Skip to main content
Top
Published in: International Journal for Equity in Health 1/2019

Open Access 01-12-2019 | Research

Confidentiality agreements: a challenge in market regulation

Authors: Roberto F. Iunes, Manuela Villar Uribe, Janet Bonilla Torres, Marina Morgado Garcia, Carolina Zampirolli Dias, Juliana Alvares-Teodoro, Francisco de Assis Acurcio, Augusto Afonso Guerra-Junior

Published in: International Journal for Equity in Health | Issue 1/2019

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Sustainability and the ability to maintain the right to health, with the guarantee of access to quality medicines and health services, have been a great challenge for countries with universal health systems. The great technological advances bring with it an expressive increase in the expenditures of the health systems, especially those directed towards the acquisition of high-cost drugs, which are still under patent protection, have a high cost and, in some cases, present uncertainties about their effectiveness and safety. As a way of maintaining the proper functioning of the systems and guaranteeing access to these medicines, some countries started to negotiate discounts with manufacturing companies. Pricing agreements have been adopted by developed countries with the objective of reducing their spending on high-cost medicines and, although they represent an opportunity for better negotiation with the industries, they violate the principle of transparency that regulates the world market. However, the existence of confidentiality agreements has meant that the declared prices are not the actual prices, unfairly harming the countries that use these price lists as beacons in their systems.

Methods

Representatives of health, judicial, legislative, patient organizations and academics from eight countries in Latin America and South Korea participated in a meeting in September 2017 in Chile to discuss price confidentiality agreements and the impact on public health policies. During the meeting, participants were presented with a hypothetical case to subsidize the discussion on the topic. Divided into groups, participants should propose recommendations for the problem by pointing out the pros and cons if each proposed recommendation was adopted. The groups were then confronted by a simulated jury and finally issued a single and final recommendation for the problem.

Results

The topic was widely discussed and recommendations were raised by the participants. Among them, it is worth noting the elaboration of norms that regulate the negotiations of prices between the countries bringing transparency and harmony in the adopted conducts. In addition, the possible consequences and potential impacts of confidentiality on drug prices and inputs, such as information asymmetry and inequity of access between countries, were pointed out.

Conclusion

Despite there are efforts to make price negotiations more transparent, there is still no well-established standardization that promotes a well-functioning market. Confidentiality agreements hamper the fairness of access to essential health products.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Adamski J, Godman B, Ofierska-sujkowska G, et al. Risk sharing arrangements for pharmaceuticals: potential considerations and recommendations for European payers. BMC Health Serv Res. 2010;10:153.CrossRef Adamski J, Godman B, Ofierska-sujkowska G, et al. Risk sharing arrangements for pharmaceuticals: potential considerations and recommendations for European payers. BMC Health Serv Res. 2010;10:153.CrossRef
2.
go back to reference Carlson JJ, Sullivan SD, Garrison LP, Neumann PJ, Veenstraa DL. Linking payment to health outcomes: A taxonomy and examination of performance-based reimbursement schemes between healthcare payers and manufacturers. Health Policy. 2010;96:179–90.CrossRef Carlson JJ, Sullivan SD, Garrison LP, Neumann PJ, Veenstraa DL. Linking payment to health outcomes: A taxonomy and examination of performance-based reimbursement schemes between healthcare payers and manufacturers. Health Policy. 2010;96:179–90.CrossRef
3.
go back to reference Ferrario, A.; Kanavos, P. Managed entry agreements for pharmaceuticals: the European experience. LSE research online, 2013. The London School of Economics and Political Science. Ferrario, A.; Kanavos, P. Managed entry agreements for pharmaceuticals: the European experience. LSE research online, 2013. The London School of Economics and Political Science.
4.
go back to reference Freitas H, Janissek R. Análise léxica e análise de conteúdo. Ed. Sagra Luzzato: Porto Alegre; 2000. 176p. Freitas H, Janissek R. Análise léxica e análise de conteúdo. Ed. Sagra Luzzato: Porto Alegre; 2000. 176p.
5.
go back to reference Godman B, Peterson K, Malmstrom RE, et al. Improving the managed entry of new medicines: sharing experiences across Europe. Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res. 2012;12(4):439–41.CrossRef Godman B, Peterson K, Malmstrom RE, et al. Improving the managed entry of new medicines: sharing experiences across Europe. Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res. 2012;12(4):439–41.CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Gupta UG, Clarke RE. Theory and application of the Delphi technique: a bibliography (1975-1994). Technol Forecast Soc Chang. 1996;53:185–211.CrossRef Gupta UG, Clarke RE. Theory and application of the Delphi technique: a bibliography (1975-1994). Technol Forecast Soc Chang. 1996;53:185–211.CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Jaroslawski S, Toumi M. Market access agreements for pharmaceuticals in Europe: diversity of approaches and underlying concepts. BMC Health Serv Res. 2011;11:259.CrossRef Jaroslawski S, Toumi M. Market access agreements for pharmaceuticals in Europe: diversity of approaches and underlying concepts. BMC Health Serv Res. 2011;11:259.CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Jaruzelski B, Dehoff K. How the top innovators keep winning. Strategy Business. 2010;61. Jaruzelski B, Dehoff K. How the top innovators keep winning. Strategy Business. 2010;61.
9.
go back to reference Khanna I. Drug discovery in pharmaceutical industry: productivity challenges and trends. Drug Discovery Today, v. 17, n. 19/20, 2012. Khanna I. Drug discovery in pharmaceutical industry: productivity challenges and trends. Drug Discovery Today, v. 17, n. 19/20, 2012.
10.
go back to reference Klemp M, Fronsdal KB. What principles should govern the use of managed entry agreements? Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2011;27(1):77–83.CrossRef Klemp M, Fronsdal KB. What principles should govern the use of managed entry agreements? Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2011;27(1):77–83.CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Meirelles DS. Teorias de mercado e regulação: por que os mercados e o governo falham? CADERNOS EBAPE. BR, v. 8, n° 4, artigo 5, Rio de Janeiro, Dez. 2010. Meirelles DS. Teorias de mercado e regulação: por que os mercados e o governo falham? CADERNOS EBAPE. BR, v. 8, n° 4, artigo 5, Rio de Janeiro, Dez. 2010.
12.
go back to reference Miziara NM. Regulação do mercado de medicamentos: a CMED e a política de controle de preços: Dissertação apresentada à Faculdade de Direito da Universidade de São Paulo para a obtenção do título de Mestre em Direito; 2013. Miziara NM. Regulação do mercado de medicamentos: a CMED e a política de controle de preços: Dissertação apresentada à Faculdade de Direito da Universidade de São Paulo para a obtenção do título de Mestre em Direito; 2013.
13.
go back to reference Morgan SG, Vogler S, Wagner AN. Payers’ experiences with confidential pharmaceutical price discounts: A survey of public and statutory health systems in North America, Europe, and Australasia. Health Policy. 2017;121:354–62.CrossRef Morgan SG, Vogler S, Wagner AN. Payers’ experiences with confidential pharmaceutical price discounts: A survey of public and statutory health systems in North America, Europe, and Australasia. Health Policy. 2017;121:354–62.CrossRef
14.
go back to reference Munaretto LF.; Corrêa, H. L.; Cunha, J. A. C. A study on the characteristics of the Delphi method and focus group as techniques to obtain data in exploratory research. Rev Admin UFSM [Internet]. 2013. Munaretto LF.; Corrêa, H. L.; Cunha, J. A. C. A study on the characteristics of the Delphi method and focus group as techniques to obtain data in exploratory research. Rev Admin UFSM [Internet]. 2013.
15.
go back to reference Pauwels K. et al. Managed Entry Agreements for Oncology Drugs: Lessons from the European Experience to Inform the Future. Frontiers in Pharmacology. April 2017 | Volume 8 | Article 171. Pauwels K. et al. Managed Entry Agreements for Oncology Drugs: Lessons from the European Experience to Inform the Future. Frontiers in Pharmacology. April 2017 | Volume 8 | Article 171.
16.
go back to reference Vogler, S.; Zimmermann, N.; Habl, C.; Piessnegger, J.; Bucsics, A. Discounts and rebates granted to public payers for medicines in European countries. Southern Med Review Vol 5 Issue 1 July 2012. Vogler, S.; Zimmermann, N.; Habl, C.; Piessnegger, J.; Bucsics, A. Discounts and rebates granted to public payers for medicines in European countries. Southern Med Review Vol 5 Issue 1 July 2012.
Metadata
Title
Confidentiality agreements: a challenge in market regulation
Authors
Roberto F. Iunes
Manuela Villar Uribe
Janet Bonilla Torres
Marina Morgado Garcia
Carolina Zampirolli Dias
Juliana Alvares-Teodoro
Francisco de Assis Acurcio
Augusto Afonso Guerra-Junior
Publication date
01-12-2019
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
International Journal for Equity in Health / Issue 1/2019
Electronic ISSN: 1475-9276
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12939-019-0916-3

Other articles of this Issue 1/2019

International Journal for Equity in Health 1/2019 Go to the issue