Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics 5/2009

01-11-2009 | Original Article

Comparison of the efficacy of diclofenac and indomethacin suppositories in treating perineal pain after episiotomy or laceration: a prospective, randomized, double-blind clinical trial

Authors: Recep Yildizhan, Begum Yildizhan, Sadik Sahin, Necdet Suer

Published in: Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics | Issue 5/2009

Login to get access

Abstract

Purpose

To compare the results in terms of effectiveness, side effects, and patient satisfaction when diclofenac and indomethacin suppositories were used for the relief of perineal pain after episiotomy or tearing during childbirth.

Methods

A total of 200 women who had undergone mediolateral episiotomy or suffered lacerations while giving birth vaginally were randomly assigned to receive either rectal diclofenac or indomethacin. Pain ratings were recorded before the administration of drugs and at 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, and 24 h after the first dose on a 10 cm visual analog scale. Side effects and overall opinion on the two treatments were assessed at 24 h.

Results

The prophylactic use of diclofenac suppositories reduced perineal pain more than the use of indomethacin suppositories, although the difference was not significant. Overall additional analgesia requirement was correspondingly lower in the diclofenac group. There were no significant differences in overall patient satisfaction between the two groups.

Conclusions

Since the two analgesics were rated similarly and gave satisfactory pain relief, diclofenac may be preferred because it is administered in a single dose and requires less nursing time to dispense and is a substantially less costly alternative to the new pain treatment technologies currently in use.
Literature
3.
go back to reference Rockemann MG, Seeling W, Duschek S, Reinelt H, Steffen P, Georgieff M (1997) Epidural bolus clonidine/morphine versus epidural patient-controlled bupivacaine/sufentanil: quality of postoperative analgesia and cost-identification analysis. Anesth Analg 85:864–869. doi:10.1097/00000539-199710000-00028 PubMedCrossRef Rockemann MG, Seeling W, Duschek S, Reinelt H, Steffen P, Georgieff M (1997) Epidural bolus clonidine/morphine versus epidural patient-controlled bupivacaine/sufentanil: quality of postoperative analgesia and cost-identification analysis. Anesth Analg 85:864–869. doi:10.​1097/​00000539-199710000-00028 PubMedCrossRef
4.
go back to reference Rawal N, Allvin R (1998) Acute pain services in Europe: a 17-nation survey of 105 hospitals. The EuroPain Acute Pain Working Party. Eur J Anaesthesiol 15:354–363PubMed Rawal N, Allvin R (1998) Acute pain services in Europe: a 17-nation survey of 105 hospitals. The EuroPain Acute Pain Working Party. Eur J Anaesthesiol 15:354–363PubMed
5.
go back to reference Rosaeg OP, Lindsay MP (1994) Epidural opioid analgesia after caesarean section: a comparison of patient-controlled analgesia with meperidine and single bolus injection of morphine. Can J Anaesth 41:1063–1068PubMedCrossRef Rosaeg OP, Lindsay MP (1994) Epidural opioid analgesia after caesarean section: a comparison of patient-controlled analgesia with meperidine and single bolus injection of morphine. Can J Anaesth 41:1063–1068PubMedCrossRef
6.
go back to reference Fuller JG, McMorland GH, Douglas MJ, Palmer L (1990) Epidural morphine for analgesia after caesarean section: a report of 4,880 patients. Can J Anaesth 37:636–640PubMedCrossRef Fuller JG, McMorland GH, Douglas MJ, Palmer L (1990) Epidural morphine for analgesia after caesarean section: a report of 4,880 patients. Can J Anaesth 37:636–640PubMedCrossRef
7.
go back to reference Etches RC (1994) Respiratory depression associated with patient-controlled analgesia: a review of eight cases. Can J Anaesth 41:125–132PubMedCrossRef Etches RC (1994) Respiratory depression associated with patient-controlled analgesia: a review of eight cases. Can J Anaesth 41:125–132PubMedCrossRef
8.
go back to reference Macrae DJ, Munishankrappa S, Burrow LM, Milne MK, Grant IS (1987) Double-blind comparison of the efficacy of extradural diamorphine, extradural phenoperidine and i.m. diamorphine following caesarean section. Br J Anaesth 59:354–359. doi:10.1093/bja/59.3.354 PubMedCrossRef Macrae DJ, Munishankrappa S, Burrow LM, Milne MK, Grant IS (1987) Double-blind comparison of the efficacy of extradural diamorphine, extradural phenoperidine and i.m. diamorphine following caesarean section. Br J Anaesth 59:354–359. doi:10.​1093/​bja/​59.​3.​354 PubMedCrossRef
10.
go back to reference Carlborg L, Lindoff C, Hellman A (1987) Diclofenac versus pethidine in the treatment of pain after hysterectomy. Eur J Anaesthesiol 4:241–247PubMed Carlborg L, Lindoff C, Hellman A (1987) Diclofenac versus pethidine in the treatment of pain after hysterectomy. Eur J Anaesthesiol 4:241–247PubMed
12.
13.
go back to reference McQuay HJ, Carroll D, Watts PG, Juniper RP, Moore RA (1989) Codeine 20 mg increases pain relief from ibuprofen 400 mg after third molar surgery. A repeat-dosing comparison of ibuprofen and an ibuprofen-codeine combination. Pain 37:7–13. doi:10.1016/0304-3959(89)90147-4 PubMedCrossRef McQuay HJ, Carroll D, Watts PG, Juniper RP, Moore RA (1989) Codeine 20 mg increases pain relief from ibuprofen 400 mg after third molar surgery. A repeat-dosing comparison of ibuprofen and an ibuprofen-codeine combination. Pain 37:7–13. doi:10.​1016/​0304-3959(89)90147-4 PubMedCrossRef
14.
go back to reference Gertzbein SD, Tile M, McMurty RY, Kellam JF, Hunter GA, Keith RG, Harsanyi Z, Luffman J (1986) Analysis of the analgesic efficacy of acetaminophen 1,000 mg, codeine phosphate 60 mg, and the combination of acetaminophen 1,000 mg, and codeine phosphate 60 mg, in the relief of postoperative pain. Pharmacotherapy 6:104–107PubMed Gertzbein SD, Tile M, McMurty RY, Kellam JF, Hunter GA, Keith RG, Harsanyi Z, Luffman J (1986) Analysis of the analgesic efficacy of acetaminophen 1,000 mg, codeine phosphate 60 mg, and the combination of acetaminophen 1,000 mg, and codeine phosphate 60 mg, in the relief of postoperative pain. Pharmacotherapy 6:104–107PubMed
15.
go back to reference Gordon SM, Brahim JS, Rowan J, Kent A, Dionne RA (2002) Peripheral prostanoid levels and nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug analgesia: replicate clinical trials in a tissue injury model. Clin Pharmacol Ther 72:175–183. doi:10.1067/mcp.2002.126501 PubMedCrossRef Gordon SM, Brahim JS, Rowan J, Kent A, Dionne RA (2002) Peripheral prostanoid levels and nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug analgesia: replicate clinical trials in a tissue injury model. Clin Pharmacol Ther 72:175–183. doi:10.​1067/​mcp.​2002.​126501 PubMedCrossRef
16.
go back to reference McCormack JP, Warriner CB, Levine M, Glick N (1993) A comparison of regularly dosed oral morphine and on-demand intramuscular morphine in the treatment of postsurgical pain. Can J Anaesth 40:819–824PubMedCrossRef McCormack JP, Warriner CB, Levine M, Glick N (1993) A comparison of regularly dosed oral morphine and on-demand intramuscular morphine in the treatment of postsurgical pain. Can J Anaesth 40:819–824PubMedCrossRef
17.
go back to reference Bloomfield SS, Cissell GB, Mitchell J, Barden TP, Kaiko RF, Fitzmartin RD, Grandy RP, Komorowski J, Goldenheim PD (1993) Analgesic efficacy and potency of two oral controlled-release morphine preparations. Clin Pharmacol Ther 53:469–478PubMed Bloomfield SS, Cissell GB, Mitchell J, Barden TP, Kaiko RF, Fitzmartin RD, Grandy RP, Komorowski J, Goldenheim PD (1993) Analgesic efficacy and potency of two oral controlled-release morphine preparations. Clin Pharmacol Ther 53:469–478PubMed
Metadata
Title
Comparison of the efficacy of diclofenac and indomethacin suppositories in treating perineal pain after episiotomy or laceration: a prospective, randomized, double-blind clinical trial
Authors
Recep Yildizhan
Begum Yildizhan
Sadik Sahin
Necdet Suer
Publication date
01-11-2009
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics / Issue 5/2009
Print ISSN: 0932-0067
Electronic ISSN: 1432-0711
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00404-009-1006-3

Other articles of this Issue 5/2009

Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics 5/2009 Go to the issue