Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Annals of Surgical Oncology 6/2013

01-06-2013 | Healthcare Policy and Outcomes

Comprehensive Databases: A Cautionary Note

Author: Barry Feig, MD

Published in: Annals of Surgical Oncology | Issue 6/2013

Login to get access

Excerpt

Over the last decade, there has been in an increase in the number and availability of registries of cancer patients. Two of the more commonly accessed sources of cancer patient data are the Surveillance Epidemiology and End Results (SEER) and the National Cancer Data Base (NCDB). These two databases differ fundamentally in how patient data are acquired; the NCDB is hospital based, while SEER is population based. Although this difference in method of data acquisition is extremely different, there are commonalities, both positive and negative, when large data sets such as these are queried to ascertain clinical outcomes on cancer patients. The large number of patients available for analysis allows for a broader perspective on treatment patterns and epidemiology. Additionally, it allows the opportunity to study rare cancers and to perform subset analysis of specific groups within a common cancer (i.e., postmastectomy radiotherapy in patients with locally advanced breast cancer; adjuvant chemotherapy in stage II colon cancer). Most recently, these types of data sets are being used to provide cancer-specific outcomes and minimum performance benchmarks, which are being made available for quality assessment and quality improvement. …
Literature
3.
go back to reference Lerro CC, Robbins AS, Phillips JL, Stewart AK. Comparison of cases captured in the national cancer data base with those in population-based central cancer registries. Ann Surg Oncol. In press. Lerro CC, Robbins AS, Phillips JL, Stewart AK. Comparison of cases captured in the national cancer data base with those in population-based central cancer registries. Ann Surg Oncol. In press.
4.
go back to reference Bilimoria KY, Bentram DJ, Stewart AK, Winchester DP, Ko CY. Comparison of commission on cancer-approved and -nonapproved hospitals in the United States: implications for studies that use the national cancer data base. J Clin Oncol. 2009;27:4177–81.PubMedCrossRef Bilimoria KY, Bentram DJ, Stewart AK, Winchester DP, Ko CY. Comparison of commission on cancer-approved and -nonapproved hospitals in the United States: implications for studies that use the national cancer data base. J Clin Oncol. 2009;27:4177–81.PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
Comprehensive Databases: A Cautionary Note
Author
Barry Feig, MD
Publication date
01-06-2013
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
Annals of Surgical Oncology / Issue 6/2013
Print ISSN: 1068-9265
Electronic ISSN: 1534-4681
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-013-2904-y

Other articles of this Issue 6/2013

Annals of Surgical Oncology 6/2013 Go to the issue