Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Annals of Surgical Oncology 9/2019

01-09-2019 | Health Services Research and Global Oncology

Complex General Surgical Oncology Fellowship Applicants: Trends over Time and the Impact of Board Certification Eligibility

Authors: Heather A. Lillemoe, MD, Christopher P. Scally, MD, Celia L. Adams, MD, Brian K. Bednarski, MD, Charles M. Balch, MD, Thomas A. Aloia, MD, Jeffrey E. Gershenwald, MD, Jeffrey E. Lee, MD, Elizabeth G. Grubbs, MD, MS

Published in: Annals of Surgical Oncology | Issue 9/2019

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Complex general surgical oncology (CGSO) fellowships recently obtained Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME) accreditation and board certification eligibility. We aimed to characterize the applicant pool and identify factors predictive of matching into our program.

Methods

We conducted a retrospective review of CGSO fellowship applications to a major cancer center from 2008 to 2018. Data were analyzed for trends over time, including a comparison of pre- versus post-American Board of Surgery (ABS) certification eligibility.

Results

A total of 846 applications were reviewed. Most applicants (86.2%) trained in a US residency program; 58.4% performed ≥ 1 research year during residency; 29.6% had a dual degree. Fewer applicants (34.5%) were female, a trend which did not change over time. Post-ABS, applicants were more likely to complete ≥ 1 year between residency and fellowship (20.9% versus 13.2%, p = 0.003), to be in practice at the time of application (12.2% versus 6.6%, p = 0.005), and to reapply (5.5% versus 1.0%, p < 0.001). Post-ABS applicants listed more peer-reviewed publications (8 [interquartile range (IQR) 4, 15] versus 5 [IQR 2, 10]; p < 0.001). On multivariable analysis, factors associated with matching into our program included: US allopathic medical school graduation [odds ratio (OR) 4.6, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.8–11.7], Alpha Omega Alpha (AOA) Honor Medical Society distinction (OR 2.7, 95% CI 1.6–4.7), dual degree (OR 2.0, 95% CI 1.1–3.4), and performance of a clinical/research rotation at our institution (OR 4.9, 95% CI 2.2–10.7).

Conclusions

After establishment of CGSO board certification eligibility, applicants were more likely to apply while in practice and to reapply. A number of factors, including having a dual degree and rotating at our institution, were associated with matriculation.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Berman RS, Weigel RJ. Training and certification of the surgical oncologist. Chin Clin Oncol. 2014;3(4). Berman RS, Weigel RJ. Training and certification of the surgical oncologist. Chin Clin Oncol. 2014;3(4).
2.
go back to reference Michelassi F. 2010 SSO presidential address: subspecialty certificate in advanced surgical oncology. Ann Surg Oncol. 2010;17(12):3094–3103.CrossRefPubMed Michelassi F. 2010 SSO presidential address: subspecialty certificate in advanced surgical oncology. Ann Surg Oncol. 2010;17(12):3094–3103.CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Lee DY, Flaherty DC, Lau BJ, et al. Attitudes and perceptions of surgical oncology fellows on ACGME accreditation and the complex general surgical oncology certification. Ann Surg Oncol. 2015;22(12):3776–3784.CrossRefPubMed Lee DY, Flaherty DC, Lau BJ, et al. Attitudes and perceptions of surgical oncology fellows on ACGME accreditation and the complex general surgical oncology certification. Ann Surg Oncol. 2015;22(12):3776–3784.CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Borman KR, Vick LR, Biester TW, Mitchell ME. Changing demographics of residents choosing fellowships: longterm data from the American Board of Surgery. J Am Coll Surg. 2008;206(5):782–788; discussion 788–789. Borman KR, Vick LR, Biester TW, Mitchell ME. Changing demographics of residents choosing fellowships: longterm data from the American Board of Surgery. J Am Coll Surg. 2008;206(5):782–788; discussion 788–789.
5.
go back to reference Ellis MC, Dhungel B, Weerasinghe R, Vetto JT, Deveney K. Trends in research time, fellowship training, and practice patterns among general surgery graduates. J Surg Educ. 2011;68(4):309–312.CrossRefPubMed Ellis MC, Dhungel B, Weerasinghe R, Vetto JT, Deveney K. Trends in research time, fellowship training, and practice patterns among general surgery graduates. J Surg Educ. 2011;68(4):309–312.CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Klingensmith ME, Cogbill TH, Luchette F, et al. Factors influencing the decision of surgery residency graduates to pursue general surgery practice versus fellowship. Ann Surg. 2015;262(3):449–455; discussion 454–445. Klingensmith ME, Cogbill TH, Luchette F, et al. Factors influencing the decision of surgery residency graduates to pursue general surgery practice versus fellowship. Ann Surg. 2015;262(3):449–455; discussion 454–445.
10.
go back to reference Wach MM, Ruff SM, Ayabe RI, et al. An examination of applicants and factors associated with matriculation to complex general surgical oncology fellowship training programs. Ann Surg Oncol. 2018;25(12):3436–42.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Wach MM, Ruff SM, Ayabe RI, et al. An examination of applicants and factors associated with matriculation to complex general surgical oncology fellowship training programs. Ann Surg Oncol. 2018;25(12):3436–42.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
13.
go back to reference Davis EC, Risucci DA, Blair PG, Sachdeva AK. Women in surgery residency programs: evolving trends from a national perspective. J Am Coll Surg. 2011;212(3):320–6.CrossRefPubMed Davis EC, Risucci DA, Blair PG, Sachdeva AK. Women in surgery residency programs: evolving trends from a national perspective. J Am Coll Surg. 2011;212(3):320–6.CrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference Long TR, Elliott BA, Warner ME, Brown MJ, Rose SH. Resident and program director gender distribution by specialty. J. Women’s Health. 2011;20(12):1867–70.CrossRef Long TR, Elliott BA, Warner ME, Brown MJ, Rose SH. Resident and program director gender distribution by specialty. J. Women’s Health. 2011;20(12):1867–70.CrossRef
15.
go back to reference Greenberg CC. Association for Academic Surgery presidential address: sticky floors and glass ceilings. J Surg Res. 2017;219:ix–xviii. Greenberg CC. Association for Academic Surgery presidential address: sticky floors and glass ceilings. J Surg Res. 2017;219:ix–xviii.
16.
go back to reference Joshua Smith J, Patel RK, Chen X, Tarpley MJ, Terhune KP. Does intentional support of degree programs in general surgery residency affect research productivity or pursuit of academic surgery? J Surg Educ. 2014;71(4):486–91.CrossRefPubMed Joshua Smith J, Patel RK, Chen X, Tarpley MJ, Terhune KP. Does intentional support of degree programs in general surgery residency affect research productivity or pursuit of academic surgery? J Surg Educ. 2014;71(4):486–91.CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Complex General Surgical Oncology Fellowship Applicants: Trends over Time and the Impact of Board Certification Eligibility
Authors
Heather A. Lillemoe, MD
Christopher P. Scally, MD
Celia L. Adams, MD
Brian K. Bednarski, MD
Charles M. Balch, MD
Thomas A. Aloia, MD
Jeffrey E. Gershenwald, MD
Jeffrey E. Lee, MD
Elizabeth G. Grubbs, MD, MS
Publication date
01-09-2019
Publisher
Springer International Publishing
Published in
Annals of Surgical Oncology / Issue 9/2019
Print ISSN: 1068-9265
Electronic ISSN: 1534-4681
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-019-07420-w

Other articles of this Issue 9/2019

Annals of Surgical Oncology 9/2019 Go to the issue

Health Services Research and Global Oncology

Trends in Volume–Outcome Relationship in Gastrectomies in Texas