Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Techniques in Coloproctology 12/2022

10-10-2022 | Constipation | Editorial

Effectiveness of laparoscopic ventral mesh rectopexy in adults with internal rectal prolapse and defecatory disorders

Author: A. D’Hoore

Published in: Techniques in Coloproctology | Issue 12/2022

Login to get access

Excerpt

Laparoscopic ventral mesh rectopexy (LVMR) was first described in 2004 to improve surgical outcomes in patients with external rectal prolapse operated between 1995 and 1999 [1]. The technique aims at correction of the full thickness intussusception as the leading cause. Dissection is limited to the rectovaginal septum and avoids extensive rectal mobilization. Despite a limited dissection, recurrence rates have been comparable to other more extensive techniques [2]. …
Literature
1.
go back to reference D’Hoore A, Cadoni R, Penninckx F (2004) Long-term outcome of laparoscopic ventral rectopexy for total rectal prolapse. Br J Surg 91(11):1500–1505CrossRefPubMed D’Hoore A, Cadoni R, Penninckx F (2004) Long-term outcome of laparoscopic ventral rectopexy for total rectal prolapse. Br J Surg 91(11):1500–1505CrossRefPubMed
2.
go back to reference Consten ECJ et al (2015) Long-term outcome after laparoscopic ventral mesh rectopexy an observational study of 919 consecutive patients. Ann Surg 262(5):742–748CrossRefPubMed Consten ECJ et al (2015) Long-term outcome after laparoscopic ventral mesh rectopexy an observational study of 919 consecutive patients. Ann Surg 262(5):742–748CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Hidaka J et al (2019) Functional outcome after laparoscopic posterior sutured rectopexy versus ventral mesh rectopexy for rectal prolapse: six-year follow-up of a double-blind, randomized single-center study. EClinicalMedicine 16:18–22CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Hidaka J et al (2019) Functional outcome after laparoscopic posterior sutured rectopexy versus ventral mesh rectopexy for rectal prolapse: six-year follow-up of a double-blind, randomized single-center study. EClinicalMedicine 16:18–22CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
4.
go back to reference van Iersel JJ et al (2016) Current status of laparoscopic and robotic ventral mesh rectopexy for external and internal rectal prolapse. World J Gastroenterol 22(21):4977–4987CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral van Iersel JJ et al (2016) Current status of laparoscopic and robotic ventral mesh rectopexy for external and internal rectal prolapse. World J Gastroenterol 22(21):4977–4987CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
5.
go back to reference Prapasrivorakul S et al (2014) Sacral neuromodulation for faecal incontinence: is the outcome compromised in patients with high-grade internal rectal prolapse? Int J Colorectal Dis 30(2):229–234CrossRefPubMed Prapasrivorakul S et al (2014) Sacral neuromodulation for faecal incontinence: is the outcome compromised in patients with high-grade internal rectal prolapse? Int J Colorectal Dis 30(2):229–234CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Lundby L, Laurberg S (2015) Laparoscopic ventral mesh rectopexy for obstructed defaecation syndrome: time for a critical appraisal. Colorectal Dis 17(2):102–103CrossRefPubMed Lundby L, Laurberg S (2015) Laparoscopic ventral mesh rectopexy for obstructed defaecation syndrome: time for a critical appraisal. Colorectal Dis 17(2):102–103CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Effectiveness of laparoscopic ventral mesh rectopexy in adults with internal rectal prolapse and defecatory disorders
Author
A. D’Hoore
Publication date
10-10-2022
Publisher
Springer International Publishing
Published in
Techniques in Coloproctology / Issue 12/2022
Print ISSN: 1123-6337
Electronic ISSN: 1128-045X
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10151-022-02663-4

Other articles of this Issue 12/2022

Techniques in Coloproctology 12/2022 Go to the issue