O, Kirigia J, Mwikisa C, Mbeeli T. Inequities in utilization of maternal health interventions in Namibia: implications for progress towards MDG 5 targets. Int J Equity Health. 2010;9:16.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
49.
go back to reference Hosseinpoor AR, Van Doorslaer E, Speybroeck N, Naghavi M, Mohammad K, Majdzadeh R, et al. Decomposing socioeconomic inequality in infant mortality in Iran. Int J Epidemiol. 2006;35:1211–9.PubMedCrossRef Hosseinpoor AR, Van Doorslaer E, Speybroeck N, Naghavi M, Mohammad K, Majdzadeh R, et al. Decomposing socioeconomic inequality in infant mortality in Iran. Int J Epidemiol. 2006;35:1211–9.PubMedCrossRef
50.
go back to reference Victora CG, Joseph G, Silva ICM, Maia FS, Vaughan JP, Barros FC, et al. The inverse equity hypothesis: analyses of institutional deliveries in 286 national surveys. Am J Public Health. 2018;108:464–71 American Public Health Association.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Victora CG, Joseph G, Silva ICM, Maia FS, Vaughan JP, Barros FC, et al. The inverse equity hypothesis: analyses of institutional deliveries in 286 national surveys. Am J Public Health. 2018;108:464–71 American Public Health Association.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
Metadata
Title
Trends in utilisation and inequality in the use of reproductive health services in Sub-Saharan Africa
Author
Gordon Abekah-Nkrumah
Publication date
01-12-2019
Publisher
BioMed Central
Keyword
Contraception
Published in
BMC Public Health / Issue 1/2019
Electronic ISSN: 1471-2458
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-019-7865-z

Other articles of this Issue 1/2019

BMC Public Health 1/2019 Go to the issue