Skip to main content
Top
Published in: International Orthopaedics 9/2018

01-09-2018 | Original Paper

Comparison of culture and broad-range polymerase chain reaction methods for diagnosing periprosthetic joint infection: analysis of joint fluid, periprosthetic tissue, and sonicated fluid

Authors: Zida Huang, Qiqiao Wu, Xinyu Fang, Wenbo Li, Chaofan Zhang, Huiyi Zeng, Qijin Wang, Jianhua Lin, Wenming Zhang

Published in: International Orthopaedics | Issue 9/2018

Login to get access

Abstract

Purpose

This study compared the diagnostic capabilities of culture and broad-range polymerase chain reaction (PCR) using joint fluid (JF), periprosthetic tissue (PT), and sonicated fluid (SF) for the diagnosis of periprosthetic joint infection (PJI).

Methods

Sixty-seven subjects underwent knee or hip revision surgery, with 53 PJI and 14 aseptic failure (AF) cases included retrospectively. JF, PT, and SF samples were collected after a suspension of antibiotics more than two weeks, and culture and broad-range PCR were performed for all samples.

Results

The sensitivities of SF culture (83.0%), JF-PCR (83.0%), and SF-PCR (84.9%) were similar (P > 0.05), but each was significantly more sensitive than JF culture (69.8%), PT culture (71.7%), and PT-PCR (34.0%) (P < 0.05). The specificities of JF culture, PT culture, SF culture, JF-PCR, PT-PCR, and SF-PCR were similar (100, 100, 85.7, 85.7, 100, and 78.6%, respectively) (P > 0.05). PCR was unable to accurately detect six polymicrobial infections and two fungal infections.

Conclusions

SF culture, JF-PCR, and SF-PCR were more sensitive than JF culture, PT culture, and PT-PCR for diagnosing PJI among patients who have stopped taking antibiotics for two weeks or more. Compared with PCR methods, SF culture has the advantage of detecting polymicrobial or fungal infections. PT-PCR proved to be insufficiently sensitive for providing correct diagnoses.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference Saleh KJ, Rand JA, McQueen DA (2003) Current status of revision total knee arthroplasty: how do we assess results? J Bone Joint Surg Am 85-A(Suppl 1):S18–S20CrossRef Saleh KJ, Rand JA, McQueen DA (2003) Current status of revision total knee arthroplasty: how do we assess results? J Bone Joint Surg Am 85-A(Suppl 1):S18–S20CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Bemer P, Plouzeau C, Tande D, Leger J, Giraudeau B, Valentin AS, Jolivet-Gougeon A, Vincent P, Corvec S, Gibaud S, Juvin ME, Hery-Arnaud G, Lemarie C, Kempf M, Bret L, Quentin R, Coffre C, de Pinieux G, Bernard L, Burucoa C, Centre de Reference des Infections Osteo-articulaires du Grand Ouest Study T (2014) Evaluation of 16S rRNA gene PCR sensitivity and specificity for diagnosis of prosthetic joint infection: a prospective multicenter cross-sectional study. J Clin Microbiol 52(10):3583–3589. https://doi.org/10.1128/JCM.01459-14 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Bemer P, Plouzeau C, Tande D, Leger J, Giraudeau B, Valentin AS, Jolivet-Gougeon A, Vincent P, Corvec S, Gibaud S, Juvin ME, Hery-Arnaud G, Lemarie C, Kempf M, Bret L, Quentin R, Coffre C, de Pinieux G, Bernard L, Burucoa C, Centre de Reference des Infections Osteo-articulaires du Grand Ouest Study T (2014) Evaluation of 16S rRNA gene PCR sensitivity and specificity for diagnosis of prosthetic joint infection: a prospective multicenter cross-sectional study. J Clin Microbiol 52(10):3583–3589. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1128/​JCM.​01459-14 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
9.
go back to reference Della Valle C, Parvizi J, Bauer TW, DiCesare PE, Evans RP, Segreti J, Spangehl M, Watters WC 3rd, Keith M, Turkelson CM, Wies JL, Sluka P, Hitchcock K, American Academy of Orthopaedic S (2011) American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons clinical practice guideline on: the diagnosis of periprosthetic joint infections of the hip and knee. J Bone Joint Surg Am 93(14):1355–1357. https://doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.9314ebo CrossRefPubMed Della Valle C, Parvizi J, Bauer TW, DiCesare PE, Evans RP, Segreti J, Spangehl M, Watters WC 3rd, Keith M, Turkelson CM, Wies JL, Sluka P, Hitchcock K, American Academy of Orthopaedic S (2011) American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons clinical practice guideline on: the diagnosis of periprosthetic joint infections of the hip and knee. J Bone Joint Surg Am 93(14):1355–1357. https://​doi.​org/​10.​2106/​JBJS.​9314ebo CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Tunney MM, Patrick S, Curran MD, Ramage G, Hanna D, Nixon JR, Gorman SP, Davis RI, Anderson N (1999) Detection of prosthetic hip infection at revision arthroplasty by immunofluorescence microscopy and PCR amplification of the bacterial 16S rRNA gene. J Clin Microbiol 37(10):3281–3290PubMedPubMedCentral Tunney MM, Patrick S, Curran MD, Ramage G, Hanna D, Nixon JR, Gorman SP, Davis RI, Anderson N (1999) Detection of prosthetic hip infection at revision arthroplasty by immunofluorescence microscopy and PCR amplification of the bacterial 16S rRNA gene. J Clin Microbiol 37(10):3281–3290PubMedPubMedCentral
13.
go back to reference Gomez E, Cazanave C, Cunningham SA, Greenwood-Quaintance KE, Steckelberg JM, Uhl JR, Hanssen AD, Karau MJ, Schmidt SM, Osmon DR, Berbari EF, Mandrekar J, Patel R (2012) Prosthetic joint infection diagnosis using broad-range PCR of biofilms dislodged from knee and hip arthroplasty surfaces using sonication. J Clin Microbiol 50(11):3501–3508. https://doi.org/10.1128/JCM.00834-12 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Gomez E, Cazanave C, Cunningham SA, Greenwood-Quaintance KE, Steckelberg JM, Uhl JR, Hanssen AD, Karau MJ, Schmidt SM, Osmon DR, Berbari EF, Mandrekar J, Patel R (2012) Prosthetic joint infection diagnosis using broad-range PCR of biofilms dislodged from knee and hip arthroplasty surfaces using sonication. J Clin Microbiol 50(11):3501–3508. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1128/​JCM.​00834-12 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
16.
go back to reference Lamas CC, Fournier PE, Zappa M, Brandao TJ, Januario-da-Silva CA, Correia MG, Barbosa GI, Golebiovski WF, Weksler C, Lepidi H, Raoult D (2016) Diagnosis of blood culture-negative endocarditis and clinical comparison between blood culture-negative and blood culture-positive cases. Infection 44(4):459–466. https://doi.org/10.1007/s15010-015-0863-x CrossRefPubMed Lamas CC, Fournier PE, Zappa M, Brandao TJ, Januario-da-Silva CA, Correia MG, Barbosa GI, Golebiovski WF, Weksler C, Lepidi H, Raoult D (2016) Diagnosis of blood culture-negative endocarditis and clinical comparison between blood culture-negative and blood culture-positive cases. Infection 44(4):459–466. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1007/​s15010-015-0863-x CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Comparison of culture and broad-range polymerase chain reaction methods for diagnosing periprosthetic joint infection: analysis of joint fluid, periprosthetic tissue, and sonicated fluid
Authors
Zida Huang
Qiqiao Wu
Xinyu Fang
Wenbo Li
Chaofan Zhang
Huiyi Zeng
Qijin Wang
Jianhua Lin
Wenming Zhang
Publication date
01-09-2018
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
International Orthopaedics / Issue 9/2018
Print ISSN: 0341-2695
Electronic ISSN: 1432-5195
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-018-3827-9

Other articles of this Issue 9/2018

International Orthopaedics 9/2018 Go to the issue