Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Graefe's Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology 7/2009

01-07-2009 | Cataract

Comparison of contrast sensitivity, depth of field and ocular wavefront aberrations in eyes with an IOL with zero versus positive spherical aberration

Authors: Jay S. Pepose, Mujtaba A. Qazi, Keith H. Edwards, Jeff P. Sanderson, Edwin J. Sarver

Published in: Graefe's Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology | Issue 7/2009

Login to get access

Abstract

Purpose

To compare the clinical performance of the zero spherical aberration (SA) SofPort LI61AO (AO, Bausch & Lomb) intraocular lens (IOL) to the AcrySof SA60AT (AT, Alcon), which has positive spherical aberration.

Methods

Patients underwent uneventful phacoemulsification with implantation of either an aspheric (AO, n = 19) or spherical (AT, n = 20) IOL. Postoperatively, a 5 mm artificial pupil was positioned in trial frames with the cycloplegic refraction during monocular, mesopic contrast sensitivity (CSF) and low-contrast visual acuity (LCVA) testing with glare. Ocular and corneal wavefront error was determined at 5 mm diameters.

Results

Mean CSF scores were better at all frequencies tested for the AO than for the AT group, and achieved statistical significance at 1.5 cpd (p = 0.038) and 6 cpd (p = 0.017). With glare, AO eyes read 30.9 ± 5.0 low-contrast letters versus 25.2 ± 6.8 for AT eyes (p = 0.005) (mean ΔLogMAR  =  −0.10), while high-contrast acuity and refraction were similar. Eyes implanted with the SA60AT had 43% greater positive spherical aberration at a 5 mm wavefront diameter, with no significant difference in corneal SA between groups. A through-focus analysis demonstrated a similar depth of field, yet a comparatively higher visual Strehl ratio for the aspheric IOL at emmetropia (p = 0.038).

Conclusion

Eyes with the SofPort Advance Optics neutral aberration IOL demonstrated less spherical aberration and better low-contrast acuity compared to eyes with a spherical IOL, without sacrificing tolerance to defocus. The aspheric IOL showed superior optical and clinical performance, which is most likely due to its surface design.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Applegate RA, Sarver EJ, Khemsara V (2002) Are all aberrations equal? J Refract Surg 18:S556−S562PubMed Applegate RA, Sarver EJ, Khemsara V (2002) Are all aberrations equal? J Refract Surg 18:S556−S562PubMed
2.
go back to reference Holladay JT, Piers PA, Koranyi G, van der Mooren M, Norrby NES (2002) A new intraocular lens design to spherical aberration in pseudophakic eyes. J Refract Surg 18:83–691 Holladay JT, Piers PA, Koranyi G, van der Mooren M, Norrby NES (2002) A new intraocular lens design to spherical aberration in pseudophakic eyes. J Refract Surg 18:83–691
5.
6.
go back to reference Kelly JE, Mihashi T, Howland HC (2004) Compensation of corneal horizontal/vertical astigmatism, lateral coma, and spherical aberrations by internal optics of the eye. J Vis 4:262–271, doi:10.1167/4.4.2 PubMedCrossRef Kelly JE, Mihashi T, Howland HC (2004) Compensation of corneal horizontal/vertical astigmatism, lateral coma, and spherical aberrations by internal optics of the eye. J Vis 4:262–271, doi:10.​1167/​4.​4.​2 PubMedCrossRef
8.
go back to reference Artal P, Guirao A, Berrio E, Piers P, Norrby S (2003) Optical aberrations and the aging eye. Int Ophthalmol Clin 43:63–77PubMed Artal P, Guirao A, Berrio E, Piers P, Norrby S (2003) Optical aberrations and the aging eye. Int Ophthalmol Clin 43:63–77PubMed
9.
go back to reference Guirao A, Redondo M, Geraghty E, Piers P, Norrby S, Artal P (2002) Corneal optical aberrations and retinal image quality in patients whom monofocal intraocular lenses were implanted. Arch Ophthalmol 120:1143–1151PubMed Guirao A, Redondo M, Geraghty E, Piers P, Norrby S, Artal P (2002) Corneal optical aberrations and retinal image quality in patients whom monofocal intraocular lenses were implanted. Arch Ophthalmol 120:1143–1151PubMed
12.
go back to reference Casprini F, Balestrazzi A, Tosi GM, Miracco F, Marotne G, Cevevivi G, Caporossi A (2004) Glare disability and spherical aberration with five foldable intraocular lenses: a prospective randomized study. Acta Ophthalmol Scand 83:20–25, doi:10.1111/j.1600-0420.2005.00378.x CrossRef Casprini F, Balestrazzi A, Tosi GM, Miracco F, Marotne G, Cevevivi G, Caporossi A (2004) Glare disability and spherical aberration with five foldable intraocular lenses: a prospective randomized study. Acta Ophthalmol Scand 83:20–25, doi:10.​1111/​j.​1600-0420.​2005.​00378.​x CrossRef
14.
go back to reference Bellucci R, Morselli S, Piers P (2004) Comparison of wavefront aberration and optical quality of eyes implanted with five different intraocular lenses. J Refract Surg 20:297–306PubMed Bellucci R, Morselli S, Piers P (2004) Comparison of wavefront aberration and optical quality of eyes implanted with five different intraocular lenses. J Refract Surg 20:297–306PubMed
15.
go back to reference Bellucci R, Scialdone A, Buratto L, Morselli S, Chierego C, Criscuoli A, Moretti G, Piers P (2005) Visual quality and contrast sensitivity comparison between Tecnis and AcrySof SA60AT intraocular lenses: a multicenter randomized study. J Cataract Refract Surg 31:712–717, doi:10.1016/j.jcrs.2004.08.049 PubMedCrossRef Bellucci R, Scialdone A, Buratto L, Morselli S, Chierego C, Criscuoli A, Moretti G, Piers P (2005) Visual quality and contrast sensitivity comparison between Tecnis and AcrySof SA60AT intraocular lenses: a multicenter randomized study. J Cataract Refract Surg 31:712–717, doi:10.​1016/​j.​jcrs.​2004.​08.​049 PubMedCrossRef
18.
go back to reference Kennis H, Huygens M, Callebaut F (2004) Comparing the contrast sensitivity of a modified prolate anterior surface IOL and of two spherical IOLs. Bull Soc Belge Ophtalmol 294:49–58PubMed Kennis H, Huygens M, Callebaut F (2004) Comparing the contrast sensitivity of a modified prolate anterior surface IOL and of two spherical IOLs. Bull Soc Belge Ophtalmol 294:49–58PubMed
19.
20.
go back to reference Kasper T, Bühren J, Kohnen T (2006) Visual performance of aspherical and spherical intraocular lenses: intraindividual comparison of visual acuity acuity, contrast sensitivity, and higher-order aberrations. J Cataract Refract Surg 32:2022–2029, doi:10.1016/j.jcrs.2006.07.029 PubMedCrossRef Kasper T, Bühren J, Kohnen T (2006) Visual performance of aspherical and spherical intraocular lenses: intraindividual comparison of visual acuity acuity, contrast sensitivity, and higher-order aberrations. J Cataract Refract Surg 32:2022–2029, doi:10.​1016/​j.​jcrs.​2006.​07.​029 PubMedCrossRef
21.
go back to reference Tzelikis PF, Akaishi L, Trindade PF, Boteon JE (2008) Spherical aberration and contrast sensitivity in eyes implanted with aspheric and spherical lenses. A comparative study. Am J Ophthalmol 145:827–833, doi:10.1016/j.ajo.2007.12.023 CrossRef Tzelikis PF, Akaishi L, Trindade PF, Boteon JE (2008) Spherical aberration and contrast sensitivity in eyes implanted with aspheric and spherical lenses. A comparative study. Am J Ophthalmol 145:827–833, doi:10.​1016/​j.​ajo.​2007.​12.​023 CrossRef
22.
go back to reference Caporossi A, Martone G, Casprini F, Rapisarda L (2007) Prospective randomized study of clinical performance of 3 aspheric and 2 spherical intraocular lenses in 250 eyes. J Refract Surg 23(7):639–648PubMed Caporossi A, Martone G, Casprini F, Rapisarda L (2007) Prospective randomized study of clinical performance of 3 aspheric and 2 spherical intraocular lenses in 250 eyes. J Refract Surg 23(7):639–648PubMed
23.
go back to reference Awwad ST, Lehmann JD, McCulley JP, Bowman RW (2007) A comparison of higher order aberrations in eyes implanted with AcrySof IQ SN60WF and AcrySof N60AT intraocular lenses. Eur J Ophthalmol 17:320–326PubMed Awwad ST, Lehmann JD, McCulley JP, Bowman RW (2007) A comparison of higher order aberrations in eyes implanted with AcrySof IQ SN60WF and AcrySof N60AT intraocular lenses. Eur J Ophthalmol 17:320–326PubMed
25.
go back to reference Pandita D, Raj SM, Vasavada VA, Vasavada VA, Kazi NS, Vasavada AR (2007) Contrast sensitivity and glare disability after implantation of AcrySof IQ Natural aspherical intraocular lens: prospective randomized masked clinical trial. J Cataract Refract Surg 33:603–610, doi:10.1016/j.jcrs.2007.01.009 PubMedCrossRef Pandita D, Raj SM, Vasavada VA, Vasavada VA, Kazi NS, Vasavada AR (2007) Contrast sensitivity and glare disability after implantation of AcrySof IQ Natural aspherical intraocular lens: prospective randomized masked clinical trial. J Cataract Refract Surg 33:603–610, doi:10.​1016/​j.​jcrs.​2007.​01.​009 PubMedCrossRef
27.
go back to reference Sandoval HP, Fernández de Castro LE, Vroman DT, Solomon KD (2008) Comparison of visual outcomes, photopic contrast sensitivity, wavefront analysis, and patient satisfaction following cataract extraction and IOL implantation: aspheric vs spherical acrylic lenses. Eye 22(12):1469–1475PubMedCrossRef Sandoval HP, Fernández de Castro LE, Vroman DT, Solomon KD (2008) Comparison of visual outcomes, photopic contrast sensitivity, wavefront analysis, and patient satisfaction following cataract extraction and IOL implantation: aspheric vs spherical acrylic lenses. Eye 22(12):1469–1475PubMedCrossRef
28.
go back to reference Denoyer A, LeLez ML, Majzoub S, Pisella PJ (2007) Tecnis Z9000 intraocular lens implantation. Effect of contrast sensitivity and wavefront aberration improvements on the quality of daily vision. J Cataract Refract Surg 33(2):210–216PubMedCrossRef Denoyer A, LeLez ML, Majzoub S, Pisella PJ (2007) Tecnis Z9000 intraocular lens implantation. Effect of contrast sensitivity and wavefront aberration improvements on the quality of daily vision. J Cataract Refract Surg 33(2):210–216PubMedCrossRef
29.
go back to reference Rocha KM, Soriano ES, Chalita MR, Yamada AC, Bottós J, Morimoto L, Nosé W (2006) Wavefront analysis and contrast sensitivity of aspheric and spherical intraocular lenses: a randomized prospective study. Am J Ophthalmol 142:750–756, doi:10.1016/j.ajo.2006.06.031 PubMedCrossRef Rocha KM, Soriano ES, Chalita MR, Yamada AC, Bottós J, Morimoto L, Nosé W (2006) Wavefront analysis and contrast sensitivity of aspheric and spherical intraocular lenses: a randomized prospective study. Am J Ophthalmol 142:750–756, doi:10.​1016/​j.​ajo.​2006.​06.​031 PubMedCrossRef
31.
go back to reference Packer M, Fine IH, Hoffman RS, Piers PA (2002) Prospective randomized trial of an anterior surface modified prolate intraocular lens. J Refract Surg 18:692–696PubMed Packer M, Fine IH, Hoffman RS, Piers PA (2002) Prospective randomized trial of an anterior surface modified prolate intraocular lens. J Refract Surg 18:692–696PubMed
32.
go back to reference Muñoz G, Albarrán-Diego C, Montés-Micó R, Rodriguez-Galietero A, Alio JL (2006) Spherical aberration and contrast sensitivity of aspheric after cataract surgery with the Tecnis Z9000 intraocular lens. J Cataract Refract Surg 32(8):1320–1327PubMedCrossRef Muñoz G, Albarrán-Diego C, Montés-Micó R, Rodriguez-Galietero A, Alio JL (2006) Spherical aberration and contrast sensitivity of aspheric after cataract surgery with the Tecnis Z9000 intraocular lens. J Cataract Refract Surg 32(8):1320–1327PubMedCrossRef
33.
34.
go back to reference Tzelikis PF, Akaishi L, Trindade PF, Boteon JE (2007) Ocular aberrations and contrast sensitivity with AcrySof IQ intraocular lens implantation. Clinical comparative study. J Cataract Refract Surg 33:1918–1924, doi:10.1016/j.jcrs.2007.06.053 CrossRef Tzelikis PF, Akaishi L, Trindade PF, Boteon JE (2007) Ocular aberrations and contrast sensitivity with AcrySof IQ intraocular lens implantation. Clinical comparative study. J Cataract Refract Surg 33:1918–1924, doi:10.​1016/​j.​jcrs.​2007.​06.​053 CrossRef
35.
37.
go back to reference Dietze HH, Cox MJ (2005) Limitations of correcting spherical aberration with aspheric intraocular lenses. J Refract Surg 21:S541–S546PubMed Dietze HH, Cox MJ (2005) Limitations of correcting spherical aberration with aspheric intraocular lenses. J Refract Surg 21:S541–S546PubMed
38.
go back to reference Marcos S, Barbero S, Jimenez-Alfaro I (2005) Optical quality and depth-of-field of eyes implanted with spherical and aspheric intraocular lenses. J Refract Surg 21:223–235PubMed Marcos S, Barbero S, Jimenez-Alfaro I (2005) Optical quality and depth-of-field of eyes implanted with spherical and aspheric intraocular lenses. J Refract Surg 21:223–235PubMed
39.
go back to reference Johansson B, Sundelin S (2007) Wikberg-Matsson, Unsbo P, Behndig A. Visual and optical performance of the Akreos Adapt Advanced Optics and Tecnis Z9000 intraocular lenses. J Cataract Refract Surg 33:1565–1572, doi:10.1016/j.jcrs.2007.05.025 Johansson B, Sundelin S (2007) Wikberg-Matsson, Unsbo P, Behndig A. Visual and optical performance of the Akreos Adapt Advanced Optics and Tecnis Z9000 intraocular lenses. J Cataract Refract Surg 33:1565–1572, doi:10.​1016/​j.​jcrs.​2007.​05.​025
40.
go back to reference Marsack JD, Thibos LN, Applegate RA (2004) Metrics of optical quality derived from wave aberrations predict visual performance. J Vis 23:322–328, doi:10.1167/4.4.8 CrossRef Marsack JD, Thibos LN, Applegate RA (2004) Metrics of optical quality derived from wave aberrations predict visual performance. J Vis 23:322–328, doi:10.​1167/​4.​4.​8 CrossRef
43.
44.
go back to reference Padmanabhan P, Yoon G, Porter J, Rao SK, Roy J, Choudhry M (2006) Wavefront aberrations in eyes with Acrysof monofocal intraocular lenses. J Refract Surg 22:237–242PubMed Padmanabhan P, Yoon G, Porter J, Rao SK, Roy J, Choudhry M (2006) Wavefront aberrations in eyes with Acrysof monofocal intraocular lenses. J Refract Surg 22:237–242PubMed
47.
go back to reference Hayashi K, Harada M, Hayashi H, Nakao F, Hayashi F (1997) Decentration and tilt of polymethyl methacrylate, silicone, and acrylic soft intraocular lenses. Ophthalmology 104:793–798PubMed Hayashi K, Harada M, Hayashi H, Nakao F, Hayashi F (1997) Decentration and tilt of polymethyl methacrylate, silicone, and acrylic soft intraocular lenses. Ophthalmology 104:793–798PubMed
50.
go back to reference Negishi K, Ohnuma K, Hirayama N, Noda T (2001) Policy based medical services network study group for intraocular lens and refractive surgery. Effect of chromatic aberration on contrast sensitivity in pseudophakic eyes. Arch Ophthalmol 119:1154–1158 Negishi K, Ohnuma K, Hirayama N, Noda T (2001) Policy based medical services network study group for intraocular lens and refractive surgery. Effect of chromatic aberration on contrast sensitivity in pseudophakic eyes. Arch Ophthalmol 119:1154–1158
51.
go back to reference Piers PA, Weeber HA, Artal P, Norrby S (2007) Theoretical comparison of aberration-correcting customized and aspheric intraocular lenses. J Refract Surg 23:374–384PubMed Piers PA, Weeber HA, Artal P, Norrby S (2007) Theoretical comparison of aberration-correcting customized and aspheric intraocular lenses. J Refract Surg 23:374–384PubMed
54.
go back to reference Amesbury EC, Schallhorn SC (2003) Contrast sensitivity and limits of vision. Int Ophthalmol Clin 43:31–42PubMed Amesbury EC, Schallhorn SC (2003) Contrast sensitivity and limits of vision. Int Ophthalmol Clin 43:31–42PubMed
58.
go back to reference Schwartz DM (2003) Light-adjustable lens. Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc 101:417–436PubMed Schwartz DM (2003) Light-adjustable lens. Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc 101:417–436PubMed
Metadata
Title
Comparison of contrast sensitivity, depth of field and ocular wavefront aberrations in eyes with an IOL with zero versus positive spherical aberration
Authors
Jay S. Pepose
Mujtaba A. Qazi
Keith H. Edwards
Jeff P. Sanderson
Edwin J. Sarver
Publication date
01-07-2009
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
Graefe's Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology / Issue 7/2009
Print ISSN: 0721-832X
Electronic ISSN: 1435-702X
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00417-009-1038-1

Other articles of this Issue 7/2009

Graefe's Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology 7/2009 Go to the issue