Top

Published in:

01-05-2014 | Original Paper

Computed tomographic measurement of acetabular and femoral component version in total hip arthroplasty

Authors: Takaaki Fujishiro, Shinya Hayashi, Noriyuki Kanzaki, Shingo Hashimoto, Masahiro Kurosaka, Taiki Kanno, Takeshi Masuda

Published in: International Orthopaedics | Issue 5/2014

Abstract

Purpose

The purposes of the present study were (1) to investigate the variation and accuracy of both acetabular and femoral component version on the axial computed tomographic (CT) images, and (2) to better define the associations between the components version and clinical factors.

Methods

We investigated acetabular and femoral component orientation in 1,411 primary total hip arthroplasties that had been performed without computer-assisted navigation. Version of the acetabular and femoral components was measured on the axial CT images.

Results

The component version was significantly greater than the native version in both acetabular and femoral version. There was a significant correlation between the stem and native femoral versions, but not between the acetabular component and native acetabular versions.

Conclusion

This study identifies several features that might help analyse the effect of pre-operative native acetabular and femoral version on the variation of component alignment.

Lewinnek GE, Lewis JL, Tarr R, Compere CL, Zimmerman JR (1978) Dislocations after total hip replacement arthroplasties. J Bone Joint Surg Am 60(2):217–220PubMed

Sugano N, Takao M, Sakai T, Nishii T, Miki H (2012) Does CT-based navigation improve the long-term survival in ceramic-on-ceramic THA? Clin Orthop Relat Res 470(11):3054–3059PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef

Bosker BH, Verheyen CC, Horstmann WG, Tulp NJ (2007) Poor accuracy of freehand cup positioning during total hip arthroplasty. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 127(5):375–379PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef

Dorr LD, Wan Z, Malik A, Zhu J, Dastane M, Deshmane P (2009) A comparison of surgeon estimation and computed tomographic measurement of femoral component anteversion in cementless total hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am 91(11):2598–2604PubMedCrossRef

Emerson RH Jr (2012) Increased anteversion of press-fit femoral stems compared with anatomic femur. Clin Orthop Relat Res 470(2):477–481PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef

Saxler G, Marx A, Vandevelde D, Langlotz U, Tannast M, Wiese M, Michaelis U, Kemper G, Grützner PA, Steffen R, von Knoch M, Holland-Letz T, Bernsmann K (2004) The accuracy of free-hand cup positioning-a CT based measurement of cup placement in 105 total hip arthroplasties. Int Orthop 28(4):198–201PubMedCentralPubMed

Sendtner E, Tibor S, Winkler R, Wörner M, Grifka J, Renkawitz T (2010) Stem torsion in total hip replacement. Acta Orthop 81(5):579–582PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef

Reikerås O, Gunderson RB (2011) Components anteversion in primary cementless THA using straight stem and hemispherical cup: A prospective study in 91 hips using CT-scan measurements. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res 97(6):615–621PubMedCrossRef

Wines AP, McNicol D (2006) Computed tomography measurement of the accuracy of component version in total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 21(5):696–701PubMedCrossRef

10.

Sutherland CJ, Wilde AH, Borden LS, Marks KE (1982) A 10-year follow-up of one hundred consecutive Müller curved-stem total hip-replacement arthroplasties. J Bone Joint Surg Am 64(7):970–982PubMed

11.

Hayashi S, Nishiyama T, Fujishiro T, Hashimoto S, Kanzaki N, Nishida K, Kuroda R, Kurosaka M (2013) Evaluation of the accuracy of femoral component orientation by the CT-based fluoro-matched navigation system. Int Orthop 37(6):1063–1068PubMedCrossRef

12.

Nogler M, Kessler O, Prassl A, Donnelly B, Streicher R, Sledge JB, Krismer M (2004) Reduced variability of acetabular cup positioning with use of an imageless navigation system. Clin Orthop Relat Res 426:159–163PubMedCrossRef

13.

Stem ES, O’Connor MI, Kransdorf MJ, Crook J (2006) Computed tomography analysis of acetabular anteversion and abduction. J Skeletal Radiol 35(6):385–389CrossRef

14.

Sugano N, Noble PC, Kamaric E (1998) A comparison of alternative methods of measuring femoral anteversion. J Comput Assist Tomogr 22(4):610–614PubMedCrossRef

15.

Minoda Y, Kadowaki T, Kim M (2006) Acetabular component orientation in 834 total hip arthroplasties using a manual technique. Clin Orthop Relat Res 445:186–191PubMed

16.

Jingushi S, Ohfuji S, Sofue M et al (2010) Multiinstitutional epidemiological study regarding osteoarthritis of the hip in Japan. J Orthop Sci 15(5):626–631PubMedCrossRef

Title: Computed tomographic measurement of acetabular and femoral component version in total hip arthroplasty
Authors: Takaaki Fujishiro
Shinya Hayashi
Noriyuki Kanzaki
Shingo Hashimoto
Masahiro Kurosaka
Taiki Kanno
Takeshi Masuda
Publication date: 01-05-2014
Publisher: Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in: International Orthopaedics / Issue 5/2014
Print ISSN: 0341-2695
Electronic ISSN: 1432-5195
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-013-2264-z

At a glance: The STEP trials

Springer Medicine

Computed tomographic measurement of acetabular and femoral component version in total hip arthroplasty

Abstract

Purpose

Methods

Results

Conclusion

At a glance: The STEP trials

Springer Medicine

Abstract

Purpose

Methods

Results

Conclusion

Please log in to get access to this content

Other articles of this Issue 5/2014

Are the claims made in orthopaedic print advertisements valid?

Lower recurrence rate in chondroblastoma using extended curettage and cryosurgery

Multi-plate reconstruction for severe bicondylar tibial plateau fractures of young adults

Relationship of plasma and synovial fluid vascular endothelial growth factor with radiographic severity in primary knee osteoarthritis

Progress in musculoskeletal oncology from 1922 – 2012

Clinical and radiological outcome of the Total Evolutive Shoulder System (TESS®) reverse shoulder arthroplasty: a prospective comparative non-randomised study