Skip to main content
Top
Published in: International Ophthalmology 1/2010

01-02-2010 | Original Paper

Comparison of the quality score of intraocular pressure and ocular pulse amplitude values measured by the Pascal dynamic contour tonometer

Authors: S. Pourjavan, P. Boghossian, M. Detry-Morel

Published in: International Ophthalmology | Issue 1/2010

Login to get access

Abstract

The Pascal dynamic contour tonometer (PDCT) is designed to measure intraocular pressure (IOP) largely independent of the corneal properties. It is equipped with a digital LCD screen that displays the IOP, the ocular pulse amplitude (OPA) and the quality score (Q) of the measurements [range 1 (excellent) to 5 (poor)]. The manufacturer has recommended discarding the IOP and OPA values of Q4 and Q5. The aim of our study was to assess if IOP and OPA measurements with Q3 are acceptable for clinical and research purposes. This is a prospective, observational study in which both patients with ocular hypertension or glaucoma and healthy subjects were enrolled; three consecutive PDCT IOP measurements were performed on all participants. Only patients and subjects with Q1, Q2 and Q3 recorded together were eligible. Only one eye per subject was considered for statistical analysis. The mean PDCT IOP and OPA were taken for statistical analyses. An ANOVA test for repeated measures was used to compare the differences between PDCT IOP and OPA Q1, Q2, and Q3 scores. A total of 87 subjects met the inclusion criteria. Mean PDCT (±SD) IOP were 17.5 ± 3.4 mmHg for Q1, 17.6 ± 3.3 mmHg for Q2 and 17.9 ± 3.3 mmHg for Q3 (P > 0.05). Mean OPA Q1, Q2 and Q3 were 2.5 ± 0.9, 2.5 ± 1.0 and 2.5 ± 1.0 mmHg, respectively, and were not statistically different. Based on these results, we concluded that the IOP and OPA values with Q1, Q2 or Q3 measured by PDCT are not significantly different and can therefore be taken into account indiscriminately for clinical and research purposes.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Flammer J, Orgül S (1998) Optic nerve blood-flow abnormalities in glaucoma. Prog Retin Eye Res 17:267–289CrossRefPubMed Flammer J, Orgül S (1998) Optic nerve blood-flow abnormalities in glaucoma. Prog Retin Eye Res 17:267–289CrossRefPubMed
2.
go back to reference Flammer J, Orgül S, Costa VP, Orzalesi N, Krieglstein GK, Serra LM, Renard JP, Stefánsson E (2002) The impact of ocular blood flow in glaucoma. Prog Retin Eye Res 21:359–393CrossRefPubMed Flammer J, Orgül S, Costa VP, Orzalesi N, Krieglstein GK, Serra LM, Renard JP, Stefánsson E (2002) The impact of ocular blood flow in glaucoma. Prog Retin Eye Res 21:359–393CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Hoffmann EM, Grus F-H, Pfeiffer N (2004) Intraocular pressure and ocular pulse amplitude using dynamic contour tonometry and contact lens tonometry. BMC Ophthalmol 4:1–7CrossRef Hoffmann EM, Grus F-H, Pfeiffer N (2004) Intraocular pressure and ocular pulse amplitude using dynamic contour tonometry and contact lens tonometry. BMC Ophthalmol 4:1–7CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Schwenn O, Troost R, Vogel A, Grus F, Beck S, Pfeiffer N (2002) Ocular pulse amplitude in patients with open angle glaucoma, normal tension glaucoma and ocular hypertension. Br J Ophthalmol 86:981–984CrossRefPubMed Schwenn O, Troost R, Vogel A, Grus F, Beck S, Pfeiffer N (2002) Ocular pulse amplitude in patients with open angle glaucoma, normal tension glaucoma and ocular hypertension. Br J Ophthalmol 86:981–984CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Williamson TH, Harris A (1996) Color Doppler ultrasound imaging of the eye and orbit. Surv Ophthalmol 40:255–267CrossRefPubMed Williamson TH, Harris A (1996) Color Doppler ultrasound imaging of the eye and orbit. Surv Ophthalmol 40:255–267CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Kanngiesser HE, Kniestedt C, Roberts YC (2005) Dynamic contour tonometry: presentation of a new tonometer. J Glaucoma 14:344–350CrossRefPubMed Kanngiesser HE, Kniestedt C, Roberts YC (2005) Dynamic contour tonometry: presentation of a new tonometer. J Glaucoma 14:344–350CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Kotecha A, White ET, Shewry JM, Garway-Heath DF (2005) The relative effects of corneal thickness and age on Goldmann applanation tonometry and dynamic contour tonometry. Br J Ophthalmol 89:1572–1575CrossRefPubMed Kotecha A, White ET, Shewry JM, Garway-Heath DF (2005) The relative effects of corneal thickness and age on Goldmann applanation tonometry and dynamic contour tonometry. Br J Ophthalmol 89:1572–1575CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Kaufmann C, Bachmann LM, Thiel MA (2004) Comparison of dynamic contour tonometry with Goldmann applanation tonometry. IOVS 45:3118–3121 Kaufmann C, Bachmann LM, Thiel MA (2004) Comparison of dynamic contour tonometry with Goldmann applanation tonometry. IOVS 45:3118–3121
10.
go back to reference Pourjavan S, Boëlle PY, Detry-Morel M, De Potter P (2007) Physiological diurnal variability and characteristics of the ocular pulse amplitude (OPA) with the dynamic contour tonometer (DCT-Pascal). Int Ophthalmol 27:357–360CrossRefPubMed Pourjavan S, Boëlle PY, Detry-Morel M, De Potter P (2007) Physiological diurnal variability and characteristics of the ocular pulse amplitude (OPA) with the dynamic contour tonometer (DCT-Pascal). Int Ophthalmol 27:357–360CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Vulsteke C, Satlmans I, Fieuw S, Zeyen T (2008). Correlation between ocular pulse amplitude measured by dynamic contour tonometer and visual field defects. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 246:559–565 Vulsteke C, Satlmans I, Fieuw S, Zeyen T (2008). Correlation between ocular pulse amplitude measured by dynamic contour tonometer and visual field defects. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 246:559–565
12.
go back to reference Barreto J Jr, Babic M, Vessani MR, Susanna R Jr (2006) Dynamic contour tonometry and Goldman applanation tonometry in eyes with keratoconus. Clinics 61:511–514PubMed Barreto J Jr, Babic M, Vessani MR, Susanna R Jr (2006) Dynamic contour tonometry and Goldman applanation tonometry in eyes with keratoconus. Clinics 61:511–514PubMed
13.
go back to reference Pourjavan S, Deghislghe C, Van Maelderen , Zeyen T (2005) Pachymetry before or after applanation tonometry. Does it matter? Bull Soc Belge Ophthalmol 296:51–55 Pourjavan S, Deghislghe C, Van Maelderen , Zeyen T (2005) Pachymetry before or after applanation tonometry. Does it matter? Bull Soc Belge Ophthalmol 296:51–55
14.
go back to reference Lachkar Y (2006) I have tested for you. The contour tonometer. IOP analysis using “Dynamic Contour Tonometry”. J Fr Ophthalmol 29:32–35CrossRef Lachkar Y (2006) I have tested for you. The contour tonometer. IOP analysis using “Dynamic Contour Tonometry”. J Fr Ophthalmol 29:32–35CrossRef
15.
go back to reference Medeiros FA, Sample PA, Weinreb RN (2007) Comparison of dynamic contour tonometry and Goldmann applanation tonometry in African American subjects. Ophthalmology 114:658–665CrossRefPubMed Medeiros FA, Sample PA, Weinreb RN (2007) Comparison of dynamic contour tonometry and Goldmann applanation tonometry in African American subjects. Ophthalmology 114:658–665CrossRefPubMed
16.
go back to reference Pache M, Wilmsmeyer S, Lautebach S, Funk J (2005) Dynamic contour tonometry versus Goldmann applanation tonometry: a comparative study. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 243:763–767CrossRefPubMed Pache M, Wilmsmeyer S, Lautebach S, Funk J (2005) Dynamic contour tonometry versus Goldmann applanation tonometry: a comparative study. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 243:763–767CrossRefPubMed
17.
go back to reference Detry-Morel M, Jamart J, Detry MB, Ledoux A, Pourjavan S (2007) Clinical evaluation of the Pascal dynamic contour tonometer. J Fr Ophtalmol 30:260–270CrossRefPubMed Detry-Morel M, Jamart J, Detry MB, Ledoux A, Pourjavan S (2007) Clinical evaluation of the Pascal dynamic contour tonometer. J Fr Ophtalmol 30:260–270CrossRefPubMed
18.
go back to reference Herdener S, Pache M, Lautebach S, Funk J (2007) Dynamic contour tonometry (DCT) versus Goldmann applanation tonometry (GAT)—a comparison of agreement and reproducibility. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 24:1027–1030CrossRef Herdener S, Pache M, Lautebach S, Funk J (2007) Dynamic contour tonometry (DCT) versus Goldmann applanation tonometry (GAT)—a comparison of agreement and reproducibility. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 24:1027–1030CrossRef
19.
go back to reference Herdener S, Hafizovic D, Pache M, Lautebach S, Funk J (2008) Is the PASCAL-tonometer suitable for measuring intraocular pressure in clinical routine? Long- and short-term reproducibility of dynamic contour tonometry. Eur J Ophthalmol 18:39–43PubMed Herdener S, Hafizovic D, Pache M, Lautebach S, Funk J (2008) Is the PASCAL-tonometer suitable for measuring intraocular pressure in clinical routine? Long- and short-term reproducibility of dynamic contour tonometry. Eur J Ophthalmol 18:39–43PubMed
20.
go back to reference Georgopoulos GT, Diestelhorst M, Fisher R, Ruokonen P, Krieglstein GK (2002) The short-term effect of latanoprost on intraocular pressure and pulsatile ocular blood flow. Acta Ophthalmol Scand 80:54–58CrossRefPubMed Georgopoulos GT, Diestelhorst M, Fisher R, Ruokonen P, Krieglstein GK (2002) The short-term effect of latanoprost on intraocular pressure and pulsatile ocular blood flow. Acta Ophthalmol Scand 80:54–58CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Comparison of the quality score of intraocular pressure and ocular pulse amplitude values measured by the Pascal dynamic contour tonometer
Authors
S. Pourjavan
P. Boghossian
M. Detry-Morel
Publication date
01-02-2010
Publisher
Springer Netherlands
Published in
International Ophthalmology / Issue 1/2010
Print ISSN: 0165-5701
Electronic ISSN: 1573-2630
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10792-008-9280-9

Other articles of this Issue 1/2010

International Ophthalmology 1/2010 Go to the issue