Skip to main content
Key Specialties
Cardiology Diabetology Endocrinology Gastroenterology Geriatrics and Gerontology Gynecology and Obstetrics Hematology Infectious Disease Internal Medicine Nephrology Neurology Oncology Pediatrics Respiratory Medicine Rheumatology Surgery
Congress Coverage
2024 ACC Congress 2023 ESMO Congress 2023 EASD Congress 2023 ERS Congress 2023 ESC Congress
Clinical Collections
Advances in Alzheimer’s

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on medication adherence

LIVE: Thursday 27th June 2024, 18:00-19:30 (CEST)
Join our expert panel to discover why you need to understand the drivers of non-adherence in your patients, and how you can optimize medication adherence in your clinics to drastically improve patient outcomes.
ADVANCED SEARCH
Log in
Top
Allergy, Asthma & Clinical Immunology
Published in: Allergy, Asthma & Clinical Immunology 1/2017

Open Access 01-12-2017 | Research

Consumer preferences for food allergen labeling

Authors: Carlo A. Marra, Stephanie Harvard, Maja Grubisic, Jessica Galo, Ann Clarke, Susan Elliott, Larry D. Lynd

Published in: Allergy, Asthma & Clinical Immunology | Issue 1/2017

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Food allergen labeling is an important tool to reduce risk of exposure and prevent anaphylaxis for individuals with food allergies. Health Canada released a Canadian food allergen labeling regulation (2008) and subsequent update (2012) suggesting that research is needed to guide further iterations of the regulation to improve food allergen labeling and reduce risk of exposure.

Objective

The primary objective of this study was to examine consumer preferences in food labeling for allergy avoidance and anaphylaxis prevention. A secondary objective was to identify whether different subgroups within the consumer population emerged.

Methods

A discrete choice experiment using a fractional factorial design divided into ten different versions with 18 choice-sets per version was developed to examine consumer preferences for different attributes of food labeling.

Results

Three distinct subgroups of Canadian consumers with different allergen considerations and food allergen labeling needs were identified. Overall, preferences for standardized precautionary and safety symbols at little or no increased cost emerged.

Conclusion

While three distinct groups with different preferences were identified, in general the results revealed that the current Canadian food allergen labeling regulation can be improved by enforcing the use of standardized precautionary and safety symbols and educating the public on the use of these symbols.
Literature
1.
Rona RJ, Keil T, Summers C, Gislason D, Zuidmeer L, Sodergren E, Sigurdardottir ST, Lindner T, Goldhahn K, Dahlstrom J, et al. The prevalence of food allergy: a meta-analysis. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2007;120:638–46.CrossRefPubMed
2.
3.
4.
Grundy J, Matthews S, Bateman B, Dean T, Arshad SH. Rising prevalence of allergy to peanut in children: data from 2 sequential cohorts. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2002;110:784–9.CrossRefPubMed
5.
Sicherer SH, Munoz-Furlong A, Sampson HA. Prevalence of peanut and tree nut allergy in the United States determined by means of a random digit dial telephone survey: a 5-year follow-up study. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2003;112:1203–7.CrossRefPubMed
6.
Sicherer SH, Munoz-Furlong A, Burks AW, Sampson HA. Prevalence of peanut and tree nut allergy in the US determined by a random digit dial telephone survey. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 1999;103:559–62.CrossRefPubMed
7.
8.
O’Hara NN, Roy L, O’Hara LM, Spiegel JM, Lynd LD, FitzGerald JM, Yassi A, Nophale LE, Marra CA. Healthcare worker preferences for active tuberculosis case finding programs in South Africa: a best–worst scaling choice experiment. PLoS ONE. 2015;10:e0133304.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
9.
Guo N, Marra CA, FitzGerald JM, Elwood RK, Anis AH, Marra F. Patient preference for latent tuberculosis infection preventive treatment: a discrete choice experiment. Value Health. 2011;14:937–43.CrossRefPubMed
10.
Soller L, Ben-Shoshan M, Harrington DW, Fragapane J, Joseph L, St Pierre Y, Godefroy SB, La Vieille S, Elliott SJ, Clarke AE. Overall prevalence of self-reported food allergy in Canada. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2012;130:986–8.CrossRefPubMed
11.
Venter C, Pereira B, Voigt K, Grundy J, Clayton CB, Higgins B, Arshad SH, Dean T. Prevalence and cumulative incidence of food hypersensitivity in the first 3 years of life. Allergy. 2008;63:354–9.CrossRefPubMed
12.
Zuberbier T, Edenharter G, Worm M, Ehlers I, Reimann S, Hantke T, Roehr CC, Bergmann KE, Niggemann B. Prevalence of adverse reactions to food in Germany—a population study. Allergy. 2004;59:338–45.CrossRefPubMed
13.
Allen KJ, Koplin JJ. Why does Australia appear to have the highest rates of food allergy? Pediatr Clin N Am. 2015;62:1441–51.CrossRef
14.
Ben-Shoshan M, Harrington DW, Soller L, Fragapane J, Joseph L, St Pierre Y, Godefroy SB, Elliott SJ, Clarke AE. A population-based study on peanut, tree nut, fish, shellfish, and sesame allergy prevalence in Canada. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2010;125:1327–35.CrossRefPubMed
15.
Decker WW, Campbell RL, Manivannan V, Luke A, St Sauver JL, Weaver A, Bellolio MF, Bergstralh EJ, Stead LG, Li JT. The etiology and incidence of anaphylaxis in Rochester, Minnesota: a report from the Rochester Epidemiology Project. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2008;122:1161–5.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
16.
Simon MR, Mulla ZD. A population-based epidemiologic analysis of deaths from anaphylaxis in Florida. Allergy. 2008;63:1077–83.CrossRefPubMed
17.
Pumphrey R. Anaphylaxis: can we tell who is at risk of a fatal reaction? Curr Opin Allergy Clin Immunol. 2004;4:285–90.CrossRefPubMed
18.
Liew WK, Williamson E, Tang ML. Anaphylaxis fatalities and admissions in Australia. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2009;123:434–42.CrossRefPubMed
19.
Piromrat K, Chinratanapisit S, Trathong S. Anaphylaxis in an emergency department: a 2-year study in a tertiary-care hospital. Asian Pac J Allergy Immunol. 2008;26:121–8.PubMed
20.
Yocum MW, Khan DA. Assessment of patients who have experienced anaphylaxis: a 3-year survey. Mayo Clin Proc. 1994;69:16–23.CrossRefPubMed
21.
Yocum MW, Butterfield JH, Klein JS, Volcheck GW, Schroeder DR, Silverstein MD. Epidemiology of anaphylaxis in Olmsted County: a population-based study. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 1999;104:452–6.CrossRefPubMed
22.
23.
Lin RY, Anderson AS, Shah SN, Nurruzzaman F. Increasing anaphylaxis hospitalizations in the first 2 decades of life: New York State, 1990–2006. Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol. 2008;101:387–93.CrossRefPubMed
24.
Calvani M, Di Lallo D, Polo A, Spinelli A, Zappala D, Zicari AM. Hospitalizations for pediatric anaphylaxis. Int J Immunopathol Pharmacol. 2008;21:977–83.CrossRefPubMed
25.
Branum AM, Lukacs SL. Food allergy among children in the United States. Pediatrics. 2009;124:1549–55.CrossRefPubMed
26.
Hochstadter E, Clarke A, De Schryver S, LaVieille S, Alizadehfar R, Joseph L, Eisman H, Ben-Shoshan M. Increasing visits for anaphylaxis and the benefits of early epinephrine administration: a 4-year study at a pediatric emergency department in Montreal, Canada. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2016;137(1888–1890):e1884.
27.
28.
29.
Cornelisse-Vermaat JR, Voordouw J, Yiakoumaki V, Theodoridis G, Frewer LJ. Food-allergic consumers’ labelling preferences: a cross-cultural comparison. Eur J Public Health. 2008;18:115–20.CrossRefPubMed
30.
Turner PJ, Kemp AS, Campbell DE. Advisory food labels: consumers with allergies need more than “traces” of information. BMJ. 2011;343:d6180.CrossRefPubMed
31.
Noimark L, Gardner J, Warner JO. Parents’ attitudes when purchasing products for children with nut allergy: a UK perspective. Pediatr Allergy Immunol. 2009;20:500–4.CrossRefPubMed
32.
Sheth SS, Waserman S, Kagan R, Alizadehfar R, Primeau MN, Elliot S, St Pierre Y, Wickett R, Joseph L, Harada L, et al. Role of food labels in accidental exposures in food-allergic individuals in Canada. Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol. 2010;104:60–5.CrossRefPubMed
33.
Ben-Shoshan M, Sheth S, Harrington D, Soller L, Fragapane J, Joseph L, St Pierre Y, La Vieille S, Elliott S, Waserman S, et al. Effect of precautionary statements on the purchasing practices of Canadians directly and indirectly affected by food allergies. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2012;129:1401–4.CrossRefPubMed
34.
Louviere J, Flynn T. Discrete choice experiments are not conjoint analysis. Choice Model. 2010;3:57–72.CrossRef
35.
Lancsar E, Louviere J, Flynn T. Several methods to investigate relative attribute impact in stated preference experiments. Soc Sci Med. 2007;64:1738–53.CrossRefPubMed
36.
Lancsar E, Louviere J. Conducting discrete choice experiments to inform healthcare decision making: a user’s guide. Pharmacoeconomics. 2008;26:661–77.CrossRefPubMed
37.
Lagarde M, Blaauw D. A review of the application and contribution of discrete choice experiments to inform human resources policy interventions. Hum Resour Health. 2009;7:62.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
38.
Guimaraes C, Marra CA, Gill S, Simpson S, Meneilly G, Queiroz RH, Lynd LD. A discrete choice experiment evaluation of patients’ preferences for different risk, benefit, and delivery attributes of insulin therapy for diabetes management. Patient Prefer Adherence. 2011;4:433–40.
39.
Laba TL, Brien JA, Fransen M, Jan S. Patient preferences for adherence to treatment for osteoarthritis: the MEdication Decisions in Osteoarthritis Study (MEDOS). BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2013;14:160.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
40.
Hoefkens C, Veettil PC, Van Huylenbroeck G, Van Camp J, Verbeke W. What nutrition label to use in a catering environment? A discrete choice experiment. Food Policy. 2012;37:741–50.CrossRef
41.
Brown KM, Fenton NE, Lynd LD, Marra CA, FitzGerald JM, Harvard SS, Rosenthal M, Chow BYL, Clarke AE, Elliott SJ. Canadian policy on food allergen labelling: consumers’ perspectives regarding unment needs. Univers J Public Health. 2015;3:41–8.CrossRef
42.
Gupta RS, Springston EE, Kim JS, Smith B, Pongracic JA, Wang X, Holl J. Food allergy knowledge, attitudes, and beliefs of primary care physicians. Pediatrics. 2010;125:126–32.CrossRefPubMed
43.
Campos S, Doxey J, Hammond D. Nutrition labels on pre-packaged foods: a systematic review. Public Health Nutr. 2011;14:1496–506.CrossRefPubMed
44.
Feunekes GI, Gortemaker IA, Willems AA, Lion R, van den Kommer M. Front-of-pack nutrition labelling: testing effectiveness of different nutrition labelling formats front-of-pack in four European countries. Appetite. 2008;50:57–70.CrossRefPubMed
45.
Barnett J, Muncer K, Leftwich J, Shepherd R, Raats MM, Gowland MH, Grimshaw K, Lucas JS. Using ‘may contain’ labelling to inform food choice: a qualitative study of nut allergic consumers. BMC Public Health. 2011;11:734.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
Metadata
Title
Consumer preferences for food allergen labeling
Authors
Carlo A. Marra
Stephanie Harvard
Maja Grubisic
Jessica Galo
Ann Clarke
Susan Elliott
Larry D. Lynd
Publication date
01-12-2017
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
Allergy, Asthma & Clinical Immunology / Issue 1/2017
Electronic ISSN: 1710-1492
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s13223-017-0189-6

Other articles of this Issue 1/2017

Allergy, Asthma & Clinical Immunology 1/2017 Go to the issue

Review

Asthma biomarkers in the age of biologics

Letter to the editor

Primum non nocere—first do no harm. And then feed peanut

Research

A case series evaluating the serological response of adult asthma patients to the 23-valent pneumococcal polysaccharide vaccine

Letter to the Editor

Are food allergic consumers ready for informative precautionary allergen labelling?

Research

Breakthrough attacks in patients with hereditary angioedema receiving long-term prophylaxis are responsive to icatibant: findings from the Icatibant Outcome Survey

Case report

Atopic keratoconjunctivitis complicated by Kocuria koreensis keratitis: the first case