Skip to main content
Top
Published in: BMC Health Services Research 1/2015

Open Access 01-12-2015 | Research article

Conceptualising patient empowerment: a mixed methods study

Authors: Paulina Bravo, Adrian Edwards, Paul James Barr, Isabelle Scholl, Glyn Elwyn, Marion McAllister, the Cochrane Healthcare Quality Research Group, Cardiff University

Published in: BMC Health Services Research | Issue 1/2015

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

In recent years, interventions and health policy programmes have been established to promote patient empowerment, with a particular focus on patients affected by long-term conditions. However, a clear definition of patient empowerment is lacking, making it difficult to assess effectiveness of interventions designed to promote it. The aim in this study was to develop a conceptual map of patient empowerment, including components of patient empowerment and relationships with other constructs such as health literacy, self-management and shared decision-making.

Methods

A mixed methods study was conducted comprising (i) a scoping literature review to identify and map the components underpinning published definitions of patient empowerment (ii) qualitative interviews with key stakeholders (patients, patient representatives, health managers and health service researchers) to further develop the conceptual map. Data were analysed using qualitative methods. A combination of thematic and framework analysis was used to integrate and map themes underpinning published definitions of patient empowerment with the views of key UK stakeholders.

Results

The scoping literature review identified 67 articles that included a definition of patient empowerment. A range of diverse definitions of patient empowerment was extracted. Thematic analysis identified key underpinning themes, and these themes were used to develop an initial coding framework for analysis of interview data. 19 semi-structured interviews were conducted with key stakeholders. Transcripts were analysed using the initial coding framework, and findings were used to further develop the conceptual map. The resulting conceptual map describes that patient empowerment can be conceived as a state ranging across a spectrum from low to high levels of patient empowerment, with the level of patient empowerment potentially measurable using a set of indicators. Five key components of the conceptual map were identified: underpinning ethos, moderators, interventions, indicators and outcomes. Relationships with other constructs such as health literacy, self-management and shared decision-making are illustrated in the conceptual map.

Conclusion

A novel conceptual map of patient empowerment grounded in published definitions of patient empowerment and qualitative interviews with UK stakeholders is described, that may be useful to healthcare providers and researchers designing, implementing and evaluating interventions to promote patient empowerment.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference Herbert RJ, Gagnon AJ, Rennick JE, O'Loughlin JL. A systematic review of questionnaires measuring health-related empowerment. Res Theory Nurs Pract. 2009;23:107–32.CrossRefPubMed Herbert RJ, Gagnon AJ, Rennick JE, O'Loughlin JL. A systematic review of questionnaires measuring health-related empowerment. Res Theory Nurs Pract. 2009;23:107–32.CrossRefPubMed
2.
go back to reference McAllister M, Dunn G, Payne K, Davies L, Todd C T. Patient empowerment: The need to consider it as a measurable Patient-Reported Outcome for Chronic Conditions. BMC Health Services Research 2012; 13;12:157 McAllister M, Dunn G, Payne K, Davies L, Todd C T. Patient empowerment: The need to consider it as a measurable Patient-Reported Outcome for Chronic Conditions. BMC Health Services Research 2012; 13;12:157
3.
5.
go back to reference Anderson RM, Funnell MM. Patient empowerment: reflections on the challenge of fostering the adoption of a new paradigm. Patient Educ Couns. 2005;57:153–7.CrossRefPubMed Anderson RM, Funnell MM. Patient empowerment: reflections on the challenge of fostering the adoption of a new paradigm. Patient Educ Couns. 2005;57:153–7.CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Wallerstein N. What is the evidence on effectiveness of empowerment to improve health? In. Edited by (HEN) HEN. Copenhagen: World Health Organization; 2006. Wallerstein N. What is the evidence on effectiveness of empowerment to improve health? In. Edited by (HEN) HEN. Copenhagen: World Health Organization; 2006.
7.
go back to reference Lorig K, Ritter PL, Villa FJ, Armas J. Community-based peer-led diabetes self-management: a randomized trial. Diabetes Educ. 2009;35:641–51.CrossRefPubMed Lorig K, Ritter PL, Villa FJ, Armas J. Community-based peer-led diabetes self-management: a randomized trial. Diabetes Educ. 2009;35:641–51.CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Kennedy A, Reeves D, Bower P, Lee V, Middleton E, Richardson G, et al. The effectiveness and cost effectiveness of a national lay-led self care support programme for patients with long-term conditions: a pragmatic randomised controlled trial. J Epidemiol Community Health. 2007;61:254–61.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Kennedy A, Reeves D, Bower P, Lee V, Middleton E, Richardson G, et al. The effectiveness and cost effectiveness of a national lay-led self care support programme for patients with long-term conditions: a pragmatic randomised controlled trial. J Epidemiol Community Health. 2007;61:254–61.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
9.
go back to reference Rogers A, Kennedy A, Bower P, Gardner C, Gately C, Lee V, et al. The United Kingdom Expert Patients Programme: results and implications from a national evaluation. Med J Aust. 2008;189:S21–4.PubMed Rogers A, Kennedy A, Bower P, Gardner C, Gately C, Lee V, et al. The United Kingdom Expert Patients Programme: results and implications from a national evaluation. Med J Aust. 2008;189:S21–4.PubMed
10.
go back to reference Nolte E, McKee M. Caring for people with chronic conditions: an introduction. In: Nolte E, McKee M, editors. Caring for people with chronic conditions A health system perspective. England: McGraw-Hill; 2008. p. 1–14. Nolte E, McKee M. Caring for people with chronic conditions: an introduction. In: Nolte E, McKee M, editors. Caring for people with chronic conditions A health system perspective. England: McGraw-Hill; 2008. p. 1–14.
17.
go back to reference Anderson RM, Funnell MM, Fitzgerald JT, Marrero DG. The Diabetes Empowerment Scale: a measure of psychosocial self-efficacy. Diabetes Care. 2000;23:739–43.CrossRefPubMed Anderson RM, Funnell MM, Fitzgerald JT, Marrero DG. The Diabetes Empowerment Scale: a measure of psychosocial self-efficacy. Diabetes Care. 2000;23:739–43.CrossRefPubMed
18.
go back to reference Bulsara C, Styles I, Ward AM, Bulsara M. The psychometrics of developing the patient empowerment scale. J Psychosoc Oncol. 2006;24:1–16.CrossRefPubMed Bulsara C, Styles I, Ward AM, Bulsara M. The psychometrics of developing the patient empowerment scale. J Psychosoc Oncol. 2006;24:1–16.CrossRefPubMed
19.
go back to reference Hibbard JH, Mahoney ER, Stockard J, Tusler M. Development and testing of a short form of the patient activation measure. Health Serv Res. 2005;40:1918–30.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Hibbard JH, Mahoney ER, Stockard J, Tusler M. Development and testing of a short form of the patient activation measure. Health Serv Res. 2005;40:1918–30.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
20.
go back to reference Howie JG, Heaney DJ, Maxwell M, Walker JJ. A comparison of a Patient Enablement Instrument (PEI) against two established satisfaction scales as an outcome measure of primary care consultations. Fam Pract. 1998;15:165–71.CrossRefPubMed Howie JG, Heaney DJ, Maxwell M, Walker JJ. A comparison of a Patient Enablement Instrument (PEI) against two established satisfaction scales as an outcome measure of primary care consultations. Fam Pract. 1998;15:165–71.CrossRefPubMed
21.
go back to reference Arksey H, O'Malley L. Scoping studies: towards a methodological framework. Int J Soc Res Meth. 2005;8:19–32.CrossRef Arksey H, O'Malley L. Scoping studies: towards a methodological framework. Int J Soc Res Meth. 2005;8:19–32.CrossRef
22.
go back to reference Makoul G, Clayman ML. An integrative model of shared decision making in medical encounters. Patient Educ Couns. 2006;60:301–12.CrossRefPubMed Makoul G, Clayman ML. An integrative model of shared decision making in medical encounters. Patient Educ Couns. 2006;60:301–12.CrossRefPubMed
24.
25.
go back to reference Ritchie J, Spencer L. Qualitative data analysis for applied policy research. In: Bryman A, Burgess R, editors. Analyzing Qualitative Data. London: Routledge; 1994. Ritchie J, Spencer L. Qualitative data analysis for applied policy research. In: Bryman A, Burgess R, editors. Analyzing Qualitative Data. London: Routledge; 1994.
27.
go back to reference Gale N, Heath G, Cameron E, Rashid S, Redwood S. Using the framework method for the analysis of qualitative data in multi-disciplinary health research. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2013;13:117.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Gale N, Heath G, Cameron E, Rashid S, Redwood S. Using the framework method for the analysis of qualitative data in multi-disciplinary health research. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2013;13:117.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
28.
go back to reference Silverman D. Credibility Qualitative Research. In: Silverman D, editor. Interpreting Qualitative Data: Methods for Analyzing Talk, Text and Interaction. Oxford: SAGE Publications; 2006. p. 271–314. Silverman D. Credibility Qualitative Research. In: Silverman D, editor. Interpreting Qualitative Data: Methods for Analyzing Talk, Text and Interaction. Oxford: SAGE Publications; 2006. p. 271–314.
29.
go back to reference Funnell MM, Anderson RM. Empowerment and Self-Management of Diabetes. Clin Diabetes. 2004;22:123–7.CrossRef Funnell MM, Anderson RM. Empowerment and Self-Management of Diabetes. Clin Diabetes. 2004;22:123–7.CrossRef
30.
go back to reference Funnell MM, Anderson RM, Arnold MS, Barr PA, Donnelly M, Johnson PD, et al. Empowerment: an idea whose time has come in diabetes education. Diabetes Educ. 1991;17:37–41.CrossRefPubMed Funnell MM, Anderson RM, Arnold MS, Barr PA, Donnelly M, Johnson PD, et al. Empowerment: an idea whose time has come in diabetes education. Diabetes Educ. 1991;17:37–41.CrossRefPubMed
31.
go back to reference Aujoulat I, d’Hoore W, Deccache A. Patient empowerment in theory and practice: Polysemy or cacophony? Pat Educ Counsel. 2007;66:13–20.CrossRef Aujoulat I, d’Hoore W, Deccache A. Patient empowerment in theory and practice: Polysemy or cacophony? Pat Educ Counsel. 2007;66:13–20.CrossRef
32.
go back to reference Anderson RM, Funnell MM. Patient empowerment: myths and misconceptions. Pat Educ Counsel. 2010;79:277–82.CrossRef Anderson RM, Funnell MM. Patient empowerment: myths and misconceptions. Pat Educ Counsel. 2010;79:277–82.CrossRef
33.
go back to reference Anderson RM, Funnell MM. Using the empowerment approach to help patients change behaivior. Practical psychology for diabetes clinicians In. Am Diabetes Assoc. 2002;2002:3–12. Anderson RM, Funnell MM. Using the empowerment approach to help patients change behaivior. Practical psychology for diabetes clinicians In. Am Diabetes Assoc. 2002;2002:3–12.
34.
go back to reference Lau DH. Patient empowerment–a patient-centred approach to improve care. Hong Kong Med J. 2002;8:372–4.PubMed Lau DH. Patient empowerment–a patient-centred approach to improve care. Hong Kong Med J. 2002;8:372–4.PubMed
36.
go back to reference Dwamena F, Holmes-Rovner M, Gaulden CM, Jorgenson S, Sadigh G, Sikorskii A, Lewin S, Smith RC, Coffey J, Olomu A. Interventions for providers to promote a patient-centred approach in clinical consultations. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012;12:CD003267. doi:10.1002/14651858.CD003267.pub2. Dwamena F, Holmes-Rovner M, Gaulden CM, Jorgenson S, Sadigh G, Sikorskii A, Lewin S, Smith RC, Coffey J, Olomu A. Interventions for providers to promote a patient-centred approach in clinical consultations. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012;12:CD003267. doi:10.​1002/​14651858.​CD003267.​pub2.
37.
go back to reference Stacey D, Bennett CL, Barry MJ, Col NF, Eden KB, Holmes-Rovner M, Llewellyn-Thomas H, Lyddiatt A, Legare F, Thomson R. Decision aids for people facing health treatment or screening decisions. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2011;(10):CD001431. doi:10.1002/14651858.CD001431.pub3. Stacey D, Bennett CL, Barry MJ, Col NF, Eden KB, Holmes-Rovner M, Llewellyn-Thomas H, Lyddiatt A, Legare F, Thomson R. Decision aids for people facing health treatment or screening decisions. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2011;(10):CD001431. doi:10.​1002/​14651858.​CD001431.​pub3.
38.
go back to reference Rubak S, Sandbaek A, Lauritzen T, Christensen B. Motivational interviewing: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Br J Gen Pract. 2005;55:305–12.PubMedPubMedCentral Rubak S, Sandbaek A, Lauritzen T, Christensen B. Motivational interviewing: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Br J Gen Pract. 2005;55:305–12.PubMedPubMedCentral
39.
go back to reference Coleman K, Austin BT, Brach C, Wagner EH. Evidence on the Chronic Care Model in the new millennium. Health Aff. 2009;28:75–85.CrossRef Coleman K, Austin BT, Brach C, Wagner EH. Evidence on the Chronic Care Model in the new millennium. Health Aff. 2009;28:75–85.CrossRef
40.
go back to reference Foster G, Taylor SJ, Eldridge SE, Ramsay J, Griffiths CJ. Self-management education programmes by lay leaders for people with chronic conditions. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2007;17(4):CD005108. Foster G, Taylor SJ, Eldridge SE, Ramsay J, Griffiths CJ. Self-management education programmes by lay leaders for people with chronic conditions. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2007;17(4):CD005108.
41.
go back to reference Hagiwara E, Futawatari T. Trends and issues related to studies on cancer patient empowerment. Kitakanto Medical Journal. 2011;61:367–75.CrossRef Hagiwara E, Futawatari T. Trends and issues related to studies on cancer patient empowerment. Kitakanto Medical Journal. 2011;61:367–75.CrossRef
42.
go back to reference Hood G. Patient empowerment in diabetes - past debates and new perceptions. Eur Diabetes Nurs. 2010;7:77–8.CrossRef Hood G. Patient empowerment in diabetes - past debates and new perceptions. Eur Diabetes Nurs. 2010;7:77–8.CrossRef
43.
go back to reference de Haes H, Bensing J. Endpoints in medical communication research, proposing a framework of functions and outcomes. Patient Educ Counsel. 2009;74:287–94.CrossRef de Haes H, Bensing J. Endpoints in medical communication research, proposing a framework of functions and outcomes. Patient Educ Counsel. 2009;74:287–94.CrossRef
44.
go back to reference Nutbeam D. Health literacy as a public health goal: a challenge for contemporary health education and communication strategies into the 21st century. Health Promot Int. 2000;15:259–67.CrossRef Nutbeam D. Health literacy as a public health goal: a challenge for contemporary health education and communication strategies into the 21st century. Health Promot Int. 2000;15:259–67.CrossRef
45.
go back to reference Edwards M, Davies M, Edwards A. What are the external influences on information exchange and shared decision making in healthcare consultations: A meta-synthesis of the literature. Patient Educ Counsel. 2009;75:37–52.CrossRef Edwards M, Davies M, Edwards A. What are the external influences on information exchange and shared decision making in healthcare consultations: A meta-synthesis of the literature. Patient Educ Counsel. 2009;75:37–52.CrossRef
46.
go back to reference Edwards M, Wood F, Davies M, Edwards A. The development of health literacy in patients with a long-term health condition: the health literacy pathway model. BMC Public Health. 2012;12:130.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Edwards M, Wood F, Davies M, Edwards A. The development of health literacy in patients with a long-term health condition: the health literacy pathway model. BMC Public Health. 2012;12:130.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
47.
go back to reference Schulz PJ, Nakamoto K. Health literacy and patient empowerment in health communication: the importance of separating conjoined twins. Patient Educ Counsel. 2013;90:4–11.CrossRef Schulz PJ, Nakamoto K. Health literacy and patient empowerment in health communication: the importance of separating conjoined twins. Patient Educ Counsel. 2013;90:4–11.CrossRef
48.
go back to reference Elwyn G, Frosch D, Thomson R, Joseph-Williams N, Lloyd A, Kinnersley P, et al. Shared decision making: a model for clinical practice. J Gen Intern Med. 2012;27:1361–7.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Elwyn G, Frosch D, Thomson R, Joseph-Williams N, Lloyd A, Kinnersley P, et al. Shared decision making: a model for clinical practice. J Gen Intern Med. 2012;27:1361–7.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
49.
50.
go back to reference Lo YYC. Patient empowerment. Hong Kong Pract. 2012;34(3):89–91. Lo YYC. Patient empowerment. Hong Kong Pract. 2012;34(3):89–91.
51.
go back to reference Bos L, Marsh A, Carroll D, Gupta S, Rees M. Patient 2.0 empowerment. In: International Conference on Semantic Web & Web Services SWWS08, vol. 2008. 2008. p. 164–8. Bos L, Marsh A, Carroll D, Gupta S, Rees M. Patient 2.0 empowerment. In: International Conference on Semantic Web & Web Services SWWS08, vol. 2008. 2008. p. 164–8.
52.
go back to reference Holmström I, Röing M. The relation between patient-centeredness and patient empowerment: a discussion on concepts. Patient Educ Counsel. 2010;79:167–72.CrossRef Holmström I, Röing M. The relation between patient-centeredness and patient empowerment: a discussion on concepts. Patient Educ Counsel. 2010;79:167–72.CrossRef
53.
go back to reference Schulz PJ, Nakamoto K. Patient behavior and the benefits of artificial intelligence: the perils of “dangerous” literacy and illusory patient empowerment. Patient Educ Counsel. 2013;92:223–8.CrossRef Schulz PJ, Nakamoto K. Patient behavior and the benefits of artificial intelligence: the perils of “dangerous” literacy and illusory patient empowerment. Patient Educ Counsel. 2013;92:223–8.CrossRef
54.
go back to reference Kravitz RL, Tancredi DJ, Grennan T, Kalauokalani D, Street Jr RL, Slee CK, et al. Cancer Health Empowerment for Living without Pain (Ca-HELP): effects of a tailored education and coaching intervention on pain and impairment. Pain. 2011;152:1572–82.CrossRefPubMed Kravitz RL, Tancredi DJ, Grennan T, Kalauokalani D, Street Jr RL, Slee CK, et al. Cancer Health Empowerment for Living without Pain (Ca-HELP): effects of a tailored education and coaching intervention on pain and impairment. Pain. 2011;152:1572–82.CrossRefPubMed
55.
go back to reference Barr P, Scholl I, Bravo P, Faber M, Elwyn G, McAllister M. Assessment of patient empowerment: A systematic review of measures. PLOS ONE. Barr P, Scholl I, Bravo P, Faber M, Elwyn G, McAllister M. Assessment of patient empowerment: A systematic review of measures. PLOS ONE.
56.
go back to reference Small N, Bower P, Chew-Graham CA, Whalley D, Protheroe J. Patient empowerment in long-term conditions: development and preliminary testing of a new measure. BMC Health Serv Res. 2013;13:1472–6963. Small N, Bower P, Chew-Graham CA, Whalley D, Protheroe J. Patient empowerment in long-term conditions: development and preliminary testing of a new measure. BMC Health Serv Res. 2013;13:1472–6963.
Metadata
Title
Conceptualising patient empowerment: a mixed methods study
Authors
Paulina Bravo
Adrian Edwards
Paul James Barr
Isabelle Scholl
Glyn Elwyn
Marion McAllister
the Cochrane Healthcare Quality Research Group, Cardiff University
Publication date
01-12-2015
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
BMC Health Services Research / Issue 1/2015
Electronic ISSN: 1472-6963
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-015-0907-z

Other articles of this Issue 1/2015

BMC Health Services Research 1/2015 Go to the issue