Skip to main content
Key Specialties
Cardiology Diabetology Endocrinology Gastroenterology Geriatrics and Gerontology Gynecology and Obstetrics Hematology Infectious Disease Internal Medicine Nephrology Neurology Oncology Pediatrics Respiratory Medicine Rheumatology Surgery
Congress Coverage
2024 ACC Congress 2023 ESMO Congress 2023 EASD Congress 2023 ERS Congress 2023 ESC Congress
Clinical Collections
Advances in Alzheimer’s

At a glance: The STEP trials

A round-up of the STEP phase 3 clinical trials evaluating semaglutide for weight loss in people with overweight or obesity.
ADVANCED SEARCH
Log in
Top
Sports Medicine
Published in: Sports Medicine 10/2017

01-10-2017 | Systematic Review

Comparison of Periodized and Non-Periodized Resistance Training on Maximal Strength: A Meta-Analysis

Authors: Tyler D. Williams, Danilo V. Tolusso, Michael V. Fedewa, Michael R. Esco

Published in: Sports Medicine | Issue 10/2017

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Periodization is a logical method of organizing training into sequential phases and cyclical time periods in order to increase the potential for achieving specific performance goals while minimizing the potential for overtraining. Periodized resistance training plans are proposed to be superior to non-periodized training plans for enhancing maximal strength.

Objective

The primary aim of this study was to examine the previous literature comparing periodized resistance training plans to non-periodized resistance training plans and determine a quantitative estimate of effect on maximal strength.

Methods

All studies included in the meta-analysis met the following inclusion criteria: (1) peer-reviewed publication; (2) published in English; (3) comparison of a periodized resistance training group to a non-periodized resistance training group; (4) maximal strength measured by 1-repetition maximum (1RM) squat, bench press, or leg press. Data were extracted and independently coded by two authors. Random-effects models were used to aggregate a mean effect size (ES), 95% confidence intervals (CIs) and potential moderators.

Results

The cumulative results of 81 effects gathered from 18 studies published between 1988 and 2015 indicated that the magnitude of improvement in 1RM following periodized resistance training was greater than non-periodized resistance training (ES = 0.43, 95% CI 0.27–0.58; P < 0.001). Periodization model (β = 0.51; P = 0.0010), training status (β = −0.59; P = 0.0305), study length (β = 0.03; P = 0.0067), and training frequency (β = 0.46; P = 0.0123) were associated with a change in 1RM. These results indicate that undulating programs were more favorable for strength gains. Improvements in 1RM were greater among untrained participants. Additionally, higher training frequency and longer study length were associated with larger improvements in 1RM.

Conclusion

These results suggest that periodized resistance training plans have a moderate effect on 1RM compared to non-periodized training plans. Variation in training stimuli appears to be vital for increasing maximal strength, and longer periods of higher training frequency may be preferred.
Literature
1.
Kenney WL, Wilmore JH, Costill DL. Physiology of sport and exercise. 5th ed. Champaign: Human Kinetics; 2011.
2.
Kraemer WJ, Ratamess NA. Fundamentals of resistance training: progression and exercise prescription. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2004;36(4):674–88.CrossRefPubMed
3.
Siff MC. Supertraining. Denver: Supertraining Institute; 2003.
4.
Baechle TR, Earle RW. Essentials of strength training and conditioning. Champaign: Human Kinetics; 2008.
5.
Baker D, Nance S. The relation between strength and power in professional rugby league players. J Strength Cond Res. 1999;13(3):224–9.
6.
Moss B, Refsnes P, Abildgaard A, et al. Effects of maximal effort strength training with different loads on dynamic strength, cross-sectional area, load-power and load-velocity relationships. Eur J Appl Physiol Occup Physiol. 1997;75(3):193–9.CrossRefPubMed
7.
Baker D. Comparison of upper-body strength and power between professional and college-aged rugby league players. J Strength Cond Res. 2001;15(1):30–5.PubMed
8.
Stone MH, Sanborn K, O’Bryant HS, et al. Maximum strength-power-performance relationships in collegiate throwers. J Strength Cond Res. 2003;17(4):739–45.PubMed
9.
Cormie P, McGuigan MR, Newton RU. Influence of strength on magnitude and mechanisms of adaptation to power training. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2010;42(8):1566–81.CrossRefPubMed
10.
Taber C, Bellon C, Abbott H, et al. Roles of maximal strength and rate of force development in maximizing muscular power. Strength Cond J. 2016;38(1):71–8.CrossRef
11.
Fry AC. The role of resistance exercise intensity on muscle fibre adaptations. Sports Med. 2004;34(10):663–79.CrossRefPubMed
12.
Tan B. Manipulating resistance training program variables to optimize maximum strength in men: a review. J Strength Cond Res. 1999;13(3):289–304.CrossRef
13.
Campos GE, Luecke TJ, Wendeln HK, et al. Muscular adaptations in response to three different resistance-training regimens: specificity of repetition maximum training zones. Eur J Appl Physiol. 2002;88(1–2):50–60.CrossRefPubMed
14.
Rhea MR, Alvar BA, Burkett LN, et al. A meta-analysis to determine the dose response for strength development. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2003;35(3):456–64.CrossRefPubMed
15.
Peterson MD, Rhea MR, Alvar BA. Maximizing strength development in athletes: a meta-analysis to determine the dose-response relationship. J Strength Cond Res. 2004;18(2):377–82.PubMed
16.
Peterson MD, Rhea MR, Alvar BA. Applications of the dose-response for muscular strength development: a review of meta-analytic efficacy and reliability for designing training prescription. J Strength Cond Res. 2005;19(4):950–8.PubMed
17.
Herrick AB, Stone WJ. The effects of periodization versus progressive resistance exercise on upper and lower body strength in women. J Strength Cond Res. 1996;10(2):72–6.
18.
Stone MH, O’Bryant HS, Schilling BK, et al. Periodization: effects of manipulating volume and intensity. Part 1. Strength Cond J. 2000;49(2):56–62.
19.
DeWeese B, Gray H, Sams M, et al. Revising the definition of periodization: merging historical principles with modern concern. Olympic Coach. 2013;24:5–19.
20.
DeWeese BH, Hornsby G, Stone M, et al. The training process: planning for strength–power training in track and field. Part 1: theoretical aspects. J Sport Health Sci. 2015;4(4):308–17.
21.
Plisk SS, Stone MH. Periodization strategies. Strength Cond J. 2003;25(6):19–37.CrossRef
22.
Stone MH, Stone M, Sands WA, et al. Principles and practice of resistance training. Champaign: Human Kinetics; 2007.
23.
DeWeese BH, Hornsby G, Stone M, et al. The training process: planning for strength–power training in track and field. Part 2: Practical and applied aspects. J Sport Health Sci. 2015;4(4):318–24.
24.
Issurin VB. New horizons for the methodology and physiology of training periodization. Sports Med. 2010;40(3):189–206.CrossRefPubMed
25.
Bartolomei S, Hoffman JR, Merni F, et al. A comparison of traditional and block periodized strength training programs in trained athletes. J Strength Cond Res. 2014;28(4):990–7.CrossRefPubMed
26.
Issurin V. Block periodization versus traditional training theory: a review. J Sports Med Phys Fit. 2008;48(1):65.
27.
Haff GG, Triplett NT. Essentials of strength training and conditioning. 4th ed. Champaign: Human Kinetics; 2015.
28.
29.
Rhea MR, Ball SD, Phillips WT, et al. A comparison of linear and daily undulating periodized programs with equated volume and intensity for strength. J Strength Cond Res. 2002;16(2):250–5.PubMed
30.
Buford TW, Rossi SJ, Smith DB, et al. A comparison of periodization models during nine weeks with equated volume and intensity for strength. J Strength Cond Res. 2007;21(4):1245–50.PubMed
31.
Bradley-Popovich GE. Nonlinear versus linear periodization models. Strength Cond J. 2001;23(1):42.
32.
Stone MH, O’Bryant HS. Letter to the editor. J Strength Cond Res. 1995;9(2):125–6.
33.
O’Bryant HS, Byrd R, Stone MH. Cycle ergometer performance and maximum leg and hip strength adaptations to two different methods of weight-training. J Strength Cond Res. 1988;2(2):27–30.
34.
Stone MH, Potteiger JA, Pierce KC, et al. Comparison of the effects of three different weight-training programs on the one repetition maximum squat. J Strength Cond Res. 2000;14(3):332–7.
35.
Kramer JB, Stone MH, O’Bryant HS, et al. Effects of single vs. multiple sets of weight training: Impact of volume, intensity, and variation. J Strength Cond Res. 1997;11(3):143–7.
36.
Willoughby DS. A comparison of three selected weight training programs on the upper and lower body of strength trained males. Appl Res Coaching Athletics. 1992;1:124–46.
37.
Hoffman JR, Ratamess NA, Klatt M, et al. Comparison between different off-season resistance training programs in division III American college football players. J Strength Cond Res. 2009;23(1):11–9.CrossRefPubMed
38.
Souza EO, Ugrinowitsch C, Tricoli V, et al. Early adaptations to six weeks of non-periodized and periodized strength training regimens in recreational males. J Sports Sci Med. 2014;13(3):604–9.PubMedPubMedCentral
39.
Rhea MR, Alderman BL. A meta-analysis of periodized versus nonperiodized strength and power training programs. Res Q Exerc Sport. 2004;75(4):413–22.CrossRefPubMed
40.
Marx JO, Ratamess NA, Nindl BC, et al. Low-volume circuit versus high-volume periodized resistance training in women. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2001;33(4):635–43.CrossRefPubMed
41.
Kraemer WJ, Hakkinen K, Triplett-Mcbride NT, et al. Physiological changes with periodized resistance training in women tennis players. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2003;35(1):157–68.CrossRefPubMed
42.
DeBeliso M, Harris C, Spitzer-Gibson T, et al. A comparison of periodised and fixed repetition training protocol on strength in older adults. J Sci Med Sport. 2005;8(2):190–9.CrossRefPubMed
43.
Monteiro AG, Aoki MS, Evangelista AL, et al. Nonlinear periodization maximizes strength gains in split resistance training routines. J Strength Cond Res. 2009;23(4):1321–6.CrossRefPubMed
44.
Pacobahyba N, de Souza Vale RG, de Souza SLP, et al. Muscle strength, serum basal levels of testosterone and urea in soccer athletes submitted to non-linear periodization program. Rev Bras Med Esporte. 2012;18(2):130–3.
45.
Moraes E, Fleck SJ, Ricardo Dias M, et al. Effects on strength, power, and flexibility in adolescents of nonperiodized vs. daily nonlinear periodized weight training. J Strength Cond Res. 2013;27(12):3310–21.CrossRefPubMed
46.
Ahmadizad S, Ghorbani S, Ghasemikaram M, et al. Effects of short-term nonperiodized, linear periodized and daily undulating periodized resistance training on plasma adiponectin, leptin and insulin resistance. Clin Biochem. 2014;47(6):417–22.CrossRefPubMed
47.
Storer TW, Dolezal BA, Berenc MN, et al. Effect of supervised, periodized exercise training vs. self-directed training on lean body mass and other fitness variables in health club members. J Strength Cond Res. 2014;28(7):1995–2006.CrossRefPubMed
48.
Harries SK, Lubans DR, Callister R. Systematic review and meta-analysis of linear and undulating periodized resistance training programs on muscular strength. J Strength Cond Res. 2015;29(4):1113–25.CrossRefPubMed
49.
Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, et al. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. Ann Intern Med. 2009;151(4):264–9.CrossRefPubMed
50.
McGee D, Jessee TC, Stone MH, et al. Leg and hip endurance adaptations to three weight-training programs. J Strength Cond Res. 1992;6(2):92–5.
51.
Stowers T, McMillan J, Scala D, et al. The short-term effects of three different strength-power training methods. NSCA J. 1983;5(3):24–7.
52.
Willoughby DS. The effects of mesocycle length weight training programs involving periodization and partially equated volumes on upper and lower body strength. J Strength Cond Res. 1993;7:2–8.
53.
Conlon JA, Haff GG, Tufano JJ, et al. Application of session rating of perceived exertion among different models of resistance training in older adults. J Strength Cond Res. 2015;29(12):3439–46.CrossRefPubMed
54.
Hedges LV, Olkin I. Statistical methods for meta-analysis. Orlando: Academic; 1985.
55.
Maher CG, Sherrington C, Herbert RD, et al. Reliability of the PEDro scale for rating quality of randomized controlled trials. Phys Ther. 2003;83(8):713–21.PubMed
56.
57.
Rosenberg MS. The file-drawer problem revisited: a general weighted method for calculating fail-safe numbers in meta-analysis. Evolution. 2005;59(2):464–8.CrossRefPubMed
58.
Lipsey MW, Wilson DB. Practical meta-analysis. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications; 2001.
59.
60.
Hox J. Multilevel analysis: techniques and applications. 2nd ed. New York: Taylor & Francis; 2010.
61.
Singer JD, Using SAS. PROC MIXED to fit multilevel models, hierarchical models, and individual growth models. J Educ Behav Stat. 1998;23(4):323–55.CrossRef
62.
Kraemer WJ. Influence of resistance training volume and periodization on physiological and performance adaptations in collegiate women tennis players. Am J Sports Med. 2000;28:626–33.CrossRefPubMed
63.
Baker D, Wilson G, Carlyon R. Periodization: the effect on strength of manipulating volume and intensity. J Strength Cond Res. 1994;8(4):235–42.
64.
Schiotz MK, Potteiger JA, Huntsinger PG, et al. The short-term effects of periodized and constant-intensity training on body composition, strength, and performance. J Strength Cond Res. 1998;12(3):173–8.
65.
Rosenthal R. The file drawer problem and tolerance for null results. Psychol Bull. 1979;86(3):638.CrossRef
66.
Oba Y, Hetzler RK, Stickley CD, et al. Allometric scaling of strength scores in NCAA division I-A football athletes. J Strength Cond Res. 2014;28(12):3330–7.CrossRefPubMed
67.
Hoeger WW, Hopkins DR, Barette SL, et al. Relationship between repetitions and selected percentages of one repetition maximum: a comparison between untrained and trained males and females. J Strength Cond Res. 1990;4(2):47–54.
68.
Painter KB, Haff GG, Ramsey MW, et al. Strength gains: block versus daily undulating periodization weight training among track and field athletes. Int J Sports Physiol Perform. 2012;7(2):161–9.CrossRefPubMed
69.
Peterson MD, Dodd DJ, Alvar BA, et al. Undulation training for development of hierarchical fitness and improved firefighter job performance. J Strength Cond Res. 2008;22(5):1683–95.CrossRefPubMed
70.
Rhea MR, Phillips WT, Burkett LN, et al. A comparison of linear and daily undulating periodized programs with equated volume and intensity for local muscular endurance/Comparaison entre des programmes d‘entrainement periodises, quotidiens et lineaires avec des intensites et des volumes egaux pour l‘endurance musculaire locale. J Strength Cond Res. 2003;17(1):82–7.PubMed
71.
Prestes J, Frollini AB, de Lima C, et al. Comparison between linear and daily undulating periodized resistance training to increase strength. J Strength Cond Res. 2009;23(9):2437–42.CrossRefPubMed
72.
Miranda F, Simao R, Rhea M, et al. Effects of linear vs. daily undulatory periodized resistance training on maximal and submaximal strength gains. J Strength Cond Res. 2011;25(7):1824–30.CrossRefPubMed
73.
Franchini E, Branco BM, Agostinho MF, et al. Influence of linear and undulating strength periodization on physical fitness, physiological, and performance responses to simulated judo matches. J Strength Cond Res. 2015;29(2):358–67.CrossRefPubMed
74.
Hoffman JR, Wendell M, Cooper J, et al. Comparison between linear and nonlinear in-season training programs in freshman football players. J Strength Cond Res. 2003;17(3):561–5.PubMed
75.
American College of Sports Medicine. American College of Sports Medicine position stand. Progression models in resistance training for healthy adults. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2009;41(3):687–708.CrossRef
76.
Stone M, O’Bryant H, Schilling B, et al. Periodization: effects of manipulating volume and intensity. Part 2. Strength Cond J. 1999;21(3):54.
77.
Zourdos MC, Jo E, Khamoui AV, et al. Modified daily undulating periodization model produces greater performance than a traditional configuration in powerlifters. J Strength Cond Res. 2015;30(3):784–91.CrossRef
78.
Klemp A, Dolan C, Quiles JM, et al. Volume-equated high-and low-repetition daily undulating programming strategies produce similar hypertrophy and strength adaptations. Appl Physiol Nutr Metab. 2016;41(999):1–7.
79.
Ahtiainen JP, Pakarinen A, Alen M, et al. Muscle hypertrophy, hormonal adaptations and strength development during strength training in strength-trained and untrained men. Eur J Appl Physiol. 2003;89(6):555–63.CrossRefPubMed
80.
Moritani T. Neural factors versus hypertrophy in the time course of muscle strength gain. Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 1979;58(3):115–30.
81.
Mangine GT, Hoffman JR, Fukuda DH, et al. Improving muscle strength and size: the importance of training volume, intensity, and status. Kineziologija. 2015;47(2):131–8.
82.
Phillips SM. Short-term training: when do repeated bouts of resistance exercise become training? Can J Appl Physiol. 2000;25(3):185–93.CrossRefPubMed
83.
Stone MH, Plisk SS, Stone ME, et al. Athletic performance development: volume load −1 set vs. multiple sets, training velocity and training variation. Strength Cond J. 1998;20(6):22–31.
84.
Fleck SJ. Periodized strength training: a critical review. J Strength Cond Res. 1999;13(1):82–9.
85.
Häkkinen K, Pakarinen A, Komi PV, et al. Neuromuscular adaptations and hormone balance in strength athletes, physically active males and females during intensive strength training. J Biomech. 1989;22(10):1017.CrossRef
86.
Häkkinen K, Komi PV, Alén M, et al. EMG, muscle fibre and force production characteristics during a 1 year training period in elite weight-lifters. Eur J Appl Physiol Occup Physiol. 1987;56(4):419–27.CrossRefPubMed
87.
McLester JR, Bishop E, Guilliams M. Comparison of 1 day and 3 days per week of equal-volume resistance training in experienced subjects. J Strength Cond Res. 2000;14(3):273–81.
88.
Häkkinen K, Kallinen M. Distribution of strength training volume into one or two daily sessions and neuromuscular adaptations in female athletes. Electromyogr Clin Neurophysiol. 1994;34(2):117–24.PubMed
89.
Raastad T, Kirketeig A, Wolf D, et al., editors. Powerlifters improved strength and muscular adaptations to a greater extent when equal total training volume was divided into 6 compared to 3 training sessions per week. In: 17th annual conference of the European College of Sport Science: Bruges; 2012.
90.
Lidor R, Tenenbaum G, Ziv G, et al. Achieving expertise in sport: deliberate practice, adaptation, and periodization of training. Kinesiol Rev. 2016;5(2):129–41.CrossRef
91.
Newell A, Rosenbloom PS. Mechanisms of skill acquisition and the law of practice. Cognitive skills and their acquisition. Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates; 1981. p. 1–55.
92.
Schoenfeld BJ, Ratamess NA, Peterson MD, et al. Influence of resistance training frequency on muscular adaptations in well-trained men. J Strength Cond Res. 2015;29(7):1821–9.CrossRefPubMed
93.
Candow DG, Burke DG. Effect of short-term equal-volume resistance training with different workout frequency on muscle mass and strength in untrained men and women. J Strength Cond Res. 2007;21(1):204–7.CrossRefPubMed
94.
Krieger JW. Single versus multiple sets of resistance exercise: a meta-regression. J Strength Cond Res. 2009;23(6):1890–901.CrossRefPubMed
95.
Rhea MR, Alvar BA, Ball SD, et al. Three sets of weight training superior to 1 set with equal intensity for eliciting strength. J Strength Cond Res. 2002;16(4):525–9.PubMed
96.
Haff GG. Quantifying workloads in resistance training: a brief review. Strength Cond J. 2010;10:31–40.
97.
Scott BR, Duthie GM, Thornton HR, et al. Training monitoring for resistance exercise: theory and applications. Sports Med. 2016;46(5):1–12.CrossRef
98.
Schoenfeld BJ, Peterson MD, Ogborn D, et al. Effects of low-vs. high-load resistance training on muscle strength and hypertrophy in well-trained men. J Strength Cond Res. 2015;29(10):2954–63.CrossRefPubMed
99.
Schoenfeld BJ, Ratamess NA, Peterson MD, et al. Effects of different volume-equated resistance training loading strategies on muscular adaptations in well-trained men. J Strength Cond Res. 2014;28(10):2909–18.CrossRefPubMed
100.
Lemeshow AR, Blum RE, Berlin JA, et al. Searching one or two databases was insufficient for meta-analysis of observational studies. J Clin Epidemiol. 2005;58(9):867–73.CrossRefPubMed
101.
Linder SK, Kamath GR, Pratt GF, et al. Citation searches are more sensitive than keyword searches to identify studies using specific measurement instruments. J Clin Epidemiol. 2015;68(4):412–7.CrossRefPubMed
102.
Papaioannou D, Sutton A, Carroll C, et al. Literature searching for social science systematic reviews: consideration of a range of search techniques. Health Info Libr J. 2010;27(2):114–22.CrossRefPubMed
103.
Whiting P, Westwood M, Burke M, et al. Systematic reviews of test accuracy should search a range of databases to identify primary studies. J Clin Epidemiol. 2008;61(4):357. e1–10.CrossRef
104.
Davies T, Orr R, Halaki M, et al. Effect of training leading to repetition failure on muscular strength: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Sports Med. 2016;46(4):487–502.CrossRefPubMed
105.
Stewart LA, Tierney JF. To IPD or not to IPD? Advantages and disadvantages of systematic reviews using individual patient data. Eval Health Prof. 2002;25(1):76–97.CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Comparison of Periodized and Non-Periodized Resistance Training on Maximal Strength: A Meta-Analysis
Authors
Tyler D. Williams
Danilo V. Tolusso
Michael V. Fedewa
Michael R. Esco
Publication date
01-10-2017
Publisher
Springer International Publishing
Published in
Sports Medicine / Issue 10/2017
Print ISSN: 0112-1642
Electronic ISSN: 1179-2035
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s40279-017-0734-y

Other articles of this Issue 10/2017

Sports Medicine 10/2017 Go to the issue

Review Article

Fluid Balance in Team Sport Athletes and the Effect of Hypohydration on Cognitive, Technical, and Physical Performance

Leading Article

Management of Nasal Fractures in Sports

Systematic Review

Intervention Strategies Used in Sport Injury Prevention Studies: A Systematic Review Identifying Studies Applying the Haddon Matrix

Letter to the Editor

Comment on: “Effect of Exercise Training on Non-exercise Physical Activity: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials”

Current Opinion

Non-Muscular Structures Can Limit the Maximal Joint Range of Motion during Stretching

Original Research Article

Sudden Arrhythmic Death During Exercise: A Post-Mortem Genetic Analysis