Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Cancer Causes & Control 12/2018

01-12-2018 | Original paper

Comprehensive cancer control in the U.S.: summarizing twenty years of progress and looking ahead

Authors: Nikki S. Hayes, Karin Hohman, Cynthia Vinson, Mandi Pratt-Chapman

Published in: Cancer Causes & Control | Issue 12/2018

Login to get access

Abstract

In order to celebrate the accomplishments of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention’s (CDC) National Comprehensive Cancer Control Program (NCCCP), the Comprehensive Cancer Control National Partners (CCCNP) developed this Special Issue on Cancer Causes and Control. This, the third Special Issue on Comprehensive Cancer Control (CCC), is a reflection of 20 years of building successful partnerships to prevent and control cancer; planning and implementing strategic cancer control; collaborating to address national cancer prevention and control priorities; evaluating efforts; sharing successes; and, in later years, serving as a model for global cancer control planning and implementation. The CDC currently supports cancer control planning and implementation in all 50 states, the District of Columbia, eight tribes or tribal organizations, and seven Pacific Island Jurisdictions and U.S. territories through the NCCCP. CCC is an approach that brings together multi-sector partners to address the cancer burden in a community collectively by leveraging existing resources and identifying and addressing cancer related issues and needs. The Comprehensive Cancer Control National Partnership (CCCNP), a partnership of national organizations, has been committed to supporting comprehensive cancer control efforts since 1999. We summarize the efforts described in this Special Issue. We also describe opportunities and critical elements to continue the momentum for comprehensive cancer control well into the future.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Given, L S et al (2018) Cancer control planning: self-assessment for pre-planning, development, implementation, and evaluation of national cancer control plans. Cancer Causes Control Given, L S et al (2018) Cancer control planning: self-assessment for pre-planning, development, implementation, and evaluation of national cancer control plans. Cancer Causes Control
2.
go back to reference Vinson CA et al (2018) Collaborating to conquer cancer: the role of partnerships in comprehensive cancer control. Cancer Causes Control Vinson CA et al (2018) Collaborating to conquer cancer: the role of partnerships in comprehensive cancer control. Cancer Causes Control
3.
go back to reference Momin B et al (2018) Advancing health equity through the National Comprehensive Cancer Control Program. Cancer Causes and Control Momin B et al (2018) Advancing health equity through the National Comprehensive Cancer Control Program. Cancer Causes and Control
4.
go back to reference Farrell M et al (2018) How the Comprehensive Cancer Control National Partnership shapes the public health workforce. Cancer Causes Control Farrell M et al (2018) How the Comprehensive Cancer Control National Partnership shapes the public health workforce. Cancer Causes Control
5.
go back to reference Moreland-Russell, Sarah et al (2018) Evaluating centralized technical assistance as an implementation strategy to improve cancer prevention and control. Cancer Causes Control Moreland-Russell, Sarah et al (2018) Evaluating centralized technical assistance as an implementation strategy to improve cancer prevention and control. Cancer Causes Control
6.
go back to reference Pyron T et al (2018) Examining comprehensive cancer control partnerships, plans, and program interventions: successes and lessons learned from a utilization-focused evaluation. Cancer Causes Control Pyron T et al (2018) Examining comprehensive cancer control partnerships, plans, and program interventions: successes and lessons learned from a utilization-focused evaluation. Cancer Causes Control
7.
go back to reference Given LS et al (2005) Collaborating to conquer cancer: a comprehensive approach to cancer control. Cancer Causes Control 16(Suppl 1):3–14CrossRef Given LS et al (2005) Collaborating to conquer cancer: a comprehensive approach to cancer control. Cancer Causes Control 16(Suppl 1):3–14CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Atkin C (2001) Theory and principles of media health campaigns. In: Publication communication campaigns, Chap 3. Sage, Thousand Oaks Atkin C (2001) Theory and principles of media health campaigns. In: Publication communication campaigns, Chap 3. Sage, Thousand Oaks
9.
go back to reference Bencivenga M et al (2008) Community partnerships, food pantries, and an evidence-based intervention to increase mammography among rural women. J Rural Health 24:91–95CrossRef Bencivenga M et al (2008) Community partnerships, food pantries, and an evidence-based intervention to increase mammography among rural women. J Rural Health 24:91–95CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Legler J et al (2002) The effectiveness of interventions to promote mammography among women with historically lower rates of screening. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 11:59–71PubMed Legler J et al (2002) The effectiveness of interventions to promote mammography among women with historically lower rates of screening. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 11:59–71PubMed
11.
go back to reference Love B et al (2018) Communication and comprehensive cancer coalitions: lessons from two decades of campaigns, outreach, and training. Cancer Causes Control Love B et al (2018) Communication and comprehensive cancer coalitions: lessons from two decades of campaigns, outreach, and training. Cancer Causes Control
12.
go back to reference Meade C et al (2011) Creating community-academic partnerships for cancer disparities research and health promotion. Health Promot Pract 12:456–462CrossRef Meade C et al (2011) Creating community-academic partnerships for cancer disparities research and health promotion. Health Promot Pract 12:456–462CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Rohan E et al (2018) Comprehensive cancer control: promoting survivor health and wellness. Cancer Causes Control Rohan E et al (2018) Comprehensive cancer control: promoting survivor health and wellness. Cancer Causes Control
14.
go back to reference Implementation Science at a Glance (2018) A Guide for Public Health Practitioners. National Institutes of Health, Betheseda, Maryland Implementation Science at a Glance (2018) A Guide for Public Health Practitioners. National Institutes of Health, Betheseda, Maryland
15.
go back to reference Castro FG et al (2004) The cultural adaptation of prevention interventions: resolving tensions between fidelity and fit. Prev Sci 5:41–45CrossRef Castro FG et al (2004) The cultural adaptation of prevention interventions: resolving tensions between fidelity and fit. Prev Sci 5:41–45CrossRef
16.
go back to reference Seeff L et al (2010) Comprehensive cancer control programs and coalitions: partnering to launch successful colorectal cancer screening initiatives. Cancer Causes Control 21:2023–2031CrossRef Seeff L et al (2010) Comprehensive cancer control programs and coalitions: partnering to launch successful colorectal cancer screening initiatives. Cancer Causes Control 21:2023–2031CrossRef
17.
go back to reference Ilbawi A et al (2017) Advancing access and equity: the vision of a new generation in cancer control. Lancet Oncol 18(2):172–175CrossRef Ilbawi A et al (2017) Advancing access and equity: the vision of a new generation in cancer control. Lancet Oncol 18(2):172–175CrossRef
18.
go back to reference Pratt-Chapman M et al (eds) (2018) Patient-reported outcomes in health economic decision making: A changing landscape in oncology. In: Walter E, Dittrich C (eds) Regulatory and economic aspects in oncology. Springer International, New York Pratt-Chapman M et al (eds) (2018) Patient-reported outcomes in health economic decision making: A changing landscape in oncology. In: Walter E, Dittrich C (eds) Regulatory and economic aspects in oncology. Springer International, New York
19.
go back to reference Coleman CN et al (2014) The international cancer expert corps: a unique approach for sustainable cancer care in low and lower-middle income countries. Front Oncol 4:1–4CrossRef Coleman CN et al (2014) The international cancer expert corps: a unique approach for sustainable cancer care in low and lower-middle income countries. Front Oncol 4:1–4CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Comprehensive cancer control in the U.S.: summarizing twenty years of progress and looking ahead
Authors
Nikki S. Hayes
Karin Hohman
Cynthia Vinson
Mandi Pratt-Chapman
Publication date
01-12-2018
Publisher
Springer International Publishing
Published in
Cancer Causes & Control / Issue 12/2018
Print ISSN: 0957-5243
Electronic ISSN: 1573-7225
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10552-018-1124-y

Other articles of this Issue 12/2018

Cancer Causes & Control 12/2018 Go to the issue
Webinar | 19-02-2024 | 17:30 (CET)

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on antibody–drug conjugates in cancer

Antibody–drug conjugates (ADCs) are novel agents that have shown promise across multiple tumor types. Explore the current landscape of ADCs in breast and lung cancer with our experts, and gain insights into the mechanism of action, key clinical trials data, existing challenges, and future directions.

Dr. Véronique Diéras
Prof. Fabrice Barlesi
Developed by: Springer Medicine