Skip to main content
Key Specialties
Cardiology Diabetology Endocrinology Gastroenterology Geriatrics and Gerontology Gynecology and Obstetrics Hematology Infectious Disease Internal Medicine Nephrology Neurology Oncology Pediatrics Respiratory Medicine Rheumatology Surgery
Congress Coverage
2024 ACC Congress 2023 ESMO Congress 2023 EASD Congress 2023 ERS Congress 2023 ESC Congress
Clinical Collections
Advances in Alzheimer’s

At a glance: The STEP trials

A round-up of the STEP phase 3 clinical trials evaluating semaglutide for weight loss in people with overweight or obesity.
ADVANCED SEARCH
Log in
Top
Journal of Clinical Monitoring and Computing
Published in: Journal of Clinical Monitoring and Computing 2/2019

Open Access 01-04-2019 | Original Research

Comparison of conventional fluid management with PVI-based goal-directed fluid management in elective colorectal surgery

Authors: Sevim Cesur, Tülay Çardaközü, Alparslan Kuş, Neşe Türkyılmaz, Ömer Yavuz

Published in: Journal of Clinical Monitoring and Computing | Issue 2/2019

Login to get access

Abstract

Intraoperative fluid management is quite important in terms of postoperative organ perfusion and complications. Different fluid management protocols are in use for this purpose. Our primary goal was to compare the effects of conventional fluid management (CFM) with the Pleth Variability Index (PVI) guided goal-directed fluid management (GDFM) protocols on the amount of crystalloids administered, blood lactate, and serum creatinine levels during the intraoperative period. The length of hospital stay was our secondary goal. Seventy ASA I–II elective colorectal surgery patients were randomly assigned to CFM or GDFM for fluid management. The hemodynamic data and the data obtained from ABG were recorded at the end of induction and during the follow-up period at 1 h intervals. In the preoperative period and at 24 h postoperatively, blood samples were taken for the measurement of hemoglobin, Na, K, Cl, serum creatinine, albumin and blood lactate. In the first 24 h after surgery, oliguria and the time of first bowel movement were recorded. Length of hospital stay was also recorded. Intraoperative crystalloid administration and urine output were statistically significantly higher in CFM group (p < 0.001, p: 0.018). The end-surgery fluid balance was significantly lower in Group GDFM. Preoperative and postoperative Na, K, Cl, serum albumin, serum creatinine, lactate and hemoglobin values were similar between the groups. The time to passage of stool was significantly short in Group-GDFM compared to Group-CFM (p = 0.016). The length of hospital stay was found to be similar in both group. PVI-guided GDFM might be an alternative to CFM in ASA I–II patients undergoing elective colorectal surgery. However, further studies need to be carried out to search the efficiency and safety of PVI.
Literature
1.
2.
3.
Arieff AI. Fatal postoperative pulmonary edema: pathogenesis and literatüre review. Chest. 1999;115:1371–7.CrossRefPubMed
4.
Holte K, Sharrock NE, Kehley H. Pathophysiology and clinical implications of perioperative fluid excess. Br J Anaesth. 2002;89:622–32.CrossRefPubMed
5.
Nisanevich V, Felsenstein I, Almogy G, Weissman C, Einav S, Matot I. Effect of intraoperative fluid management on outcome after intraabdominal surgery. Anesthesiology. 2005;103:25–32.CrossRefPubMed
6.
Patel S, Lutz JM, Panchagnula U, Bansal S. Anesthesia and perioperative management of colorectal surgical patients- specific issues (part 2). J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol. 2012;28:304–13.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
7.
Marik PE, Cavallazzi R. Does the central venous pressure predict fluid responsiveness? An updated mata-analysis and a plea for some common sense. Crit Care Med. 2013;41:1774–81.CrossRefPubMed
8.
Le Manach Y, Hofer CK, Lehot JJ, Vallet B, Goarin JP, Tavernier B, Cannesson M. Can changes in arterial pressure be used to detect changes in cardiac output during volume expansion in the perioperative period? Anesthesiology. 2012;117:1165–74.CrossRefPubMed
9.
McDermid RC, Raghunathan K, Romanovsky A, Shaw AD, Bagshaw SM. Controversies in fluid therapy: type, dose and toxicity. World J Crit Care Med. 2014;3:24–33.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
10.
Della Rocca G, Vetrugno L, Tripi G, Deana C, Barbariol F, Livia Pompei L. Liberal or restricted fluid administration: are we ready for a proposal of a restricted intraoperative approach? BMC Anesthesiol. 2014;14:62–70.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
11.
Lambert KG, Wakim JH, Lambert NE. Preoperative fluid bolus and reduction of postoperative nausea and vomiting in patients undergoing laparoscopic gynecologic surgery. AANA J. 2009;77:110–4.PubMed
12.
Maharaj CH, Kallam SR, Malik A, Hassett P, Grady D, Laffey JG. Preoperative intravenous fluid therapy decreases postoperative nausea and pain in high risk patients. Anesth Analg. 2005;100:675–82.CrossRefPubMed
13.
14.
Brandstrup B, Tønnesen H, Beier-Holgersen R, Hjortsø E, Ørding H, Lindorff-Larsen K, Rasmussen MS, Lanng C, Wallin L, Iversen LH, Gramkow CS, Okholm M, Blemmer T, Svendsen PE, Rottensten HH, Thage B, Riis J, Jeppesen IS, Teilum D, Christensen AM, Graungaard B, Pott F. Effects of intravenous fluid restriction on postoperative complications: comparison of two perioperative fluid regimens: a randomized assessor-blinded multicenter trial. Ann Surg. 2003;238:641–8.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
15.
Arkilic CF, Taguchi A, Sharma N, Ratnaraj J, Sessler DI, Read TE, Fleshman JW, Kurz A. Supplemental perioperative fluid administration increases tissue oxygen pressure. Surgery. 2003;133:49–55.CrossRefPubMed
16.
Holte K, Foss NB, Andersen J, Valentiner L, Lund C, Bie P, Kehlet H. Liberal or restrictive fluid administration in fast-track colonic surgery:a randominized, double-blind study. Br J Anesth. 2007;99:500–8.CrossRef
17.
18.
Abraham-Nordling M, Hjern F, Pollack J, Prytz M, Borg T, Kressner U. Randomized clinical trial of fluid restriction in colorectal surgery. Br J Surg. 2012;99:186–91.CrossRefPubMed
19.
Jacob M, Chappell D, Conzen P, Finsterer U, Rehm M. Blood volume is normal after preoperative overnight fasting. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2008;52:522–9.CrossRefPubMed
20.
Chappell D, Jacob M, Hofmann-Kiefer K, Conzen P, Rehm M. A rational approach to perioperative fluid management. Anesthesiology. 2008;109:723–40.CrossRefPubMed
21.
Brandstrup B. Fluid therapy for the surgical patient. Best Pract Res Clin Anaesthesiol. 2006;20:265–83.CrossRefPubMed
22.
23.
Lobo DN. Fluid overload and surgical outcome: another piece in the jigsaw. Ann Surg. 2009;249:186–8.CrossRefPubMed
24.
Giglio MT, Marucci M, Testini M, Brienza N. Goal-directed haemodynamic therapy and gastrointestinal complications in major surgery: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Br J Anaesth. 2009;103:637–46.CrossRefPubMed
25.
Phan TD, Ismail H, Heriot AG, Ho KM. Improving perioperative outcomes: fluid optimization with the esophageal Doppler monitor, a metaanalysis and review. J Am Coll Surg. 2008;207:935–41.CrossRefPubMed
26.
Corcoran T, Rhodes JE, Clarke S, Myles PS, Ho KM. Perioperative fluid management strategies in major surgery: a stratified meta-analysis. Anesth Analg. 2012;114:640–51.CrossRefPubMed
27.
Pearse RM, Harrison DA, MacDonald N, Gillies MA, Blunt M, Ackland G, Grocott MP, Ahern A, Griggs K, Scott R, Hinds C, Rowan K. Effect of a perioperative, cardiac output-guided hemodynamic therapy algorithm on outcomes following major gastrointestinal surgery: a randomized clinical trial and systematic review. JAMA. 2014;311:2181–90.CrossRefPubMed
28.
Forget P, Lois F, Kock M. Goal directed fluid management based on the pulse oximeter derived pleth variability index reduces lactate and improves fluid management. Anesth Analg. 2010;111:910–4.PubMed
29.
30.
Schmid S, Kapfer B, Heim M, Bogdanski R, Anetsberger A, Blobner M, Jungwirth B. Algorithm guided goal-directed haemodynamic therapy does not improve renal function after major abdominal surgery compared to good standard clinical care—a prospective randomised trial. Crit Care. 2016;20:50–61.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
31.
Iregui MG, Prentice D, Sherman G, Schallom L, Sona C, Kollef MH. Physician’sestimates of cardiac index and intravascular volume based on clinical assessment versus transesophageal Doppler measurements obtained by critical care nurses. Am J Crit Care. 2003;12:336–42.PubMed
32.
Magder S, Georgiadis G, Cheong T. Respiratory variations in right atrial pressure predict the response to fluid challenge. Crit Care. 1992;7:76–85.CrossRef
33.
Marik PE, Baram M, Vahid B. Does central venous pressure predict fluid responsiveness? A systematic review of the literature and the tale of seven mares. Chest. 2008;134:172–8.CrossRefPubMed
34.
Magder S, Bafaqeeh F. The clinical role of central venous pressure measurements. Intensive Care Med. 2007;22:44–51.CrossRef
35.
Thiele RH, Bartels K, Gan TJ. Inter-device differences in monitoring for goal-directed fluid therapy. Can J Anaesth. 2015;62:169–81.CrossRefPubMed
36.
37.
Funk DJ, Moretti EW, Gan TJ. Minimally invasive cardiac output monitoring in the perioperative setting. Anesth Analg. 2009;108:887–97.CrossRefPubMed
38.
Desebbe O, Cannesson M. Using ventilation-induced plethysmographic variations to optimize patient fluid status. Curr Opin Anaesthesiol. 2008;21:772–8.CrossRefPubMed
39.
40.
Ansari BM, Zochios V, Falter F, Klein AA. Physiological controversies and methods used to determine fluid responsiveness: a qualitative systematic review. Anaesthesia. 2016;71:94–105.CrossRefPubMed
41.
Brandstrup B, Svendsen PE, Rasmussen M, Belhage B, Rodt S, Hansen B, Møller DR, Lundbech LB, Andersen N, Berg V, Thomassen N, Andersen ST, Simonsen L. Which goal for fluid therapy during colorectal surgery is followed by the best outcome:near-maximal stoke volume or zero fluid balance? Br J Anaesth. 2012;109:191–9.CrossRefPubMed
42.
Yu Y, Dong J, Xu Z, Shen H, Zheng J. Pleth variability index-directed fluid management in abdominal surgery under combined general and epidural anesthesia. J Clin Monit Comput. 2015;29:47–52.CrossRefPubMed
43.
Hood JA, Wilson RJT. Pleth variability index to predict fluid responsiveness in colorectal surgery. Anesth Analg. 2011;113:1058–63.CrossRefPubMed
44.
Monnet X, Guerin L, Jozwiak M, Bataille A, Julien F, Richard C, Teboul JL. Monnet X, Guerin L, Jozwiak M. Pleth variability index is a weak predictor of fluid responsiveness in patients receiving norepinephrine. Br J Anaesth. 2013;110:207–13.CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Comparison of conventional fluid management with PVI-based goal-directed fluid management in elective colorectal surgery
Authors
Sevim Cesur
Tülay Çardaközü
Alparslan Kuş
Neşe Türkyılmaz
Ömer Yavuz
Publication date
01-04-2019
Publisher
Springer Netherlands
Published in
Journal of Clinical Monitoring and Computing / Issue 2/2019
Print ISSN: 1387-1307
Electronic ISSN: 1573-2614
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10877-018-0163-y

Other articles of this Issue 2/2019

Journal of Clinical Monitoring and Computing 2/2019 Go to the issue

Letter to the Editor

A novel cause of rebreathing carbon dioxide related to removed CLIC-seal on the Dräger Apollo© anesthesia machine

Letter to the Editor

Response to: Is the new ASNM intraoperative neuromonitoring supervision “guideline” a trustworthy guideline? A commentary

Original Research

Risk factors for positioning-related somatosensory evoked potential changes in 3946 spinal surgeries

Original Research

Comparison between pulse wave velocities measured using Complior and measured using Biopac

Original Research

A low dose of three local anesthetic solutions for interscalene blockade tested by thermal quantitative sensory testing: a randomized controlled trial

Original Research

Cardiac output measurement in liver transplantation patients using pulmonary and transpulmonary thermodilution: a comparative study