Skip to main content
Top
Published in: European Spine Journal 1/2016

Open Access 01-05-2016 | Case Report

Cone-beam CT to assess bony fusion following anterior cervical interbody fusion

Authors: Jan Erik Vandevenne, Dieter Peuskens, Leen Wijnen, Jan Wuyts

Published in: European Spine Journal | Special Issue 1/2016

Login to get access

Abstract

Purpose

Assessment of bony fusion following anterior cervical interbody fusion (ACIF) is usually done by plain film or CT. We present the first clinical application of Cone-Beam CT (CBCT) to evaluate bony fusion after ACIF.

Methods

A 56-year-old man with disc herniation at C6-C7 underwent ACIF surgery using a compressed nanocrystalline hydroxyapatite interbody device (nanOss-C, Pioneer Surgical Marquette, MI, USA) and a nanocrystalline hydroxyapatite bone graft filler (nanOss Bioactive, Pioneer Surgical Marquette, MI, USA). Imaging follow-up was performed by CBCT (NewTom 5G, QR Srl, Verona, Italy) at 1 day, 6 weeks, 3 and 9 months post-operatively. Two independent assessors quantitatively measured the greyscale changes of the bone graft filler and qualitatively evaluated the bony fusion process.

Results

Quantitative analysis of the images showed a steadily increasing matrix density of the bone graft filler over the 9 months follow-up, suggesting increasing calcification. Qualitative evaluation demonstrated different stages of the bone fusion process within the disc space around the cage, at the interface between cage and endplates, and at the interface between bone graft filler and the endplates.

Conclusions

CBCT provides high-resolution cross-sectional imaging of the cervical spine after ACIF. For the first time, in vivo evaluation of the bone graft filler within the centre of the circumferentially radiodense cage and detailed cross-sectional evaluation of bone fusion was achieved. Confirmation of these promising outlooks of CBCT in a large cohort of ACIF patients is needed with regard to routine clinical application and evaluation of different interbody devices.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Miracle AC, Mukherji SK (2009) Conebeam CT of the head and neck, part 2: clinical applications. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 30:1285–1292CrossRefPubMed Miracle AC, Mukherji SK (2009) Conebeam CT of the head and neck, part 2: clinical applications. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 30:1285–1292CrossRefPubMed
2.
go back to reference Casselman JW, Quirynen M, Lemahieu SF, Baert AL, Bonte J (1988) Computed tomography in the determination of anatomical landmarks in the perspective of endosseous oral implant installation. J Head Neck Pathol 7:255–264 Casselman JW, Quirynen M, Lemahieu SF, Baert AL, Bonte J (1988) Computed tomography in the determination of anatomical landmarks in the perspective of endosseous oral implant installation. J Head Neck Pathol 7:255–264
3.
go back to reference Jacobs R (2011) Dental cone beam CT and its justified use in oral health care. JBR-BTR 94:254–265PubMed Jacobs R (2011) Dental cone beam CT and its justified use in oral health care. JBR-BTR 94:254–265PubMed
4.
go back to reference Pauwels R, Beinsberger J, Collaert B, Theodorakou C, Rogers J, Walker A, Cockmartin L, Bosmans H, Jacobs R, Bogaerts R, Horner K, Consortium SP (2012) Effective dose range for dental cone beam computed tomography scanners. Eur J Radiol 81:267–271CrossRefPubMed Pauwels R, Beinsberger J, Collaert B, Theodorakou C, Rogers J, Walker A, Cockmartin L, Bosmans H, Jacobs R, Bogaerts R, Horner K, Consortium SP (2012) Effective dose range for dental cone beam computed tomography scanners. Eur J Radiol 81:267–271CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Loubele M, Bogaerts R, Van Dijck E, Pauwels R, Vanheusden S, Suetens P, Marchal G, Sanderink G, Jacobs R (2009) Comparison between effective radiation dose of CBCT and MSCT scanners for dentomaxillofacial applications. Eur J Radiol 71:461–468CrossRefPubMed Loubele M, Bogaerts R, Van Dijck E, Pauwels R, Vanheusden S, Suetens P, Marchal G, Sanderink G, Jacobs R (2009) Comparison between effective radiation dose of CBCT and MSCT scanners for dentomaxillofacial applications. Eur J Radiol 71:461–468CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Ludlow JB, Ivanovic M (2008) Comparative dosimetry of dental CBCT devices and 64-slice CT for oral and maxillofacial radiology. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 106:106–114CrossRefPubMed Ludlow JB, Ivanovic M (2008) Comparative dosimetry of dental CBCT devices and 64-slice CT for oral and maxillofacial radiology. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 106:106–114CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Ruivo J, Mermuys K, Bacher K, Kuhweide R, Offeciers E, Casselman JW (2009) Cone beam computed tomography, a low-dose imaging technique in the postoperative assessment of cochlear implantation. Otol Neurotol 30:299–303CrossRefPubMed Ruivo J, Mermuys K, Bacher K, Kuhweide R, Offeciers E, Casselman JW (2009) Cone beam computed tomography, a low-dose imaging technique in the postoperative assessment of cochlear implantation. Otol Neurotol 30:299–303CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference De Vos W, Casselman J, Swennen GR (2009) Cone-beam computerized tomography (CBCT) imaging of the oral and maxillofacial region: a systematic review of the literature. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 38:609–625CrossRefPubMed De Vos W, Casselman J, Swennen GR (2009) Cone-beam computerized tomography (CBCT) imaging of the oral and maxillofacial region: a systematic review of the literature. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 38:609–625CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Razi T, Niknami M, Alavi Ghazani F (2014) Relationship between Hounsfield Unit in CT Scan and Gray Scale in CBCT. J Dent Res Dent Clin Dent Prospects 8:107–110PubMedPubMedCentral Razi T, Niknami M, Alavi Ghazani F (2014) Relationship between Hounsfield Unit in CT Scan and Gray Scale in CBCT. J Dent Res Dent Clin Dent Prospects 8:107–110PubMedPubMedCentral
10.
go back to reference Morgan EF, Mason ZD, Chien KB, Pfeiffer AJ, Barnes GL, Einhorn TA, Gerstenfeld LC (2009) Micro-computed tomography assessment of fracture healing: relationships among callus structure, composition, and mechanical function. Bone 44:335–344CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Morgan EF, Mason ZD, Chien KB, Pfeiffer AJ, Barnes GL, Einhorn TA, Gerstenfeld LC (2009) Micro-computed tomography assessment of fracture healing: relationships among callus structure, composition, and mechanical function. Bone 44:335–344CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
11.
go back to reference McKinley DW, Chambliss ML (2000) Follow-up radiographs to detect callus formation after fractures. Arch Fam Med 9:373–374CrossRefPubMed McKinley DW, Chambliss ML (2000) Follow-up radiographs to detect callus formation after fractures. Arch Fam Med 9:373–374CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Kovacs M, Fejerdy P, Dobo NC (2008) Metal artefact on head and neck cone-beam CT images. Fogorv Sz 101:171–178PubMed Kovacs M, Fejerdy P, Dobo NC (2008) Metal artefact on head and neck cone-beam CT images. Fogorv Sz 101:171–178PubMed
13.
14.
go back to reference Schulze RK, Berndt D, d’Hoedt B (2010) On cone-beam computed tomography artifacts induced by titanium implants. Clin Oral Implant Res 21:100–107CrossRef Schulze RK, Berndt D, d’Hoedt B (2010) On cone-beam computed tomography artifacts induced by titanium implants. Clin Oral Implant Res 21:100–107CrossRef
15.
go back to reference Benic GI, Sancho-Puchades M, Jung RE, Deyhle H, Hammerle CH (2013) In vitro assessment of artifacts induced by titanium dental implants in cone beam computed tomography. Clin Oral Implant Res 24:378–383CrossRef Benic GI, Sancho-Puchades M, Jung RE, Deyhle H, Hammerle CH (2013) In vitro assessment of artifacts induced by titanium dental implants in cone beam computed tomography. Clin Oral Implant Res 24:378–383CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Cone-beam CT to assess bony fusion following anterior cervical interbody fusion
Authors
Jan Erik Vandevenne
Dieter Peuskens
Leen Wijnen
Jan Wuyts
Publication date
01-05-2016
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
European Spine Journal / Issue Special Issue 1/2016
Print ISSN: 0940-6719
Electronic ISSN: 1432-0932
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-015-4248-8

Other articles of this Special Issue 1/2016

European Spine Journal 1/2016 Go to the issue