Skip to main content
Top

Open Access 21-05-2024 | Original Article

Complications and survival rates of subtrochanteric fractures are similar between short and long intramedullary nail fixation and independent of weight-bearing

Authors: Daniel Cohen, Yaakov Tolwin, Michael Toybenshlak, Gershon Zinger, Amos Peyser, Yadin Levy

Published in: European Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery & Traumatology

Login to get access

Abstract

Purpose

Intertrochanteric fractures are treated surgically, allowing rapid weight-bearing to improve ambulation and lower complications and mortality. Subtrochanteric fractures are mechanically less stable and are traditionally treated with a non-weight approach and longer intramedullary nails. This study compared immediate weight-bearing versus limited weight-bearing and different intramedullary nail lengths regarding patient outcomes.

Methods

We analyzed all consecutive cases of low-energy subtrochanteric fractures treated surgically at our institution between January 2016 and November 2020. One hundred and nine patients were found. We compared nail length and immediate versus delayed weight-bearing concerning the length of stay, time to painless ambulation, time to radiographic fracture union, and revision rates. Fracture severity was also examined using the Seinsheimer classification.

Results

Length of stay and time to painless ambulation were shorter in the immediate weight-bearing group. Time to radiographic union and rate of complications were lower; however, they were not statistically significant. Conversely, no significant difference in revision rates was found. Regarding nail length, the length of stay was shorter, and the time to painless ambulation was faster in the short-length group. The rate of complications and time to union were similar. No difference in revision rate was found. Seinsheimer classification of the fracture did not influence the decision to allow weight-bearing or nail selection (p = 0.65).

Conclusions

This study demonstrates that immediate weight-bearing as tolerated and short intramedullary nails allow a quicker time for painless ambulation and hospitalization, with possibly fewer perioperative complications and faster radiographic union, without increasing complications.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Nieves JW, Bilezikian JP, Lane JM, Einhorn TA, Wang Y, Steinbuch M et al (2010) Fragility fractures of the hip and femur: incidence and patient characteristics. Osteoporos Int 21(3):399–408CrossRefPubMed Nieves JW, Bilezikian JP, Lane JM, Einhorn TA, Wang Y, Steinbuch M et al (2010) Fragility fractures of the hip and femur: incidence and patient characteristics. Osteoporos Int 21(3):399–408CrossRefPubMed
2.
go back to reference Bergman GD, Winquist RA, Mayo KA, Hansen ST Jr (1987) Subtrochanteric fracture of the femur. Fixation using Zickel nail JBJS 69(7):1032–1040 Bergman GD, Winquist RA, Mayo KA, Hansen ST Jr (1987) Subtrochanteric fracture of the femur. Fixation using Zickel nail JBJS 69(7):1032–1040
3.
go back to reference Wiss DA, Brien WW (1992) Subtrochanteric Fractures of the Femur Results of Treatment by Interlocking Nailing. Clin Orthop Relat Res 283:231–236CrossRef Wiss DA, Brien WW (1992) Subtrochanteric Fractures of the Femur Results of Treatment by Interlocking Nailing. Clin Orthop Relat Res 283:231–236CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Cunningham BP, Zaman SU, Roberts J, Ortega G, Only AJ, Rhorer AS et al (2020) Weight bearing protocols following subtrochanteric fracture fixation with intramedullary implants, a retrospective cohort study. Int J of Orth 7(6):1390–1396 Cunningham BP, Zaman SU, Roberts J, Ortega G, Only AJ, Rhorer AS et al (2020) Weight bearing protocols following subtrochanteric fracture fixation with intramedullary implants, a retrospective cohort study. Int J of Orth 7(6):1390–1396
5.
go back to reference Warren J, Sundaram K, Anis H, McLaughlin J, Patterson B, Higuera CA et al (2019) The association between weight-bearing status and early complications in hip fractures. Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol 29(7):1419–1427CrossRefPubMed Warren J, Sundaram K, Anis H, McLaughlin J, Patterson B, Higuera CA et al (2019) The association between weight-bearing status and early complications in hip fractures. Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol 29(7):1419–1427CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Cunningham BP, Ali A, Parikh HR, Heare A, Blaschke B, Zaman S et al (2021) Immediate weight bearing as tolerated (WBAT) correlates with a decreased length of stay post intramedullary fixation for subtrochanteric fractures: a multicenter retrospective cohort study. Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol 31(2):235–243CrossRefPubMed Cunningham BP, Ali A, Parikh HR, Heare A, Blaschke B, Zaman S et al (2021) Immediate weight bearing as tolerated (WBAT) correlates with a decreased length of stay post intramedullary fixation for subtrochanteric fractures: a multicenter retrospective cohort study. Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol 31(2):235–243CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Beingessner DM, Scolaro JA, Orec RJ, Nork SE, Barei DP (2013) Open reduction and intramedullary stabilisation of subtrochanteric femur fractures: a retrospective study of 56 cases. Injury 44(12):1910–1915CrossRefPubMed Beingessner DM, Scolaro JA, Orec RJ, Nork SE, Barei DP (2013) Open reduction and intramedullary stabilisation of subtrochanteric femur fractures: a retrospective study of 56 cases. Injury 44(12):1910–1915CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Bovbjerg P, Froberg L, Schmal H (2019) Short versus long intramedullary nails for treatment of intertrochanteric femur fractures (AO 31–A1 and AO 31–A2): a systematic review. Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol 29(8):1823–1831CrossRefPubMed Bovbjerg P, Froberg L, Schmal H (2019) Short versus long intramedullary nails for treatment of intertrochanteric femur fractures (AO 31–A1 and AO 31–A2): a systematic review. Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol 29(8):1823–1831CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Parker MJ, Cawley S (2020) Short (175 mm) versus standard (220 mm) length intramedullary nail for trochanteric hip fractures: a randomized trial of 229 patients. The Bone Jt J 102(3):394–399CrossRef Parker MJ, Cawley S (2020) Short (175 mm) versus standard (220 mm) length intramedullary nail for trochanteric hip fractures: a randomized trial of 229 patients. The Bone Jt J 102(3):394–399CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Baldwin PC, Lavender RC, Sanders R, Koval KJ (2016) Controversies in intramedullary fixation for intertrochanteric hip fractures. J Orthop Trauma 30:635–641CrossRefPubMed Baldwin PC, Lavender RC, Sanders R, Koval KJ (2016) Controversies in intramedullary fixation for intertrochanteric hip fractures. J Orthop Trauma 30:635–641CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Womble TN, Kirk A, Boyle M, Comadoll SM, Su L, Srinath A, Aneja A (2022) Comparison of Short, Intermediate, and Long Cephalomedullary Nail Length Outcomes in Elderly Intertrochanteric Femur Fractures. JAAOS Glob Res Rev 6(3):e21CrossRef Womble TN, Kirk A, Boyle M, Comadoll SM, Su L, Srinath A, Aneja A (2022) Comparison of Short, Intermediate, and Long Cephalomedullary Nail Length Outcomes in Elderly Intertrochanteric Femur Fractures. JAAOS Glob Res Rev 6(3):e21CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Zhang Y, Zhang S, Wang S et al (2017) Long and short intramedullary nails for fixation of intertrochanteric femur fractures (OTA 31–A1, A2 and A3): a systematic review and meta-analysis. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res 103:685–690CrossRefPubMed Zhang Y, Zhang S, Wang S et al (2017) Long and short intramedullary nails for fixation of intertrochanteric femur fractures (OTA 31–A1, A2 and A3): a systematic review and meta-analysis. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res 103:685–690CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference Seinsheimer F (1978) Subtrochanteric fractures of the femur. J Bone Joint Surg At 60:300–306CrossRef Seinsheimer F (1978) Subtrochanteric fractures of the femur. J Bone Joint Surg At 60:300–306CrossRef
14.
go back to reference Loizou CL, McNamara I, Ahmed K, Pryor GA, Parker MJ (2010) Classification of subtrochanteric femoral fractures. Injury 41(7):739–745CrossRefPubMed Loizou CL, McNamara I, Ahmed K, Pryor GA, Parker MJ (2010) Classification of subtrochanteric femoral fractures. Injury 41(7):739–745CrossRefPubMed
15.
go back to reference Kwak DK, Bang SH, Kim WH, Lee SJ, Lee S, Yoo JH (2021) Biomechanics of subtrochanteric fracture fixation using short cephalomedullary nails: a finite element analysis. PLoS One 16(7):e0253862CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Kwak DK, Bang SH, Kim WH, Lee SJ, Lee S, Yoo JH (2021) Biomechanics of subtrochanteric fracture fixation using short cephalomedullary nails: a finite element analysis. PLoS One 16(7):e0253862CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
Metadata
Title
Complications and survival rates of subtrochanteric fractures are similar between short and long intramedullary nail fixation and independent of weight-bearing
Authors
Daniel Cohen
Yaakov Tolwin
Michael Toybenshlak
Gershon Zinger
Amos Peyser
Yadin Levy
Publication date
21-05-2024
Publisher
Springer Paris
Published in
European Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery & Traumatology
Print ISSN: 1633-8065
Electronic ISSN: 1432-1068
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00590-024-03992-w