Skip to main content
Top
Published in: European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology 3/2015

01-03-2015 | Miscellaneous

Comparison of traditional face-to-face teaching with synchronous e-learning in otolaryngology emergencies teaching to medical undergraduates: a randomised controlled trial

Authors: Talal Alnabelsi, Ali Al-Hussaini, David Owens

Published in: European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology | Issue 3/2015

Login to get access

Abstract

Undergraduate otolaryngology teaching in the UK is generally limited primarily due to curriculum time constraints with traditional face-to-face (FtF) teaching being restrained by the limitations of time and location. Advances in network technology have opened up new doors for the delivery of teaching in the form of online learning. This study compares a traditional instructor-led lecture with synchronous e-learning (SeL) using otolaryngological emergencies teaching as an educational intervention. A randomised controlled trial was designed involving two groups of medical students attending an otolaryngology emergencies management lecture: one present FtF and the other viewing the streamed lecture online. The primary outcome measure was improvement between pre-and post-lecture test scores. Secondary outcomes comprised the students’ ratings of the lecture on a Likert-type scale. Students in both groups had improved test scores following the lecture (p < 0.001 for both groups) and there was no difference in magnitude of improvement in test scores between the two groups (p = 0.168). There was no difference in student ratings between the two groups for the usefulness of the lecture (p = 0.484), interactivity (p = 0.834) and meeting educational needs (p = 0.968). The FtF group, however, was more satisfied overall (p = 0.034). This study demonstrates that SeL may be as effective as FtF teaching in improving students’ knowledge on the management of otolaryngological emergencies, and that it is generally positively perceived by medical undergraduates. This highlights the potential utility of e-learning technology in undergraduate otolaryngology training.
Literature
2.
go back to reference Khan MM, Saeed SR (2012) Provision of undergraduate otorhinolaryngology teaching within general medical council approved UK medical schools: what is current practice? J Laryngol Otol 126(4):340–344CrossRefPubMed Khan MM, Saeed SR (2012) Provision of undergraduate otorhinolaryngology teaching within general medical council approved UK medical schools: what is current practice? J Laryngol Otol 126(4):340–344CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Donnelly MJ, Quraishi MS, McShane DP (1995) ENT and general practice: a study of paediatric ENT problems seen in general practice and recommendations for general practitioner training in ENT in Ireland. Ir J Med Sci 164(3):209–211CrossRefPubMed Donnelly MJ, Quraishi MS, McShane DP (1995) ENT and general practice: a study of paediatric ENT problems seen in general practice and recommendations for general practitioner training in ENT in Ireland. Ir J Med Sci 164(3):209–211CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Sharpe D, Farboud A, Trinidade A (2009) ’Is that the ENT SHO?’: concerns over training and experience of juniors expected to cross-cover ENT at night. Clin Otolaryngol 34(3):275CrossRefPubMed Sharpe D, Farboud A, Trinidade A (2009) ’Is that the ENT SHO?’: concerns over training and experience of juniors expected to cross-cover ENT at night. Clin Otolaryngol 34(3):275CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Davis SJ, McDonald S (2006) Covering ENT out of hours: how confident are senior house officers? J Laryngol Otol 120(7):587–590CrossRefPubMed Davis SJ, McDonald S (2006) Covering ENT out of hours: how confident are senior house officers? J Laryngol Otol 120(7):587–590CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Clamp PJ, Gunasekaran S, Pothier DD, Sunders MW (2007) ENT in general practice: training, experience and referral rates. J Laryngol Otol 121(6):580–583CrossRefPubMed Clamp PJ, Gunasekaran S, Pothier DD, Sunders MW (2007) ENT in general practice: training, experience and referral rates. J Laryngol Otol 121(6):580–583CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Ruiz JG, Mintzer MJ, Leipzig RM (2006) The impact of e-learning in medical education. Acad Med 81(3):207–212CrossRefPubMed Ruiz JG, Mintzer MJ, Leipzig RM (2006) The impact of e-learning in medical education. Acad Med 81(3):207–212CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Hrastinski S (2008) Asynchronous and synchronous e-learning. Educ Q 31(4):51–55 Hrastinski S (2008) Asynchronous and synchronous e-learning. Educ Q 31(4):51–55
11.
go back to reference Bernard RM, Abrami PC, Lou Y, Borokhovski E, Wade A, Wozney L et al (2004) How does distance education compare with classroom instruction? A meta-analysis of the empirical literature. Rev Educ Res 74(3):379–439CrossRef Bernard RM, Abrami PC, Lou Y, Borokhovski E, Wade A, Wozney L et al (2004) How does distance education compare with classroom instruction? A meta-analysis of the empirical literature. Rev Educ Res 74(3):379–439CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Chen NS, Ko HC, Kinshuk, Lin T (2005) A model for synchronous learning using the Internet. Innov Educ Teach Int 42(2):181–194CrossRef Chen NS, Ko HC, Kinshuk, Lin T (2005) A model for synchronous learning using the Internet. Innov Educ Teach Int 42(2):181–194CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Hannum W (2001) Web-based training: advantages and limitations. In: Khan BH (ed) Web-based training. Educational Technology Publications, Englewood Cliffs, pp 13–20 Hannum W (2001) Web-based training: advantages and limitations. In: Khan BH (ed) Web-based training. Educational Technology Publications, Englewood Cliffs, pp 13–20
16.
go back to reference Hortos K, Sefcik D, Wilson SG, McDaniel JT, Zemper E (2013) Synchronous videoconferencing: impact on achievement of medical students. Teach Learn Med 25(3):211–215CrossRefPubMed Hortos K, Sefcik D, Wilson SG, McDaniel JT, Zemper E (2013) Synchronous videoconferencing: impact on achievement of medical students. Teach Learn Med 25(3):211–215CrossRefPubMed
17.
go back to reference Garland KV (2010) E-learning vs. classroom instruction in infection control in a dental hygiene program. J Dent Educ 74(6):637–643PubMed Garland KV (2010) E-learning vs. classroom instruction in infection control in a dental hygiene program. J Dent Educ 74(6):637–643PubMed
18.
go back to reference de Jong N, Verstegen DML, Tan FES, O’Connor SJ (2013) A comparison of classroom and online asynchronous problem-based learning for students undertaking statistics training as part of a Public Health Masters degree. Adv Health Sci Educ 18(2):245–264CrossRef de Jong N, Verstegen DML, Tan FES, O’Connor SJ (2013) A comparison of classroom and online asynchronous problem-based learning for students undertaking statistics training as part of a Public Health Masters degree. Adv Health Sci Educ 18(2):245–264CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Comparison of traditional face-to-face teaching with synchronous e-learning in otolaryngology emergencies teaching to medical undergraduates: a randomised controlled trial
Authors
Talal Alnabelsi
Ali Al-Hussaini
David Owens
Publication date
01-03-2015
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology / Issue 3/2015
Print ISSN: 0937-4477
Electronic ISSN: 1434-4726
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00405-014-3326-6

Other articles of this Issue 3/2015

European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology 3/2015 Go to the issue