Top

Published in:

01-04-2018 | Original Paper

Confirming the Tripartite Structure of the Duke University Religion Index: A Methodological Approach

Authors: John W. Lace, Paul J. Handal

Published in: Journal of Religion and Health | Issue 2/2018

Abstract

The present study provided a methodological critique regarding psychometric investigations of the Duke University Religion Index (DUREL) and its variants. Nine hundred seventeen (630 females and 287 males) university students (M age = 19.24) completed the DUREL, the Personal Religious Inventory, and the Daily Spiritual Experiences Scale online. Confirmatory factor analyses were performed to assess a three-factor (organizational religious activity; non-organizational religious activity; and intrinsic religiosity) and a unidimensional model of the DUREL. Chi-square difference tests were performed, and Akaike information criterion values and Bayesian information criterion values were compared between the models, each of which supported the three-factor model for the DUREL over the unidimensional model. Convergent validity for the three factors of the DUREL emerged through Spearman’s rho correlations with measures of personal prayer, ritual religious attendance, religious integration, Closeness to the Divine. This study concluded that the DUREL is a multidimensional measurement of religion for use in English-speaking university students, and it provided a broad methodological note regarding future investigations of measures of religion or spirituality that possess an existing theoretical model.

Agishtein, P., Pirutinsky, S., Kor, A., Baruch, D., Kanter, J., & Rosmarin, D. H. (2013). Integrating spirituality into a behavioral model of depression. Journal of Cognitive & Behavioral Psychotherapies, 13(2), 275–289.

Bergh, D. (2015). Chi squared test of fit and sample size-a comparison between a random sample approach and a chi square value adjustment method. Journal of Applied Measurement, 16(2), 204–217.PubMed

Chen, H., Wang, Z., Phillips, M. R., Sun, Y., & Cheng, H. G. (2014). Internal consistency and test-retest reliability of the Chinese version of the 5-item Duke University Religion Index. Shanghai Archives of Psychiatry, 26(5), 300–309. https://doi.org/10.11919/j.issn.1002-0829.214088.PubMedPubMedCentral

Crawford, M. E., Handal, P. J., & Wiener, R. L. (1989). The relationship between religion and mental health/distress. Review of Religious Research, 31(1), 16–22. https://doi.org/10.2307/3511020.CrossRef

Creech, C. A., Handal, P. J., Worley, S. A., Pashak, T. J., Perez, E. J., & Caver, L. (2013). Changing trends in ritual attendance and spirituality throughout the college years. Psychology, 4(12), 994–997. https://doi.org/10.4236/psych.2013.412143.CrossRef

Cruz, J. P., Reyes, R. W. P., Colet, P. C., Estacio, J. C., Caldeira, S., Vitorino, L. M., et al. (2017). Psychometric evaluation of the filipino versions of the Duke University Religion Index and the Spiritual Coping Strategies Scale in Filipino Hemodialysis Patients. Journal of Religion and Health, 56(4), 1381–1396. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10943-016-0355-z.CrossRefPubMed

de Paula, J. J. (2015). Propriedades psicométricas do Índice de Religiosidade de Duke aplicado em plataforma virtual. Cadernos Saúde Coletiva, 23, 276–279.CrossRef

Deb, S., McGirr, K., & Sun, J. (2016). Spirituality in Indian university students and its associations with socioeconomic status, religious background, social support, and mental health. Journal of Religion and Health, 55(5), 1623–1641. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10943-016-0207-x.CrossRefPubMed

Dobrowolska, B., Jurek, K., Pilewska-Kozak, A. B., Pawlikowski, J., Drozd, M., & Koenig, H. (2016). Validation of the Polish version of the Duke University Religion Index (PolDUREL). Polish Archives of Internal Medicine, 126(12), 1005–1008. https://doi.org/10.20452/pamw.3721.CrossRefPubMed

Ellison, C. G., & Fan, D. (2007). Daily spiritual experiences and psychological well-being among US adults. Social Indicators Research, 88(2), 247–271. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-007-9187-2.CrossRef

Fabricatore, A. N., Handal, P. J., Rubio, D. M., & Gilner, F. H. (2004). RESEARCH: Stress, religion, and mental health: Religious coping in mediating and moderating roles. The International Journal for the Psychology of Religion, 14(2), 91–108. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327582ijpr1402_2.CrossRef

Furr, R. M., & Bacharach, V. R. (2013). Psychometrics: An introduction. Thousand Oaks: Sage.

Gonzales, L., Koci, A., Gee, R. M., Noji, A., Glaser, D., Marsh, A. K., et al. (2015). Caring for women globally: Psychometric testing of two instruments translated into five languages for use in cardiovascular recovery. International Journal of Nursing Practice, 21, 27–37. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijn.12393.CrossRefPubMed

Hafizi, S., Memari, A. H., Pakrah, M., Mohebi, F., Saghazadeh, A., & Koenig, H. G. (2013). The Duke University Religion Index (DUREL): Validation and reliability of the Farsi version. Psychological Reports, 112(1), 151–159. https://doi.org/10.2466/08.07.17.pr0.112.1.151-159.CrossRefPubMed

Hall, D. E., Meador, K. G., & Koenig, H. G. (2008). Measuring religiousness in health research: Review and critique. Journal of Religion and Health, 47(2), 134–163. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10943-008-9165-2.CrossRefPubMed

Handal, P. J., Creech, C. A., Pashak, T. J., Caver, L., Perez, E. J., Schwendeman, M. G., et al. (2014). Distinguishing between self-classified religious and spiritual emerging adults: Conceptual and operational challenges. Athens Journal of Social Sciences, X(Y), 1–11.

Handal, P. J., Creech, C. A., Schwendeman, M. G., Pashak, T. J., Perez, E. J., & Caver, L. (2016). Distinguishing between self-classified religious and spiritual groups of emerging adult males: Conceptual and psychometric challenges. Journal of Religion and Health. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10943-016-0304-x.

Handal, P. J., & Lace, J. W. (2017). Differential effects of family structure on religion and spirituality of emerging adult males and females. Journal of Religion and Health, 56(4), 1361–1370. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10943-016-0343-3.CrossRefPubMed

Ho, R. (2014). Handbook of univariate and multivariate data analysis and interpretation with SPSS. Boca Raton, FL: Taylor & Francis Group.

Hu, L. T., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 6(1), 1–55. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705519909540118.CrossRef

Hurley, A. E., Scandura, T. A., Schriesheim, C. A., Brannick, M. T., Seers, A., Vandenberg, R. J., et al. (1997). Exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis: Guidelines, issues, and alternatives. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 18(6), 667–683.CrossRef

Hyman, C., & Handal, P. J. (2006). Definitions and evaluation of religion and spirituality items by religious professionals: A pilot study. Journal of Religion and Health, 45(2), 264–282. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10943-006-9015-z.CrossRef

Kass, R. E., & Raftery, A. E. (1995). Bayes factors. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 90(430), 773–795. https://doi.org/10.1080/01621459.1995.10476572.CrossRef

Kattimani, S., Sarkar, S., Bharadwaj, B., & Rajkumar, R. P. (2015). An exploration of the relationship between spirituality and state and trait anger among medical students. Journal of Religion and Health, 54(6), 2134–2141. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10943-014-9933-0.CrossRefPubMed

Kenny, D. A. (2012). SEM: Identification. Retrieved from https://perma.cc/FK2N-2DGE.

Kenny, D. A. (2015). Measuring model fit. Retrieved from https://perma.cc/YT4M-QPJQ.

Koenig, H. G., & Büssing, A. (2010). The Duke University Religion Index (DUREL): A five-item measure for use in epidemological studies. Religions, 1(1), 78–85. https://doi.org/10.3390/rel1010078.CrossRef

Koenig, H., Parkerson, G. R., Jr., & Meador, K. G. (1997). Religion index for psychiatric research. The American Journal of Psychiatry, 154(6), 885–886. https://doi.org/10.1176/ajp.154.6.885b.PubMed

Lac, A., Austin, N., Lemke, R., Poojary, S., & Hunter, P. (2017). Association between religious practice and risk of depression in older people in the subacute setting. Australasian Journal on Ageing, 36(2), E31–E34. https://doi.org/10.1111/ajag.12384.CrossRefPubMed

Lace, J., Haeberlein, K., & Handal, P. (2017). Five-factor structure of the Spiritual Transcendence Scale and its relationship with clinical psychological distress in emerging adults. Religions, 8(10), 230. https://doi.org/10.3390/rel8100230.CrossRef

Lace, J. W., & Handal, P. J. (2017). Psychometric properties of the Daily Spiritual Experiences Scale: Support for a two-factor solution, concurrent validity, and its relationship with clinical psychological distress in university students. Religions, 8(7), 123. https://doi.org/10.3390/rel8070123.CrossRef

Lipsmeyer, M. E. (1984). The measurement of religiosity and its relationship to mental health/impairment. St. Louis: Saint Louis University.

Lucchetti, G., Granero Lucchetti, A. L., Peres, M. F., Leão, F. C., Moreira-Almeida, A., & Koenig, H. G. (2012). Validation of the Duke Religion Index: DUREL (Portuguese version). Journal of Religion and Health, 51(2), 579–586. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10943-010-9429-5.CrossRefPubMed

Mulaik, S. A. (2004). Objectivity in science and structural equation modeling. In D. Kaplan (Ed.), The Sage handbook of quantitative methodology for the social sciences (pp. 422–446). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.

Newman, C. (2014). The relationships between spirituality and religiosity, trait mindfulness, and health outcomes in a Jewish community sample (3662301 Ph.D.), Yeshiva University.

Ng, S.-M., Fong, T. C. T., Tsui, E. Y. L., Au-Yeung, F. S. W., & Law, S. K. W. (2009). Validation of the Chinese version of Underwood’s Daily Spiritual Experience Scale—Transcending cultural boundaries? International Journal of Behavioral Medicine, 16(2), 91–97. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12529-009-9045-5.CrossRefPubMed

Peltzer, K., Pengpid, S., Amuleru-Marshall, O., Mufune, P., & Zeid, A. A. (2016). Religiosity and health risk behaviour among university students in 26 low, middle and high income countries. Journal of Religion and Health, 55(6), 2131–2140. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10943-016-0260-5.CrossRefPubMed

Plante, T. G., Vallaeys, C. L., Sherman, A. C., & Wallston, K. A. (2002). The development of a brief version of the Santa Clara strength of religious faith questionnaire. Pastoral Psychology, 50(5), 359–368. https://doi.org/10.1023/a:1014413720710.CrossRef

Raftery, A. E. (1995). Bayesian model selection in social research. Sociological Methodology, 25, 111–163. https://doi.org/10.2307/271063.CrossRef

Saffari, M., Zeidi, I. M., Pakpour, A. H., & Koenig, H. G. (2013). Psychometric properties of the Persian version of the Duke University Religion Index (DUREL): A study on Muslims. Journal of Religion and Health, 52(2), 631–641. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10943-012-9639-0.CrossRefPubMed

Schreiber, J. B., Nora, A., Stage, F. K., Barlow, E. A., & King, J. (2006). Reporting structural equation modeling and confirmatory factor analysis results: A review. The Journal of Educational Research, 99(6), 323–338. https://doi.org/10.3200/JOER.99.6.323-338.CrossRef

Shevlin, M., & Miles, J. N. V. (1998). Effects of sample size, model specification and factor loadings on the GFI in confirmatory factor analysis. Personality and Individual Differences, 25(1), 85–90. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0191-8869(98)00055-5.CrossRef

Short, M. B., Kasper, T. E., & Wetterneck, C. T. (2015). The relationship between religiosity and internet pornography use. Journal of Religion and Health, 54(2), 571–583. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10943-014-9849-8.CrossRefPubMed

Storch, E. A., Roberti, J. W., Heidgerken, A. D., Storch, J. B., Lewin, A. B., Killiany, E. M., et al. (2004a). The Duke Religion Index: A psychometric investigation. Pastoral Psychology, 53(2), 175–181. https://doi.org/10.1023/b:pasp.0000046828.94211.53.CrossRef

Storch, E. A., Strawser, M. S., & Storch, J. B. (2004b). Two-week test-retest reliability of the Duke Religion Index. Psychological Reports, 94(3), 993–994. https://doi.org/10.2466/pr0.94.3.993-994.CrossRefPubMed

Suhr, D. (2008). Step your way through path analysis. Retrieved from https://perma.cc/W6SM-Q2TA,

Tabachnik, B. G., & Fidell, L. (2013). Using multivariate statistics. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.

Taylor, P. W. (2013). Psychometric properties of the Duke University Religion Index, English and Spanish versions, for Hispanic-American women. San Diego: San Diego State University.

Underwood, L. G. (2011). The Daily Spiritual Experience Scale: Overview and results. Religions, 2(4), 29–50. https://doi.org/10.3390/rel2010029.CrossRef

Underwood, L. G., & Teresi, J. A. (2002). The Daily Spiritual Experience Scale: Development, theoretical description, reliability, exploratory factor analysis, and preliminary construct validity using health-related data. Annals of Behavioral Medicine, 24(1), 22–33. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15324796abm2401_04.CrossRefPubMed

Wang, Z., Rong, Y., & Koenig, H. G. (2014). Psychometric properties of a Chinese version of the Duke University Religion Index in College Students and Community Residents in China. Psychological Reports, 115(2), 427–443. https://doi.org/10.2466/08.17.PR0.115c19z8.CrossRefPubMed

Werner, C., & Schermelleh-Engel, K. (2010). Deciding between competing models: Chi square difference tests. Retrieved from https://perma.cc/2RTR-8XPZ.

Wilson Van Voorhis, C. R., & Morgan, B. L. (2007). Understanding power and rules of thumb for determining sample sizes. Tutorials in Quantitative Methods for Psychology, 3(2), 43–50. https://doi.org/10.20982/tqmp.03.2.p043.CrossRef

Zangiacomi Martinez, E., dos Santos Almeida, R. G., Garcia Braz, A. C., & Duarte de Carvalho, A. C. (2014). Association between religiousness and blood donation among Brazilian postgraduate students from health-related areas. Revista Brasileira de Hematologia e Hemoterapia, 36(3), 184–190. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bjhh.2014.03.012.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Title: Confirming the Tripartite Structure of the Duke University Religion Index: A Methodological Approach
Authors: John W. Lace
Paul J. Handal
Publication date: 01-04-2018
Publisher: Springer US
Published in: Journal of Religion and Health / Issue 2/2018
Print ISSN: 0022-4197
Electronic ISSN: 1573-6571
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10943-017-0556-0

At a glance: The STEP trials

Springer Medicine

Confirming the Tripartite Structure of the Duke University Religion Index: A Methodological Approach

Abstract

At a glance: The STEP trials

Springer Medicine

Abstract

Please log in to get access to this content

Other articles of this Issue 2/2018

Humor as Wisdom for Reframing Life

Religious Affiliation, Religiosity, and Spirituality in Pediatric Residents: Effects on Communication and Self-Efficacy with Adolescents in a Clinical Setting

A Closer Look at Transcendence and Its Relationship to Mental Health

Revisiting The Depleted Self

From “The Depleted Self” to “The Will to Believe”: Excavating the Hermeneutics of Donald Capps

A Contemporary Paradigm: Integrating Spirituality in Advance Care Planning