Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Lasers in Medical Science 1/2010

01-01-2010 | Original Article

Comparison of the effects of short- and long-pulse durations when using a 585-nm pulsed dye laser in the treatment of new surgical scars

Authors: Keyvan Nouri, Mohamed L. Elsaie, Voraphol Vejjabhinanta, Mark Stevens, Shalu S. Patel, Caroline Caperton, George Elgart

Published in: Lasers in Medical Science | Issue 1/2010

Login to get access

Abstract

More than 70 million surgical procedures are performed annually in the USA with the majority involving a skin lesion and almost all individuals in their lifetime will have one or more surgical procedures resulting in scars. Patients and physicians alike are thereby motivated to improve the cosmetic outcome of scars. Prior studies have shown that the pulsed dye laser (PDL) is effective in improving the quality and appearance of the scar when using the 585-nm PDL immediately after the removal of sutures. Most published studies used a pulse duration of 450 µs, which along with the other study parameters, has led to an overall improvement of the scars. However, a pulse duration of 1.5 ms is also available when using the pulsed dye laser and it should theoretically cause fewer side-effects. To our knowledge, there are no other studies comparing the effectiveness of different pulse durations in the treatment of surgical scars starting on the day of suture removal. The purpose of this study is to compare the effect of different pulse durations (450 µs vs. 1.5 ms) in the treatments of postsurgical linear scars immediately after suture removal when using the 585-nm pulsed dye laser (PDL). Twenty non-hospitalized male and female patients (older than 18 years of age) with skin types I–IV and with postoperative linear scars measuring at least 2.1 cm were enrolled in this prospective study. Scars were randomly divided into three equal sections. The different fields were randomly chosen to receive treatment (two out of three fields) or remain as control (one field). The two fields chosen to be treated received treatment with the 585-nm PDL using a 7-mm spot size at 4.0 J. One of the treated sections was randomly selected to receive a pulse duration of 450 µs, and the other section to receive a 1.5-ms pulse. The remaining scar section was designated as control (no treatment). The three sections were mapped and recorded. The patient received treatment immediately after the sutures were removed from the wound and then monthly for 3 months. Evaluations were performed before each treatment and 1 month after the last treatment. The short-pulse and long-pulse 585-nm PDL-treated sections demonstrated a statistically significant overall average improvement of the VSS of 92 and 89%, respectively, compared to 67% for the control site (Fig. 1). Further, for individual parameters of the Vancouver scar scale (VSS), there were significant (p < 0.05) differences between control and treatment groups for all parameters, but there were no differences between the short- and long-pulse treatment groups for any parameter. Both short-pulse and long-pulse PDL are safe and effective in improving the quality and cosmetic appearance of surgical scars in skin type’s I–IV starting on the day of suture removal with no significant difference between the two pulse durations.
Literature
1.
go back to reference FastStats (2002) National Center for Health Statistics. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, USA FastStats (2002) National Center for Health Statistics. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, USA
2.
go back to reference Alster TS (1994) Improvement of erythematous and hypertrophic scars by the 585-nm flashlamp pumped pulsed dye laser. Ann Plast Surg 32(2):186–90CrossRefPubMed Alster TS (1994) Improvement of erythematous and hypertrophic scars by the 585-nm flashlamp pumped pulsed dye laser. Ann Plast Surg 32(2):186–90CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Alster TS, Williams CM (1995) Treatment of keloid stemotoy scars with 585-nm flashlamp pumped pulsed dye laser. Lancet 345:1998–200CrossRef Alster TS, Williams CM (1995) Treatment of keloid stemotoy scars with 585-nm flashlamp pumped pulsed dye laser. Lancet 345:1998–200CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Alster TS (1997) Laser treatment of hypertrophic scars, keloids and striae. Dermatol Clin 15(3):419–29CrossRefPubMed Alster TS (1997) Laser treatment of hypertrophic scars, keloids and striae. Dermatol Clin 15(3):419–29CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Manuskiatti W, Fitzpatrick R, Goldman M (2001) Energy density and numbers of treatment affect response of keloidal and hypertrophic sternotomy scars to the 58 nm PDL. J Am Acad Dermatol 45:557–565CrossRefPubMed Manuskiatti W, Fitzpatrick R, Goldman M (2001) Energy density and numbers of treatment affect response of keloidal and hypertrophic sternotomy scars to the 58 nm PDL. J Am Acad Dermatol 45:557–565CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference McGraw JB, McGraw JA, McMellin A et al (1999) Prevention of unfavorable scars using early pulsed dye laser treatments: a preliminary report. Ann Plast Surg 42:7–14CrossRef McGraw JB, McGraw JA, McMellin A et al (1999) Prevention of unfavorable scars using early pulsed dye laser treatments: a preliminary report. Ann Plast Surg 42:7–14CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Nouri Jimenez GP, Harrison-Balestra C, Elgart GW (2003) 585-nm PDL in the treatment of surgical scars starting on suture removal day. Dermatol Surg 29:65–73CrossRef Nouri Jimenez GP, Harrison-Balestra C, Elgart GW (2003) 585-nm PDL in the treatment of surgical scars starting on suture removal day. Dermatol Surg 29:65–73CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Nouri K, Rivas M, Stevens M et al. Comparison of the effectiveness of the pulsed dye laser 585-nm vs. 595-nm in the treatment of new surgical scars. Accepted for publication in Lasers Med Sci Nouri K, Rivas M, Stevens M et al. Comparison of the effectiveness of the pulsed dye laser 585-nm vs. 595-nm in the treatment of new surgical scars. Accepted for publication in Lasers Med Sci
9.
go back to reference Bock O, Yu H, Zitron S et al (2005) Studies of transforming growth factors beta 1–3 and their receptors I and II in fibroblast of keloids and hypertrophic scars. Acta Dermatol Venereol 85:216–20 Bock O, Yu H, Zitron S et al (2005) Studies of transforming growth factors beta 1–3 and their receptors I and II in fibroblast of keloids and hypertrophic scars. Acta Dermatol Venereol 85:216–20
10.
go back to reference Stamenkovic I (2003) Extracellular matrix remodelling: the role of matrix metalloproteinases. J Pathol 200:448–64CrossRefPubMed Stamenkovic I (2003) Extracellular matrix remodelling: the role of matrix metalloproteinases. J Pathol 200:448–64CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Bouzari N, Davis SC, Nouri K (2007) Laser treatment of keloids and hypertrophic scars. Int J Dermatol 46:80–88CrossRefPubMed Bouzari N, Davis SC, Nouri K (2007) Laser treatment of keloids and hypertrophic scars. Int J Dermatol 46:80–88CrossRefPubMed
12.
13.
go back to reference Slemp AE, Kirschner RE (2006) Keloids and scars: a review of keloids and scars, their pathogenesis, risk factors, and management. Curr Opin Pediatr 18:396–402CrossRefPubMed Slemp AE, Kirschner RE (2006) Keloids and scars: a review of keloids and scars, their pathogenesis, risk factors, and management. Curr Opin Pediatr 18:396–402CrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference Karsai S, Roos S, Hammes S, Raulin C (2007) Pulsed dye laser: what's new in non-vascular lesions. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol 21:877–890 (Review)CrossRefPubMed Karsai S, Roos S, Hammes S, Raulin C (2007) Pulsed dye laser: what's new in non-vascular lesions. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol 21:877–890 (Review)CrossRefPubMed
15.
go back to reference Alster TS (1994) Improvement of erythematous and hypertrophic scars by the 585-nm flashlamp-pumped pulsed dye laser. Ann Plast Surg 32:186–90CrossRefPubMed Alster TS (1994) Improvement of erythematous and hypertrophic scars by the 585-nm flashlamp-pumped pulsed dye laser. Ann Plast Surg 32:186–90CrossRefPubMed
16.
go back to reference Wolfram D, Tzankov A, Pulzi P et al (2009) Hypertrophic scars and kelolids: a review of their pathophysiology, risk factors, and therapeutic management. Dermatol Surg 35:171–181CrossRefPubMed Wolfram D, Tzankov A, Pulzi P et al (2009) Hypertrophic scars and kelolids: a review of their pathophysiology, risk factors, and therapeutic management. Dermatol Surg 35:171–181CrossRefPubMed
17.
go back to reference Chan HH, Wong DS, Ho WS et al (2004) The use of pulsed dye laser for the prevention and treatment of hypertrophic scars in Chinese persons. Dermatol Surg 30:987–94CrossRefPubMed Chan HH, Wong DS, Ho WS et al (2004) The use of pulsed dye laser for the prevention and treatment of hypertrophic scars in Chinese persons. Dermatol Surg 30:987–94CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Comparison of the effects of short- and long-pulse durations when using a 585-nm pulsed dye laser in the treatment of new surgical scars
Authors
Keyvan Nouri
Mohamed L. Elsaie
Voraphol Vejjabhinanta
Mark Stevens
Shalu S. Patel
Caroline Caperton
George Elgart
Publication date
01-01-2010
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
Lasers in Medical Science / Issue 1/2010
Print ISSN: 0268-8921
Electronic ISSN: 1435-604X
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10103-009-0710-3

Other articles of this Issue 1/2010

Lasers in Medical Science 1/2010 Go to the issue