Skip to main content
Top
Published in: World Journal of Surgery 8/2020

01-08-2020 | Surgery in Low and Middle Income Countries

Comparison of the Pediatric Resuscitation and Trauma Outcome (PRESTO) Model and Pediatric Trauma Scoring Systems in a Middle-Income Country

Authors: Michael D. Traynor Jr., Etienne St. Louis, Matthew C. Hernandez, Ahmed S. Alsayed, Denise B. Klinkner, Robert Baird, Dan Poenaru, Victor Y. Kong, Christopher R. Moir, Martin D. Zielinski, Grant L. Laing, John L. Bruce, Damian L. Clarke

Published in: World Journal of Surgery | Issue 8/2020

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

The pediatric resuscitation and trauma outcome (PRESTO) model was developed to aid comparisons of risk-adjusted mortality after injury in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). We sought to validate PRESTO using data from a middle-income country (MIC) trauma registry and compare its performance to the Pediatric Trauma Score (PTS), Revised Trauma Score, and pediatric age-adjusted shock index (SIPA).

Methods

We included children (age < 15 years) admitted to a single trauma center in South Africa from December 2012 to January 2019. We excluded patients missing variables necessary for the PRESTO model—age, systolic blood pressure, pulse, oxygen saturation, neurologic status, and airway support. Trauma scores were assigned retrospectively. PRESTO’s previously high-income country (HIC)-validated optimal threshold was compared to MIC-validated threshold using area under the receiver operating characteristic curves (AUROC). Prediction of in-hospital death using trauma scoring systems was compared using ROC analysis.

Results

Of 1160 injured children, 988 (85%) had complete data for calculation of PRESTO. Median age was 7 (IQR: 4, 11), and 67% were male. Mortality was 2% (n = 23). Mean predicted mortality was 0.5% (range 0–25.7%, AUROC 0.93). Using the HIC-validated threshold, PRESTO had a sensitivity of 26.1% and a specificity of 99.7%. The MIC threshold showed a sensitivity of 82.6% and specificity of 89.4%. The MIC threshold yielded superior discrimination (AUROC 0.86 [CI 0.78, 0.94]) compared to the previously established HIC threshold (0.63 [CI 0.54, 0.72], p < 0.0001). PRESTO showed superior prediction of in-hospital death compared to PTS and SIPA (all p < 0.01).

Conclusion

PRESTO can be applied in MIC settings and discriminates between children at risk for in-hospital death following trauma. Further research should clarify optimal decision thresholds for quality improvement and benchmarking in LMIC settings.
Literature
4.
go back to reference Peden M, Oyegbite K, Ozanne-Smith J et al (2009) World report on child injury prevention. World Health Organization, Geneva Peden M, Oyegbite K, Ozanne-Smith J et al (2009) World report on child injury prevention. World Health Organization, Geneva
16.
go back to reference Tepas JJI, Ramenofsky ML, Mollitt DL et al (1988) The pediatric trauma score as a predictor of injury severity: an objective assessment. J Trauma Acute Care Surg 28:425CrossRef Tepas JJI, Ramenofsky ML, Mollitt DL et al (1988) The pediatric trauma score as a predictor of injury severity: an objective assessment. J Trauma Acute Care Surg 28:425CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Comparison of the Pediatric Resuscitation and Trauma Outcome (PRESTO) Model and Pediatric Trauma Scoring Systems in a Middle-Income Country
Authors
Michael D. Traynor Jr.
Etienne St. Louis
Matthew C. Hernandez
Ahmed S. Alsayed
Denise B. Klinkner
Robert Baird
Dan Poenaru
Victor Y. Kong
Christopher R. Moir
Martin D. Zielinski
Grant L. Laing
John L. Bruce
Damian L. Clarke
Publication date
01-08-2020
Publisher
Springer International Publishing
Published in
World Journal of Surgery / Issue 8/2020
Print ISSN: 0364-2313
Electronic ISSN: 1432-2323
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-020-05512-3

Other articles of this Issue 8/2020

World Journal of Surgery 8/2020 Go to the issue