Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Cancer Chemotherapy and Pharmacology 4/2017

01-10-2017 | Short Communication

Continuous low plasma concentrations of everolimus provides equivalent efficacy to oral daily dosing in mouse xenograft models of human cancer

Authors: Laurent Laborde, Fatos Oz, Mitko Ristov, Daniel Guthy, Dario Sterker, Paul McSheehy

Published in: Cancer Chemotherapy and Pharmacology | Issue 4/2017

Login to get access

Abstract

Purpose

Everolimus is a drug used successfully in a number of different oncology indications, but significant on-target toxicities exist. We explored the possibility of improving the therapeutic index (TI) by studying alternative means of administering the drug based upon low continuous dosing.

Methods

All studies were performed using naïve nude mice or nude mice bearing s.c. human renal 786-O tumours or human breast MDA-MB-468 tumours. Everolimus was administered via a standard emulsion, either i.v., p.o., i.p., s.c., or via s.c. osmotic mini-pumps (MP) or via poly-lactic-co-glycolic (PLGA)-microparticles (PLGA-µP) prepared from everolimus powder injected s.c. Total-drug levels in blood, plasma or tissues were quantified ex vivo by LC–MS/MS. Efficacy studies were performed over 2–3 weeks and toxicity assessed by changes in body weight, glucose and white blood cell count. Effects on tumour activity biomarkers were quantified using reverse-phase protein array.

Results

Everolimus administration s.c. in an emulsion decreased the absorption rate but increased the C max and bio-availability of everolimus compared to standard approaches of administration p.o. or i.p. Everolimus administration s.c. via MP or PLGA-µP reduced the C max and provided continuous low concentrations of everolimus in the plasma, which inhibited tumour pS6/S6 to a similar degree to oral administration. Toxicities such as changes in body weight or white blood cell count were unaffected. Provided the everolimus concentration was above the free unbound IC50 for proliferation of the tumour cell line, efficacy could be achieved equivalent to that provided by standard oral administration. However, an overall improvement in the TI could not be demonstrated.

Conclusions

Continuous low plasma concentrations of everolimus can provide strong efficacy in preclinical models, which if translatable to the clinic may reduce on-target toxicities and so increase the TI.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference Lebwohl D, Anak O, Sahmoud T, Klimovsky J, Elmroth I, Haas T, Posluszny J, Saletan S, Berg W (2013) Development of everolimus, a novel oral mTOR inhibitor, across a spectrum of diseases. Ann NY Acad Sci 1291:14–32CrossRefPubMed Lebwohl D, Anak O, Sahmoud T, Klimovsky J, Elmroth I, Haas T, Posluszny J, Saletan S, Berg W (2013) Development of everolimus, a novel oral mTOR inhibitor, across a spectrum of diseases. Ann NY Acad Sci 1291:14–32CrossRefPubMed
2.
go back to reference Tanaka C, O’Reilly T, Kovarik JM, Shand N, Hazell K, Judson I, Raymond E, Zumstein-Mecker S, Stephan C, Boulay A, Hattenberger M, Thomas G, Lane HA (2008) Identifying optimal biologic doses of everolimus (RAD001) in patients with cancer based on the modeling of preclinical and clinical pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic data. J Clin Oncol 26:1596–1602CrossRefPubMed Tanaka C, O’Reilly T, Kovarik JM, Shand N, Hazell K, Judson I, Raymond E, Zumstein-Mecker S, Stephan C, Boulay A, Hattenberger M, Thomas G, Lane HA (2008) Identifying optimal biologic doses of everolimus (RAD001) in patients with cancer based on the modeling of preclinical and clinical pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic data. J Clin Oncol 26:1596–1602CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference O’Donnell A, Faivre S, Burris HA 3rd, Rea D, Papadimitrakopoulou V, Shand N, Lane HA, Hazell K, Zoellner U, Kovarik JM, Brock C, Jones S, Raymond E, Judson I (2008) Phase I pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic study of the oral mammalian target of rapamycin inhibitor everolimus in patients with advanced solid tumors. J Clin Oncol 26:1588–1595CrossRefPubMed O’Donnell A, Faivre S, Burris HA 3rd, Rea D, Papadimitrakopoulou V, Shand N, Lane HA, Hazell K, Zoellner U, Kovarik JM, Brock C, Jones S, Raymond E, Judson I (2008) Phase I pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic study of the oral mammalian target of rapamycin inhibitor everolimus in patients with advanced solid tumors. J Clin Oncol 26:1588–1595CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Ravaud A, Urva SR, Grosch K, Cheung WK, Anak O, Sellami DB (2014) Relationship between everolimus exposure and safety and efficacy: meta-analysis of clinical trials in oncology. Eur J Cancer 50:486–495CrossRefPubMed Ravaud A, Urva SR, Grosch K, Cheung WK, Anak O, Sellami DB (2014) Relationship between everolimus exposure and safety and efficacy: meta-analysis of clinical trials in oncology. Eur J Cancer 50:486–495CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Thiery-Vuillemin A, Mouillet G, Nguyen Tan Hon T, Montcuquet P, Maurina T, Almotlak H, Stein U, Montange D, Foubert A, Nerich V, Pivot X, Royer B (2014) Impact of everolimus blood concentration on its anti-cancer activity in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol 73:999–1007CrossRefPubMed Thiery-Vuillemin A, Mouillet G, Nguyen Tan Hon T, Montcuquet P, Maurina T, Almotlak H, Stein U, Montange D, Foubert A, Nerich V, Pivot X, Royer B (2014) Impact of everolimus blood concentration on its anti-cancer activity in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol 73:999–1007CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference de Wit D, Schneider TC, Moes DJ, Roozen CF, den Hartigh J, Gelderblom H, Guchelaar HJ, van der Hoeven JJ, Links TP, Kapiteijn E, van Erp NP (2016) Everolimus pharmacokinetics and its exposure-toxicity relationship in patients with thyroid cancer. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol 78:63–71CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral de Wit D, Schneider TC, Moes DJ, Roozen CF, den Hartigh J, Gelderblom H, Guchelaar HJ, van der Hoeven JJ, Links TP, Kapiteijn E, van Erp NP (2016) Everolimus pharmacokinetics and its exposure-toxicity relationship in patients with thyroid cancer. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol 78:63–71CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
7.
go back to reference Patel JK, Kobashigawa JA (2006) Everolimus: an immunosuppressive agent in transplantation. Expert Opin Pharmacother 7:1347–1355CrossRefPubMed Patel JK, Kobashigawa JA (2006) Everolimus: an immunosuppressive agent in transplantation. Expert Opin Pharmacother 7:1347–1355CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Deppenweiler M, Falkowski S, Saint-Marcoux F et al (2017) Towards therapeutic drug monitoring of everolimus in cancer? Results of an exploratory study of exposure-effect relationship. Pharmacol Res 121:138–144CrossRefPubMed Deppenweiler M, Falkowski S, Saint-Marcoux F et al (2017) Towards therapeutic drug monitoring of everolimus in cancer? Results of an exploratory study of exposure-effect relationship. Pharmacol Res 121:138–144CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Tabernero J, Rojo F, Calvo E et al (2008) Dose- and schedule-dependent inhibition of the mammalian target of rapamycin pathway with everolimus: a phase I tumor pharmacodynamic study in patients with advanced solid tumors. J Clin Oncol 26:1603–1610CrossRefPubMed Tabernero J, Rojo F, Calvo E et al (2008) Dose- and schedule-dependent inhibition of the mammalian target of rapamycin pathway with everolimus: a phase I tumor pharmacodynamic study in patients with advanced solid tumors. J Clin Oncol 26:1603–1610CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Aapro M, Andre F, Blackwell K et al (2014) Adverse event management in patients with advanced cancer receiving oral everolimus: focus on breast cancer. Ann Oncol 25:763–773CrossRefPubMed Aapro M, Andre F, Blackwell K et al (2014) Adverse event management in patients with advanced cancer receiving oral everolimus: focus on breast cancer. Ann Oncol 25:763–773CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Shi J, Kantoff PW, Wooster R, Farokhzad OC (2017) Cancer nanomedicine: progress, challenges and opportunities. Nat Rev Cancer 17:20–37CrossRefPubMed Shi J, Kantoff PW, Wooster R, Farokhzad OC (2017) Cancer nanomedicine: progress, challenges and opportunities. Nat Rev Cancer 17:20–37CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference Smith DA, Di L, Kerns EH (2010) The effect of plasma protein binding on in vivo efficacy: misconceptions in drug discovery. Nat Rev Drug Discov 9:929–939CrossRefPubMed Smith DA, Di L, Kerns EH (2010) The effect of plasma protein binding on in vivo efficacy: misconceptions in drug discovery. Nat Rev Drug Discov 9:929–939CrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference Petersen H, Bizec JC, Schuetz H, Delporte ML (2011) Pharmacokinetic and technical comparison of Sandostatin® LAR® and other formulations of long-acting octreotide. BMC Res Notes 9:344CrossRef Petersen H, Bizec JC, Schuetz H, Delporte ML (2011) Pharmacokinetic and technical comparison of Sandostatin® LAR® and other formulations of long-acting octreotide. BMC Res Notes 9:344CrossRef
15.
go back to reference O’Reilly T, McSheehy PM, Kawai R, Kretz O, McMahon L, Brueggen J, Bruelisauer A, Gschwind HP, Allegrini PR, Lane HA (2010) Comparative pharmacokinetics of RAD001 (everolimus) in normal and tumor-bearing rodents. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol 65:625–639CrossRefPubMed O’Reilly T, McSheehy PM, Kawai R, Kretz O, McMahon L, Brueggen J, Bruelisauer A, Gschwind HP, Allegrini PR, Lane HA (2010) Comparative pharmacokinetics of RAD001 (everolimus) in normal and tumor-bearing rodents. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol 65:625–639CrossRefPubMed
16.
go back to reference Royce ME, Osman D (2015) Everolimus in the treatment of metastatic breast cancer. Breast Cancer Basic Clin Res 9:73–79CrossRef Royce ME, Osman D (2015) Everolimus in the treatment of metastatic breast cancer. Breast Cancer Basic Clin Res 9:73–79CrossRef
17.
go back to reference O’Reilly T, McSheehy PM (2010) Biomarker development for the clinical activity of the mTOR inhibitor everolimus (RAD001): Processes, limitations, and further proposals. Transl Oncol 3:65–79CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral O’Reilly T, McSheehy PM (2010) Biomarker development for the clinical activity of the mTOR inhibitor everolimus (RAD001): Processes, limitations, and further proposals. Transl Oncol 3:65–79CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
18.
go back to reference O’Reilly T, Wartmann M, Brueggen J et al (2008) Pharmacokinetic profile of the microtubule stabilizer patupilone in tumor-bearing rodents and comparison of anti-cancer activity with other MTS in vitro and in vivo. Cancer Chemother Pharm 62:1045–1054CrossRef O’Reilly T, Wartmann M, Brueggen J et al (2008) Pharmacokinetic profile of the microtubule stabilizer patupilone in tumor-bearing rodents and comparison of anti-cancer activity with other MTS in vitro and in vivo. Cancer Chemother Pharm 62:1045–1054CrossRef
19.
go back to reference Tunçay M, Caliş S, Kaş HS, Ercan MT, Peksoy I, Hincal AA (2000) Diclofenac sodium incorporated PLGA (50:50) microspheres: formulation considerations and in vitro/in vivo evaluation. Int J Pharm 195:179–188CrossRefPubMed Tunçay M, Caliş S, Kaş HS, Ercan MT, Peksoy I, Hincal AA (2000) Diclofenac sodium incorporated PLGA (50:50) microspheres: formulation considerations and in vitro/in vivo evaluation. Int J Pharm 195:179–188CrossRefPubMed
20.
go back to reference Pacifici GM, Viani A (1992) Methods of determining plasma and tissue binding of drugs. Clin Pharmacokinet 23:449–468CrossRefPubMed Pacifici GM, Viani A (1992) Methods of determining plasma and tissue binding of drugs. Clin Pharmacokinet 23:449–468CrossRefPubMed
21.
go back to reference Pawlak M, Schick E, Bopp MA, Schneider MJ, Oroszlan P, Ehrat M (2002) Zeptosens’ protein microarrays: a novel high performance microarray platform for low abundance protein analysis. Proteomics 2:383–393CrossRefPubMed Pawlak M, Schick E, Bopp MA, Schneider MJ, Oroszlan P, Ehrat M (2002) Zeptosens’ protein microarrays: a novel high performance microarray platform for low abundance protein analysis. Proteomics 2:383–393CrossRefPubMed
22.
go back to reference van Oostrum J, Calonder C, Rechsteiner D, Ehrat M, Mestan J, Fabbro D, Voshol H (2009) Tracing pathway activities with kinase inhibitors and reverse phase protein arrays. Proteom Clin Appl 3:412–422CrossRef van Oostrum J, Calonder C, Rechsteiner D, Ehrat M, Mestan J, Fabbro D, Voshol H (2009) Tracing pathway activities with kinase inhibitors and reverse phase protein arrays. Proteom Clin Appl 3:412–422CrossRef
23.
go back to reference Lane HA, Wood JM, McSheehy PM et al (2009) mTOR inhibitor RAD001 (everolimus) has antiangiogenic/vascular properties distinct from a VEGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitor. Clin Cancer Res 15:1612–1622CrossRefPubMed Lane HA, Wood JM, McSheehy PM et al (2009) mTOR inhibitor RAD001 (everolimus) has antiangiogenic/vascular properties distinct from a VEGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitor. Clin Cancer Res 15:1612–1622CrossRefPubMed
24.
go back to reference Apryshkina O, Manukyants A, Romen F, Elzenga C, Collins L, Morgan (2015) Everolimus novartis investigator’s brochure, edn 14. Tables 5.2 and 5.3, p. 65 Apryshkina O, Manukyants A, Romen F, Elzenga C, Collins L, Morgan (2015) Everolimus novartis investigator’s brochure, edn 14. Tables 5.2 and 5.3, p. 65
25.
go back to reference O’Reilly T, McSheehy PM, Wartmann M, Lassota P, Brandt R, Lane HA (2011) Evaluation of the mTOR inhibitor, everolimus, in combination with cytotoxic antitumor agents using human tumor models in vitro and in vivo. Anticancer Drugs 22:58–78CrossRefPubMed O’Reilly T, McSheehy PM, Wartmann M, Lassota P, Brandt R, Lane HA (2011) Evaluation of the mTOR inhibitor, everolimus, in combination with cytotoxic antitumor agents using human tumor models in vitro and in vivo. Anticancer Drugs 22:58–78CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Continuous low plasma concentrations of everolimus provides equivalent efficacy to oral daily dosing in mouse xenograft models of human cancer
Authors
Laurent Laborde
Fatos Oz
Mitko Ristov
Daniel Guthy
Dario Sterker
Paul McSheehy
Publication date
01-10-2017
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
Cancer Chemotherapy and Pharmacology / Issue 4/2017
Print ISSN: 0344-5704
Electronic ISSN: 1432-0843
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00280-017-3407-5

Other articles of this Issue 4/2017

Cancer Chemotherapy and Pharmacology 4/2017 Go to the issue
Webinar | 19-02-2024 | 17:30 (CET)

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on antibody–drug conjugates in cancer

Antibody–drug conjugates (ADCs) are novel agents that have shown promise across multiple tumor types. Explore the current landscape of ADCs in breast and lung cancer with our experts, and gain insights into the mechanism of action, key clinical trials data, existing challenges, and future directions.

Dr. Véronique Diéras
Prof. Fabrice Barlesi
Developed by: Springer Medicine