Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Supportive Care in Cancer 5/2019

01-05-2019 | Original Article

Construction of new personal meanings by cancer patients: a qualitative analysis in an Italian patient population

Authors: Loredana Buonaccorso, Gianfranco Martucci, Guido Miccinesi, Alice Maruelli, Carla Ripamonti

Published in: Supportive Care in Cancer | Issue 5/2019

Login to get access

Abstract

Purpose

The goal of this study is to investigate the meaning that cancer patients in active therapy and/or rehabilitation give to their illness and resources they rely on to build new experiences of meaning and a future perspective.

Methods

The present study consisted in a summative content analysis of answers to open questions of the Purpose In Life (PIL) Questionnaire administered to 158 consecutive patients with non-advanced cancer (no metastases). The PIL is an attitude scale that indicates the degree of attainment of meaning and purpose in life and is divided into three sections: a first 20-item quantitative section, with statements rated on a 7-point verbal scale with two anchoring phrases (part A); a qualitative section with 13 open-end items and paragraph composition section addressing the future goals (part B) and past meaningful experience (part C). For the present study, we analyzed the answers to open questions, most interesting in a therapeutic contest related to the meanings associated with life, illness, and suffering to understand the experienced of the cancer patients.

Results

The main recurring themes in PIL section B analyzed associated to the sense of life, disease, and death are as follows: meaning (positive/negative), personal dimension, religiousness; physical health, family, normal life; negative sense of death, the end, natural transition, religious belief, consolation, mystery, rejection; opportunity, negativity. Whereas main themes emerging from section C were associated to life goals of the interviewed patients: the desire of realization in the future perspective; the value of life; physical health and healing; guiding values; plus three more themes, distinguishable, but with a minor recurrence: legacy responsibility, religiousness, lack of purpose/resignation.

Conclusion

The use of summative content analysis evidenced the recurrence of a strong sense of positivity, present in the majority of the interviews. In particular, this positivity is shown by the use of words associated frequently to self-consciousness and self-evaluation, desire of happiness, and desire of contributing to the good of significant others and of taking care of your own life in order to give a positive contribution.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
3.
go back to reference Grassi L, Caruso R, Mitchell AJ, Sabato S, Nanni MG (2018) Screening for emotional disorders in patients with cancer using the Brief Symptom Inventory (BSI) and the BSI-18 versus a standardized psychiatric interview (the World Health Organization Composite International Diagnostic Interview). Cancer 124:2415–2426. https://doi.org/10.1002/cncr.31340 CrossRefPubMed Grassi L, Caruso R, Mitchell AJ, Sabato S, Nanni MG (2018) Screening for emotional disorders in patients with cancer using the Brief Symptom Inventory (BSI) and the BSI-18 versus a standardized psychiatric interview (the World Health Organization Composite International Diagnostic Interview). Cancer 124:2415–2426. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1002/​cncr.​31340 CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Robinson S, Kissane DW, Brooker J, Burney S (2015) A systematic review of the demoralization syndrome in individuals with progressive disease and cancer: a decade of research. J Pain Symptom Manag 49(3):595–610CrossRef Robinson S, Kissane DW, Brooker J, Burney S (2015) A systematic review of the demoralization syndrome in individuals with progressive disease and cancer: a decade of research. J Pain Symptom Manag 49(3):595–610CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Manne S, Badr H, Zaider T, Nelson C, Kissane D (2010) Cancer-related communication, relationship intimacy, and psychological distress among couples coping with localized prostate cancer. J Cancer Surviv 4(1):74–85CrossRefPubMed Manne S, Badr H, Zaider T, Nelson C, Kissane D (2010) Cancer-related communication, relationship intimacy, and psychological distress among couples coping with localized prostate cancer. J Cancer Surviv 4(1):74–85CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Lynch J, Goodhart F, Saunders Y, O’Connor SJ (2011) Screening for psychological distress in patients with lung cancer: results of a clinical audit evaluating the use of the patient distress thermometer. Support Care Cancer 19:193–202CrossRef Lynch J, Goodhart F, Saunders Y, O’Connor SJ (2011) Screening for psychological distress in patients with lung cancer: results of a clinical audit evaluating the use of the patient distress thermometer. Support Care Cancer 19:193–202CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Lauzier S, Maunsell E, Levesque P, Mondor M, Robert J, Robidoux A, Provencher L (2010) Psychological distress and physical health in the year after diagnosis of DCIS or invasive breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res Treat 120:685–691CrossRefPubMed Lauzier S, Maunsell E, Levesque P, Mondor M, Robert J, Robidoux A, Provencher L (2010) Psychological distress and physical health in the year after diagnosis of DCIS or invasive breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res Treat 120:685–691CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Linley PA, Joseph S (2011) Meaning in life and posttraumatic growth. J Loss Trauma 16:150–159CrossRef Linley PA, Joseph S (2011) Meaning in life and posttraumatic growth. J Loss Trauma 16:150–159CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Lee V (2008) The existential plight of cancer: meaning making as a concrete approach to the intangible search for meaning. Support Care Cancer 16:779–785CrossRefPubMed Lee V (2008) The existential plight of cancer: meaning making as a concrete approach to the intangible search for meaning. Support Care Cancer 16:779–785CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Breitbart W (2002) Spirituality and meaning in supportive care: spirituality and meaning-centered group psychotherapy intervention in advanced cancer. 2001. Support Care Cancer 10(4):272–280CrossRefPubMed Breitbart W (2002) Spirituality and meaning in supportive care: spirituality and meaning-centered group psychotherapy intervention in advanced cancer. 2001. Support Care Cancer 10(4):272–280CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Rosenfeld B, Cham H, Pessin H, Breitbart W (2018) Why is Meaning-Centered Group Psychotherapy (MCGP) effective? Enhanced sense of meaning as the mechanism of change for advanced cancer patients. Psychooncology 27(2):654–660CrossRefPubMed Rosenfeld B, Cham H, Pessin H, Breitbart W (2018) Why is Meaning-Centered Group Psychotherapy (MCGP) effective? Enhanced sense of meaning as the mechanism of change for advanced cancer patients. Psychooncology 27(2):654–660CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Nelson C, Jacobson CM, Weinberger MI, Bhaskaran V, Rosenfeld B, Breitbart W, Roth AJ (2009) The role of spirituality in the relationship between religiosity and depression in prostate cancer patients. Ann Behav Med 38(2):105–114CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Nelson C, Jacobson CM, Weinberger MI, Bhaskaran V, Rosenfeld B, Breitbart W, Roth AJ (2009) The role of spirituality in the relationship between religiosity and depression in prostate cancer patients. Ann Behav Med 38(2):105–114CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
13.
go back to reference Lee V, Robin Cohen S, Edgar L, Laizner AM, Gagnon AJ (2006) Meaning-making intervention during breast or colorectal cancer treatment improves self-esteem, optimism, and self-efficacy. Soc Sci Med 62:3133–3145CrossRefPubMed Lee V, Robin Cohen S, Edgar L, Laizner AM, Gagnon AJ (2006) Meaning-making intervention during breast or colorectal cancer treatment improves self-esteem, optimism, and self-efficacy. Soc Sci Med 62:3133–3145CrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference van der Spek N, Vos J, van Uden-Kraan CF, Breitbart W, Tollenaar RAEM, Cuijpers P, Verdonck-de Leeuw IM (2013) Meaning making in cancer survivors: a focus group study. PLoS One 8(9):e76089CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral van der Spek N, Vos J, van Uden-Kraan CF, Breitbart W, Tollenaar RAEM, Cuijpers P, Verdonck-de Leeuw IM (2013) Meaning making in cancer survivors: a focus group study. PLoS One 8(9):e76089CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
15.
go back to reference Steinhauser KE, Alexander SC, Byock IR, George LK, Olsen MK, Tulsky JA (2008) Do preparation and life completion discussions improve functioning and quality of life in seriously ill patients? Pilot randomized control trial. J Palliat Med 11:1234–1240CrossRefPubMed Steinhauser KE, Alexander SC, Byock IR, George LK, Olsen MK, Tulsky JA (2008) Do preparation and life completion discussions improve functioning and quality of life in seriously ill patients? Pilot randomized control trial. J Palliat Med 11:1234–1240CrossRefPubMed
16.
go back to reference Ripamonti CI, Buonaccorso L, Maruelli A, Bandieri E, Boldini S, Pessi MA, Chiesi F, Miccinesi G (2012) Hope Herth Index (HHI): a validation study in Italian patients with solid and hematological malignancies on active cancer treatment. Tumori 98:385–392CrossRefPubMed Ripamonti CI, Buonaccorso L, Maruelli A, Bandieri E, Boldini S, Pessi MA, Chiesi F, Miccinesi G (2012) Hope Herth Index (HHI): a validation study in Italian patients with solid and hematological malignancies on active cancer treatment. Tumori 98:385–392CrossRefPubMed
17.
go back to reference Ripamonti CI, Buonaccorso L, Maruelli A, Bandieri E, Pessi MA, Boldini S, Primi C, Miccinesi G (2012) Patient Dignity Inventory (PDI) questionnaire: the validation study in Italian patients with solid and haematological cancers on active oncological treatments. Tumori 98(4):491–500CrossRefPubMed Ripamonti CI, Buonaccorso L, Maruelli A, Bandieri E, Pessi MA, Boldini S, Primi C, Miccinesi G (2012) Patient Dignity Inventory (PDI) questionnaire: the validation study in Italian patients with solid and haematological cancers on active oncological treatments. Tumori 98(4):491–500CrossRefPubMed
18.
go back to reference Maruelli A, Ripamonti C, Bandieri E et al (2014) Sexual satisfaction assessment in 194 nonmetastatic cancer patients on treatment or in follow-up. Tumori 100(2):232–236CrossRefPubMed Maruelli A, Ripamonti C, Bandieri E et al (2014) Sexual satisfaction assessment in 194 nonmetastatic cancer patients on treatment or in follow-up. Tumori 100(2):232–236CrossRefPubMed
19.
go back to reference Ripamonti CI, Bandieri E, Pessi MA, Maruelli A, Buonaccorso L, Miccinesi G (2014) The Edmonton Symptom Assessment System (ESAS) as a screening tool for depression and anxiety in non-advanced patients with solid or haematological malignancies on cure or follow-up. Support Care Cancer 22(3):783–793CrossRefPubMed Ripamonti CI, Bandieri E, Pessi MA, Maruelli A, Buonaccorso L, Miccinesi G (2014) The Edmonton Symptom Assessment System (ESAS) as a screening tool for depression and anxiety in non-advanced patients with solid or haematological malignancies on cure or follow-up. Support Care Cancer 22(3):783–793CrossRefPubMed
20.
go back to reference Crumbaugh JC, Maholick LT Manual of instructions for the Purpose in Life test. Viktor Frankl Institute of Logotherapy, Abilene, p 1069 Crumbaugh JC, Maholick LT Manual of instructions for the Purpose in Life test. Viktor Frankl Institute of Logotherapy, Abilene, p 1069
21.
go back to reference Brunelli C, Bianchi L, Murru P et al (2012) Italian Validation of The Purpose In Life (PIL) test and the Seeking Of Noetic Goals (SONG) test in a population of cancer patients. Support Care Cancer 20:2775–2783CrossRefPubMed Brunelli C, Bianchi L, Murru P et al (2012) Italian Validation of The Purpose In Life (PIL) test and the Seeking Of Noetic Goals (SONG) test in a population of cancer patients. Support Care Cancer 20:2775–2783CrossRefPubMed
22.
go back to reference Braun V, Clarke V (2006) Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qual Res Psychol 3(2):77–101CrossRef Braun V, Clarke V (2006) Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qual Res Psychol 3(2):77–101CrossRef
23.
go back to reference Hsieh H-F, Shannon SE (2005) Three approaches to qualitative content analysis. Qual Health Res 15:1277–1288CrossRefPubMed Hsieh H-F, Shannon SE (2005) Three approaches to qualitative content analysis. Qual Health Res 15:1277–1288CrossRefPubMed
24.
go back to reference Elliott R, Fischer CT, Rennie DL (1999) Evolving guidelines for publication of qualitative research studies in psychology and related fields. Br J Clin Psychol 38(3):215–229CrossRefPubMed Elliott R, Fischer CT, Rennie DL (1999) Evolving guidelines for publication of qualitative research studies in psychology and related fields. Br J Clin Psychol 38(3):215–229CrossRefPubMed
25.
go back to reference Holtmaat K, van der Spek N, Witte BI, Breitbart W, Cuijpers P, Verdonck-de Leeuw IM (2017) Moderators of the effects of meaning-centered group psychotherapy in cancer survivors on personal meaning, psychological well-being, and distress. Support Care Cancer 25:3385–3393CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Holtmaat K, van der Spek N, Witte BI, Breitbart W, Cuijpers P, Verdonck-de Leeuw IM (2017) Moderators of the effects of meaning-centered group psychotherapy in cancer survivors on personal meaning, psychological well-being, and distress. Support Care Cancer 25:3385–3393CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
26.
go back to reference Chochinov HM, McClement S, Hack T, Thompson G, Dufault B, Harlos M (2015) Eliciting personhood within clinical practice: effects on patients, families, and healthcare providers. J Pain Symptom Manag 49:974–980CrossRef Chochinov HM, McClement S, Hack T, Thompson G, Dufault B, Harlos M (2015) Eliciting personhood within clinical practice: effects on patients, families, and healthcare providers. J Pain Symptom Manag 49:974–980CrossRef
27.
go back to reference Arantzamendi M, Belar A, Martínez M (2016) Promoting patient-centred palliative care: a scoping review of the patient dignity question. Curr Opin Support Palliat Care 10(4):324–329CrossRefPubMed Arantzamendi M, Belar A, Martínez M (2016) Promoting patient-centred palliative care: a scoping review of the patient dignity question. Curr Opin Support Palliat Care 10(4):324–329CrossRefPubMed
28.
go back to reference Golombok S Modern families. Parents and children in new family forms. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge Golombok S Modern families. Parents and children in new family forms. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
29.
go back to reference Schumacher JR, Palta M, Loconte NK et al (2013) Characterizing the psychological distress response before and after a cancer diagnosis. J Behav Med 36:591–600CrossRefPubMed Schumacher JR, Palta M, Loconte NK et al (2013) Characterizing the psychological distress response before and after a cancer diagnosis. J Behav Med 36:591–600CrossRefPubMed
30.
go back to reference Hannum SM, Rubinstein RL (2016 Jan) The meaningfulness of time; narratives of cancer among chronically ill older adults. J Aging Stud 36:17–25CrossRefPubMed Hannum SM, Rubinstein RL (2016 Jan) The meaningfulness of time; narratives of cancer among chronically ill older adults. J Aging Stud 36:17–25CrossRefPubMed
31.
go back to reference Chochinov HM, Hassard T, McClement S et al (2008) The patient dignity inventory: a novel way of measuring dignity-related distress in palliative care. J Pain Symptom Manage 36(6):559–571CrossRefPubMed Chochinov HM, Hassard T, McClement S et al (2008) The patient dignity inventory: a novel way of measuring dignity-related distress in palliative care. J Pain Symptom Manage 36(6):559–571CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Construction of new personal meanings by cancer patients: a qualitative analysis in an Italian patient population
Authors
Loredana Buonaccorso
Gianfranco Martucci
Guido Miccinesi
Alice Maruelli
Carla Ripamonti
Publication date
01-05-2019
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
Supportive Care in Cancer / Issue 5/2019
Print ISSN: 0941-4355
Electronic ISSN: 1433-7339
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-018-4444-2

Other articles of this Issue 5/2019

Supportive Care in Cancer 5/2019 Go to the issue
Webinar | 19-02-2024 | 17:30 (CET)

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on antibody–drug conjugates in cancer

Antibody–drug conjugates (ADCs) are novel agents that have shown promise across multiple tumor types. Explore the current landscape of ADCs in breast and lung cancer with our experts, and gain insights into the mechanism of action, key clinical trials data, existing challenges, and future directions.

Dr. Véronique Diéras
Prof. Fabrice Barlesi
Developed by: Springer Medicine