Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Indian Journal of Hematology and Blood Transfusion 1/2019

01-01-2019 | Original Article

Comparison of Rapid Centrifugation Technique with Conventional Centrifugation for Prothrombin Time (PT) and Activated Partial Thromboplastin Time (APTT) Testing

Authors: Ekta Chandler, Naveen Kakkar, Rupinder Kaur

Published in: Indian Journal of Hematology and Blood Transfusion | Issue 1/2019

Login to get access

Abstract

Prothrombin Time (PT) and activated partial thromboplastin time (APTT) are frequently performed coagulation tests in patients with coagulation disorders especially in critical care areas and in monitoring patients on anticoagulation therapy. In coagulation testing, sample processing especially centrifugation is one of the most critical steps that affect turnaround time (TAT). This study was carried out over a period of 1 year. Three hundred paired samples from patients sent for PT and APTT estimation were included. One sample was centrifuged in a regular bench top centrifuge at 1500g for 20 min. The other sample was divided into two polypropylene aliquots and centrifuged in a microcentrifuge at 13000g for 3 min. The plasma obtained from both methods was tested for PT and APTT using the automated method on STA Compact coagulometer (Stago) using commercial thromboplastin STAR-NeoplastineR C1 Plus and phospholipid (cephalin), STAR-C K PRESTR 5 respectively. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics, Student t test, correlation coefficient and Bland–Altman plots. Mean PT, INR and APTT for both centrifugation methods was comparable with no statistically significant difference (p > 0.05). PT, INR and APTT also showed good correlation (r > 0.98) when compared between the two methods of centrifugation. Bland–Altman comparison between rapid and conventional methods of centrifugation for PT, INR and APTT also showed acceptable agreement. Rapid centrifugation technique for routine coagulation testing can be used safely with a significant reduction in the TAT. This can benefit patients in critical care settings and those on outpatient oral anticoagulant therapy.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Laffan MA, Manning R (2012) Investigation of hemostasis. In: Bain BJ, Bates I, Laffan M, Lewis SM (eds) Dacie and Lewis practical hematology, 11th edn. Churchill Livingstone, London, pp 393–445CrossRef Laffan MA, Manning R (2012) Investigation of hemostasis. In: Bain BJ, Bates I, Laffan M, Lewis SM (eds) Dacie and Lewis practical hematology, 11th edn. Churchill Livingstone, London, pp 393–445CrossRef
2.
go back to reference Magnette A, Chatelain M, Chatelain B, Ten Cate H, Mullier F (2016) Pre-analytical issues in the haemostasis laboratory: guidance for the clinical laboratories. Thromb J 14:49CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Magnette A, Chatelain M, Chatelain B, Ten Cate H, Mullier F (2016) Pre-analytical issues in the haemostasis laboratory: guidance for the clinical laboratories. Thromb J 14:49CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
3.
go back to reference Adcock DM, Hoefner DM, Kottke-Marchant K, Marlar RA, Szamosi DI, Warunek DJ (2008) Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute: collection, transport and processing of blood specimens for testing plasma-based coagulation assays and molecular hemostasis assay; Approved guideline- H21-A5, 5th edn. NCCLS, Wayne Adcock DM, Hoefner DM, Kottke-Marchant K, Marlar RA, Szamosi DI, Warunek DJ (2008) Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute: collection, transport and processing of blood specimens for testing plasma-based coagulation assays and molecular hemostasis assay; Approved guideline- H21-A5, 5th edn. NCCLS, Wayne
4.
go back to reference Hilborne LH, Oye RK, McArdle JE, Repinski JA, Rodgerson DO (1989) Evaluation of stat and routine turnaround times as a component of laboratory quality. Am J Clin Pathol 91:331–335CrossRefPubMed Hilborne LH, Oye RK, McArdle JE, Repinski JA, Rodgerson DO (1989) Evaluation of stat and routine turnaround times as a component of laboratory quality. Am J Clin Pathol 91:331–335CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Steindel SJ, Howanitz PJ (2001) Physician satisfaction and emergency department laboratory test turnaround time. Arch Pathol Lab Med 125:863–871PubMed Steindel SJ, Howanitz PJ (2001) Physician satisfaction and emergency department laboratory test turnaround time. Arch Pathol Lab Med 125:863–871PubMed
6.
go back to reference Callum JL, Rizoli S, Pendergrast J (2010) Rapid laboratory testing for trauma patients: where a perfect result may not be in the best interests of the patient. Transfusion 50:2529–2532CrossRefPubMed Callum JL, Rizoli S, Pendergrast J (2010) Rapid laboratory testing for trauma patients: where a perfect result may not be in the best interests of the patient. Transfusion 50:2529–2532CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Hope E, Mayorga SR, Robinson S, Goldberg L, Leveson JE, Marengo-Rowe AJ et al (1991) Preparation of plasma for coagulation testing: evaluation of the StatSpin® high-speed centrifuge. Lab Med 22:190–193CrossRef Hope E, Mayorga SR, Robinson S, Goldberg L, Leveson JE, Marengo-Rowe AJ et al (1991) Preparation of plasma for coagulation testing: evaluation of the StatSpin® high-speed centrifuge. Lab Med 22:190–193CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Boudaoud L, Divaret G, Marie P, Bezeaud A (2006) Rapid centrifugation for routine coagulation testing. Ann Biol Clin 64:315–317 Boudaoud L, Divaret G, Marie P, Bezeaud A (2006) Rapid centrifugation for routine coagulation testing. Ann Biol Clin 64:315–317
9.
go back to reference Kao CH, Shu LC, Yen WH (2010) Evaluation of a high-speed centrifuge with rapid preparation of plasma for coagulation testing to improve turnaround time. J Biomed Lab Sci 22:23–27 Kao CH, Shu LC, Yen WH (2010) Evaluation of a high-speed centrifuge with rapid preparation of plasma for coagulation testing to improve turnaround time. J Biomed Lab Sci 22:23–27
10.
go back to reference Pappas AA, Palmer SK, Meece D, Fink LM (1991) Rapid preparation of plasma for coagulation testing. Arch Pathol Lab Med 115:816–817PubMed Pappas AA, Palmer SK, Meece D, Fink LM (1991) Rapid preparation of plasma for coagulation testing. Arch Pathol Lab Med 115:816–817PubMed
11.
go back to reference Nelson S, Pritt A, Marlar RA (1994) Rapid preparation of plasma for ‘Stat’ coagulation testing. Arch Pathol Lab Med 118:175–176PubMed Nelson S, Pritt A, Marlar RA (1994) Rapid preparation of plasma for ‘Stat’ coagulation testing. Arch Pathol Lab Med 118:175–176PubMed
12.
go back to reference Hope E, Mayorga SR, Robinson S, Goldberg L, Leveson JE, Marengo-Rowe AJ et al (1991) Preparation of plasma for coagulation testing: evaluation of the StatSpin® high-speed centrifuge. Lab Med 22:190–193CrossRef Hope E, Mayorga SR, Robinson S, Goldberg L, Leveson JE, Marengo-Rowe AJ et al (1991) Preparation of plasma for coagulation testing: evaluation of the StatSpin® high-speed centrifuge. Lab Med 22:190–193CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Sultan A (2010) Five-minute preparation of platelet-poor plasma for routine coagulation testing. East Mediterr Health J 16:233–236CrossRefPubMed Sultan A (2010) Five-minute preparation of platelet-poor plasma for routine coagulation testing. East Mediterr Health J 16:233–236CrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference Azlin I, Hafiza A, Azma RZ, Aidifitrina RK, Hamidah NH (2011) Effect of higher centrifugation speed and shortened centrifugation time on prothrombin and activated thromboplastin time. Med Health 6:68–72CrossRef Azlin I, Hafiza A, Azma RZ, Aidifitrina RK, Hamidah NH (2011) Effect of higher centrifugation speed and shortened centrifugation time on prothrombin and activated thromboplastin time. Med Health 6:68–72CrossRef
15.
go back to reference Boissier E, Sévin-Allouet M, Le Thuaut A, De Gaalon S, Trossaërt M, Rozec B et al (2017) A 2-min at 4500g rather than a 15-min at 2200g centrifugation does not impact the reliability of 10 critical coagulation assays. Clin Chem Lab Med 55:e118–e121CrossRefPubMed Boissier E, Sévin-Allouet M, Le Thuaut A, De Gaalon S, Trossaërt M, Rozec B et al (2017) A 2-min at 4500g rather than a 15-min at 2200g centrifugation does not impact the reliability of 10 critical coagulation assays. Clin Chem Lab Med 55:e118–e121CrossRefPubMed
16.
go back to reference Suchsland J, Friedrich N, Grotevendt A, Kallner A, Lüdemann J, Nauck M et al (2014) Optimizing centrifugation of coagulation samples in laboratory automation. Clin Chem Lab Med 52:1187–1191CrossRefPubMed Suchsland J, Friedrich N, Grotevendt A, Kallner A, Lüdemann J, Nauck M et al (2014) Optimizing centrifugation of coagulation samples in laboratory automation. Clin Chem Lab Med 52:1187–1191CrossRefPubMed
17.
go back to reference Lawrence JB (2003) Preanalytical variables in the coagulation laboratory. Lab Med 34:49–57CrossRef Lawrence JB (2003) Preanalytical variables in the coagulation laboratory. Lab Med 34:49–57CrossRef
18.
go back to reference Lippi G, Salvagno GL, Montagnana M, Lima-Oliveira G, Guidi GC, Favaloro EJ (2012) Quality standards for sample collection in coagulation testing. Semin Thromb Hemost 38:565–575CrossRefPubMed Lippi G, Salvagno GL, Montagnana M, Lima-Oliveira G, Guidi GC, Favaloro EJ (2012) Quality standards for sample collection in coagulation testing. Semin Thromb Hemost 38:565–575CrossRefPubMed
19.
go back to reference Laga AC, Cheves TA, Sweeney JD (2006) The effect of specimen hemolysis on coagulation test results. Am J Clin Pathol 126:748–755CrossRefPubMed Laga AC, Cheves TA, Sweeney JD (2006) The effect of specimen hemolysis on coagulation test results. Am J Clin Pathol 126:748–755CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Comparison of Rapid Centrifugation Technique with Conventional Centrifugation for Prothrombin Time (PT) and Activated Partial Thromboplastin Time (APTT) Testing
Authors
Ekta Chandler
Naveen Kakkar
Rupinder Kaur
Publication date
01-01-2019
Publisher
Springer India
Published in
Indian Journal of Hematology and Blood Transfusion / Issue 1/2019
Print ISSN: 0971-4502
Electronic ISSN: 0974-0449
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s12288-018-0983-4

Other articles of this Issue 1/2019

Indian Journal of Hematology and Blood Transfusion 1/2019 Go to the issue
Webinar | 19-02-2024 | 17:30 (CET)

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on antibody–drug conjugates in cancer

Antibody–drug conjugates (ADCs) are novel agents that have shown promise across multiple tumor types. Explore the current landscape of ADCs in breast and lung cancer with our experts, and gain insights into the mechanism of action, key clinical trials data, existing challenges, and future directions.

Dr. Véronique Diéras
Prof. Fabrice Barlesi
Developed by: Springer Medicine