Skip to main content
Top
Published in: International Ophthalmology 3/2018

01-06-2018 | Original Paper

Comparison of visual outcomes and reading performance after bilateral implantation of multifocal intraocular lenses with bilateral monofocal intraocular lenses

Authors: Özge Güngör Akkuş, Ikbal Seza Petriçli

Published in: International Ophthalmology | Issue 3/2018

Login to get access

Abstract

Purpose

To compare the visual acuity outcomes, contrast sensitivity function (CS) and reading ability in patients with bilateral multifocal intraocular lenses and patients with bilateral monofocal lenses.

Setting

Vizyon Eye Center, Denizli, Turkey.

Design

Comparative case series.

Methods

Consecutive bilateral cataract patients having implantation of Acriva Reviol MFM 611 multifocal IOLs (Group A) or Acriva BB UD 613 monofocal IOLs (Group B) were included. Parameters analyzed 6 months postoperatively included monocular uncorrected distance (UDVA), binocular uncorrected intermediate (UIVA), binocular uncorrected near (UNVA), CS and bilateral reading performance using MN Read.

Results

The study evaluated 42 eyes in Group A and 40 eyes in Group B. There were no statistically significant differences in UDVA between two groups postoperatively (p = .39). Binocular UIVA and binocular UNVA are better in Group A (p = .00, p = .00). Under photopic and scotopic conditions, contrast sensitivity results were decreased in Group A, especially at high spatial frequencies. No statistically difference were found in reading acuity, critical print size and maximum reading speed between two groups (p = .57, p = .62, p = .22).

Conclusions

This study concludes that multifocal lenses are reliable and efficient replacements for reading glasses since they significantly improve the vision for near or intermediate distance activities.
Literature
1.
go back to reference SGK Rehberi (2012) Social security system guide 2012, Turkey SGK Rehberi (2012) Social security system guide 2012, Turkey
2.
go back to reference Legge GE, Ross JA, Luebker A, Lamays JM (1989) Psychophysics of reading. VIII. The minnesota low-vision reading test. Optom Vis Sci 66:843–853CrossRefPubMed Legge GE, Ross JA, Luebker A, Lamays JM (1989) Psychophysics of reading. VIII. The minnesota low-vision reading test. Optom Vis Sci 66:843–853CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Virgili G, Cordaro C, Bigoni A, Crovato S, Cecchini P, Menchini U (2004) Reading acuity in children: evaluation and reliability using MNREAD charts. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 45:3349–3354CrossRefPubMed Virgili G, Cordaro C, Bigoni A, Crovato S, Cecchini P, Menchini U (2004) Reading acuity in children: evaluation and reliability using MNREAD charts. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 45:3349–3354CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Heatley CJ, Spalton DJ, Hancox J, Kumar A, Marshall J (2005) Fellow eye comparison between the 1CU accommodative intraocular lens and the Acrysof MA30 monofocal intraocular lens. Am J Ophthalmol 140:207–213CrossRefPubMed Heatley CJ, Spalton DJ, Hancox J, Kumar A, Marshall J (2005) Fellow eye comparison between the 1CU accommodative intraocular lens and the Acrysof MA30 monofocal intraocular lens. Am J Ophthalmol 140:207–213CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Gupta N, Wolffsohn JSW, Naroo SA (2009) Comparison of near visual acuity and reading metrics in presbyopia correction. J Cataract Refract Surg 35:1401–1409CrossRefPubMed Gupta N, Wolffsohn JSW, Naroo SA (2009) Comparison of near visual acuity and reading metrics in presbyopia correction. J Cataract Refract Surg 35:1401–1409CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Ito M, Shimizu K (2009) Reading ability with pseudophakic monovision and with refractive multifocal intraocular lenses: comparative study. J Cataract Refract Surg 35:1501–1504CrossRefPubMed Ito M, Shimizu K (2009) Reading ability with pseudophakic monovision and with refractive multifocal intraocular lenses: comparative study. J Cataract Refract Surg 35:1501–1504CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Santhiago MR, Netto MV, Espindola RF, Mazurek MG, Gomes BAF, Parede TRR, Harooni H, Kara-Junior N (2010) Comparison of reading performance after bilateral implantation of multifocal intraocular lenses with +3.00 or +4.00 diopter addition. J Cataract Refract Surg 36:1874–1879CrossRefPubMed Santhiago MR, Netto MV, Espindola RF, Mazurek MG, Gomes BAF, Parede TRR, Harooni H, Kara-Junior N (2010) Comparison of reading performance after bilateral implantation of multifocal intraocular lenses with +3.00 or +4.00 diopter addition. J Cataract Refract Surg 36:1874–1879CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Alio JL, Grabner G, Plaza-Puche AB, Rasp M, Pinero DP, Seyeddain O, Rodriguez-Prats JL, Ayala MJ, Moreu R, Hohensinn M, Riha W, Dexl A (2011) Postoperative bilateral reading performance with 4 intraocular lens models: six-month results. J Cataract Refract Surg 37:842–852CrossRefPubMed Alio JL, Grabner G, Plaza-Puche AB, Rasp M, Pinero DP, Seyeddain O, Rodriguez-Prats JL, Ayala MJ, Moreu R, Hohensinn M, Riha W, Dexl A (2011) Postoperative bilateral reading performance with 4 intraocular lens models: six-month results. J Cataract Refract Surg 37:842–852CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Alio JL, Plaza-Puche AB, Pinero DP, Amparo F, Jimenez R, Rodriguez-Prats JL, Javaloy J, Pongo V (2011) Optical analysis, reading performance, and quality-of-life evaluation after implantation of a diffractive multifocal intraocular lens. J Cataract Refract Surg 37:27–37CrossRefPubMed Alio JL, Plaza-Puche AB, Pinero DP, Amparo F, Jimenez R, Rodriguez-Prats JL, Javaloy J, Pongo V (2011) Optical analysis, reading performance, and quality-of-life evaluation after implantation of a diffractive multifocal intraocular lens. J Cataract Refract Surg 37:27–37CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Buckhurst PJ, Wolffsohn JS, Gupta N, Naroo SA, Davies LN, Shah S (2012) Development of a questionnaire to assess the relative subjective benefits of presbyopia correction. J Cataract Refract Surg 38:74–79CrossRefPubMed Buckhurst PJ, Wolffsohn JS, Gupta N, Naroo SA, Davies LN, Shah S (2012) Development of a questionnaire to assess the relative subjective benefits of presbyopia correction. J Cataract Refract Surg 38:74–79CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Cillino G, Casuccio A, Pasti M, Bono V, Mencucci R, Cillino S (2014) Working-age cataract patients: visual results, reading performance, and quality of life with three diffractive multifocal intraocular lenses. Ophthalmology 121:34–44CrossRefPubMed Cillino G, Casuccio A, Pasti M, Bono V, Mencucci R, Cillino S (2014) Working-age cataract patients: visual results, reading performance, and quality of life with three diffractive multifocal intraocular lenses. Ophthalmology 121:34–44CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Can I, Ceran BB, Soyugelen G, Takmaz T (2012) Comparison of clinical outcomes with 2 small-incision diffractive multifocal intraocular lens. J Cataract Refract Surg 38:60–67CrossRefPubMed Can I, Ceran BB, Soyugelen G, Takmaz T (2012) Comparison of clinical outcomes with 2 small-incision diffractive multifocal intraocular lens. J Cataract Refract Surg 38:60–67CrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference Wang M, Corpuz CCC, Fujiwara M, Tomita M (2015) Visual and optical performances of multifocal intraocular lenses with three different near additions: 6-months follow-up. Open Ophthalmol J 9:1–7CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Wang M, Corpuz CCC, Fujiwara M, Tomita M (2015) Visual and optical performances of multifocal intraocular lenses with three different near additions: 6-months follow-up. Open Ophthalmol J 9:1–7CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
15.
go back to reference Akçay L, Tutas Günaydın N, Sayman I, Dogan O (2010) Comparison of visual acuity and contrast sensitivity between aspheric monofocal and multifocal intraocular lenses. In: Poster presented at ESCRS, Paris Akçay L, Tutas Günaydın N, Sayman I, Dogan O (2010) Comparison of visual acuity and contrast sensitivity between aspheric monofocal and multifocal intraocular lenses. In: Poster presented at ESCRS, Paris
16.
go back to reference Cochener B, Lafuma A, Khoshnood B, Courouve L, Berdeaux G (2011) Comparison of outcomes with multifocal intraocular lenses : a meta-analysis. Clin Ophthalmol 5:45–55PubMedPubMedCentral Cochener B, Lafuma A, Khoshnood B, Courouve L, Berdeaux G (2011) Comparison of outcomes with multifocal intraocular lenses : a meta-analysis. Clin Ophthalmol 5:45–55PubMedPubMedCentral
17.
go back to reference Vries NE, Webers CAB, Verbakel F, Brabander J, Berendschot TT, Cheng YYY, Doors M, Nuijts RMMA (2010) Visual outcome and patient satisfaction after multifocal intraocular lens implantation: aspheric versus spherical design. J Cataract Refract Surg 36:1897–1904CrossRefPubMed Vries NE, Webers CAB, Verbakel F, Brabander J, Berendschot TT, Cheng YYY, Doors M, Nuijts RMMA (2010) Visual outcome and patient satisfaction after multifocal intraocular lens implantation: aspheric versus spherical design. J Cataract Refract Surg 36:1897–1904CrossRefPubMed
18.
go back to reference Petermeier K, Messias A, Gekeler F, Szurman P (2011) Effect of +3.00 diopter and +4.00 diopter additions in multifocal intraocular lenses an defocus profiles, patient satisfaction, and contrast sensitivity. J Cataract Refract Surg 37:720–726CrossRefPubMed Petermeier K, Messias A, Gekeler F, Szurman P (2011) Effect of +3.00 diopter and +4.00 diopter additions in multifocal intraocular lenses an defocus profiles, patient satisfaction, and contrast sensitivity. J Cataract Refract Surg 37:720–726CrossRefPubMed
19.
go back to reference Kim JS, Jung JW, Lee JM, Seo KY, Kim EK, Kim T (2015) Clinical outcomes following implantation of diffractive multifocal intraocular lenses with varying add powers. Am J Ophthalmol 160:702–709CrossRefPubMed Kim JS, Jung JW, Lee JM, Seo KY, Kim EK, Kim T (2015) Clinical outcomes following implantation of diffractive multifocal intraocular lenses with varying add powers. Am J Ophthalmol 160:702–709CrossRefPubMed
21.
go back to reference Alio JL, Pinero DP, Plaza-Puche AB, Chan MJR (2011) Visual outcomes and optical performance of a monofocal intraocular lens and new-generation multifocal intraocular lens. J Cataract Refract Surg 37:241–250CrossRefPubMed Alio JL, Pinero DP, Plaza-Puche AB, Chan MJR (2011) Visual outcomes and optical performance of a monofocal intraocular lens and new-generation multifocal intraocular lens. J Cataract Refract Surg 37:241–250CrossRefPubMed
22.
go back to reference Zhang F, Sugar A, Jacobsen G, Collins M (2011) Visual function and patient satisfaction: comparison between bilateral diffractive multifocal intraocular lenses and monovision pseudophakia. J Cataract Refract Surg 37:446–453CrossRefPubMed Zhang F, Sugar A, Jacobsen G, Collins M (2011) Visual function and patient satisfaction: comparison between bilateral diffractive multifocal intraocular lenses and monovision pseudophakia. J Cataract Refract Surg 37:446–453CrossRefPubMed
23.
go back to reference Alio JL, Pinero DP, Plaza-Puche AB (2010) Visual outcomes and optical performance with a monofocal intraocular lens and new-generation single-optic accommodating intraocular lens. J Cataract Refract Surg 36:1656–1664CrossRefPubMed Alio JL, Pinero DP, Plaza-Puche AB (2010) Visual outcomes and optical performance with a monofocal intraocular lens and new-generation single-optic accommodating intraocular lens. J Cataract Refract Surg 36:1656–1664CrossRefPubMed
24.
go back to reference Alio JL, Plaza-Puche AB, Pinero DP, Amparo F, Rodriguez-Prats JL, Ayala MJ (2011) Quality of life evaluation after implantation of 2 multifocal intraocular lens models and a monofocal model. J Cataract Refract Surg 37:638–648CrossRefPubMed Alio JL, Plaza-Puche AB, Pinero DP, Amparo F, Rodriguez-Prats JL, Ayala MJ (2011) Quality of life evaluation after implantation of 2 multifocal intraocular lens models and a monofocal model. J Cataract Refract Surg 37:638–648CrossRefPubMed
25.
go back to reference Prieto JC, Bautista MJ (2010) Visual outcomes after implantation of a refractive multifocal intraocular lens with a +3.00 D addition. J Cataract Refract Surg 36:1508–1516CrossRef Prieto JC, Bautista MJ (2010) Visual outcomes after implantation of a refractive multifocal intraocular lens with a +3.00 D addition. J Cataract Refract Surg 36:1508–1516CrossRef
26.
go back to reference Ye Pan-Pan, Li Xia, Yao Ke (2013) Visual outcome and optical quality after bilateral implantation of aspheric diffractive multifocal, aspheric monofocal and spherical monofocal intraocular lenses: a prospective comparison. Int J Ophthalmol 6(3):300–306PubMedPubMedCentral Ye Pan-Pan, Li Xia, Yao Ke (2013) Visual outcome and optical quality after bilateral implantation of aspheric diffractive multifocal, aspheric monofocal and spherical monofocal intraocular lenses: a prospective comparison. Int J Ophthalmol 6(3):300–306PubMedPubMedCentral
27.
go back to reference Mesci C, Erbil H, Özdöker L, Karakurt Y, Bilge AD (2010) Visual acuity and contrast sensitivity function after accommodative and multifocal intraocular lens implantation. Eur J Ophthalmol 20:90–1002CrossRefPubMed Mesci C, Erbil H, Özdöker L, Karakurt Y, Bilge AD (2010) Visual acuity and contrast sensitivity function after accommodative and multifocal intraocular lens implantation. Eur J Ophthalmol 20:90–1002CrossRefPubMed
28.
go back to reference Montes-Mico R, Alio JL (2003) Distance and near contrast sensitivity function after multifocal intraocular lens implantation. J Cataract Refract Surg 29:703–711CrossRefPubMed Montes-Mico R, Alio JL (2003) Distance and near contrast sensitivity function after multifocal intraocular lens implantation. J Cataract Refract Surg 29:703–711CrossRefPubMed
29.
go back to reference Souza CE, Muccioli C, Soriano ES et al (2006) Visual performance of Acrysof Restor apodized diffractive IOL: a prospective comparative trial. Am J Ophthalmol 141:827–832CrossRefPubMed Souza CE, Muccioli C, Soriano ES et al (2006) Visual performance of Acrysof Restor apodized diffractive IOL: a prospective comparative trial. Am J Ophthalmol 141:827–832CrossRefPubMed
30.
go back to reference Netto MV, Ambrosio R Jr, Wilson SE (2004) Pupil size in refractive surgery candidates. J Refract Surg 20:337–342PubMed Netto MV, Ambrosio R Jr, Wilson SE (2004) Pupil size in refractive surgery candidates. J Refract Surg 20:337–342PubMed
Metadata
Title
Comparison of visual outcomes and reading performance after bilateral implantation of multifocal intraocular lenses with bilateral monofocal intraocular lenses
Authors
Özge Güngör Akkuş
Ikbal Seza Petriçli
Publication date
01-06-2018
Publisher
Springer Netherlands
Published in
International Ophthalmology / Issue 3/2018
Print ISSN: 0165-5701
Electronic ISSN: 1573-2630
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10792-017-0552-0

Other articles of this Issue 3/2018

International Ophthalmology 3/2018 Go to the issue