Skip to main content
Top
Published in: European Radiology 2/2006

01-02-2006 | Radiological Education

Comparison of radiology residency programs in ten countries

Authors: J. M. G. Willatt, A. C. Mason

Published in: European Radiology | Issue 2/2006

Login to get access

Abstract

The purpose of our study was to compare various aspects of radiology training schemes in ten countries. A questionnaire was sent to senior residents in the UK, USA, Canada, Australia, New Zealand, Italy, Egypt, India, Malaysia and Greece. The questions concerned length of training, required pre-training experience, the organization of the training scheme, teaching, resources, stages at which residents can independently perform and report examinations, fellowships, and progression to jobs. A wide variety of training, ranging from highly scheduled programs with detailed aims and objectives, to self-learning occurs across the world. Examinations and assessments are also variable. There are lessons to be learned from varying practices; more exchanges of ideas should be encouraged. In view of the “internationalization” of radiology services and the variation in training styles an international qualification for quality assurance purposes may be desirable.
Literature
1.
go back to reference McLoud TC ARRS (2000) Presidential Address. Education in radiology: challenges for the new millennium. Am J Radiol 174:3–8 McLoud TC ARRS (2000) Presidential Address. Education in radiology: challenges for the new millennium. Am J Radiol 174:3–8
2.
go back to reference Lenthall, DR, Phillips, S, Jones R et al (2000) Radiology training in the UK: a report on the results of a national questionnaire. R Coll Radiol Newsl 60:6–10 Lenthall, DR, Phillips, S, Jones R et al (2000) Radiology training in the UK: a report on the results of a national questionnaire. R Coll Radiol Newsl 60:6–10
3.
go back to reference Forster BB (1998) Canadian radiology resident stress in 1998: Where are we? Can Assoc Radiol J 49:311–313 Forster BB (1998) Canadian radiology resident stress in 1998: Where are we? Can Assoc Radiol J 49:311–313
4.
go back to reference Yoon LS, Haims AH, Brink JA et al. (2002) Evaluation of an emergency radiology quality assurance program at a level 1 trauma center: abdominal and pelvic CT studies. Radiology 224:42–46 Yoon LS, Haims AH, Brink JA et al. (2002) Evaluation of an emergency radiology quality assurance program at a level 1 trauma center: abdominal and pelvic CT studies. Radiology 224:42–46
5.
go back to reference Needham G (1999) Towards quality assurance of postgraduate training in radiology. Clin Radiol 54:140–143 Needham G (1999) Towards quality assurance of postgraduate training in radiology. Clin Radiol 54:140–143
6.
go back to reference Collins J (2001) Radiology training: a program director’s perspective. Am J Radiol 177:1009–1010 Collins J (2001) Radiology training: a program director’s perspective. Am J Radiol 177:1009–1010
7.
go back to reference Lindsell DR, Gleason F (2002) Clinical Radiology: a workforce in crisis. The Royal College of Radiologists, UK Lindsell DR, Gleason F (2002) Clinical Radiology: a workforce in crisis. The Royal College of Radiologists, UK
8.
go back to reference Crewson PE, Sunshine JH (2000) Diagnostic radiologists’ subspecialisation and fields of practice. Am J Radiol 174:1203–1209 Crewson PE, Sunshine JH (2000) Diagnostic radiologists’ subspecialisation and fields of practice. Am J Radiol 174:1203–1209
9.
go back to reference Gunderman RB, Kang Y, Fraley RE et al. (2002) Teaching the teachers. Radiology 222:599–603 Gunderman RB, Kang Y, Fraley RE et al. (2002) Teaching the teachers. Radiology 222:599–603
10.
go back to reference Cohen MD, Gunderman RB (2002) Academic radiology: sustaining the mission. Radiology 224:1–4 Cohen MD, Gunderman RB (2002) Academic radiology: sustaining the mission. Radiology 224:1–4
11.
go back to reference Dixon AK. Royal College of Radiologists Newsletter Spring 2003; 73:5 Dixon AK. Royal College of Radiologists Newsletter Spring 2003; 73:5
12.
go back to reference Gay SB, Hillman BJ (2000) Evaluation of a mandatory radiology resident research rotation. Acad Radiol 7:172–175 Gay SB, Hillman BJ (2000) Evaluation of a mandatory radiology resident research rotation. Acad Radiol 7:172–175
13.
go back to reference Vydareny KH (1999) Radiology 1998: Are today’s residents ready for practice? Am J Radiol 173:537–538 Vydareny KH (1999) Radiology 1998: Are today’s residents ready for practice? Am J Radiol 173:537–538
14.
go back to reference Gunderman RB (2001) The fight for education. Am J Radiol 176:23–26 Gunderman RB (2001) The fight for education. Am J Radiol 176:23–26
15.
go back to reference Collins J, Amsel S, Alderson PO (2001) Teaching noninterpretive skills to radiology residents. Acad Radiol 8:903–907 Collins J, Amsel S, Alderson PO (2001) Teaching noninterpretive skills to radiology residents. Acad Radiol 8:903–907
16.
go back to reference Friedenberg RM (2000) An endangered art: teaching. Radiology 214:317–319 Friedenberg RM (2000) An endangered art: teaching. Radiology 214:317–319
17.
go back to reference Gunderman RB (2001) Is technical school a good model for radiology residency? AJR 177:1005–1007 Gunderman RB (2001) Is technical school a good model for radiology residency? AJR 177:1005–1007
Metadata
Title
Comparison of radiology residency programs in ten countries
Authors
J. M. G. Willatt
A. C. Mason
Publication date
01-02-2006
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
European Radiology / Issue 2/2006
Print ISSN: 0938-7994
Electronic ISSN: 1432-1084
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-004-2635-3

Other articles of this Issue 2/2006

European Radiology 2/2006 Go to the issue

Acknowledgement to Reviewers

Acknowledgement to reviewers 2005