Skip to main content
Top
Published in: HAND 3/2012

01-09-2012 | Surgery Articles

Complete digital amputations undergoing replantation surgery: a 10-year retrospective study

Authors: Ryan M Neinstein, Linda T. Dvali, Suzanne Le, D.J. Anastakis

Published in: HAND | Issue 3/2012

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

As a result of growing expertise and skill, replantation surgery has evolved to more than the technical reattachment of an amputated part.

Methods

A retrospective study of complete digital amputations undergoing replantation surgery was conducted for the purpose of assessing trends in these complex cases. All incomplete and partial amputations were excluded.

Results

A total of 171 patients who had replantation surgery between January 1, 1994 and December 31, 2003 for 278 completely amputated digits were reviewed. Of the 171 patients, 91 (53 %) had work-related injuries. The main mechanism of injury was saw injury (95 patients) for both occupational- and non-occupational-related injuries. The proximal phalanx was the most common level of amputation and the thumb was most frequently involved. The injuries happened more commonly in the summer months. Microvascular failure occurred in 29 % of the replanted digits and was most commonly associated with avulsion-type injuries.

Conclusions

Complete amputations represent a more complex injury than incomplete amputations, with a higher failure rate.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Masuhara K, Tamai S, Fukunishi H, et al. Experience with reanastomosis of the amputated thumb. Seikeigeka. 1967;18:403–4.PubMed Masuhara K, Tamai S, Fukunishi H, et al. Experience with reanastomosis of the amputated thumb. Seikeigeka. 1967;18:403–4.PubMed
2.
go back to reference Isenberg JS. Flying solo: a single year–single surgeon community hospital replantation/revascularization experience. J Reconstr Microsurg. 2002;18:483–6.PubMedCrossRef Isenberg JS. Flying solo: a single year–single surgeon community hospital replantation/revascularization experience. J Reconstr Microsurg. 2002;18:483–6.PubMedCrossRef
3.
go back to reference Woo-Kyung K, Seung-Kyu S, Jae-Ho L. Fingertip replantations: clinical evaluations of 135 digits. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1996;98:470–6.CrossRef Woo-Kyung K, Seung-Kyu S, Jae-Ho L. Fingertip replantations: clinical evaluations of 135 digits. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1996;98:470–6.CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Soucacos PN. Indications and selection for digital amputation and replantation. J Hand Surg [Br]. 2001;26:572–81.CrossRef Soucacos PN. Indications and selection for digital amputation and replantation. J Hand Surg [Br]. 2001;26:572–81.CrossRef
5.
go back to reference An PC, Kuo YR, Lin TS, et al. Heterotopic replantation in mutilating hand injury. Ann Plast Surg. 2003;50:113–8. discussion 118-119.PubMedCrossRef An PC, Kuo YR, Lin TS, et al. Heterotopic replantation in mutilating hand injury. Ann Plast Surg. 2003;50:113–8. discussion 118-119.PubMedCrossRef
6.
go back to reference Arakaki A, Tsai TM. Thumb replantation: survival factors and re-exploration in 122 cases. J Hand Surg [Br]. 1993;18:152–6.CrossRef Arakaki A, Tsai TM. Thumb replantation: survival factors and re-exploration in 122 cases. J Hand Surg [Br]. 1993;18:152–6.CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Wang H. Secondary surgery after digit replantation: its incidence and sequence. Microsurgery. 2002;22:57–61.PubMedCrossRef Wang H. Secondary surgery after digit replantation: its incidence and sequence. Microsurgery. 2002;22:57–61.PubMedCrossRef
8.
go back to reference Waikakul S, Sakkarnkosol S, Vanadurongwan V, et al. Results of 1018 digital replantations in 552 patients. Injury. 2000;31:33–40.PubMedCrossRef Waikakul S, Sakkarnkosol S, Vanadurongwan V, et al. Results of 1018 digital replantations in 552 patients. Injury. 2000;31:33–40.PubMedCrossRef
9.
go back to reference MacLeod A M, O'Brien B M, Morrison W A. Digital replantation: clinical experiences. Clin Orthop Relat Res: 1978;26–34. MacLeod A M, O'Brien B M, Morrison W A. Digital replantation: clinical experiences. Clin Orthop Relat Res: 1978;26–34.
10.
go back to reference Kaplan FT, Raskin KB. Indications and surgical techniques for digit replantation. Bull Hosp Jt Dis. 2001;60:179–88.PubMed Kaplan FT, Raskin KB. Indications and surgical techniques for digit replantation. Bull Hosp Jt Dis. 2001;60:179–88.PubMed
11.
go back to reference Patradul A, Ngarmukos C, Parkpian V. Distal digital replantations and revascularizations. 237 digits in 192 patients. J Hand Surg [Br]. 1998;23:578–82.CrossRef Patradul A, Ngarmukos C, Parkpian V. Distal digital replantations and revascularizations. 237 digits in 192 patients. J Hand Surg [Br]. 1998;23:578–82.CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Niibayashi H, Tamura K, Fujiwara M, et al. Survival factors in digital replantation: significance of postoperative anaemia. J Hand Surg [Br]. 2000;25:512–5. Niibayashi H, Tamura K, Fujiwara M, et al. Survival factors in digital replantation: significance of postoperative anaemia. J Hand Surg [Br]. 2000;25:512–5.
13.
go back to reference van Adrichem LN, Hovius SE, van Strik R, et al. The acute effect of cigarette smoking on the microcirculation of a replanted digit. J Hand Surg [Am]. 1992;17:230–4.CrossRef van Adrichem LN, Hovius SE, van Strik R, et al. The acute effect of cigarette smoking on the microcirculation of a replanted digit. J Hand Surg [Am]. 1992;17:230–4.CrossRef
14.
go back to reference Merle M, Dautel G. Advances in digital replantation. Clin Plast Surg. 1997;24:87–105.PubMed Merle M, Dautel G. Advances in digital replantation. Clin Plast Surg. 1997;24:87–105.PubMed
Metadata
Title
Complete digital amputations undergoing replantation surgery: a 10-year retrospective study
Authors
Ryan M Neinstein
Linda T. Dvali
Suzanne Le
D.J. Anastakis
Publication date
01-09-2012
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
HAND / Issue 3/2012
Print ISSN: 1558-9447
Electronic ISSN: 1558-9455
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11552-012-9427-z

Other articles of this Issue 3/2012

HAND 3/2012 Go to the issue