Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Trials 1/2022

Open Access 01-12-2022 | Contraception | Study protocol

Comparison between two methods of the immediate post-placental insertion of copper intrauterine device in vaginal birth—a protocol for a randomized clinical trial

Authors: Thuany Bento Herculano, Fernanda Garanhani Surita, Cássia Raquel Teatin Juliato, Patrícia Moretti Rehder

Published in: Trials | Issue 1/2022

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Ensuring effective and long-term contraception in the immediate postpartum period is an effective strategy for reducing unplanned pregnancies. In the meantime, the intrauterine device (IUD) is an excellent option. The aim of our study was to evaluate the best way to insert post-placental IUDs in the immediate postpartum period. Discomfort during insertion, expulsion rate, uterine perforation rate, and proper positioning 40–60 days postpartum will be analyzed.

Methods

Randomized, controlled, open clinical trial. The study group will be composed of women between 18 and 43 years old who are admitted for vaginal birth at the Women’s Hospital of the State University of Campinas and who wish to use the IUD as a contraceptive method. The sample will be randomized into two insertion groups: manual and forceps. To calculate the sample size, the method of comparing the proportion between 2 groups was used, setting the level of significance alpha at 5% (alpha=0.05) and the power of the sample at 80% (beta=0.20). Based on the results, it was estimated that a sample of n=186 women (n=93 with manual insertion and n=93 with forceps) would be representative for comparison of expulsion between the 2 groups. All participants will undergo a postpartum consultation 40–60 days after birth with transvaginal ultrasound to assess the proper placement of the IUD.

Discussion

Insertion of an IUD in the immediate postpartum period has been considered a good option to increase coverage and access to contraception, and its benefit outweighs the inconvenience of a higher expulsion rate.

Trial registration

This study was approved by the Ethics and Research Commission of UNICAMP (CAAE: 50497321.4.0000.5404) and the Brazilian Registry of Clinical Trials (REBEC) (number RBR-4j62jv6). This is the first version of the study protocol approved on 11/12/2021 prior to the start of participant recruitment.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference Conde-Agudelo A, Rosas-Bermudez A, Castaño F, Norton MH. Effects of birth spacing on maternal, perinatal, infant, and child health: a systematic review of causal mechanisms. Stud Fam Plann. 2012;43:9.CrossRef Conde-Agudelo A, Rosas-Bermudez A, Castaño F, Norton MH. Effects of birth spacing on maternal, perinatal, infant, and child health: a systematic review of causal mechanisms. Stud Fam Plann. 2012;43:9.CrossRef
2.
go back to reference Conde-Agudelo A, Belizán JM, Lammers C. Maternal-perinatal morbidity and mortality associated with adolescent pregnancy in Latin America: cross-sectional study. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2005;192:342–9.CrossRef Conde-Agudelo A, Belizán JM, Lammers C. Maternal-perinatal morbidity and mortality associated with adolescent pregnancy in Latin America: cross-sectional study. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2005;192:342–9.CrossRef
3.
go back to reference DaVanzo J, Hale L, Razzaque A, Rahmand M. Effects of interpregnancy interval and outcome of the preceding pregnancy on pregnancy outcomes in MATLAB, Bangladesh. BJOG. 2007;114:1079–87.CrossRef DaVanzo J, Hale L, Razzaque A, Rahmand M. Effects of interpregnancy interval and outcome of the preceding pregnancy on pregnancy outcomes in MATLAB, Bangladesh. BJOG. 2007;114:1079–87.CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Cleland J, Bernstein S, Ezeh A, Faundes A, Glasier A, Innis J. Family planning: the unfinished agenda. Lancet. 2006;368:1810–27.CrossRef Cleland J, Bernstein S, Ezeh A, Faundes A, Glasier A, Innis J. Family planning: the unfinished agenda. Lancet. 2006;368:1810–27.CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Rossier C, Bradley SEK, Ross J, Winfrey W. Reassessing unmet need for family planning in the postpartum period. Stud Fam Plann. 2015;46(4):355–67.CrossRef Rossier C, Bradley SEK, Ross J, Winfrey W. Reassessing unmet need for family planning in the postpartum period. Stud Fam Plann. 2015;46(4):355–67.CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Surita FGC, Luz AG, Hsu LPR, Carvalho FHC, Brock MF, Nakamura MU. Outpatient care for pregnant and puerperal women during the COVID-19 pandemic. Rev Bras Ginecol Obstet. 2020;42(9):588–92.CrossRef Surita FGC, Luz AG, Hsu LPR, Carvalho FHC, Brock MF, Nakamura MU. Outpatient care for pregnant and puerperal women during the COVID-19 pandemic. Rev Bras Ginecol Obstet. 2020;42(9):588–92.CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Barbieri MM, Herculano TB, Dantas Silva A, Bahamondes L, Juliato CR, Surita FG. Acceptability of ENG-releasing subdermal implants among postpartum Brazilian young women during the COVID-19 pandemic. Int J Gynecol Obstet. 2021;00:1–7. Barbieri MM, Herculano TB, Dantas Silva A, Bahamondes L, Juliato CR, Surita FG. Acceptability of ENG-releasing subdermal implants among postpartum Brazilian young women during the COVID-19 pandemic. Int J Gynecol Obstet. 2021;00:1–7.
8.
go back to reference Echeverry G. Family planning in the immediate postpartum period. Stud Fam Plann. 1973;4(2):33–5.CrossRef Echeverry G. Family planning in the immediate postpartum period. Stud Fam Plann. 1973;4(2):33–5.CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Jackson E, Glaiser A. Return of ovulation and menses in postpartum nonlactating women: a systematic review. Obstet Gynecol. 2011;117:657–62.CrossRef Jackson E, Glaiser A. Return of ovulation and menses in postpartum nonlactating women: a systematic review. Obstet Gynecol. 2011;117:657–62.CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Sok C, Sanders JN, Salzman HM, Turok DK. Sexual behavior, satisfaction, contraceptive use among postpartum women. J Midwifery Women Health. 2016;61:158–65.CrossRef Sok C, Sanders JN, Salzman HM, Turok DK. Sexual behavior, satisfaction, contraceptive use among postpartum women. J Midwifery Women Health. 2016;61:158–65.CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Marangoni M Jr, Laporte M, Surita F, Kraft MB, Bahamondes L, Juliato CRT. One-year follow up on postplacental IUD insertion: a randomized clinical trial. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2021;00:1–8. Marangoni M Jr, Laporte M, Surita F, Kraft MB, Bahamondes L, Juliato CRT. One-year follow up on postplacental IUD insertion: a randomized clinical trial. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2021;00:1–8.
12.
go back to reference Kapp N, Curtis KM. Intrauterine device insertion during the postpartum period: a systematic review. Contraception. 2009;80:327–36.CrossRef Kapp N, Curtis KM. Intrauterine device insertion during the postpartum period: a systematic review. Contraception. 2009;80:327–36.CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Grimes DA, Lopez LM, Schulz KF, Van Vilet HAAM, Stanwood NL. Immediate postpartum insertion of intrauterine devices. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. 2010;5:1-8. Grimes DA, Lopez LM, Schulz KF, Van Vilet HAAM, Stanwood NL. Immediate postpartum insertion of intrauterine devices. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. 2010;5:1-8.
14.
go back to reference Hulley SB, Cummings SR, Browner WS, Grady DG, Newman TB. Designing Clinical Research. 3rd ed. Chapter 6. Philadelphia: Lippincott, Williams & Wilkins; 2007. p. 80–1. Hulley SB, Cummings SR, Browner WS, Grady DG, Newman TB. Designing Clinical Research. 3rd ed. Chapter 6. Philadelphia: Lippincott, Williams & Wilkins; 2007. p. 80–1.
15.
go back to reference Gurney EP, Sonalkar S, McAllister A, Sammel MD, Schreiber CA. Six-month expulsion of postplacental copper intrauterine devices placed after vaginal delivery. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2018;219(2):183.e1–9.CrossRef Gurney EP, Sonalkar S, McAllister A, Sammel MD, Schreiber CA. Six-month expulsion of postplacental copper intrauterine devices placed after vaginal delivery. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2018;219(2):183.e1–9.CrossRef
16.
go back to reference Chan AW, Tetzlaff JM, Altman DG, Laupacis A, Gøtzsche PC, Krleža-Jerić K, et al. SPIRIT 2013 statement: defining standard protocol items for clinical trials. Ann Intern Med. 2013;158(3):200–7.CrossRef Chan AW, Tetzlaff JM, Altman DG, Laupacis A, Gøtzsche PC, Krleža-Jerić K, et al. SPIRIT 2013 statement: defining standard protocol items for clinical trials. Ann Intern Med. 2013;158(3):200–7.CrossRef
17.
go back to reference Averbach SH, Ermias Y, Jeng G, Curtis KM, Whiteman MK, Berry-Bibee E, et al. Expulsion of intrauterine devices after postpartum placement by timing of placement, delivery type, and intrauterine device type: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2020;223(2):177–88.CrossRef Averbach SH, Ermias Y, Jeng G, Curtis KM, Whiteman MK, Berry-Bibee E, et al. Expulsion of intrauterine devices after postpartum placement by timing of placement, delivery type, and intrauterine device type: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2020;223(2):177–88.CrossRef
18.
go back to reference Makins A, Taghinejadi N, Sethi M, Machiyama K, Munganyizi P, Odongo E, et al. FIGO postpartum intrauterine device initiative: complication rates across six countries. Int J Gynecol Obstet. 2018;143(1):20–7.CrossRef Makins A, Taghinejadi N, Sethi M, Machiyama K, Munganyizi P, Odongo E, et al. FIGO postpartum intrauterine device initiative: complication rates across six countries. Int J Gynecol Obstet. 2018;143(1):20–7.CrossRef
19.
go back to reference Singh S, Das V, Agarwal A, Dewan R, Mittal P, Bhamrah R, et al. A dedicated postpartum intrauterine device inserter: pilot experience and proof of concept. Glob Health Sci Pract. 2016;4(1):132–40.CrossRef Singh S, Das V, Agarwal A, Dewan R, Mittal P, Bhamrah R, et al. A dedicated postpartum intrauterine device inserter: pilot experience and proof of concept. Glob Health Sci Pract. 2016;4(1):132–40.CrossRef
20.
go back to reference Blumenthal PD, Lerma K, Bhamrah R, Singh S. Comparative safety and efficacy of a dedicated postpartum IUD inserter versus forceps for immediate postpartum IUD insertion: a randomized trial. Contraception. 2018;98(3):215–9.CrossRef Blumenthal PD, Lerma K, Bhamrah R, Singh S. Comparative safety and efficacy of a dedicated postpartum IUD inserter versus forceps for immediate postpartum IUD insertion: a randomized trial. Contraception. 2018;98(3):215–9.CrossRef
21.
go back to reference Bahamondes L, Fernandes A, Monteiro I, Bahamondes MV. Long-acting reversible contraceptive (LARCs) methods. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynecol. 2020;66:28–40.CrossRef Bahamondes L, Fernandes A, Monteiro I, Bahamondes MV. Long-acting reversible contraceptive (LARCs) methods. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynecol. 2020;66:28–40.CrossRef
22.
go back to reference Laporte M, Becerra A, Castro L, et al. Evaluation of clinical performance when intrauterine devices are inserted by different categories of healthcare professional. Int J Gynecol Obstet. 2021;152(2):196–201.CrossRef Laporte M, Becerra A, Castro L, et al. Evaluation of clinical performance when intrauterine devices are inserted by different categories of healthcare professional. Int J Gynecol Obstet. 2021;152(2):196–201.CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Comparison between two methods of the immediate post-placental insertion of copper intrauterine device in vaginal birth—a protocol for a randomized clinical trial
Authors
Thuany Bento Herculano
Fernanda Garanhani Surita
Cássia Raquel Teatin Juliato
Patrícia Moretti Rehder
Publication date
01-12-2022
Publisher
BioMed Central
Keyword
Contraception
Published in
Trials / Issue 1/2022
Electronic ISSN: 1745-6215
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s13063-022-07041-x

Other articles of this Issue 1/2022

Trials 1/2022 Go to the issue