Skip to main content
Top
Published in: BMC Pediatrics 1/2020

Open Access 01-12-2020 | Research article

Comparison of three classes of Marginal Risk Set Model in predicting infant mortality among newborn babies at Kigali University Teaching Hospital, Rwanda, 2016

Authors: Paul Gatabazi, Sileshi Fanta Melesse, Shaun Ramroop

Published in: BMC Pediatrics | Issue 1/2020

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

The Infant Mortality Rate (IMR) in Sub-Saharan Africa (SSA) remains the highest relatively to the rest of the world. In the past decade, the policy on reducing infant mortality in SSA was reinforced and both infant mortality and parental death decreased critically for some countries of SSA. The analysis of risk to death or attracting chronic disease may be done for helping medical practitioners and decision makers and for better preventing the infant mortality.

Methods

This study uses popular statistical methods of re-sampling and one selected model of multiple events analysis for measuring the survival outcomes for the infants born in 2016 at Kigali University Teaching Hospital (KUTH) in Rwanda, a country of SSA, amidst maternal and child’s socio-economic and clinical covariates. Dataset comprises the newborns with correct information on the covariates of interest. The Bootstrap Marginal Risk Set Model (BMRSM) and Jackknife Marginal Risk Set Model (JMRSM) for the available maternal and child’s socio-economic and clinical covariates were conducted and then compared to the outcome with Marginal Risk Set Model (MRSM). That was for measuring stability of the MRSM.

Results

The 2117 newborns had the correct information on all the covariates, 82 babies died along the study time, 69 stillborn babies were observed while 1966 were censored. Both BMRSM JMRSM and MRSM displayed the close results for significant covariates. The BMRSM displayed in some instance, relatively higher standard errors for non-significant covariates and this emphasized their insignificance in MRSM. The models revealed that female babies survive better than male babies. The risk is higher for babies whose parents are under 20 years old parents as compared to other parents’ age groups, the risk decreases as the APGAR increases, is lower for underweight babies than babies with normal weight and overweight and is lower for babies with normal circumference of head as compared to those with relatively small head.

Conclusion

The results of JMRSM were closer to MRSM than that of BMRSM. Newborns of mothers aged less than 20 years were at relatively higher risk of dying than those who their mothers were aged 20 years and above. Being abnormal in weight and head increased the risk of infant mortality. Avoidance of teenage pregnancy and provision of clinical care including an adequate dietary intake during pregnancy would reduce the IMR in Kigali.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference Ester PV, Torres A, Freire JM, Hernández V, Gil A. Factors associated to infant mortality in Sub-Saharan Africa. J Public Health Afr. 2011;2(e27):112–6. Ester PV, Torres A, Freire JM, Hernández V, Gil A. Factors associated to infant mortality in Sub-Saharan Africa. J Public Health Afr. 2011;2(e27):112–6.
3.
go back to reference Gatabazi P, Melesse SF, Ramroop S. Infant mortality at the Kigali University Teaching Hospital: Application of Aalen additive hazards model and comparison with other classical survival models. Afr Popul Stud. 2019;33(2):4834–51. Gatabazi P, Melesse SF, Ramroop S. Infant mortality at the Kigali University Teaching Hospital: Application of Aalen additive hazards model and comparison with other classical survival models. Afr Popul Stud. 2019;33(2):4834–51.
4.
go back to reference Gatabazi P, Melesse SF, Ramroop S. Multiple events model for the infant at Kigali University teaching hospital. Open Public Health J. 2018;11:464–73.CrossRef Gatabazi P, Melesse SF, Ramroop S. Multiple events model for the infant at Kigali University teaching hospital. Open Public Health J. 2018;11:464–73.CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Hamada C. Bootstrap Cox regression using SAS procedures. SAS Institute Japan Ltd. 1995;211:1258–62. Hamada C. Bootstrap Cox regression using SAS procedures. SAS Institute Japan Ltd. 1995;211:1258–62.
6.
go back to reference Utzet F, Sánchez A. Some applications of the bootstrap to survival analysis. Anuario de Psicologia. 1992;55:155–67. Utzet F, Sánchez A. Some applications of the bootstrap to survival analysis. Anuario de Psicologia. 1992;55:155–67.
7.
go back to reference Cook RJ, Lawless JF. The statistical analysis of recurrent events. New York: Springer; 2007. Cook RJ, Lawless JF. The statistical analysis of recurrent events. New York: Springer; 2007.
8.
go back to reference Wei LJ, Glidden DV. An overview of statistical methods for multiple failure time data in clinical trials. Stat Med. 1997;16:833–9.CrossRef Wei LJ, Glidden DV. An overview of statistical methods for multiple failure time data in clinical trials. Stat Med. 1997;16:833–9.CrossRef
9.
go back to reference B Efron and R J Tibshirani. An introduction to the bootstrap. Chapman & Hall/CRC, 1994. B Efron and R J Tibshirani. An introduction to the bootstrap. Chapman & Hall/CRC, 1994.
10.
go back to reference Bělašková SB, Fišerová E, Krupičková S. Study of bootstrap estimates in Cox regression model with delayed entry. Mathematica. 2013;52(2):21–30. Bělašková SB, Fišerová E, Krupičková S. Study of bootstrap estimates in Cox regression model with delayed entry. Mathematica. 2013;52(2):21–30.
11.
go back to reference Xu G, Sen B, Ying Z. Bootstrapping a change-point Cox model for survival data. Electron J Stat. 2014;8(1):1345–79.CrossRef Xu G, Sen B, Ying Z. Bootstrapping a change-point Cox model for survival data. Electron J Stat. 2014;8(1):1345–79.CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Xiao L, Yao-Hua W, Dong-Sheng T. Jackknifed random weighting for Cox proportional hazards model. Sci China Math. 2012;55(4):775–86.CrossRef Xiao L, Yao-Hua W, Dong-Sheng T. Jackknifed random weighting for Cox proportional hazards model. Sci China Math. 2012;55(4):775–86.CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Gatabazi P, Melesse SF, Ramroop S. Re-sampled Cox proportional hazard model for the infant mortality at the Kigali University teaching hospital teaching hospital. Open Public Health J. 2019;12:136–44.CrossRef Gatabazi P, Melesse SF, Ramroop S. Re-sampled Cox proportional hazard model for the infant mortality at the Kigali University teaching hospital teaching hospital. Open Public Health J. 2019;12:136–44.CrossRef
14.
go back to reference Wang Z, Wu Y, Zhao LC. Approximation by randomly weighting method in censored regression model. Sci China Ser A. 2009;52:567–76. Wang Z, Wu Y, Zhao LC. Approximation by randomly weighting method in censored regression model. Sci China Ser A. 2009;52:567–76.
15.
go back to reference Zheng ZG. Random weighting method. Acta Math Appl Sin. 1987;10:247–53. Zheng ZG. Random weighting method. Acta Math Appl Sin. 1987;10:247–53.
16.
go back to reference Zheng ZG, Tu D. Random weighting method in regression models. Sci Sinica Series A. 1988;31:1442–59. Zheng ZG, Tu D. Random weighting method in regression models. Sci Sinica Series A. 1988;31:1442–59.
17.
go back to reference James LF. A study of a class of weighted bootstraps for censored data. Ann Stat. 1997;25:1595–621.CrossRef James LF. A study of a class of weighted bootstraps for censored data. Ann Stat. 1997;25:1595–621.CrossRef
18.
go back to reference Quan H, Tsai WY. Jackknife for the proportional hazards model. J Stat Comput Simul. 1992;43:163–76.CrossRef Quan H, Tsai WY. Jackknife for the proportional hazards model. J Stat Comput Simul. 1992;43:163–76.CrossRef
19.
go back to reference Sauerbrei W, Schumacher M. A bootstrap resampling procedure for model building: application to the Cox regression model. Stat Med. 1992;11:2093–109.CrossRef Sauerbrei W, Schumacher M. A bootstrap resampling procedure for model building: application to the Cox regression model. Stat Med. 1992;11:2093–109.CrossRef
20.
go back to reference Efron B. Censored data and the bootstrap. J Am Stat Assoc. 1981;76:312–9.CrossRef Efron B. Censored data and the bootstrap. J Am Stat Assoc. 1981;76:312–9.CrossRef
21.
go back to reference Hjort N. Bootstrapping Cox’s regression model. Technical Report, Stanford University, Dept. of Statistics, vol. 241; 1985. Hjort N. Bootstrapping Cox’s regression model. Technical Report, Stanford University, Dept. of Statistics, vol. 241; 1985.
22.
go back to reference Kim J. Conditional bootstrap methods for censored data. PhD dissertation, Florida State University, Dept, of Statistics; 1990. Kim J. Conditional bootstrap methods for censored data. PhD dissertation, Florida State University, Dept, of Statistics; 1990.
23.
go back to reference Collet D. Modeling survival data in medical research. 2nd ed. London: Chapman & Hall; 2003. Collet D. Modeling survival data in medical research. 2nd ed. London: Chapman & Hall; 2003.
24.
go back to reference Wei LJ, Lin DY, Weissfeld L. Regression analysis of multivariate incomplete failure time data by modelling marginal distributions. J Am Stat Assoc. 1989;84(408):1065–73.CrossRef Wei LJ, Lin DY, Weissfeld L. Regression analysis of multivariate incomplete failure time data by modelling marginal distributions. J Am Stat Assoc. 1989;84(408):1065–73.CrossRef
25.
go back to reference Gatabazi P, Kabera G. Survival analysis and its stochastic process approach with application to diabetes data; 2015. Gatabazi P, Kabera G. Survival analysis and its stochastic process approach with application to diabetes data; 2015.
26.
go back to reference Sankaran PG, Anisha P. Shared frailty model for recurrent event data with multiple causes. J Appl Stat. 2011;38(12):2859–68.CrossRef Sankaran PG, Anisha P. Shared frailty model for recurrent event data with multiple causes. J Appl Stat. 2011;38(12):2859–68.CrossRef
27.
go back to reference Breslow NE. Covariance analysis of censored survival data. Biometrics. 1974;30:89–99.CrossRef Breslow NE. Covariance analysis of censored survival data. Biometrics. 1974;30:89–99.CrossRef
28.
go back to reference Efron B. The efficiency of Cox’s likelihood function for censored data. J Am Stat Assoc. 1977;72:557–65.CrossRef Efron B. The efficiency of Cox’s likelihood function for censored data. J Am Stat Assoc. 1977;72:557–65.CrossRef
29.
go back to reference Cox DR. Regression models and life-tables (with discussion). J R Stat Soc. 1972;34(2):187–220 Series B. Cox DR. Regression models and life-tables (with discussion). J R Stat Soc. 1972;34(2):187–220 Series B.
30.
go back to reference Parzen M, Lipsitz SR. A global goodness-of-fit statistic for Cox regression models. Biometrics. 1999;55:580–4.CrossRef Parzen M, Lipsitz SR. A global goodness-of-fit statistic for Cox regression models. Biometrics. 1999;55:580–4.CrossRef
31.
go back to reference Basinga P, Moore AM, Singh S, Remez L, Birungi F, Nyirazinyoye L. Unintended pregnancy and induced abortion in Rwanda: causes and consequences. New York: Guttmacher Institute; 2012. Basinga P, Moore AM, Singh S, Remez L, Birungi F, Nyirazinyoye L. Unintended pregnancy and induced abortion in Rwanda: causes and consequences. New York: Guttmacher Institute; 2012.
32.
go back to reference Olausson PO, Cnattinius S, Haglund B. Teenage pregnancies and risk of late fetal death and infant mortality. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1999;106:116–21.CrossRef Olausson PO, Cnattinius S, Haglund B. Teenage pregnancies and risk of late fetal death and infant mortality. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1999;106:116–21.CrossRef
33.
go back to reference Lampinen R, Julkunen KV, Kankkunen P. A review of pregnancy in women over 35 years of age. Open Nurs J. 2009;3:33–8.CrossRef Lampinen R, Julkunen KV, Kankkunen P. A review of pregnancy in women over 35 years of age. Open Nurs J. 2009;3:33–8.CrossRef
34.
go back to reference Pongou R. Why is infant mortality higher in boys than in girls? A new hypothesis based on preconception environment and evidence from a large sample of twins. Demography. 2013;50:421–44.CrossRef Pongou R. Why is infant mortality higher in boys than in girls? A new hypothesis based on preconception environment and evidence from a large sample of twins. Demography. 2013;50:421–44.CrossRef
35.
go back to reference Zarulli V, Jones JAB, Oksuzyanc A, Lindahl-Jacobsen R, Christensen K, Vaupel JW. Women live longer than men even during severe famines and epidemics. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2018;115(4):E832–40.CrossRef Zarulli V, Jones JAB, Oksuzyanc A, Lindahl-Jacobsen R, Christensen K, Vaupel JW. Women live longer than men even during severe famines and epidemics. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2018;115(4):E832–40.CrossRef
36.
go back to reference Monden CWS, Smits J. Mortality among twins and singletons in Sub-Saharan Africa between 1995 and 2014: a pooled analysis of data from 90 demographic and health surveys in 30 countries. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2017;5(7):E673–9. Monden CWS, Smits J. Mortality among twins and singletons in Sub-Saharan Africa between 1995 and 2014: a pooled analysis of data from 90 demographic and health surveys in 30 countries. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2017;5(7):E673–9.
37.
go back to reference Pongou R, Shapiro D, Tenikue M. Mortality convergence of twins and singletons in sub-Saharan Africa. Demogr Res. 2019;41(36):1047–58.CrossRef Pongou R, Shapiro D, Tenikue M. Mortality convergence of twins and singletons in sub-Saharan Africa. Demogr Res. 2019;41(36):1047–58.CrossRef
38.
go back to reference Janssen PA, Thiessen P, Klein MC, Whitfield MF, Ying C, Cullis-Kuhl SC. Standards for the measurement of birth weight, length and head circumference at term in neonates of European, Chinese and South Asian ancestry. Open Med. 2007;1(2):74–88. Janssen PA, Thiessen P, Klein MC, Whitfield MF, Ying C, Cullis-Kuhl SC. Standards for the measurement of birth weight, length and head circumference at term in neonates of European, Chinese and South Asian ancestry. Open Med. 2007;1(2):74–88.
Metadata
Title
Comparison of three classes of Marginal Risk Set Model in predicting infant mortality among newborn babies at Kigali University Teaching Hospital, Rwanda, 2016
Authors
Paul Gatabazi
Sileshi Fanta Melesse
Shaun Ramroop
Publication date
01-12-2020
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
BMC Pediatrics / Issue 1/2020
Electronic ISSN: 1471-2431
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12887-020-1945-1

Other articles of this Issue 1/2020

BMC Pediatrics 1/2020 Go to the issue