Skip to main content
Top
Published in: European Spine Journal 10/2012

01-10-2012 | Chinese section

Comparison of the aorta impingement risks between thoracolumbar/lumbar curves with different convexities in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: a computed tomography study

Authors: Jun Qiao, Feng Zhu, Leilei Xu, Zezhang Zhu, Bangping Qian, Zhen Liu, Yong Qiu

Published in: European Spine Journal | Issue 10/2012

Login to get access

Abstract

Purpose

To compare the positions of the aorta relative to vertebral bodies and the potential risk of the aorta impingement for pedicle screw (PS) placement between right-sided and left-sided thoracolumbar/lumbar curves of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS).

Methods

Thirty-nine AIS patients with a main thoracolumbar or lumbar curve were recruited. The Lenke’s classification was type 5C in all patients. According to the convexity of the thoracolumbar or lumbar curves, the patients were divided into either group R or Group L. The patients in Group R had a main right-sided thoracolumbar/lumbar curve, and the patients in Group L had a main left-sided thoracolumbar/lumbar curve. Axial CT images from T12 to L4 at the midvertebral body level were obtained to evaluate Aorta-vertebra angle (α), Vertebral rotation angle (β), Lefty safety distance (LSD), and Right safety distance (RSD). The risks of the aorta impingement from T12 to L4 were calculated and then compared between the two groups.

Results

The α increased from T12 through L4 in Group R, increased from T12 through L1, and then decreased from L1 through L4 in Group L. The β decreased from T12 through L4 in both groups. The LSD constantly increased from T12 through L4 in Group R, increased from T12 through L3, and then decreased from L3 through L4 in Group L. The RSD increased from T12 through L3 and then decreased from L3 through L4 in both groups. With the increment of the lengths of the simulated screws, the aorta impingement risks were constantly elevated at all levels in both groups. The aorta was at a high risk of impingement from left PS regardless of the diameters of the simulated screws in Group R (80–100 % at T12 and 53.3–100 % at L1). In Group L, the aorta was completely safe when using 35 mm (0 at all levels) PS and at high risks of the aorta impingement on the right side from 45 mm PSs (31.8–72.7 %). In all, the risks of the aorta impingement were mainly from left PS in Group R and from right PS in Group L, and the risk of the aorta impingement from PS placement was generally higher in right thoracolumbar or lumbar curves when compared with that of the left.

Conclusions

The present study illustrated different changed positions of the aorta relative to vertebrae between thoracolumbar/lumbar curves with different convexities. In right-sided curve, the risks of the aorta impingement were mainly from left PS while in left-sided curves, from right PS. The aorta was more proximal to entry points in right-sided lumbar curve when compared with left-sided curve; thus placing PS carries more risks in right-sided thoracolumbar/lumbar curve. Surgeons should be more cautious when placing PSs on the concave sides of T12 and L1 vertebrae of right-sided thoracolumbar/lumbar curves.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Halm H, Niemeyer T, Link T, Liljenqvist U (2000) Segmental pedicle screw instrumentation in idiopathic thoracolumbar and lumbar scoliosis. Eur Spine J Off Publ Eur Spine Soc Eur Spinal Deform Soc Eur Sect Cerv Spine Res Soc 9(3):191–197CrossRef Halm H, Niemeyer T, Link T, Liljenqvist U (2000) Segmental pedicle screw instrumentation in idiopathic thoracolumbar and lumbar scoliosis. Eur Spine J Off Publ Eur Spine Soc Eur Spinal Deform Soc Eur Sect Cerv Spine Res Soc 9(3):191–197CrossRef
2.
go back to reference Suk SI, Kim WJ, Lee SM, Kim JH, Chung ER (2001) Thoracic pedicle screw fixation in spinal deformities: are they really safe? Spine 26(18):2049–2057PubMedCrossRef Suk SI, Kim WJ, Lee SM, Kim JH, Chung ER (2001) Thoracic pedicle screw fixation in spinal deformities: are they really safe? Spine 26(18):2049–2057PubMedCrossRef
5.
go back to reference Moore KL (2010) The thoracic and abdominal aorta. In: Moore KL (ed) Clinically Oriented Anatomy. Williams and Wilkins, Baltimore, pp 167–313 Moore KL (2010) The thoracic and abdominal aorta. In: Moore KL (ed) Clinically Oriented Anatomy. Williams and Wilkins, Baltimore, pp 167–313
6.
go back to reference Sucato DJ, Duchene C (2003) The position of the aorta relative to the spine: a comparison of patients with and without idiopathic scoliosis. J bone jt surg Am 85-A(8):1461–1469 Sucato DJ, Duchene C (2003) The position of the aorta relative to the spine: a comparison of patients with and without idiopathic scoliosis. J bone jt surg Am 85-A(8):1461–1469
8.
go back to reference Wang W, Zhu Z, Zhu F, Wang B, Chu WC, Cheng JC, Qiu Y (2008) The changes of relative position of the thoracic aorta after anterior or posterior instrumentation of type I Lenke curve in adolescent idiopathic thoracic scoliosis. Eur Spine J Off Publ Eur Spine Soc Eur Spinal Deform Soc Eur Sect Cerv Spine Res Soc 17(8):1019–1026. doi:10.1007/s00586-008-0691-0 CrossRef Wang W, Zhu Z, Zhu F, Wang B, Chu WC, Cheng JC, Qiu Y (2008) The changes of relative position of the thoracic aorta after anterior or posterior instrumentation of type I Lenke curve in adolescent idiopathic thoracic scoliosis. Eur Spine J Off Publ Eur Spine Soc Eur Spinal Deform Soc Eur Sect Cerv Spine Res Soc 17(8):1019–1026. doi:10.​1007/​s00586-008-0691-0 CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Qiu Y, He YX, Wang B, Zhu F, Wang WJ (2007) The anatomical relationship between the aorta and the thoracic vertebral bodies and its importance in the placement of the screw in thoracoscopic correction of scoliosis. European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society 16(9):1367–1372. doi:10.1007/s00586-007-0338-6 CrossRef Qiu Y, He YX, Wang B, Zhu F, Wang WJ (2007) The anatomical relationship between the aorta and the thoracic vertebral bodies and its importance in the placement of the screw in thoracoscopic correction of scoliosis. European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society 16(9):1367–1372. doi:10.​1007/​s00586-007-0338-6 CrossRef
10.
11.
go back to reference Bjure J, Grimby G, Nachemson A (1968) Correction of body height in predicting spirometric values in scoliotic patients. Scand J Clin Lab Invest 21(2):191–192PubMedCrossRef Bjure J, Grimby G, Nachemson A (1968) Correction of body height in predicting spirometric values in scoliotic patients. Scand J Clin Lab Invest 21(2):191–192PubMedCrossRef
12.
go back to reference Krismer M, Bauer R, Sterzinger W (1992) Scoliosis correction by Cotrel-Dubousset instrumentation. The effect of derotation and three dimensional correction. Spine 17(8 Suppl):S263–S269PubMedCrossRef Krismer M, Bauer R, Sterzinger W (1992) Scoliosis correction by Cotrel-Dubousset instrumentation. The effect of derotation and three dimensional correction. Spine 17(8 Suppl):S263–S269PubMedCrossRef
13.
go back to reference Takeshita K, Maruyama T, Ono T, Ogihara S, Chikuda H, Shoda N, Nakao Y, Matsudaira K, Seichi A, Nakamura K (2010) New parameters to represent the position of the aorta relative to the spine for pedicle screw placement. Eur Spine J Off Publ Eur Spine Soc Eur Spinal Deform Soc Eur Sect Cerv Spine Res Soc 19(5):815–820. doi:10.1007/s00586-010-1298-9 CrossRef Takeshita K, Maruyama T, Ono T, Ogihara S, Chikuda H, Shoda N, Nakao Y, Matsudaira K, Seichi A, Nakamura K (2010) New parameters to represent the position of the aorta relative to the spine for pedicle screw placement. Eur Spine J Off Publ Eur Spine Soc Eur Spinal Deform Soc Eur Sect Cerv Spine Res Soc 19(5):815–820. doi:10.​1007/​s00586-010-1298-9 CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Comparison of the aorta impingement risks between thoracolumbar/lumbar curves with different convexities in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: a computed tomography study
Authors
Jun Qiao
Feng Zhu
Leilei Xu
Zezhang Zhu
Bangping Qian
Zhen Liu
Yong Qiu
Publication date
01-10-2012
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
European Spine Journal / Issue 10/2012
Print ISSN: 0940-6719
Electronic ISSN: 1432-0932
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-012-2315-y

Other articles of this Issue 10/2012

European Spine Journal 10/2012 Go to the issue