Skip to main content
Top
Published in: International Urogynecology Journal 10/2020

01-10-2020 | Constipation | Original Article

Specific Changes in Manometric Parameters are Associated with Non-improvement in Symptoms after Rectocele Repair

Authors: Sameh Hany Emile, Mohammed Balata, Waleed Omar, Wael Khafagy, Hesham Elgendy

Published in: International Urogynecology Journal | Issue 10/2020

Login to get access

Abstract

Introduction and hypothesis

The present study aimed to assess the changes in manometric parameters after transperineal repair (TPR) of rectocele and interpret failure of symptom improvement in light of these changes.

Methods

This was an observational cohort study on patients with anterior rectocele who underwent TPR in the period of February 2016 to February 2019. Data collected included patients’ demographics, rectocele size, Wexner constipation and incontinence scores, anal pressures, and rectal sensation before and 12 months after TPR. Analysis of data was done by paired t-test and chi-square test.

Results

Forty-six female patients with a mean age of 43.2 ± 10.7 years were included. After a mean follow-up of 13.9 ± 2.7 months, 30 (65.2%) patients reported clinical improvement and 16 (34.8%) had no significant improvement. At 12 months after rectocele repair, the entire cohort studied showed an insignificant increase in the mean anal pressures and a significant decrease in the thresholds of first rectal sensation, first urge, intense urge, and maximum tolerable volume (MTV). Patients who clinically improved showed similar physiologic changes to the entire cohort examined, whereas patients who had no clinical improvement showed significant increases in the mean anal pressures and insignificant decreases in rectal sensation and MTV.

Conclusion

Patients who showed clinical improvement showed insignificant increases in anal pressures and significant decreases in thresholds of first rectal sensation, first urge, intense urge, and MTV. Contrarily, patients who did not show clinical improvement showed significant increases in anal pressures and insignificant reduction in sensory thresholds.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
2.
go back to reference Guzman Rojas R, Quintero C, Shek KL, Dietz HP. Does childbirth play a role in the etiology of rectocele? Int Urogynecol J. 2015;26(5):737–41.CrossRef Guzman Rojas R, Quintero C, Shek KL, Dietz HP. Does childbirth play a role in the etiology of rectocele? Int Urogynecol J. 2015;26(5):737–41.CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Ellis CN. Stapled transanal rectal resection (STARR) for rectocele. J Gastrointest Surg. 2006;11:153–4.CrossRef Ellis CN. Stapled transanal rectal resection (STARR) for rectocele. J Gastrointest Surg. 2006;11:153–4.CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Altman D, Zetterström J, Mellgren A, Gustafsson C, Anzén B, López A. A three-year prospective asessment of rectocele repair using porcine xenograft. Obstet Gynecol. 2006;107:59–65.CrossRef Altman D, Zetterström J, Mellgren A, Gustafsson C, Anzén B, López A. A three-year prospective asessment of rectocele repair using porcine xenograft. Obstet Gynecol. 2006;107:59–65.CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Van Dam JH, Hop WC, Schouten WR. Analysis of patients with poor putcome of rectocele repair. Dis Colon Rectum. 2000;43:1556–60.CrossRef Van Dam JH, Hop WC, Schouten WR. Analysis of patients with poor putcome of rectocele repair. Dis Colon Rectum. 2000;43:1556–60.CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Yamana T, Takahashi T, Iwadare J. Clinical and physiologic outcomes after transvaginal rectocele repair. Dis Colon Rectum. 2006;49(5):661–7.CrossRef Yamana T, Takahashi T, Iwadare J. Clinical and physiologic outcomes after transvaginal rectocele repair. Dis Colon Rectum. 2006;49(5):661–7.CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Agachan F, Chen T, Pfeifer J, Reissman P, Wexner SD. A constipation scoring system to simplify evaluation and management of constipated patients. Dis Colon Rectum. 1996;39:681–5.CrossRef Agachan F, Chen T, Pfeifer J, Reissman P, Wexner SD. A constipation scoring system to simplify evaluation and management of constipated patients. Dis Colon Rectum. 1996;39:681–5.CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Jorge JM, Wexner SD. Etiology and management of fecal incontinence. Dis Colon Rectum. 1993;36:77e97. Jorge JM, Wexner SD. Etiology and management of fecal incontinence. Dis Colon Rectum. 1993;36:77e97.
12.
go back to reference Rao SSC, Azpiroz F, Diament N, Enck P, Tougas G, Wald A. Minimum standards of anorectal manometry. Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2002;14:553–9.CrossRef Rao SSC, Azpiroz F, Diament N, Enck P, Tougas G, Wald A. Minimum standards of anorectal manometry. Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2002;14:553–9.CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Elfeki H, Emile SH, Omar W. Transperineal repair of third degree perineal tear and anterior rectocele with complete perineal body reconstruction - a video vignette. Colorectal Dis. 2017;19:504.CrossRef Elfeki H, Emile SH, Omar W. Transperineal repair of third degree perineal tear and anterior rectocele with complete perineal body reconstruction - a video vignette. Colorectal Dis. 2017;19:504.CrossRef
15.
go back to reference Fischer F, Roblick U, Farke S, Mirow L, Bruch H. Transvaginal, transperineal and transrectal approaches for symptomatic rectocele. Coloproctology. 2007;29:258–64.CrossRef Fischer F, Roblick U, Farke S, Mirow L, Bruch H. Transvaginal, transperineal and transrectal approaches for symptomatic rectocele. Coloproctology. 2007;29:258–64.CrossRef
16.
go back to reference Singh K, Cortes E, Reid WMN. Evaluation of the fascial technique for surgical repair of isolated posterior vaginal wall prolapse. Obstet Gynecol. 2003;101:320–4.PubMed Singh K, Cortes E, Reid WMN. Evaluation of the fascial technique for surgical repair of isolated posterior vaginal wall prolapse. Obstet Gynecol. 2003;101:320–4.PubMed
17.
go back to reference Puigdollers A, Fernandez-Fraga X, Azpiroz F. Persistent symptoms of functional outlet obstruction after rectocele repair. Colorectal Dis. 2007;9:262–5.CrossRef Puigdollers A, Fernandez-Fraga X, Azpiroz F. Persistent symptoms of functional outlet obstruction after rectocele repair. Colorectal Dis. 2007;9:262–5.CrossRef
18.
go back to reference Lechaux JP, Lechaux D, Bataille P, Bars I. Transperineal repair of rectocele with prosthetic mesh. A prospective study. Ann. Chir. 2004;129:211–7. Lechaux JP, Lechaux D, Bataille P, Bars I. Transperineal repair of rectocele with prosthetic mesh. A prospective study. Ann. Chir. 2004;129:211–7.
19.
go back to reference Pescatori M. Rectoceles and the "iceberg syndrome". 2003; Urodinamica 13(1):15-22 Pescatori M. Rectoceles and the "iceberg syndrome". 2003; Urodinamica 13(1):15-22
23.
go back to reference Farid M, Madbouly KM, Hussein A, Mahdy T, Moneim HA, Omar W. Randomized controlled trial between perineal and anal repairs of rectocele in obstructed defecation. World J. Surg. 2010;34:822–9.CrossRef Farid M, Madbouly KM, Hussein A, Mahdy T, Moneim HA, Omar W. Randomized controlled trial between perineal and anal repairs of rectocele in obstructed defecation. World J. Surg. 2010;34:822–9.CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Specific Changes in Manometric Parameters are Associated with Non-improvement in Symptoms after Rectocele Repair
Authors
Sameh Hany Emile
Mohammed Balata
Waleed Omar
Wael Khafagy
Hesham Elgendy
Publication date
01-10-2020
Publisher
Springer International Publishing
Published in
International Urogynecology Journal / Issue 10/2020
Print ISSN: 0937-3462
Electronic ISSN: 1433-3023
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-020-04444-9

Other articles of this Issue 10/2020

International Urogynecology Journal 10/2020 Go to the issue