Skip to main content
Top
Published in: World Journal of Surgery 2/2005

01-02-2005

Confidentiality Governing Surgical Research Practice

Authors: Anna Mavroforou, M.Sc., M.B.A., Athanasios D. Giannoukas, M.Sc., M.D., Dimitrios Mavrophoros, M.Sc., M.D., Emmanuel Michalodimitrakis, M.D., J.D.

Published in: World Journal of Surgery | Issue 2/2005

Login to get access

Abstract

Healthy subjects or patients volunteering to participate in trials expect that their privacy and autonomy will be protected. The aim of this article is to highlight issues related to confidentiality governing surgical research practice. A search of the current relevant literature was undertaken. Consent to the disclosure of any information should be sought wherever practicable, but disclosures should be kept to the minimum necessary. The data should be made anonymous where unidentifiable data serve the purpose. Where the previously described actions are not practicable for various reasons, data may be disclosed for research, provided participants have been given information about access to their records and about their right to object. Personal information may only be disclosed without individual’s consent when it is for the protection of the public interest, but this has proved too ambiguous a rubric to be useful without proper clarification. Hampering of noncommercial medical research should also be avoided, as it may cause serious damage to public health. Confidentiality in research is an important issue in the protection of the participants’ rights to privacy and autonomy, and it should be considered in the design of each study. Breach of confidentiality is legally justifiable for the sake of the public interest, but proper clarification of the law is required in order to avoid hampering noncommercial medical research that is vital for the public health.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Sutton, JH 2001Patient privacy and health information confidentialityBull. Am. Coll. Surg.86813 Sutton, JH 2001Patient privacy and health information confidentialityBull. Am. Coll. Surg.86813
2.
go back to reference Peto, J, Fletcher, O, Gilham, C 2004Data protection, informed consent, and research. Medical research suffers because of pointless obstaclesBMJ32810291030 Peto, J, Fletcher, O, Gilham, C 2004Data protection, informed consent, and research. Medical research suffers because of pointless obstaclesBMJ32810291030
3.
go back to reference Winslade, WJ 1982Confidentiality of medical records. An overview of concepts and legal policiesJ. Leg. Med.3497533 Winslade, WJ 1982Confidentiality of medical records. An overview of concepts and legal policiesJ. Leg. Med.3497533
4.
go back to reference Hope, Savulescu, J, Hendrick, J (2003) “Confidentiality” In: Hope, T, Savulescu, J, Hendrick, J (eds), Medical Ethics and Law, the Core Curriculum, chapter 7, Churchill Livingstone, New York, pp 81–97 Hope, Savulescu, J, Hendrick, J (2003) “Confidentiality” In: Hope, T, Savulescu, J, Hendrick, J (eds), Medical Ethics and Law, the Core Curriculum, chapter 7, Churchill Livingstone, New York, pp 81–97
5.
go back to reference Medical Research Council. Personal information in medical research. October 2000 Medical Research Council. Personal information in medical research. October 2000
6.
go back to reference Mackie, C, Bradburn, N (2000) Improving access to and confidentiality of research data. Report of a workshop, Committee on National Statistics, National Research Council Mackie, C, Bradburn, N (2000) Improving access to and confidentiality of research data. Report of a workshop, Committee on National Statistics, National Research Council
7.
go back to reference Perritt, HH, Jr (2003) Protecting confidentiality of research data through law. Prepared for Data Confidentiality and Access Workshop Perritt, HH, Jr (2003) Protecting confidentiality of research data through law. Prepared for Data Confidentiality and Access Workshop
8.
go back to reference Reidenberg, JR 2003Privacy wrongs in search of remediesHastings J.J.54877 Reidenberg, JR 2003Privacy wrongs in search of remediesHastings J.J.54877
9.
go back to reference National Human Research Protections Advisory Committee (NHRPAC). Recommendations on confidentiality and research data protections. July 30-31, 2002 National Human Research Protections Advisory Committee (NHRPAC). Recommendations on confidentiality and research data protections. July 30-31, 2002
10.
go back to reference Mayor, S 2000UK researchers told to maintain confidentialityBMJ321917 Mayor, S 2000UK researchers told to maintain confidentialityBMJ321917
11.
go back to reference Data Protection Act (1998) Chapter 29, The Stationery Office Limited (ISBN 0 10 542998 8) Data Protection Act (1998) Chapter 29, The Stationery Office Limited (ISBN 0 10 542998 8)
12.
go back to reference British Medical Association Ethics Department2004ConfidentialityBritish Medical Association Ethics Department. Medical Ethics Today, the BMA’s Handbook of Ethics and Law2BMJ Publishing GroupLondon165197 British Medical Association Ethics Department2004ConfidentialityBritish Medical Association Ethics Department. Medical Ethics Today, the BMA’s Handbook of Ethics and Law2BMJ Publishing GroupLondon165197
Metadata
Title
Confidentiality Governing Surgical Research Practice
Authors
Anna Mavroforou, M.Sc., M.B.A.
Athanasios D. Giannoukas, M.Sc., M.D.
Dimitrios Mavrophoros, M.Sc., M.D.
Emmanuel Michalodimitrakis, M.D., J.D.
Publication date
01-02-2005
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
World Journal of Surgery / Issue 2/2005
Print ISSN: 0364-2313
Electronic ISSN: 1432-2323
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-004-7678-8

Other articles of this Issue 2/2005

World Journal of Surgery 2/2005 Go to the issue