Published in:
01-04-2006 | Correspondence
Conflict of opinion -- is PROWESS real progress?
Author:
Alasdair F. Mackenzie
Published in:
Intensive Care Medicine
|
Issue 4/2006
Login to get access
Excerpt
I note that all three correspondents who have objected to my article [
1] have declared conflicts of interest on this issue – my interest is only in patient safety. Dr. Ridley misreads my article: I do not cite the Global ENHANCE trial [
2], which was unpublished when I wrote my commentary. Consistency with the April 2005 revised EMEA recommendation [
3] was restored with an update from NICE in October 2005 [
4]. As this change introduced the term “high risk” to the indication in Europe there are still problems: the term is undefined, and the Summary of Product Characteristics does not include this alteration [
5]. Dr. Ridley correctly states that ‘looking for survival differences’ in the follow-up data, as done by Dr. Macias, is ‘unsound’. My statement regarding the loss of statistical significance in PROWESS with a shift of seven deaths from one group to the other appears correct. …