Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Trials 1/2015

Open Access 01-12-2015 | Study protocol

Continuous wound infiltration or epidural analgesia for pain prevention after hepato-pancreato-biliary surgery within an enhanced recovery program (POP-UP trial): study protocol for a randomized controlled trial

Authors: Timothy H. Mungroop, Denise P. Veelo, Olivier R. Busch, Susan van Dieren, Thomas M. van Gulik, Tom M. Karsten, Steve M. de Castro, Marc B. Godfried, Bram Thiel, Markus W. Hollmann, Philipp Lirk, Marc G. Besselink

Published in: Trials | Issue 1/2015

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Postoperative pain prevention is essential for the recovery of surgical patients. Continuous (thoracic) epidural analgesia (CEA) is routinely practiced for major abdominal surgery, but evidence is conflicting on its benefits in this setting. Potential disadvantages of epidural analgesia are a) perioperative hypotension, frequently requiring additional intravenous fluid boluses or prolonged use of vasopressors; b) relatively high failure rates, with periods of inadequate analgesia; and c) the risk of rare but serious, at times persistent, neurologic complications (hematoma and abscess). In recent years, continuous (subfascial) wound infiltration (CWI) plus patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) has been suggested as a safe and reliable alternative, which does not have the previously mentioned disadvantages, but evidence from multicenter trials targeting a specific surgical population is lacking. We hypothesize that CWI+PCA is equally as effective as CEA, without the mentioned disadvantages.

Methods/design

POP-UP is a randomized controlled noninferiority multicenter trial, recruiting adult patients scheduled for elective hepato-pancreato-biliary surgery via laparotomy in an enhanced recovery setting. A total of 102 patients are being randomly allocated to CWI+PCA or (P)CEA. Our primary endpoint is the Overall Benefit of Analgesic Score (OBAS), a composite endpoint of pain intensity, opioid-related adverse effects and patient satisfaction, during postoperative days 1 to 5. Secondary endpoints include length of the hospital stay, number of patients with severe pain, and the use of rescue medication.

Discussion

POP-UP is a pragmatic trial that will provide evidence of whether CWI+PCA is noninferior as compared to (P)CEA after elective hepato-pancreato-biliary surgery via laparotomy in an enhanced recovery setting. If this hypothesis is confirmed, this finding could contribute to more widespread implementation of this technique, especially when the described disadvantages of epidural analgesia are less often observed with CWI+PCA.

Trial registration

Netherlands Trial Register NTR4948 (registry date 2 January 2015).
Literature
1.
go back to reference Liu SS, Carpenter RL, Mackey DC, Thirlby RC, Rupp SM, Shine TS, et al. Effects of perioperative analgesic technique on rate of recovery after colon surgery. Anesthesiology. 1995;83:757–65.CrossRefPubMed Liu SS, Carpenter RL, Mackey DC, Thirlby RC, Rupp SM, Shine TS, et al. Effects of perioperative analgesic technique on rate of recovery after colon surgery. Anesthesiology. 1995;83:757–65.CrossRefPubMed
2.
go back to reference Werawatganon T, Charuluxananan S. WITHDRAWN: Patient controlled intravenous opioid analgesia versus continuous epidural analgesia for pain after intra-abdominal surgery. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013;3:Cd004088.PubMed Werawatganon T, Charuluxananan S. WITHDRAWN: Patient controlled intravenous opioid analgesia versus continuous epidural analgesia for pain after intra-abdominal surgery. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013;3:Cd004088.PubMed
3.
go back to reference Kehlet H, Wilkinson RC, Fischer HB, Camu F. PROSPECT: evidence-based, procedure-specific postoperative pain management. Best Pract Res Clin Anaesthesiol. 2007;21:149–59.CrossRefPubMed Kehlet H, Wilkinson RC, Fischer HB, Camu F. PROSPECT: evidence-based, procedure-specific postoperative pain management. Best Pract Res Clin Anaesthesiol. 2007;21:149–59.CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Kehlet H, Wilmore DW. Multimodal strategies to improve surgical outcome. Am J Surg. 2002;183:630–41.CrossRefPubMed Kehlet H, Wilmore DW. Multimodal strategies to improve surgical outcome. Am J Surg. 2002;183:630–41.CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Hughes MJ, Ventham NT, McNally S, Harrison E, Wigmore S. Analgesia after open abdominal surgery in the setting of enhanced recovery surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis. JAMA Surg. 2014;149:1224–30.CrossRefPubMed Hughes MJ, Ventham NT, McNally S, Harrison E, Wigmore S. Analgesia after open abdominal surgery in the setting of enhanced recovery surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis. JAMA Surg. 2014;149:1224–30.CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference McLeod G, Davies H, Munnoch N, Bannister J, MacRae W. Postoperative pain relief using thoracic epidural analgesia: outstanding success and disappointing failures. Anaesthesia. 2001;56:75–81.CrossRefPubMed McLeod G, Davies H, Munnoch N, Bannister J, MacRae W. Postoperative pain relief using thoracic epidural analgesia: outstanding success and disappointing failures. Anaesthesia. 2001;56:75–81.CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Ready LB. Acute pain: lessons learned from 25,000 patients. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 1999;24:499–505.PubMed Ready LB. Acute pain: lessons learned from 25,000 patients. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 1999;24:499–505.PubMed
8.
go back to reference Moen V, Dahlgren N, Irestedt L. Severe neurological complications after central neuraxial blockades in Sweden 1990-1999. Anesthesiology. 2004;101:950–9.CrossRefPubMed Moen V, Dahlgren N, Irestedt L. Severe neurological complications after central neuraxial blockades in Sweden 1990-1999. Anesthesiology. 2004;101:950–9.CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference van der Vyver M, Halpern S, Joseph G. Patient-controlled epidural analgesia versus continuous infusion for labour analgesia: a meta-analysis. Br J Anaesth. 2002;89:459–65.CrossRefPubMed van der Vyver M, Halpern S, Joseph G. Patient-controlled epidural analgesia versus continuous infusion for labour analgesia: a meta-analysis. Br J Anaesth. 2002;89:459–65.CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Wong-Lun-Hing EM, van Dam RM, Welsh FK, Wells JK, John TG, Cresswell AB, et al. Postoperative pain control using continuous i.m. bupivacaine infusion plus patient-controlled analgesia compared with epidural analgesia after major hepatectomy. HPB (Oxford). 2014;16:601–9.CrossRef Wong-Lun-Hing EM, van Dam RM, Welsh FK, Wells JK, John TG, Cresswell AB, et al. Postoperative pain control using continuous i.m. bupivacaine infusion plus patient-controlled analgesia compared with epidural analgesia after major hepatectomy. HPB (Oxford). 2014;16:601–9.CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Revie EJ, McKeown DW, Wilson JA, Garden OJ, Wigmore SJ. Randomized clinical trial of local infiltration plus patient-controlled opiate analgesia vs. epidural analgesia following liver resection surgery. HPB (Oxford). 2012;14:611–8.CrossRef Revie EJ, McKeown DW, Wilson JA, Garden OJ, Wigmore SJ. Randomized clinical trial of local infiltration plus patient-controlled opiate analgesia vs. epidural analgesia following liver resection surgery. HPB (Oxford). 2012;14:611–8.CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Kuper M, Gold SJ, Callow C, Quraishi T, King S, Mulreany A, et al. Intraoperative fluid management guided by oesophageal Doppler monitoring. BMJ. 2011;342:d3016.CrossRefPubMed Kuper M, Gold SJ, Callow C, Quraishi T, King S, Mulreany A, et al. Intraoperative fluid management guided by oesophageal Doppler monitoring. BMJ. 2011;342:d3016.CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference Lehmann N, Joshi GP, Dirkmann D, Weiss M, Gulur P, Peters J, et al. Development and longitudinal validation of the overall benefit of analgesia score: a simple multi-dimensional quality assessment instrument. Br J Anaesth. 2010;105:511–8.CrossRefPubMed Lehmann N, Joshi GP, Dirkmann D, Weiss M, Gulur P, Peters J, et al. Development and longitudinal validation of the overall benefit of analgesia score: a simple multi-dimensional quality assessment instrument. Br J Anaesth. 2010;105:511–8.CrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference Mather LE, Chand DH. Cardiotoxicity with modern local anaesthetics: is there a safer choice? Drugs. 2001;61:333–42.CrossRefPubMed Mather LE, Chand DH. Cardiotoxicity with modern local anaesthetics: is there a safer choice? Drugs. 2001;61:333–42.CrossRefPubMed
15.
go back to reference Ventham NT, Hughes M, O’Neill S, Johns N, Brady RR, Wigmore SJ. Systematic review and meta-analysis of continuous local anaesthetic wound infiltration versus epidural analgesia for postoperative pain following abdominal surgery. Br J Surg. 2013;100:1280–9.CrossRefPubMed Ventham NT, Hughes M, O’Neill S, Johns N, Brady RR, Wigmore SJ. Systematic review and meta-analysis of continuous local anaesthetic wound infiltration versus epidural analgesia for postoperative pain following abdominal surgery. Br J Surg. 2013;100:1280–9.CrossRefPubMed
16.
go back to reference Tilleul P, Aissou M, Bocquet F, Thiriat N, le Grelle O, Burke MJ, et al. Cost-effectiveness analysis comparing epidural, patient-controlled intravenous morphine, and continuous wound infiltration for postoperative pain management after open abdominal surgery. Br J Anaesth. 2012;108:998–1005.CrossRefPubMed Tilleul P, Aissou M, Bocquet F, Thiriat N, le Grelle O, Burke MJ, et al. Cost-effectiveness analysis comparing epidural, patient-controlled intravenous morphine, and continuous wound infiltration for postoperative pain management after open abdominal surgery. Br J Anaesth. 2012;108:998–1005.CrossRefPubMed
17.
go back to reference Forastiere E, Sofra M, Giannarelli D, Fabrizi L, Simone G. Effectiveness of continuous wound infusion of 0.5 % ropivacaine by On-Q pain relief system for postoperative pain management after open nephrectomy. Br J Anaesth. 2008;101:841–7.CrossRefPubMed Forastiere E, Sofra M, Giannarelli D, Fabrizi L, Simone G. Effectiveness of continuous wound infusion of 0.5 % ropivacaine by On-Q pain relief system for postoperative pain management after open nephrectomy. Br J Anaesth. 2008;101:841–7.CrossRefPubMed
18.
go back to reference Groenwold RH. For the critical reader: questions to ask about randomised trials. Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd. 2015;159:A9018.PubMed Groenwold RH. For the critical reader: questions to ask about randomised trials. Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd. 2015;159:A9018.PubMed
19.
go back to reference Bertoglio S, Fabiani F, Negri PD, Corcione A, Merlo DF, Cafiero F, et al. The postoperative analgesic efficacy of preperitoneal continuous wound infusion compared to epidural continuous infusion with local anesthetics after colorectal cancer surgery: a randomized controlled multicenter study. Anesth Analg. 2012;115:1442–50.CrossRefPubMed Bertoglio S, Fabiani F, Negri PD, Corcione A, Merlo DF, Cafiero F, et al. The postoperative analgesic efficacy of preperitoneal continuous wound infusion compared to epidural continuous infusion with local anesthetics after colorectal cancer surgery: a randomized controlled multicenter study. Anesth Analg. 2012;115:1442–50.CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Continuous wound infiltration or epidural analgesia for pain prevention after hepato-pancreato-biliary surgery within an enhanced recovery program (POP-UP trial): study protocol for a randomized controlled trial
Authors
Timothy H. Mungroop
Denise P. Veelo
Olivier R. Busch
Susan van Dieren
Thomas M. van Gulik
Tom M. Karsten
Steve M. de Castro
Marc B. Godfried
Bram Thiel
Markus W. Hollmann
Philipp Lirk
Marc G. Besselink
Publication date
01-12-2015
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
Trials / Issue 1/2015
Electronic ISSN: 1745-6215
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s13063-015-1075-5

Other articles of this Issue 1/2015

Trials 1/2015 Go to the issue